Measured metro asking rents rose a median 3.2% year over year, compared with 2.0% for home values, a supplied gap of 1.2 percentage points. That income-side advantage is tempered by a median gross yield of 3.7%, a median job change of negative 0.2%, and substantial differences in inventory and marketing time. The counter-signals are positive net migration and roughly 1% job growth in several named metros.
Screening therefore has to connect each property’s rent level with local employment, supply and exit liquidity rather than treating the state median as a local result. The packet cannot establish net operating income, tenant turnover, property condition, insurance cost or parcel-level hazard exposure. Coverage is also uneven: rent growth is available for 13 metros, county rent data for 22 of 44 counties, county listings for 33, and migration for 43.
