States / Idaho
State rental intelligence

Idaho rental market data

A source-traced view across 16 metro markets and 44 counties. State figures below are labelled medians and totals—not a made-up statewide investment score.

13/16 metros scored44/44 counties with FEMA risk14 sources used in this analysis
Median scored metro44.0out of 100 · 13 measured metros
Idaho identity diorama showing regional landscape, cities, housing, and infrastructure
Median metro home value$430kmedian across published metro values
Median metro rent$1,513monthly · published metro values
Median gross yield3.7%annual rent ÷ price · before costs
Median job trend▼ 0.2%trailing 12-month metro employment
Direct monthly rental evidence

Idaho rent market dynamics

Apartment List measures recent leases, rental vacancy and listing time separately. These figures do not replace Zillow, Census or Realtor measures elsewhere on this page.

Recent-lease rent$1,1702026-07 · ▲ 3.5% year over year
Rental Vacancy Index5.0%2026-07 · −1.3 pp in 12 months
Time on marketn/anot published for this state
US recent-lease rent$1,3882026-07 · ▼ 1.1% year over year
Rent and rental vacancy through timesolid state series · dashed national series · no interpolation across missing observations
Recent-lease rent$1,534$1,061$587Rental Vacancy Index9.8%5.9%1.9%2017-012021-102026-07IdahoUnited States
State research brief

Recent-lease rents rose 3.5% as rental vacancy fell to 5.0%, even while the median measured metro posted 0.2% job contraction and resale liquidity split sharply by market.

Updated 2026-08-08 · evidence current to the releases listed below.

Idaho’s July 2026 Apartment List series gives the clearest positive rental signal: recent-lease rent increased from $1,130 to $1,170 while rental vacancy declined from 6.3% to 5.0%. Zillow data also show median metro asking-rent growth of 3.2%, ahead of 2.0% median home-value growth. The counter-signal is employment: the median year-over-year change across 16 measured metros was negative 0.2%, despite positive migration and job growth in several named markets.

Screening should therefore stay local. Boise City had 1.7 months of resale supply and 29 median days on market, while Rexburg had 9.5 months and 88 days. County housing is predominantly single-family, renter burden is material, and hazard and tax measures vary. The packet cannot establish property-level occupancy, net yield, leasing time in Idaho or parcel-level hazard exposure; metro rent-growth coverage reaches 13 of 16 markets, and county market-rent coverage reaches 22 of 44 counties.

01

State recent-lease rent rose 3.5% while rental vacancy fell 1.3 percentage points to 5.0% → verify whether the same tightening appears in the target submarket and unit type.

02

Median metro employment declined 0.2%, but 43 counties recorded net migration of 5,763 people and selected metros had positive job growth → require localized tenant and employer evidence rather than treating demand as uniform.

03

Median metro asking-rent growth exceeded home-value growth by a reported 1.2 percentage points → rerun current rent comps against acquisition basis, without treating gross yield as net return.

04

Boise City had 1.7 months of resale supply versus 9.5 months in Rexburg → set negotiation, holding-period and exit-liquidity assumptions market by market.

05

County housing was 79.1% single-family at the median while 43.4% of renters were burdened → match the asset to local stock but stress-test achievable rent against tenant incomes.

01
Direct state rental dynamics

Rent rose as vacancy tightened, without an Idaho listing-time read

Apartment List’s July 2026 Idaho recent-lease rent was $1,170, up 3.5% from $1,130 a year earlier. Its separate Vacancy Index declined by 1.3 percentage points, from 6.3% to 5.0%. Idaho’s rent growth was 4.6 percentage points above the national series, while its current vacancy rate was 2.2 points lower.

The rent and vacancy measures point in the same direction, but the third liquidity test is unavailable for Idaho. The packet supplies only a national Apartment List listing time of 30 days, up two days, and that series has separate coverage. The state figures therefore support a tighter recent-lease reading, not a conclusion about Idaho listing speed, every local rent roll or a particular property’s occupancy.

Evidence: Apartment List Rent Estimates — recent-lease rent index · Apartment List Time on Market — listing liquidity · Apartment List Vacancy Index — rental vacancy

02
Employment and household movement

Positive household movement contrasts with a weak median job reading

Across 16 measured metros, median year-over-year employment change was negative 0.2%, with the measured range running from negative 0.8% at the 10th percentile to positive 0.9% at the 90th. The selected local readings were stronger: Twin Falls grew 1.1%, Boise City 1.0% and Coeur d’Alene 0.9%.

IRS movement data recorded net inflow of 5,763 people across 43 counties, equal to 3.0 per 1,000 Idaho residents. This is a counterweight to the weak median job result, not confirmation of rental demand: the migration and employment series cover different periods, and the packet does not identify movers’ tenure, household formation or target submarket. Screening needs local employer and tenant evidence rather than a statewide demand assumption.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — population · BLS CES — payroll employment · BLS LAUS — resident employment · IRS SOI — county migration and mover income

03
Price and rent momentum

Asking rents are outrunning home values in the measured metro distribution

Among 13 metros with Zillow rent-growth data, median asking-rent growth was 3.2%, with a 0.7% to 5.9% 10th-to-90th-percentile range. Across 16 home-value markets, median growth was 2.0%, with a 0.6% to 4.7% range. The packet’s reported rent-minus-price growth spread is 1.2 percentage points.

Mountain Home illustrates the separation: asking rent rose 6.2% while home value rose 1.2%, with a 5.2% gross yield. In Boise City, rent rose 5.0%, value rose 0.5% and gross yield was 4.5%. These readings support checking whether current rent comps have improved relative to acquisition basis, but gross yield excludes vacancy, operating expenses, financing and capital work, and Zillow measures do not establish a completed purchase or signed lease.

Evidence: Zillow ZHVI — metro home values · Zillow ZORI — metro market rents

04
Supply and resale conditions

Boise City and Rexburg sit at opposite ends of resale liquidity

Across 16 measured metros, the median was 2.8 months of resale supply, 41 days on market, a 32.1% price-drop share and 6.6 permitted units per 1,000 residents. Boise City combined 9,910 permits, or 12.2 per 1,000, with only 1.7 months of supply and 29 days on market; 36.4% of listings had price drops.

Rexburg also had high permit intensity at 11.5 units per 1,000, but its resale market showed 9.5 months of supply and 88 days on market. Its price-drop share was 20.1%. That split changes acquisition screening: negotiation and exit-liquidity assumptions should not be transferred between the two markets. Permits are authorizations rather than completions or identified rental units, and Redfin resale conditions cannot establish rental oversupply.

Evidence: Census Building Permits Survey — permitted units · Redfin Data Center — inventory, days on market, and price cuts

05
Housing stock and tenant conditions

Single-family stock dominates while renter burden limits easy rent assumptions

Across all 44 counties, the median renter share was 24.6%, while the median single-family share of housing was 79.1% and the median large-multifamily share was only 0.9%. The median share of renters spending at least 30% of income on rent was 43.4%, rising to 54.0% at the 90th percentile.

The named high-burden readings are concentrated in relatively small counties: 57.7% in Clark County, with 849 residents; 56.8% in Lemhi County, with 8,249; and 56.3% in Adams County, with 4,744. ACS all-housing vacancy is also highly dispersed, from 4.7% at the 10th percentile to 38.6% at the 90th, with a 10.5% median. That vacancy measure is not the Apartment List rental Vacancy Index and may include seasonal or other vacant homes. Property-type fit and tenant income therefore require county and unit-level verification.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock

06
Physical risk and property tax

Hazard-loss and tax screens can materially change local property math

FEMA assigns inland flood as the mutually exclusive leading-hazard label for 35 counties and wildfire for nine. Across 44 counties, the median measured hazard-loss ratio was 0.17% and the 90th percentile was 0.42%. Named higher readings include 0.70% in Boise County, 0.60% in Adams County and 0.44% in Shoshone County.

The median effective property-tax rate was 0.45%, rising to 0.63% at the 90th percentile. Nez Perce County measured 0.78%, Power County 0.70% and Latah County 0.64%. These figures support county-level expense triage, but a county’s leading-hazard label is not parcel exposure. The packet also lacks property-specific insurance quotes, flood or fire mapping, building condition and an exact post-acquisition tax bill.

Evidence: FEMA National Risk Index — hazard loss ratios · Census ACS 5-year — effective property tax

State ZIP rental intelligence

How direct rental evidence varies inside Idaho

The distribution uses 13 current published ZIP reports across 9 cities and 5 counties. Twelve measured counter-signals are shown below; this is not a statewide neighborhood ranking.

Published ZIP rent range$1,121$2,338full direct-ZORI report cohort
Median rent / income25.3%annual asking rent ÷ ACS household income
Median one-year growth▲ 3.4%exact direct Zillow endpoints
Renter households covered61,104across published ZCTA matches
01 · RENT DISPERSIONRepresentative direct ZIP ZORI
Horizontal bars compare direct Zillow asking-rent indexes for the twelve representative published ZIP reports.83646$2,33883634$2,23983616$2,10183815$1,97283642$1,88583687$1,74783854$1,74683686$1,63583651$1,51183605$1,50383402$1,28383440$1,121
02 · AFFORDABILITY PRESSURERent / income × observed burden
Horizontal position is annual Zillow asking rent divided by ACS median household income. Vertical position is the ACS share of renter households paying thirty percent or more.58.6%49.3%40.0%30.7%21.4%834408364283854838158364683686836058368783402836518361683634Annual asking rent / ACS household income →ACS renter burden share →
03 · PATH QUALITYOne-year growth × variability
Each point compares exact one-year Zillow asking-rent growth with annualized variability from the direct monthly series.4.8%4.0%3.2%2.3%1.5%834408364283854838158364683686836058368783402836518361683634Exact one-year Zillow rent growth →Annualized monthly variability →
WHAT THE STATE DISTRIBUTION SAYS

Across Idaho’s 13 current published direct-evidence ZIP reports, Zillow’s current ZORI—an observed asking-rent index—runs from $1,121 in Rexburg to $2,338 in Meridian, a $1,217 difference, with a $1,746 median. The practical question is therefore not whether rents are “high” statewide, but whether a household’s income, desired unit, and tolerance for recent rent movement fit the relevant local reporting area. The distribution is bounded: it represents current published direct-evidence ZIP reports, not every Idaho ZIP, neighborhood, or rental property. Its wide range makes local comparison more useful than a single state-level label.

Current index affordability and observed renter burden answer different questions. The direct asking-rent-to-income measure ranges from 20.1% to 30.4%, with a 25.3% median; it compares the current ZORI level with ACS household income. The ACS share of renter households paying 30% or more of gross rent instead ranges from 23.9% to 56.1%, with a 47.6% median, and reflects survey-estimated renter outcomes. In Coeur d’Alene, annual income required to keep the current index at that threshold is $78,880, just above the area’s $77,864 median household income. In Kuna, the corresponding $89,560 is below $97,171. These measures are complementary, not substitutes: the income screen is current-index context, while burden is a five-year ACS ZCTA estimate whose statistical boundaries do not exactly match USPS delivery ZIPs.

Rent momentum also should not be collapsed into volatility. Direct monthly Zillow series show one-year changes from a slight −0.01% decline to 5.7% growth, around a 3.4% median; annualized volatility ranges from 2.5% to 3.8%, with a 2.9% median. Caldwell occupies the high-growth, low-volatility end of those ranges, a counter-signal to the assumption that faster gains must mean a less stable monthly path. Coeur d’Alene instead combines growth with the peak volatility and the deepest observed maximum drawdown, 7.9%. Recent growth, volatility, and drawdown describe different historical aspects of the direct series; none establishes a future rent path.

HUD comparison is a benchmark check rather than a market-rent verdict. Current ZORI levels equal 90.8% to 141.3% of the mapped HUD two-bedroom FMR/SAFMR standard, with a 110.3% median. That administrative standard is set by bedroom category and mapping rules; ZORI is an observed asking-rent index rather than an equivalent two-bedroom asking-rent measure. A ratio above or below the HUD figure therefore cannot establish that a listing is expensive, affordable, eligible, or comparable. For a property decision, verify the advertised rent, bedroom count, lease duration, utilities, concessions, availability, and address-specific program applicability. The benchmark and ZORI report universe are separate coverage systems, so each supplies context rather than a property-specific conclusion.

Representative direct evidence

Twelve useful contrasts, every one traceable

The statewide summaries use all 13 qualifying reports. The table preserves measured extremes in rent, affordability, burden, momentum, volatility and the HUD benchmark gap.

ZIP reportPlaceZillow rent1Y growthRent / incomeBurden 30%+VariabilityHUD 2BR gap
83440Rexburg$1,121▼ 0.0%23.1%47.8%3.3%▲ 107.9%
83642Meridian$1,885▲ 4.8%23.3%50.1%2.8%▲ 113.9%
83854Post Falls$1,746▲ 2.7%25.3%49.7%3.6%▲ 112.9%
83815Coeur d'Alene$1,972▲ 5.0%30.4%56.1%3.8%▲ 127.5%
83646Meridian$2,338▲ 3.4%27.3%45.4%2.7%▲ 141.3%
83686Nampa$1,635▲ 4.7%22.7%47.8%2.9%▲ 98.8%
83605Caldwell$1,503▲ 5.7%26.4%44.3%2.5%▲ 90.8%
83687Nampa$1,747▲ 3.4%27.3%42.7%2.9%▲ 105.6%
83402Idaho Falls$1,283▲ 0.1%20.7%37.8%2.9%▲ 98.3%
83651Nampa$1,511▲ 2.7%25.9%47.6%2.7%▲ 91.3%
83616Eagle$2,101▲ 5.1%20.1%54.3%3.7%▲ 126.9%
83634Kuna$2,239▲ 3.6%27.7%23.9%2.7%▲ 135.3%
READ BEFORE USING

Zillow ZORI is an observed asking-rent index, not a record of executed leases or a quote for a particular home. Its ZIP-level level, growth, volatility, and drawdown should not be read as the rent, availability, or terms of an individual listing.

ACS housing, income, vacancy, renter-household, and cost-burden figures are five-year ZCTA survey estimates, and ZCTAs do not equal USPS delivery ZIPs. HUD FMR/SAFMR values are administrative bedroom standards, so they cannot validate or replace a property-specific asking-rent comparison.

SOURCE LEDGERCensus ACS five-year — ZCTA housing and incomeACS 2024 5-year ZCTA · pulled 2026-08-08HUD USPS crosswalk and Small Area FMRs — ZIP rent fallbackZIP-CBSA 2025Q4 + SAFMR FY2026 · pulled 2026-07-26Zillow ZORI — ZIP market rentsZORI ZIP 2026-06 · pulled 2026-08-08
Evidence selected for Idaho

The ranges behind the analysis

Each row keeps its own unit and shows the measured 10th percentile, median and 90th percentile. A single-value row is labelled directly.

Employment and household movementDo jobs, household movement and mover income point in the same direction?
10th pct.median90th pct.Job change-0.8%-0.2%0.9%Net migration / 1k3.0Net household movement5,763
Price and rent momentumAre home values and asking rents moving together or separating?
10th pct.median90th pct.Home-value change0.6%2.0%4.7%Asking-rent change0.7%3.2%5.9%Rent minus price1.2%
Supply and resale conditionsWhat do permits, inventory, marketing time and price cuts say about pressure?
10th pct.median90th pct.Permits / 1k3.56.611.5Months of supply2.0×2.8×6.6×Days on market26 days41 days73 daysListings with cuts20.0%32.1%40.4%
Shape of the state

Distribution before conclusion

A statewide median can hide a wide spread. These SVG charts render at build time and carry no chart library or browser-side data request.

Metro score distribution13 scored metros · median 44.0
00–19320–39840–59260–79080–100
County evidence coverageEvery gap stays visible as missing—not estimated
50%22/44Rent100%44/44Climate98%43/44Migration
Highest measured metro gross yieldsscreening metric only · before expenses and financing
Mountain Home5.2%Burley5.1%Ontario5.0%Twin Falls4.9%Boise City4.5%Lewiston4.3%Idaho Falls4.1%
Metro leaderboard

Markets touching Idaho

Multi-state CBSAs appear in every member state. Score is still a metro score; no value is reweighted into a statewide ranking.

#MetroScorePriceRentYieldJobs
1Boise City, ID67$497k$1,8744.5%▲ 1.0%
2Twin Falls, ID61$388k$1,5844.9%▲ 1.1%
3Coeur d'Alene, ID59$609k$1,8293.6%▲ 0.9%
4Logan, UT58$474k$1,4603.7%▲ 0.7%
5Blackfoot, ID54$394k$1,0183.1%▼ 0.3%
6Ontario, OR51$378k$1,5635.0%▲ 0.5%
7Mountain Home, ID44$361k$1,5655.2%▼ 0.5%
8Sandpoint, ID44$658k$1,9823.6%▲ 0.6%
9Jackson, WY43$1407k$3,4753.0%▼ 0.3%
10Moscow, ID42$481k$1,1662.9%▼ 1.0%
11Idaho Falls, ID38$413k$1,4144.1%▼ 0.1%
12Pocatello, ID32$356k$1,0783.6%▼ 1.1%

Showing the top 12 scored metros of 16. Unscored metros remain discoverable through the national rankings.

Below the metro line

Largest counties in Idaho

County figures join on the five-digit FIPS code. The table uses measured local values and prints “n/a” wherever a publisher has no record.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Ada County, ID518,935$531k$1,9264.3%inland flooding
Canyon County, ID250,790$421k$1,6734.8%inland flooding
Kootenai County, ID181,996$609k$1,8293.6%inland flooding
Bonneville County, ID129,523$405k$1,4154.2%inland flooding
Twin Falls County, ID93,734$385k$1,5694.9%inland flooding
Bannock County, ID89,454$362k$1,0773.6%inland flooding
Madison County, ID54,618$425k$1,1463.2%inland flooding
Bonner County, ID51,049$658k$1,9823.6%inland flooding
Bingham County, ID49,664$394k$1,0183.1%inland flooding
Nez Perce County, ID42,697$396k$1,4364.3%inland flooding
Latah County, ID41,049$481k$1,1662.9%inland flooding
Jefferson County, ID33,154$477k$1,3723.5%inland flooding
County yield sample22/44counties have the rent needed to compute yield
Statewide net migration+5,763IRS tax-return households summed across counties
Median investor share5.5%among counties with HMDA purchase records
Bear case

What can break the thesis

  1. Rental coverage is incomplete: year-over-year metro rent data cover 13 of 16 markets, while county market rents cover 22 of 44 counties and county rent growth covers 11.
  2. The packet has no Idaho Apartment List time-on-market figure, so rising recent-lease rent and falling vacancy cannot establish statewide listing speed.
  3. The median metro job measure is negative, and migration data come from a different period and do not identify renters or household formation.
  4. Permits are not completed units, and resale months of supply, days on market and price cuts are not rental-vacancy measures.
  5. FEMA leading-hazard labels are county classifications rather than parcel exposure, while insurance costs and property-specific tax reassessment are missing.
Investor questions

Before underwriting a property

Does the evidence establish that every Idaho rental market is tightening?

No. The July 2026 state Apartment List series shows recent-lease rent up 3.5% and vacancy down to 5.0%, but it does not represent every locality or property, and Idaho listing-time data are absent.

Which selected metro shows the clearest rent-versus-price separation?

Mountain Home had 6.2% asking-rent growth versus 1.2% home-value growth and a 5.2% gross yield. That is a screening lead, not a net-return estimate.

Do Rexburg’s figures prove rental oversupply?

No. Rexburg had 9.5 months of resale supply, 88 days on market and 788 permits, or 11.5 per 1,000 residents. Those measures indicate slower resale liquidity and development activity, but they do not identify completed rental units or rental vacancy.

How much room is there to raise rents?

The packet cannot set a rent ceiling. County ACS data show a 43.4% median renter-burden share and 54.0% at the 90th percentile, so current tenant income, competing units and signed-lease comps are necessary.

Can county hazard labels be used to price insurance?

No. Inland flood leads in 35 counties and wildfire in nine, but each is a mutually exclusive county-level leading label. Parcel exposure, building features and insurance quotes are not provided.