Counties / Connecticut / Capitol Planning Region

Capitol Planning Region, CT

FIPS 09110 · population 977,290 · part of Hartford, CT

$324k
ACS owner-reported value · ACS 2024 5-year
Direct county rent answer

What does rent cost in Capitol Planning Region, CT?

Zillow does not publish a county rent index here. The direct county answer is therefore the Census ACS median gross rent of $1,411 per month in ACS 2024 5-year. It describes occupied renter homes and is not current asking rent.

County Zillow ZORIn/aNot published for this county
County ACS gross rent$1,411ACS 2024 5-year · occupied-renter survey
HUD two-bedroom FMR$1,865FY2026 · administrative standard
HUD Fair Market Rent by bedroom count in Capitol Planning Region
BedroomsHUD monthly FMRGeographyMeasurement boundary
Studio$1,286Capitol Planning Region, CTHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
1 bedroom$1,477Capitol Planning Region, CTHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
2 bedrooms$1,865Capitol Planning Region, CTHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
3 bedrooms$2,236Capitol Planning Region, CTHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
4 bedrooms$2,537Capitol Planning Region, CTHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.

Zillow asking rent, ACS gross rent and HUD FMR describe different housing universes. They remain separate and no metro, city or neighboring-county value replaces missing county evidence.ACS pulled 2026-07-30 · HUD pulled 2026-07-26

The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

ACS owner-reported value
$324k
survey estimate; not a current listing or sale price
Census ACS · surveyed
ACS median gross rent
$1,411
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,865
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

One annual series is unavailable
FHFA five-year cumulative+61.6%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVIperiod n/an/aFHFA HPI2025+5.7%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-08-02.
Owner-reported value$324k
Surveyed gross rent$1,411
Rent burden 30%+51.9%
Median year built1966
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
6.1%vacant
416,559estimated housing units
Occupied tenure34.3% renter
owner 65.7%renter 34.3%
Structure mix63.1% single-family
Single-family 63.1%20+ units 10.6%Mobile home 0.6%Other 25.7%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs531,903▲ 1.8% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments37,295annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,628▲ 2.1% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorEducation and health services22.9% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+1.8%WEEKLY WAGE+2.1%Education and health services22.9%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2021-2025; latest 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-08-02. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

Renter affordability

Who carries the heaviest rent burden

HUD CHAS separates renter households by income relative to local HAMFI. Moderate burden means housing costs above 30% through 50% of income; severe burden means more than 50%.

Share of renter households in each income band2018-2022
Renter cost burden by HAMFI income band in Capitol Planning RegionFive horizontal bars show moderate and severe housing cost burden shares among renter households in each HUD income band.0%25%50%75%100%At or below 30% HAMFI43,44572.3% burdened30–50% HAMFI24,63574.7% burdened50–80% HAMFI25,25035.2% burdened80–100% HAMFI12,6059.5% burdenedAbove 100% HAMFI28,4702.2% burdened
Moderate: >30% to 50%Severe: >50%
Each percentage uses HUD’s published subtotal for that income band. For disclosure, HUD keeps 0 as 0, publishes 1–7 households as 4 and rounds 8 or more to the nearest 5. Independently rounded categories can differ from their displayed sum and are not forced into a percentage.
County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

County-level tension: appreciation evidence is positive, but the income case is unpriced. FHFA’s repeat-transaction HPI rose 5.74% in its annual observation and shows a separate 61.59% cumulative change; neither is a home value. Realtor.com’s median MLS listing price rose 2.93% in its supplied inventory period, but that observation is a different vintage and method, and the listing-price level is not published. Market rent is not published, so gross yield cannot be computed. Investors who can verify rents and flood costs should investigate; income-first buyers should be cautious. The absent Zillow county series prevents a fuller home-value check.

02Housing economics

ACS gives an owner-reported median value of $323,700 and surveyed gross rent of $1,411, but these describe separate survey populations; neither is current asking or transaction evidence, and they must not be combined into yield. HUD’s supplied FMR is $1,865, a payment standard rather than market rent. The effective property-tax rate is 1.99%, with median annual tax of $6,454. Carrying costs are therefore visible, while rent coverage and gross yield remain untested; FMR does not cure the missing market-rent evidence.

03Demand & competition

QCEW records 531,903 annual average covered jobs in the county, up 1.76%. Those are workplace jobs, not resident employment, unemployment, a forecast, or the metro series. Education and health services is the largest disclosed private supersector at 22.94% of private covered jobs, so the rest of the economy needs checking. Net migration was -1,621, alongside a -$8,875 average AGI gap between incoming and outgoing movers; that is a demand caution, not a causal explanation. Investor mortgages were 757 of 10,032 purchases, or 7.55%: participation is meaningful but minority. Realtor.com shows 878 active listings and a pending-to-active ratio of 167.37%. Price-reduced listings add seller-concession context, but listing evidence does not prove closed-sale demand.

04Risk & next checks

Inland flood is the dominant hazard; the modeled climate-loss ratio is 0.14% of building value per year, not a property-level loss estimate or insurance quote. Verify flood zone, elevation, claims, coverage, deductibles, and replacement assumptions. Missing property-level rent, operating expenses, capex, insurance, closed-sale comps, and a current asking-price level prevent a cash-flow, exit-price, or flood-adjusted return conclusion. The next screen is verification, not extrapolation from county aggregates.

County ZIP rental landscape

How asking rent and renter pressure vary inside Capitol Planning Region, CT

This view uses 12 direct Zillow ZIP markets matched to Census ZCTAs. Each ZIP is assigned by its largest HUD residential county share; this is not an exhaustive county inventory.

Selected ZIP range$1,572$2,270Zillow asking-rent index
Monthly spread$698highest minus lowest selected ZIP
Observed burden range36.2%57.6%ACS renter households paying 30%+
Renter households covered71,329across the selected ZCTAs
01 · ASKING RENT LADDERDirect ZIP ZORI
Horizontal bars compare Zillow asking-rent indexes across the selected direct-evidence ZIP set.06119$2,27006042$2,18306082$1,97106120$1,91606066$1,78306040$1,76006112$1,71706106$1,67306053$1,65906105$1,59006051$1,57906118$1,572
02 · PRESSURE MATRIXRent × observed burden
Each point is one selected ZIP and ZCTA match. Horizontal position is Zillow asking rent and vertical position is the ACS renter cost-burden share.60.1%53.5%46.9%40.3%33.7%061060605106105060400605306066061120612006042060820611906118Zillow asking-rent index →ACS burden share →
03 · BENCHMARK GAPZORI vs HUD 2BR
Bars show the percentage difference between the Zillow blended asking-rent index and the local HUD two-bedroom standard. Their housing universes differ.06120+108.2%06119+106.1%06051+105.3%06106+102.0%06042+97.9%06082+97.6%06112+95.4%06040+94.6%06053+94.3%06066+91.0%06105+89.8%06118+86.9%
WHAT THE LOCAL DISTRIBUTION SAYS

Selected direct Zillow evidence shows a broad observed rent range rather than a single county price point. In June 2026, the displayed ZIP/ZCTA matches run from a typical asking-rent index of $1,572 in 06118 to $2,270 in 06119, with a $1,738.50 median and a $698 spread. The decision question is whether a search budget should target the lower end of this selected range, accept a higher typical asking-rent signal, or give more weight to property-specific availability and terms. ZORI is a typical observed asking-rent index, not a quote for a particular unit; these ZIP-level observations frame a search rather than establish a countywide price schedule.

Do not collapse the three rent measures into one benchmark. The packet’s displayed ZORI-to-HUD two-bedroom comparison ranges from 86.9% to 108.2%, but it is only a cross-measure reference, not a blended rent or an affordability finding. HUD FY2026 two-bedroom FMR standards range from $1,500 to $2,230 across this set and are administrative program standards, not asking rent. Separately, ACS 2024 five-year ZCTA median gross rents span $1,143 to $1,752; they are survey estimates with a different time basis and housing universe from ZORI. Read each series for its own purpose, and do not average, substitute, or treat differences as property-level pricing.

Burden and vacancy add a household-cost and stock-use lens, but they do not resolve the listing choice by themselves. The county ACS five-year estimate puts 51.9% of renter households at 30% or more of income spent on rent, while the selected ZIP/ZCTA estimates range from 36.2% to 57.6%. Their vacancy rates span 3.3% to 14.9%, against 6.1% countywide. A higher ACS vacancy estimate denotes a greater measured share of vacant units; it does not show that ZORI is lower, that a specific unit is available, or that lease terms will be easier. In 06120, the Zillow-derived $76,640 annual income screen for allocating 30% of income to its typical asking-rent index exceeds the local $34,830 ACS median household income. This is a cross-source budgeting stress test, not a household-level burden, qualification, or availability estimate.

Geography and coverage keep the evidence from serving as a complete local inventory. The display contains 12 of 29 eligible direct-ZORI ZIP/ZCTA matches and covers 71,329 renter households. It therefore represents a selected evidence set, not an exhaustive county inventory. Each shown ZIP is assigned to the county using the largest HUD residential-address share; that share is 100% for every displayed record, although ZIPs may cross county lines. Census ZCTAs are statistical areas, not USPS delivery ZIPs. Before acting on any aggregate signal, verify a property’s current advertised rent, bedroom count, included utilities and fees, availability date, lease term, income qualification, and applicable HUD program standard.

Selected ZIP evidence

Keep each source universe visible

29 ZIP profiles passed the county gate; the 12 with the most renter households are shown.

ZIP / ZCTAZillow asking rentACS gross rentHUD 2BRBurden 30%+VacancyIncome screenHUD county share
06106$1,673$1,274$1,64054.1%12.6%$67k100.0%
06051$1,579$1,187$1,50050.2%13.3%$63k100.0%
06105$1,590$1,143$1,77052.8%14.9%$64k100.0%
06040$1,760$1,384$1,86050.6%4.9%$70k100.0%
06053$1,659$1,338$1,76054.4%6.4%$66k100.0%
06066$1,783$1,425$1,96038.5%5.8%$71k100.0%
06112$1,717$1,298$1,80057.6%11.4%$69k100.0%
06120$1,916$1,267$1,77057.1%10.7%$77k100.0%
06042$2,183$1,736$2,23038.0%4.9%$87k100.0%
06082$1,971$1,574$2,02043.7%3.3%$79k100.0%
06119$2,270$1,752$2,14036.2%5.1%$91k100.0%
06118$1,572$1,353$1,81049.6%4.9%$63k100.0%
READ BEFORE USING

ZCTAs are Census statistical areas, not USPS delivery ZIPs, and ZIPs may cross county lines. This packet assigns each displayed ZIP to the county with the largest HUD residential-address share, a display rule rather than proof of exclusive county geography.

The displayed direct-evidence set is limited to eligible matched records and is not exhaustive. Zillow, ACS, and HUD measures differ in timing, definitions, and units, so no aggregate value can establish a current property rent, availability, affordability, or qualification outcome.

SOURCE LEDGERCensus ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stockACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30Census ACS five-year — ZCTA housing and incomeACS 2024 5-year ZCTA · pulled 2026-08-08HUD Fair Market Rents — Section 8 standardFY2026 FMR · pulled 2026-07-26HUD-USPS ZIP-to-county residential-address crosswalkHUD-USPS 2026Q1 · pulled 2026-08-09Zillow ZHVI and ZORI — county values and rentscounty ZHVI/ZORI 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-26Zillow ZORI — ZIP market rentsZORI ZIP 2026-06 · pulled 2026-08-08
Cities & communities

Where people live within Capitol Planning Region

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Hartford city121.1KNew Britain city74.2KWest Hartford CDP63.6KEast Hartford CDP50.9KManchester CDP36.8KNewington CDP30.9KWethersfield CDP27.3KStorrs CDP15.2K
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

35 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Hartford cityIncorporated place
    121,127
  2. 02
    New Britain cityIncorporated place
    74,223
  3. 03
    West Hartford CDPCensus-designated place
    63,620
  4. 04
    East Hartford CDPCensus-designated place
    50,918
  5. 05
    Manchester CDPCensus-designated place
    36,759
  6. 06
    Newington CDPCensus-designated place
    30,896
  7. 07
    Wethersfield CDPCensus-designated place
    27,250
  8. 08
    Storrs CDPCensus-designated place
    15,207
  9. 09
    Windsor Locks CDPCensus-designated place
    12,579
  10. 10
    Kensington CDPCensus-designated place
    9,962
  11. 11
    Southwood Acres CDPCensus-designated place
    8,115
  12. 12
    Thompsonville CDPCensus-designated place
    7,927
Show 23 more places
  1. 13
    Glastonbury Center CDPCensus-designated place
    7,266
  2. 14
    Rockville CDPCensus-designated place
    7,072
  3. 15
    Simsbury Center CDPCensus-designated place
    6,198
  4. 16
    Hazardville CDPCensus-designated place
    6,022
  5. 17
    Sherwood Manor CDPCensus-designated place
    5,706
  6. 18
    Stafford Springs CDPCensus-designated place
    4,649
  7. 19
    Collinsville CDPCensus-designated place
    3,963
  8. 20
    Broad Brook CDPCensus-designated place
    3,609
  9. 21
    West Simsbury CDPCensus-designated place
    3,000
  10. 22
    Weatogue CDPCensus-designated place
    2,672
  11. 23
    Coventry Lake CDPCensus-designated place
    2,647
  12. 24
    Salmon Brook CDPCensus-designated place
    2,343
  13. 25
    Plantsville CDPCensus-designated place
    2,220
  14. 26
    Somers CDPCensus-designated place
    2,056
  15. 27
    Crystal Lake CDPCensus-designated place
    2,024
  16. 28
    Suffield Depot CDPCensus-designated place
    2,006
  17. 29
    Blue Hills CDPCensus-designated place
    1,676
  18. 30
    North Granby CDPCensus-designated place
    1,451
  19. 31
    South Coventry CDPCensus-designated place
    1,434
  20. 32
    Tariffville CDPCensus-designated place
    1,419
  21. 33
    Canton Valley CDPCensus-designated place
    1,186
  22. 34
    Terramuggus CDPCensus-designated place
    968
  23. 35
    Mansfield Center CDPCensus-designated place
    785

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.144% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.99%

$6,454 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-1,621

18,325 in · 19,946 out

Arriving vs leaving income−$8,875

$74,926 arriving · $83,801 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors7.5%

757 of 10,032 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings878▲ 4.0% year over year
Median days on market24▲ 0.0% year over year
Listings price-reduced6.3%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▲ 2.9% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; for a rent figure, the Hartford, CT page covers the wider market.
Same metro

The other counties in Hartford, CT

A metro is an average of these. Which side of a county line a property sits on can change the tax bill, the hazard profile and the tenant pool.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Capitol Planning Region977,290n/an/an/ainland flooding
Lower Connecticut River Valley Planning Region175,822n/an/an/ainland flooding
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Verified rents may not support property taxes, insurance, operating expenses, and required capital work.
  2. Outmigration and the negative mover-income gap may weaken tenant demand or buyer depth.
  3. Parcel-level flood exposure, insurance terms, or claims history may be materially worse than the county model.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be calculated from this record?

No. Market rent is not published. The HUD FMR is a payment standard, and the ACS gross-rent figure is surveyed rent rather than current market asking rent.

What does the labor and migration evidence actually measure?

QCEW measures annual average covered jobs located at county workplaces. Migration and AGI figures describe moving tax-return households, not resident employment or a forecast.

What is the most important next property-level check?

Obtain parcel flood-zone and elevation information, claims history, insurance terms, verified market rent, operating expenses, and closed-sale comparables.