Counties / Texas / Cameron County

Cameron County, TX

FIPS 48061 · population 426,120 · part of Brownsville, TX

$207k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$207k
▲ 1.5% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
Median asking rent
$1,428
▲ 6.0% year over year
Zillow ZORI · direct
Gross yield
8.3%
annual rent ÷ price, before costs
derived: rent × 12 ÷ price ✓
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,047
market rent is 1.36x the standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+55.1%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+1.5%FHFA HPI2025+0.1%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$137k
Surveyed gross rent$912
Rent burden 30%+49.8%
Median year built1992
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
13.3%vacant
159,679estimated housing units
Occupied tenure34.8% renter
owner 65.2%renter 34.8%
Structure mix67.5% single-family
Single-family 67.5%20+ units 8.3%Mobile home 10.5%Other 13.7%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs154,647▼ 1.3% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments7,185annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$904▲ 5.5% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorEducation and health services36.7% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS−1.3%WEEKLY WAGE+5.5%Education and health services36.7%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Cameron County is a rent-carrying-cost case rather than a clean appreciation case. At Zillow’s county observation for June 2026, the median home value was $206,791, median asking rent was $1,428 per month, and stated gross yield was 8.29% before expenses. Investors who can validate property-level costs should investigate; purchasers dependent on rapid price gains should be cautious.

02Housing economics

That market asking-rent measure exceeds HUD’s $1,047 two-bedroom FMR, but FMR is a payment standard, not an estimate of asking rent. The effective property-tax rate is 1.5%, with a $2,042 median annual tax; both reduce income beyond the stated gross yield. Zillow’s home-value measure rose 1.52% year over year at its June 2026 county observation. FHFA’s separately labeled 2025 repeat-transaction HPI, not a home value, rose 0.13% annually and 55.13% cumulatively over five years. The different methods and vintages cannot be averaged into one growth rate.

03Demand & competition

Demand evidence is mixed. QCEW’s annual average covered employment at county workplaces fell 1.26%; education and health services was the largest disclosed private supersector, while rising average weekly covered-worker wages do not measure resident earnings. Tax-return moves produced net outmigration, although in-movers reported higher average AGI than out-movers. Nonoccupants represented 9.53% of 2,864 purchase mortgages, a distinct buyer cohort. In the separate Realtor.com MLS listing observation, median asking price fell 5.16%, marketing time was 77 days, and 11.01% of listings were reduced; these are seller-side listing conditions, not closed sales or proof of demand.

04Risk & next checks

Hurricane is the dominant hazard, and the modeled climate-loss ratio is a building-value loss expectation rather than a site-specific insurance bill; it calls for elevation, flood-zone, wind, deductible and insurance verification. Published evidence lacks closed-sale comps, parcel tax assessments, insurance quotes, operating expenses, vacancy or collection history, and property-condition data. Those omissions prevent a defensible net-income, financed-cash-flow, or hazard-resilience conclusion; county averages cannot settle a submarket or asset decision.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Cameron County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Brownsville city189.2KHarlingen city72.1KSan Benito city24.7KLos Fresnos city8.3KLa Feria city6.9KCameron Park CDP6KPrimera town5.3KPort Isabel city5.1K
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

53 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Brownsville cityIncorporated place
    189,177
  2. 02
    Harlingen cityIncorporated place
    72,087
  3. 03
    San Benito cityIncorporated place
    24,709
  4. 04
    Los Fresnos cityIncorporated place
    8,291
  5. 05
    La Feria cityIncorporated place
    6,891
  6. 06
    Cameron Park CDPCensus-designated place
    5,955
  7. 07
    Primera townIncorporated place
    5,344
  8. 08
    Port Isabel cityIncorporated place
    5,111
  9. 09
    Laureles CDPCensus-designated place
    4,224
  10. 10
    Laguna Vista townIncorporated place
    3,673
  11. 11
    Santa Rosa townIncorporated place
    3,215
  12. 12
    Combes townIncorporated place
    3,178
Show 41 more places
  1. 13
    South Padre Island townIncorporated place
    2,891
  2. 14
    Rancho Viejo townIncorporated place
    2,849
  3. 15
    La Paloma CDPCensus-designated place
    2,797
  4. 16
    Encantada-Ranchito-El Calaboz CDPCensus-designated place
    2,552
  5. 17
    Palm Valley cityIncorporated place
    2,155
  6. 18
    Rio Hondo cityIncorporated place
    1,865
  7. 19
    Palmer CDPCensus-designated place
    1,435
  8. 20
    Rice Tracts CDPCensus-designated place
    1,384
  9. 21
    South Point CDPCensus-designated place
    1,054
  10. 22
    Indian Lake townIncorporated place
    962
  11. 23
    Los Indios townIncorporated place
    948
  12. 24
    Reid Hope King CDPCensus-designated place
    932
  13. 25
    Bayview townIncorporated place
    887
  14. 26
    Olmito CDPCensus-designated place
    887
  15. 27
    Arroyo Colorado Estates CDPCensus-designated place
    856
  16. 28
    Las Palmas II CDPCensus-designated place
    808
  17. 29
    Santa Maria CDPCensus-designated place
    669
  18. 30
    Solis CDPCensus-designated place
    663
  19. 31
    Ratamosa CDPCensus-designated place
    465
  20. 32
    San Pedro CDPCensus-designated place
    446
  21. 33
    Orason CDPCensus-designated place
    424
  22. 34
    La Tina Ranch CDPCensus-designated place
    405
  23. 35
    Tierra Bonita CDPCensus-designated place
    405
  24. 36
    Green Valley Farms CDPCensus-designated place
    371
  25. 37
    Laguna Heights CDPCensus-designated place
    357
  26. 38
    Arroyo Gardens CDPCensus-designated place
    335
  27. 39
    Bixby CDPCensus-designated place
    294
  28. 40
    Villa Pancho CDPCensus-designated place
    294
  29. 41
    Chula Vista CDP (Cameron County)Census place
    284
  30. 42
    Bluetown CDPCensus-designated place
    271
  31. 43
    Iglesia Antigua CDPCensus-designated place
    211
  32. 44
    Juarez CDPCensus-designated place
    196
  33. 45
    Lozano CDPCensus-designated place
    149
  34. 46
    La Feria North CDPCensus-designated place
    134
  35. 47
    Rangerville villageIncorporated place
    112
  36. 48
    El Camino Angosto CDPCensus-designated place
    95
  37. 49
    Lago CDPCensus-designated place
    85
  38. 50
    Lasana CDPCensus-designated place
    54
  39. 51
    Yznaga CDPCensus-designated place
    47
  40. 52
    Villa del Sol CDPCensus-designated place
    31
  41. 53
    Del Mar Heights CDPCensus-designated place
    0

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardhurricane

0.203% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.50%

$2,042 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-1,150

4,787 in · 5,937 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$9,717

$62,859 arriving · $53,142 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors9.5%

273 of 2,864 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings1,595▼ 7.9% year over year
Median days on market77▼ 4.9% year over year
Listings price-reduced11.0%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▼ 5.2% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Property-level insurance, flood and wind mitigation, and deductible costs could erase the pre-expense yield.
  2. County median asking rent may not match the subject property's achievable rent, vacancy, or collections.
  3. MLS asking-price evidence may not translate into closed-sale values or financing outcomes.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can HUD FMR be used as the county's asking-rent estimate?

No. The record identifies FMR as a two-bedroom payment standard and separately publishes median market asking rent.

Do the price measures establish one county appreciation rate?

No. Zillow reports a home-value measure, while FHFA reports a repeat-transaction index at a different labeled vintage and method.

What prevents a full property cash-flow conclusion?

No closed-sale comps, insurance quotes, operating expenses, vacancy or collection history, parcel assessments, or property-condition data are published in the record.