Coeur d'Alene, ID
Coeur d'Alene merits investigation for buyers who can accept a thin starting yield in exchange for positive demand signals and lean resale inventory.
Why this market scores where it does
Written from the figures on this page and then checked against them: every number below had to appear in the source record or recompute from two that did, or the text was rewritten.
Coeur d'Alene merits investigation for buyers who can accept a thin starting yield in exchange for positive demand signals and lean resale inventory. Buyers requiring low entry costs, high current yield, or minimal development and flood exposure should avoid it.
Opportunity rests on measured demand: CES jobs rose 0.88%, asking rent rose 3.22%, and tax filings show net migration of 793 households. Rent growth also exceeded the 2.35% rise in home values. That mix supports leasing conditions but does not establish unusually strong pricing power.
The constraint is the entry math. A $608,665 median home value corresponds to a 3.61% gross yield and 7.44 times median household income. Meanwhile, 1,984 permits indicate a meaningful pipeline even with 2.7 months of current supply. The low modeled climate loss ratio is favorable at metro level, but inland flood remains the dominant parcel-level hazard to investigate.
Frequently Asked Investor Questions
Are the recorded demand indicators positive?
What are the current entry economics?
What supply and climate exposures are recorded?
Investor Quick Takeaways
Computed from the current Zillow rent and home-value medians.
Zillow ZORI rent growth trend over trailing 12 months.
Originated investment purchase share (CFPB HMDA).
Annualized loss ratio evaluated for flood & hurricane risk.
Test the market, then test the deal
Keep Coeur d'Alene as the starting point or move into a more specific property and rent check.
The current market in eight signals
Fast-moving Redfin conditions sit beside the slower fundamentals so a buyer can separate today's negotiating climate from the long-run investment case.
Rents versus prices, indexed to 2019
Both series start at 100. The gap between the lines is the investment case, and which line is closing it tells you what kind of market this is.
What each component measures
Weights are published, not hidden, and the arithmetic is shown. Five components, each measured as a national percentile across all tracked metros.
| Signal | Score | Weight | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Job growth | 80 | 30% | 24.00 |
| Rent trend | 48 | 25% | 12.00 |
| Affordability | 37 | 15% | 5.55 |
| Supply pressure | 32 | 15% | 4.80 |
| Climate risk | 87 | 15% | 13.05 |
| Published score | 59 | ||
CES jobs rose 0.88% -> employment provides positive but modest support for rental demand.
Asking rent rose 3.22% while gross yield was 3.61% -> rent momentum has not translated into a high starting yield.
Home values equal 7.44 times median household income -> acquisition affordability is a material constraint.
The record shows 1,984 permits alongside 2.7 months of supply -> a visible construction pipeline coexists with lean resale inventory.
The modeled annual climate loss ratio is 0.0974%, with inland flood dominant -> metro-level losses are low, but parcel-specific water exposure still requires review.
What this market costs and what it earns
Every derived ratio below recomputes from the same source record used by the article and score.
What is being built, and for whom
Permits are the 12-to-24 month early warning. The total matters less than the mix: apartments compete with a rental the day they open.
Demand, and the competition for it
Tax filings say how many households moved and what they earn; mortgage disclosures say how many local purchases went to someone who will not live there. Moves between counties inside this metro are netted out of both flow figures.
What would make this a bad buy
Generated from the same figures with the instruction to argue against the score, and published unedited. A page that only agrees with itself is an advertisement.
Three ways the case breaks
- The $608,665 median value supports only a 3.61% gross yield, leaving limited visible cushion before costs that are not published.
- The 1,984-permit pipeline means lean existing inventory of 2.7 months should not be mistaken for an absence of new-supply exposure.
- Inland flood is the dominant hazard, and the 0.0974% metro-level loss ratio does not describe each property's exposure.
Move from the metro average to local evidence
County pages carry tax, migration, listing and hazard records. City pages appear only where direct city price, rent and Census evidence pass the publication gate.
No city in this metro has passed the current city evidence gate.
Metros that behave like Coeur d'Alene
Nearest neighbours on price level, income, yield and job growth — not on geography. Every market page gets a different peer set, which is the point.
| Metro | Score | Price | Rent | Yield | Job Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coeur d'Alene, ID (Target) | 59 | $609k | $1,829 | 3.6% | ▲ 0.9% |
| Santa Fe, NM | 44 | $561k | $1,931 | 4.1% | ▲ 0.4% |
| Kalispell, MT | 37 | $654k | $1,940 | 3.6% | ▲ 1.0% |
| Logan, UT | 58 | $474k | $1,460 | 3.7% | ▲ 0.7% |
| Oak Harbor, WA | 59 | $647k | $2,052 | 3.8% | ▲ 0.8% |
Where every figure came from
“Checked nightly” means every source is re-pulled and re-verified each night. It does not mean every source moves nightly — the release column tells you how fresh each number can possibly be.
| Dataset Source | Method | Release Period | Pulled Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Census ACS 5-year — household income | direct | ACS 2024 5-year | 2026-07-26 |
| Census ACS 5-year — population | direct | ACS 2024 5-year | 2026-07-26 |
| BLS CES — payroll employment | direct | CES SM current | 2026-07-26 |
| BLS LAUS — resident employment | direct | LAUS current | 2026-07-26 |
| BLS QCEW — county employment and wages | direct | annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 | 2026-07-31 |
| OMB/BLS delineation — metro geography | direct | OMB July 2023 delineation | 2026-07-30 |
| Census Building Permits Survey — permitted units | direct | BPS through 2026 | 2026-07-26 |
| Census ACS 5-year — city population, households and housing | direct | ACS 2024 5-year | 2026-07-29 |
| Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock | direct | ACS 2024 5-year | 2026-07-30 |
| Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities | direct | ACS 2024 5-year | 2026-07-30 |
| FEMA National Risk Index — hazard loss ratios | modelled | NRI counties (FEMA ArcGIS) | 2026-07-26 |
| FHFA House Price Index — annual county appreciation | direct | annual county HPI 2025 | 2026-07-28 |
| HMDA / CFPB — purchases by occupancy type | direct | HMDA 2024 purchase originations | 2026-07-26 |
| HUD Fair Market Rents — Section 8 standard | direct | FY2026 FMR | 2026-07-26 |
| HUD USPS crosswalk and Small Area FMRs — ZIP rent fallback | direct | ZIP-CBSA 2025Q4 + SAFMR FY2026 | 2026-07-26 |
| IRS SOI — county migration and mover income | direct | SOI migration 2022-2023 | 2026-07-26 |
| Freddie Mac PMMS — mortgage rates | direct | week of 2026-07-23 | 2026-07-27 |
| Census ACS 5-year — effective property tax | direct | ACS 2024 5-year | 2026-07-27 |
| Realtor.com Economic Research — county listing inventory | direct | county inventory 2026-06 | 2026-07-28 |
| Redfin Data Center — inventory, days on market, and price cuts | direct | metro tracker through 2026-05-01 | 2026-07-26 |
| Zillow ZHVI and ZORI — county values and rents | direct | county ZHVI/ZORI 2026-06 | 2026-07-26 |
| Zillow ZHVI — metro home values | direct | Metro_zhvi_uc_sfrcondo_tier_0.33_0.67_sm_sa_month.csv | 2026-07-26 |
| Zillow ZHVI — city home values | direct | zillow_zhvi_city.csv | 2026-07-29 |
| Zillow ZORI — metro market rents | direct | Metro_zori_uc_sfrcondomfr_sm_sa_month.csv | 2026-07-26 |
| Zillow ZORI — city market rents | direct | zillow_zori_city.csv | 2026-07-29 |
| Zillow ZORI — ZIP market rents | direct | ZORI ZIP 2026-06 | 2026-07-26 |