Cities / New Hampshire / Hillsborough County / Nashua
Nashua cityscape
City housing brief · Incorporated place

Nashua, NH

City evidence stays city-level. County, metro and national records appear separately to explain the wider market without changing the city figures.

City gross yield5.1%ZORI × 12 ÷ ZHVI · before costs
Direct city rent answer

What does rent cost in Nashua, NH?

The latest city-level Zillow ZORI for Nashua is $2,216 per month in 2026-06. It measures a typical asking-rent market across rental types—not an arithmetic average or an address-level rent estimate.

City Zillow ZORI$2,2162026-06 · up 2.6% year over year
City ACS gross rent$1,737ACS 2024 5-year occupied-renter survey
HUD two-bedroom context$2,127Hillsborough County administrative standard
How to read the rent answer for Nashua
MeasureCurrent valueGeographyMeasurement boundary
Zillow ZORI$2,216Nashua cityTypical observed asking-rent index; not a unit quote.
Census ACS gross rent$1,737Nashua citySurvey estimate for occupied renter homes, including specified utilities.
HUD 2BR FMR$2,127Hillsborough CountyAdministrative bedroom standard; wider context, never substituted as city rent.

For a property decision, match bedroom count, condition, utilities, concessions, lease timing and nearby comparable listings. Wider county and metro evidence below stays explicitly labelled.Zillow pulled 2026-07-29

City market snapshot

Four figures that frame the city

Typical home value
$517k
▲ 3.3% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · 2026-06
Observed market rent
$2,216
▲ 2.6% year over year
Zillow ZORI · 2026-06
Entry affordability
5.4x
home value ÷ household income
Zillow + Census ACS
Population
91,294
▲ 2.8% between ACS vintages
ACS 2024 5-year
Decision brief

What the city-level evidence says

01Decision frame

Nashua’s Zillow ZHVI is $517,357 and its Zillow ZORI is $2,216 a month. Their implied gross yield is 5.14%, calculated as annual ZORI divided by ZHVI and therefore before taxes, insurance, maintenance, management, financing, vacancy and utilities. ZHVI equals 5.37x ACS median household income, while annual ZORI equals 27.61% of that income. These are broad affordability screens, not a property cash-flow result or proof that a particular household can buy or rent.

02Housing stock

Nashua has 38,760 housing units, a 4.20% citywide vacancy rate, and renters in 44.19% of occupied units. Citywide stock statistics cannot establish a specific property’s condition. ACS reports a $403,900 median home value and $1,737 median gross rent for surveyed occupied housing; gross rent includes selected utilities. These ACS measures differ in concept and period from Zillow’s typical home value and observed market rent, so they should not be combined or averaged.

03City depth

At the city level, 45.84% of measured renter households spend 30% or more of income on gross rent. Single-family homes comprise 50.29% of units and large multifamily buildings 18.03%. Among vacant units, 257 were for rent, 206 seasonal and 55 for sale; these ACS reasons do not measure current purchasable or leasable inventory. Population increased 2.79% between overlapping ACS vintages, a nonannualized comparison that may reflect boundary changes. Median household income is $96,326, while poverty is 7.82% and unemployment 4.23%; these are descriptive demand constraints, not causes of market outcomes.

04Wider context

At the county scope, Hillsborough County’s effective property-tax rate is 1.66%, and county listings had a median 29 days on market, useful for expense and transaction context but not city measurements. In the broader Manchester metro, jobs declined 1.25% over the reported interval and metro months of supply were 1.8, pairing a labor-demand headwind with limited resale-supply context. At the national scope, the Freddie Mac mortgage rate was 6.66%, a financing benchmark rather than Nashua borrowing terms.

05Limits & next checks

Citywide and wider-scope aggregates cannot establish a specific asset’s rent, expenses, condition, tenant demand or resale liquidity. Next checks should verify asking rent against comparable units; obtain tax bills, insurance quotes and utility responsibilities; inspect the structure and major systems; review leases, arrears, concessions and turnover; confirm zoning, permits and unit legality; test vacancy, maintenance, management and financing assumptions; and examine site-specific hazards. Reconcile the property’s operating statement with financing terms rather than treating gross yield as net return.

Housing system

Market movement and the stock underneath it

Five-year path

Price and rent, rebased to 100

ZHVI +35.1%ZORI +31.7%
13511595202120222023202420252026
Each series starts at 100 so their direction can be compared without pretending that a home value and a monthly rent share the same unit.
Housing stock

Tenure and vacancy

ACS
44.2%RENTER
Owner occupied55.8%
Renter occupied44.2%
Vacant units4.2%

Median structure year 1975

Tenure uses occupied units; vacancy uses all housing units.
Measurement matrix

Two sources, two different questions

SourceHome valueMonthly rent
Zillow market index$517.4K$2.2K
ACS occupied housing$403.9K$1.7K
Zillow measures current market indexes. ACS reports surveyed owner value and gross rent for occupied housing. The rows are context, not interchangeable estimates.
Direct local rental evidence

Recent leases and rental-market liquidity in Nashua, NH

These Apartment List observations match the exact city Census code 3350260. They are kept separate from Zillow asking rent, Census occupied-home rent and wider metro measures.

Direct recent-lease rent history

Monthly overall-rent index; missing observations are not filled from another geography.

$2,016$1,860$1,7042021-082026-07
Recent-lease rent$1,9572026-07 · -2.2% year over year
Rental vacancyn/an/a
Time on marketn/an/a
Direct city depth

Households and housing form behind the medians

Median household income$96k

Annual ACS household measure.

Rent-to-income screen27.6%

Annual ZORI divided by ACS median income.

ACS rent burden45.8%

Renters paying at least 30% of household income toward gross rent.

Average household size2.43

People per occupied housing unit.

Single-family stock50.3%

Detached and attached one-unit structures.

Large multifamily stock18.0%

Housing in structures with 20 or more units.

Vacant and for rent15.8%

Share of vacant units listed by ACS as for rent, not a market vacancy rate.

Unemployment4.2%

Share of the civilian labor force.

Poverty7.8%

ACS population for whom poverty status is determined.

These are citywide context measures. They cannot tell you the rent, vacancy, expenses or tenant demand for a particular neighborhood or property.
Curated city comparisons

Nashua in direct city-to-city decisions

Each comparison keeps both records inside city limits and opens only when the pair differs materially on multiple decision signals.

Browse all city comparisons →
Regional alternative

Nashua, NH vs Lawrence, MA

Nearby New England city alternatives with similar population scale and materially different affordability, renter pressure, housing stock and local-demand evidence.

buyer affordabilityrenter pressurehousing stocklocal demand risk
Lawrence home value
$522k
Lawrence gross yield
5.4%
Closest market alternatives

Three useful contrasts, not a synthetic winner

The peer set broadens the decision without mixing geographies. Price, rent and housing characteristics remain city-level for every place.

Comparable market profile

Entry price, rent and gross yield

Nashua, NHManchester, NHConcord, NHLawrence, MA
Typical home valueZillow ZHVINashua$517.4KManchester$448KConcord$459.8KLawrence$521.9KObserved market rentZillow ZORI / monthNashua$2.2KManchester$2.1KConcord$1.9KLawrence$2.3KGross yieldZORI × 12 ÷ ZHVINashua5.1%Manchester5.5%Concord4.9%Lawrence5.4%
Bars begin at zero within each measure. Gross yield is a screening ratio before financing, taxes, insurance, vacancy, maintenance or management costs.
Same metro01

Manchester, NH

Compared with Nashua, typical home value is $69k lower, monthly rent is $158 lower, and gross yield is 0.4 percentage points higher.

Rent burden 30%+
50.0%
Renter share
51.3%
One-unit stock
40.6%
20+ unit stock
18.4%
Same state02

Concord, NH

Compared with Nashua, typical home value is $58k lower, monthly rent is $330 lower, and gross yield is 0.2 percentage points lower.

Rent burden 30%+
44.1%
Renter share
43.2%
One-unit stock
46.9%
20+ unit stock
15.9%
Closest data profile03

Lawrence, MA

Compared with Nashua, typical home value is $5k higher, monthly rent is $131 higher, and gross yield is 0.3 percentage points higher.

Rent burden 30%+
60.6%
Renter share
71.9%
One-unit stock
26.8%
20+ unit stock
16.1%

These are analytical alternatives, not recommendations. The structural measures come from Census ACS; price and rent use the Zillow releases shown on each card and in the source ledger below.

Wider market context

What surrounds the city without being mistaken for it

The layers below answer different questions. County records describe listing, migration, financing and hazard conditions around the city; metro records describe jobs, supply and permits; the mortgage rate is national.

Same measure, wider boundary

City marker against intersecting counties

CityCounty range
Typical home value$531.1K$531.1K$517.4KObserved market rent$2.2K$2.2K$2.2K
Both levels use Zillow indexes, but the county records cover land and housing outside the city. The comparison supplies context; it does not replace the city value.
Same Zillow index families

City limits versus the linked metro

NashuaMetro
Observed market rentMetro $2.2KCity $2.2K · +2.8%Typical home valueMetro $531.1KCity $517.4K · -2.6%Gross yieldMetro 4.9%City 5.1% · +5.5%
Zillow ZORI and ZHVI use the same release month at both boundaries. Gross yield is rent × 12 ÷ home value; the metro contains the city and is context, not a substitute.

Search all direct city–metro gaps in the interactive atlas.

COUNTY LAYER

The intersecting county

This boundary extends beyond the city and is shown only as context.

2026-06
Active listings
550
Listing DOM
29 days
FHFA one-year
▲ 4.8%
Net migration
65
Investor share
7.3%
Effective property tax
1.66%
Top hazard
inland flooding
Expected loss ratio
0.13%
METRO LAYER

Manchester, NH

Open metro analysis →
Job growth▼ 1.3%12m to 2026-06
Permitted units7062026 YTD through M06
Permits / 1,0001.7broader metro population
Months of supply1.82026-05-01
Median DOM29 daysRedfin metro tracker
Price drops18.9%Redfin metro tracker
Wider-context figures are not inputs to the city gross yield and are never used to fill a missing city price, rent or ACS measure.
What can break the thesis

Three checks before using the city averages

  1. 01

    A large city rent-burden share -> affordability pressure can limit rent-setting room.

  2. 02

    The broader Manchester metro recorded declining employment -> metro labor context is a demand headwind, not proof of a Nashua outcome.

  3. 03

    At the county scope, Hillsborough County’s reported effective property-tax rate may differ from a parcel’s bill -> property-level tax verification is necessary.

Questions answered

Quick reading guide

Does the Zillow gross yield equal an expected return?

No. It annualizes Zillow observed market rent against Zillow typical home value before every operating and financing cost.

Should the ACS and Zillow housing measures be averaged?

No. ACS covers surveyed occupied housing and includes selected utilities in gross rent, while Zillow measures typical home value and observed market rent for a different period and concept.

Do the wider figures describe Nashua directly?

No. Hillsborough County figures are county context, Manchester figures are broader metro context, and the Freddie Mac figure is a national rate; none measures a specific Nashua property.

Sources and geography

What belongs to this city page

Census recognizes this as Nashua city. The place intersects Hillsborough County.