Counties / Oklahoma / Carter County

Carter County, OK

FIPS 40019 · population 48,555 · part of Ardmore, OK

$181k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$181k
▲ 1.4% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
Median asking rent
$1,230
▲ 7.5% year over year
Zillow ZORI · direct
Gross yield
8.2%
annual rent ÷ price, before costs
derived: rent × 12 ÷ price ✓
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,054
market rent is 1.17x the standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+46.9%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+1.4%FHFA HPI2025+2.2%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$169k
Surveyed gross rent$980
Rent burden 30%+44.9%
Median year built1978
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
11.9%vacant
21,624estimated housing units
Occupied tenure33.2% renter
owner 66.8%renter 33.2%
Structure mix79.7% single-family
Single-family 79.7%20+ units 1.4%Mobile home 12.1%Other 6.8%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs23,450▲ 0.6% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments1,711annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,044▲ 0.6% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities27.9% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+0.6%WEEKLY WAGE+0.6%Trade, transportation, and utilities27.9%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Carter County presents a yield-versus-liquidity decision, not a clean growth story. Published market rent supports an 8.17% gross yield before costs, with rent up 7.53%. Yet Realtor.com MLS evidence shows median listing prices down 4.05%, active listings up 22.36%, and median marketing time at 85 days. These are asking-price and visible-supply measures, not closed sales or proof of demand. Income-focused investors should investigate property-level rent and exit liquidity; appreciation-dependent buyers should be cautious pending closed-sale and vacancy evidence.

02Housing economics

The $180,768 median home value and $1,230 median asking rent support the stated yield, not a net return. HUD's $1,054 two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard, not market rent; the supplied rent is 16.70% above it, which does not establish unit-level rent. FHFA's repeat-transaction HPI separately shows 2.17% annual-vintage growth and a 46.94% cumulative five-year change. Neither is a home value or the same observation as Zillow, and they should not be averaged. A 0.74% effective property-tax rate adds cost. Unpublished insurance, repairs, vacancy, management, utilities, and financing prevent NOI and cash-on-cash underwriting.

03Demand & competition

Demand evidence is mixed. QCEW reports modestly rising annual covered county employment and average weekly wages, with Trade, transportation, and utilities the largest disclosed private supersector; this is workplace employment, not resident or metro employment. Tax-return flows show net in-migration, but incoming movers have lower average AGI than outgoing movers, so population gain does not establish purchasing power. Investors supplied 81 of 467 purchase mortgages, a 17.34% share: meaningful participation, not dominance. Pending listings remain a market signal, not a closed-sale conversion rate.

04Risk & next checks

Inland flood is the dominant hazard; the modeled annual building-value loss ratio is 0.16%, not an insurance quote or parcel-specific determination. Check flood zone and elevation, insurance terms, leases, actual expenses, and closed-sale comparables before relying on gross yield. Vacancy, delinquency, condition, financing terms, insurance premiums, and unit-level rent are not published, preventing net-yield, debt-service, and hazard-adjusted cash-flow conclusions. The thesis is therefore conditional: potentially attractive gross income, but only after demand, expense, and flood diligence.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Carter County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Ardmore city24.9KLone Grove city5.1KHealdton city2.5KWilson city1.7KDickson town1.2KSpringer town854Gene Autry town224Tatums town164
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

10 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Ardmore cityIncorporated place
    24,877
  2. 02
    Lone Grove cityIncorporated place
    5,125
  3. 03
    Healdton cityIncorporated place
    2,495
  4. 04
    Wilson cityIncorporated place
    1,725
  5. 05
    Dickson townIncorporated place
    1,231
  6. 06
    Springer townIncorporated place
    854
  7. 07
    Gene Autry townIncorporated place
    224
  8. 08
    Tatums townIncorporated place
    164
  9. 09
    Ratliff City townIncorporated place
    95
  10. 10
    Fox CDPCensus-designated place
    63

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.164% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.74%

$1,244 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+144

1,188 in · 1,044 out

Arriving vs leaving income−$7,126

$48,809 arriving · $55,935 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors17.3%

81 of 467 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings255▲ 22.4% year over year
Median days on market85▲ 30.8% year over year
Listings price-reduced26.9%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▼ 4.0% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Underwritten rent or occupancy is weaker than the published median asking rent, leaving gross yield unable to cover operating and financing costs.
  2. Inland-flood exposure or insurance terms are materially worse at the parcel than the modeled county loss ratio indicates.
  3. Listing supply, slower marketing, and limited closed-sale demand weaken resale and leasing liquidity.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Is the reported gross yield a net return?

No. Market rent is published and a gross yield is supplied, but operating, financing, vacancy, and insurance costs are not published.

How should the HUD figure be used?

It is a two-bedroom payment standard, not an estimate of asking rent, so it should not replace the published market-rent measure.

What does the migration evidence say about demand?

The county has net in-migration, but incoming movers have lower average AGI than outgoing movers; that does not establish stronger purchasing power.