Counties / Idaho / Canyon County

Canyon County, ID

FIPS 16027 · population 250,790 · part of Boise City, ID

$421k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
Direct county rent answer

What does rent cost in Canyon County, ID?

The latest county-level Zillow ZORI is $1,673 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

County Zillow ZORI$1,6732026-06 · up 3.7% year over year
County ACS gross rent$1,347ACS 2024 5-year · occupied-renter survey
HUD two-bedroom FMR$1,655FY2026 · administrative standard
HUD Fair Market Rent by bedroom count in Canyon County
BedroomsHUD monthly FMRGeographyMeasurement boundary
Studio$1,170Canyon County, IDHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
1 bedroom$1,381Canyon County, IDHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
2 bedrooms$1,655Canyon County, IDHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
3 bedrooms$2,318Canyon County, IDHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
4 bedrooms$2,772Canyon County, IDHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.

Zillow asking rent, ACS gross rent and HUD FMR describe different housing universes. They remain separate and no metro, city or neighboring-county value replaces missing county evidence.Zillow pulled 2026-07-26 · HUD pulled 2026-07-26

The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$421k
▲ 0.6% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
Median asking rent
$1,673
▲ 3.7% year over year
Zillow ZORI · direct
Gross yield
4.8%
annual rent ÷ price, before costs
derived: rent × 12 ÷ price ✓
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,655
market rent is 1.01x the standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+54.4%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+0.6%FHFA HPI2025+1.4%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-08-02.
Owner-reported value$390k
Surveyed gross rent$1,347
Rent burden 30%+48.6%
Median year built1999
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
3.4%vacant
89,135estimated housing units
Occupied tenure24.5% renter
owner 75.5%renter 24.5%
Structure mix82.0% single-family
Single-family 82.0%20+ units 1.9%Mobile home 6.8%Other 9.3%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs90,288▲ 1.8% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments9,137annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,043▲ 4.5% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities26.1% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+1.8%WEEKLY WAGE+4.5%Trade, transportation, and utilities26.1%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2021-2025; latest 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-08-02. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

Resident income

How local income has compounded

BEA per-capita personal income divides all personal income by the county population. It is broader than wages, but it is not household income or a measure of what renters can afford.

Per-capita personal income19692024
Per-capita personal income history for Canyon CountyA line chart of annual BEA per-capita personal income from 1969 through 2024.$0k$30k$60k196919972024$3k$50k
Nominal annual dollars; not adjusted for inflation. A rising line can reflect wage, business-income, transfer-income and investment-income changes together.
Renter affordability

Who carries the heaviest rent burden

HUD CHAS separates renter households by income relative to local HAMFI. Moderate burden means housing costs above 30% through 50% of income; severe burden means more than 50%.

Share of renter households in each income band2018-2022
Renter cost burden by HAMFI income band in Canyon CountyFive horizontal bars show moderate and severe housing cost burden shares among renter households in each HUD income band.0%25%50%75%100%At or below 30% HAMFI3,56075.6% burdened30–50% HAMFI4,41070.1% burdened50–80% HAMFI4,94546.0% burdened80–100% HAMFI2,57511.1% burdenedAbove 100% HAMFI4,6302.2% burdened
Moderate: >30% to 50%Severe: >50%
Each percentage uses HUD’s published subtotal for that income band. For disclosure, HUD keeps 0 as 0, publishes 1–7 households as 4 and rounds 8 or more to the nearest 5. Independently rounded categories can differ from their displayed sum and are not forced into a percentage.
County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Canyon County’s decision tension is whether income can absorb ownership and hazard costs while prices are only edging higher. Zillow’s county median home value was $420,694 at the supplied 2026-06 observation; published median asking rent was $1,673 monthly, up 3.66%. Zillow value growth was 0.56%. The supplied 4.77% gross yield is annual market rent before all costs. Investigate for operators able to validate parcel expenses and lease evidence; be cautious where a wider net-cash-flow cushion is required.

02Housing economics

At the effective property-tax rate of 0.52%, taxes are a carrying-cost deduction from that gross yield; parcel assessments cannot establish an individual bill. HUD FMR is a payment standard, not a market-rent estimate, and cannot replace the published asking-rent measure in yield work. FHFA’s annual 2025 repeat-transaction HPI rose 1.36% and its supplied cumulative five-year change was 54.43%. It is an appreciation index rather than a dollar home value; neither it nor Zillow’s differently labeled observation should be averaged into a growth rate.

03Demand & competition

Realtor.com’s supplied MLS inventory observation showed 802 active listings and 16.04% price-reduced listings. Those are visible asking-market supply and seller concessions, not sale prices or stand-alone proof of buyer demand. Tax-return migration was net positive by 1,854 households, and incoming movers’ average income exceeded outgoing movers’ by $9,119; both are aggregate mover indicators, not property-level tenancy. Investor purchase mortgages represented 5.52% of purchases, identifying a measured non-owner share, not all investor activity. QCEW reports annual covered workplace employment and wages rising, with Trade, transportation, and utilities the largest disclosed private supersector; it is neither resident employment nor a forecast.

04Risk & next checks

Inland flood is the dominant hazard, and the modeled climate-loss ratio is 0.08% of building value per year. This modeled county measure does not set a parcel’s flood exposure or insurance cost. The record lacks insurance quotes, flood-zone and elevation data, vacancy, operating expenses, lease comps, financing terms, and closed-sale evidence; those gaps prevent net-yield, resilience-cost, and exit-price underwriting. Verify rent by unit, tax assessment, insurance availability, flood history, and comparable leases before treating county aggregates as property economics.

County ZIP rental landscape

How asking rent and renter pressure vary inside Canyon County, ID

This view uses 5 direct Zillow ZIP markets matched to Census ZCTAs. Each ZIP is assigned by its largest HUD residential county share; this is not an exhaustive county inventory.

Selected ZIP range$1,503$2,114Zillow asking-rent index
Monthly spread$611highest minus lowest selected ZIP
Observed burden range42.7%47.8%ACS renter households paying 30%+
Renter households covered19,159across the selected ZCTAs
01 · ASKING RENT LADDERDirect ZIP ZORI
Horizontal bars compare Zillow asking-rent indexes across the selected direct-evidence ZIP set.83607$2,11483687$1,74783686$1,63583651$1,51183605$1,503
02 · PRESSURE MATRIXRent × observed burden
Each point is one selected ZIP and ZCTA match. Horizontal position is Zillow asking rent and vertical position is the ACS renter cost-burden share.50.3%47.8%45.2%42.7%40.2%8368683605836878365183607Zillow asking-rent index →ACS burden share →
03 · BENCHMARK GAPZORI vs HUD 2BR
Bars show the percentage difference between the Zillow blended asking-rent index and the local HUD two-bedroom standard. Their housing universes differ.83607+127.7%83687+105.6%83686+98.8%83651+91.3%83605+90.8%
WHAT THE LOCAL DISTRIBUTION SAYS

Canyon County’s June Zillow ZORI is $1,673, while the five selected direct-evidence ZIP/ZCTA matches range from $1,503 to $2,114. The $611 range is substantial relative to the selected-set median of $1,635, so a countywide rent figure alone does not resolve the choice among the observed ZIP markets. Zillow’s typical observed asking-rent index increased 2.66% to 5.70% year over year across the set, versus 3.66% countywide. The decision question is whether a household’s bedroom need, current listing budget, and timing can accommodate observed asking-rent variation before weighing older survey rent, burden, and availability measures.

Three rent measures answer different questions and should remain separate. Zillow reports a June typical observed asking-rent index; ACS five-year ZCTA median gross rent is a survey estimate on its own measure. In the selected ZCTAs, ACS median gross rent runs from $1,124 to $1,490, not a substitute for the Zillow range. HUD’s two-bedroom Fair Market Rent is $1,655 in every displayed ZIP, an administrative bedroom-specific standard rather than an asking rent. The Zillow-to-HUD comparison spans 90.8% at the low asking-rent extreme to 127.7% at the high extreme. At a mechanical 30%-of-income test, those Zillow values imply annual income of $60,120 and $84,560, respectively; those thresholds do not establish affordability for a particular household.

Survey indicators show a different constraint profile. Countywide, ACS reports 48.62% of renter households spending 30% or more of income on rent; displayed ZCTAs span 42.66% to 47.82%. ACS vacancy ranges from 2.53% to 4.74%, around the county’s 3.44%. The high asking-rent extreme coincides with the lower vacancy extreme, while the low asking-rent extreme coincides with the upper vacancy extreme. That contrast is descriptive, not proof that rent levels determine vacancy or burden. A higher vacancy estimate may mean more choice only after confirming currently available comparable units, and a lower burden share still leaves a substantial portion of renter households over the stated threshold.

Coverage and geography set hard limits on this reading. The displayed set contains all five eligible direct-ZORI matches and covers 19,159 renter households, but it is explicitly not an exhaustive county inventory. ACS ZCTAs are statistical areas rather than USPS delivery ZIPs. ZIPs are assigned for display to the county holding the largest HUD residential-address share; displayed shares run from 97.45% to 100%, so cross-county address patterns still matter. Before acting on any comparison, check the exact property’s current asking rent, bedroom count, availability date, lease term, included charges and utilities, deposits and fees, income and screening requirements, and whether the unit is actually available. Those listing facts, rather than an index or administrative benchmark, determine a specific household’s current offer.

Selected ZIP evidence

Keep each source universe visible

All 5 eligible direct-evidence ZIP profiles are shown.

ZIP / ZCTAZillow asking rentACS gross rentHUD 2BRBurden 30%+VacancyIncome screenHUD county share
83686$1,635$1,361$1,65547.8%3.6%$65k100.0%
83605$1,503$1,124$1,65544.3%4.7%$60k100.0%
83687$1,747$1,490$1,65542.7%3.6%$70k98.8%
83651$1,511$1,426$1,65547.6%2.6%$60k100.0%
83607$2,114$1,483$1,65545.5%2.5%$85k97.4%
READ BEFORE USING

Zillow ZORI is a typical observed asking-rent index, whereas ACS county and ZCTA figures are five-year survey estimates. HUD Fair Market Rent is a bedroom-specific administrative standard. These measures use different concepts and periods and should not be combined into a single rent or affordability estimate.

ZIP display assignment uses the county with the largest HUD residential-address share, and some ZIPs cross county lines. ZCTAs are statistical areas rather than USPS delivery ZIPs. The five selected direct-evidence matches are not an exhaustive inventory of county, ZIP, or property-level rental options.

SOURCE LEDGERCensus ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stockACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30Census ACS five-year — ZCTA housing and incomeACS 2024 5-year ZCTA · pulled 2026-08-08HUD Fair Market Rents — Section 8 standardFY2026 FMR · pulled 2026-07-26HUD-USPS ZIP-to-county residential-address crosswalkHUD-USPS 2026Q1 · pulled 2026-08-09Zillow ZHVI and ZORI — county values and rentscounty ZHVI/ZORI 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-26Zillow ZORI — ZIP market rentsZORI ZIP 2026-06 · pulled 2026-08-08
Cities & communities

Where people live within Canyon County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Nampa city110.3KCaldwell city66.5KStar city*14.7KMiddleton city10.6KWilder city2.1KParma city1.9KGreenleaf city1.5KMelba city617
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

9 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Nampa cityIncorporated place
    110,319
  2. 02
    Caldwell cityIncorporated place
    66,516
  3. 03
    Star cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    14,745
  4. 04
    Middleton cityIncorporated place
    10,649
  5. 05
    Wilder cityIncorporated place
    2,074
  6. 06
    Parma cityIncorporated place
    1,928
  7. 07
    Greenleaf cityIncorporated place
    1,482
  8. 08
    Melba cityIncorporated place
    617
  9. 09
    Notus cityIncorporated place
    573

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.080% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.52%

$2,011 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+1,854

8,702 in · 6,848 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$9,119

$65,942 arriving · $56,823 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors5.5%

258 of 4,677 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings802▼ 8.9% year over year
Median days on market38▼ 13.8% year over year
Listings price-reduced16.0%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▲ 0.6% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

Same metro

The other counties in Boise City, ID

A metro is an average of these. Which side of a county line a property sits on can change the tax bill, the hazard profile and the tenant pool.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Canyon County250,790$421k$1,6734.8%inland flooding
Ada County518,935$531k$1,9264.3%inland flooding
Gem County20,614$488k$1,4903.7%wildfire
Owyhee County12,503$447kn/an/ainland flooding
Boise County8,273$490kn/an/awildfire
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Flood insurance or repair costs could overwhelm gross yield at exposed parcels.
  2. MLS price reductions may accompany weaker achieved prices despite visible active-listing supply.
  3. County rent, migration, and QCEW measures may not match the subject property’s rent, vacancy, or tenant base.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Is a market-rent input published?

Yes. The record publishes median asking rent, so a supplied gross yield is available before costs.

Can HUD FMR be used as an asking-rent estimate?

No. The record identifies HUD FMR as a payment standard rather than market rent.

What employment evidence is available?

QCEW provides annual covered workplace employment and wage evidence, and identifies Trade, transportation, and utilities as the largest disclosed private supersector.