Counties / Idaho / Butte County

Butte County, ID

FIPS 16023 · population 2,684 · part of Idaho Falls, ID

$218k
ACS owner-reported value · ACS 2024 5-year
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

ACS owner-reported value
$218k
survey estimate; not a current listing or sale price
Census ACS · surveyed
ACS median gross rent
$608
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,304
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

One annual series is unavailable
FHFA five-year cumulative+52.7%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVIperiod n/an/aFHFA HPI2025+2.1%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$218k
Surveyed gross rent$608
Rent burden 30%+44.0%
Median year built1971
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
19.7%vacant
1,336estimated housing units
Occupied tenure22.5% renter
owner 77.5%renter 22.5%
Structure mix74.0% single-family
Single-family 74.0%20+ units 0.4%Mobile home 17.1%Other 8.5%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs10,273▲ 0.6% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments146annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$2,299▲ 3.7% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorProfessional and business services92.1% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+0.6%WEEKLY WAGE+3.7%Professional and business services92.1%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Butte County’s decision tension is an appreciation record without a current market-price or market-rent anchor. Investors able to validate rents, flood exposure and local comparables should investigate; those needing demonstrated yield or resale liquidity should be cautious. FHFA’s repeat-transaction HPI rose 2.14% year over year and 52.74% cumulatively over five years. These are index changes, not home values. ACS reports a $217,600 owner-reported median value for owner-occupied homes, a separate survey measure; no Zillow county value series is supplied.

02Housing economics

Rental economics cannot be underwritten from the supplied record. No market rent is published, so gross yield cannot be computed. HUD’s FMR of $1,304 monthly is a payment standard, not asking rent. ACS reports $608 median gross rent for occupied units, a survey measure rather than current asking rent; neither can be combined with the ACS value to derive yield. The effective property-tax rate is 0.49%, with a $1,061 median annual tax. ACS’s 19.69% vacancy estimate is descriptive context, not a lease-up forecast.

03Demand & competition

Demand evidence is constructive but bounded by small county counts. Tax-return households show net migration of 32, and inbound movers’ average AGI exceeded outbound movers’ by $9,505; this is mover-income evidence, not a population or wage forecast. Investor participation was 8.33%—three of 36 purchase mortgages to non-occupants—so the observed competition signal has limited volume. QCEW annual covered employment at county workplaces increased 0.56%. Professional and business services, the largest disclosed private supersector, accounted for 92.11% of private covered jobs; this does not describe resident employment or the whole county economy.

04Risk & next checks

Inland flood is the dominant hazard, and modeled climate loss equals 0.14% of building value annually; it is a county-level modeled ratio, not a parcel loss estimate. Parcel elevation, flood zone, insurance availability and claims history remain necessary checks. The record publishes no Realtor.com median listing price, active listings, days on market or price-reduced share, so it cannot establish current asking-price competition, visible supply or marketing time. Together with absent market rent and Zillow data, those gaps prevent a defensible entry-price, yield and exit-liquidity conclusion.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Butte County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Arco city850Moore city228Butte City city95
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

3 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Arco cityIncorporated place
    850
  2. 02
    Moore cityIncorporated place
    228
  3. 03
    Butte City cityIncorporated place
    95

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.144% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.49%

$1,061 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+32

74 in · 42 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$9,505

$55,838 arriving · $46,333 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors8.3%

3 of 36 mortgages

investorother financed
No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; for a rent figure, the Idaho Falls, ID page covers the wider market.
Same metro

The other counties in Idaho Falls, ID

A metro is an average of these. Which side of a county line a property sits on can change the tax bill, the hazard profile and the tenant pool.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Butte County2,684n/an/an/ainland flooding
Bonneville County129,523$405k$1,4154.2%inland flooding
Jefferson County33,154$477k$1,3723.5%inland flooding
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Market rent and current MLS evidence may not support the acquisition economics or exit-liquidity premise.
  2. Heavy reliance on one disclosed private supersector may limit the breadth of the covered-job base.
  3. Parcel-level flood exposure or insurance terms may be materially different from the county modeled loss ratio.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be calculated from this record?

No. Market rent is not published, and neither HUD FMR nor ACS surveyed gross rent can be used to infer gross yield.

Does the record establish current listing-market competition or marketing time?

No. It does not publish Realtor.com listing price, active listings, days on market, or price-reduction figures.

What hazard requires property-specific diligence?

Inland flood; the county-level modeled loss ratio is not a substitute for parcel flood-zone, elevation, claims, and insurance review.