Direct recent-lease rent history
Monthly overall-rent index; missing observations are not filled from another geography.
FIPS 45019 · population 420,264 · part of Charleston, SC
The latest county-level Zillow ZORI is $2,156 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.
| Bedrooms | HUD monthly FMR | Geography | Measurement boundary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Studio | $1,557 | Charleston County, SC | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
| 1 bedroom | $1,630 | Charleston County, SC | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
| 2 bedrooms | $1,787 | Charleston County, SC | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
| 3 bedrooms | $2,222 | Charleston County, SC | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
| 4 bedrooms | $2,562 | Charleston County, SC | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
Zillow asking rent, ACS gross rent and HUD FMR describe different housing universes. They remain separate and no metro, city or neighboring-county value replaces missing county evidence.Zillow pulled 2026-07-26 · HUD pulled 2026-07-26
Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.
Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.
Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.
Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2021-2025; latest 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-08-02. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.
BEA per-capita personal income divides all personal income by the county population. It is broader than wages, but it is not household income or a measure of what renters can afford.
HUD CHAS separates renter households by income relative to local HAMFI. Moderate burden means housing costs above 30% through 50% of income; severe burden means more than 50%.
These Apartment List observations match the exact county Census code 45019. They are kept separate from Zillow asking rent, Census occupied-home rent and wider metro measures.
Monthly overall-rent index; missing observations are not filled from another geography.
Charleston County’s decision tension is a high entry value beside a modest pre-cost income return: Zillow’s 2026-06 median home value was $619,614, versus $2,156 monthly median asking rent and a supplied 4.18% gross yield. Rent rose 2.73% year over year, versus 0.67% for the home-value measure. Buyers able to verify property-level costs should investigate; hurricane-exposed or highly financed cases warrant caution because gross income is not net income.
Measured market rent—not HUD’s $1,787 two-bedroom Fair Market Rent—supports the yield calculation; FMR is a payment standard, not an asking-rent estimate. The 0.39% effective property-tax rate is carrying-cost context, not a parcel bill. FHFA’s 2025 repeat-transaction HPI rose 2.30% annually and 70.79% cumulatively over its stated five-year window; it is an appreciation index, not a dollar home value. Its positive direction matches Zillow’s, but their distinct methods and observation periods cannot be merged.
Tax-return migration produced a net gain of 1,923 households, and incoming movers had higher average income than outgoing movers. This raises a question about income depth but does not prove housing demand. Investors accounted for 7.69% of purchases, indicating non-owner participation without showing cash buyers or bidding intensity. QCEW’s 2025 annual average counted 283,616 covered jobs at county workplaces, not resident employment. Trade, transportation, and utilities was the largest disclosed private supersector at 21.07% of private covered employment; this does not describe the whole economy or forecast jobs.
Modeled annual building-value loss is 0.48%, consistent with hurricane as the dominant hazard, but it is not an actual loss estimate for a building. Realtor.com’s 2026-06 listing figures are not published, preventing a read of MLS asking-price movement, visible supply, marketing time, price reductions, or pending activity. Insurance, vacancy, operating expenses, property condition, and financing terms are also not published; without them, net yield, resilience costs, and transaction-level buyer competition cannot be underwritten from this county record.
This view uses 12 direct Zillow ZIP markets matched to Census ZCTAs. Each ZIP is assigned by its largest HUD residential county share; this is not an exhaustive county inventory.
For June 2026, Charleston County’s selected direct-evidence set presents a wide current Zillow ZORI asking-rent index range: $1,657 in 29406 to $3,595 in 29401. The $1,938 spread, around a $2,187.50 selected-set median, makes broad county-level pricing an incomplete screen; the county Zillow reading is $2,156. Annual ZORI change also spans 0.8% to 10.6%, so the decision question is not simply whether rent is high or low, but which price point, recent movement, unit type, and availability fit the household’s budget and search timing. These are typical observed asking-rent index values, not the rent for every currently advertised unit.
Three rent measures answer different questions and should remain separate. In ACS five-year ZCTA survey data, median gross rent is $1,790 for 29401 and $1,342 for 29406; these survey estimates are not current ZORI asking rents. HUD’s bedroom-specific two-bedroom administrative standard is $2,320 for the former ZIP and $1,690 for the latter, rather than a market asking-rent observation. In the selected set, current ZORI relative to HUD’s two-bedroom standard ranges from 89.3% to 155.0%. That variation is useful for program or screening context, but it does not establish that a particular advertised apartment qualifies, is affordable, or has a matching bedroom count. They should not be averaged or treated as sequential measurements.
Affordability pressure appears across different rent levels. The ACS ZCTA share of renter households spending at least 30% of income on rent ranges from 39.6% in 29418 to 62.0% in 29466, versus 53.4% for the county ACS estimate. Treat these as survey burden measures rather than an outcome for a new lease. ACS ZCTA vacancy ranges from 5.4% in 29414 to 31.1% in 29455, compared with 14.7% countywide. Higher vacancy can widen a renter’s search set, whereas lower vacancy can make timing and verified availability more consequential; it neither guarantees concessions nor proves an affordability result. A household should therefore assess burden alongside its income, lease terms, utilities, and actual unit rent rather than using either measure alone.
The analysis covers 12 eligible direct-ZORI ZIP/ZCTA matches and 64,807 renter households under the stated selection rule, so it is a decision screen rather than an exhaustive county inventory. ZCTAs are statistical areas, not USPS delivery ZIPs. Moreover, ZIPs may cross county boundaries; display assignment follows the largest HUD residential-address county share, which is material for cross-border ZIPs. Before acting, verify the exact address and county, current asking rent, bedroom count, utilities, fees, lease term, income rules, availability, and any program-specific rent standard directly with the listing or administering agency. Use the relevant measure for the relevant decision rather than converting one series into another.
All 12 eligible direct-evidence ZIP profiles are shown.
| ZIP / ZCTA | Zillow asking rent | ACS gross rent | HUD 2BR | Burden 30%+ | Vacancy | Income screen | HUD county share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29464 | $2,372 | $2,081 | $2,530 | 49.3% | 12.1% | $95k | 100.0% |
| 29406 | $1,657 | $1,342 | $1,690 | 56.2% | 10.8% | $66k | 100.0% |
| 29414 | $1,884 | $1,724 | $2,110 | 42.9% | 5.4% | $75k | 99.9% |
| 29407 | $1,785 | $1,431 | $1,880 | 43.7% | 10.5% | $71k | 100.0% |
| 29403 | $2,669 | $1,798 | $2,190 | 57.4% | 19.3% | $107k | 100.0% |
| 29456 | $1,667 | $1,650 | $1,780 | 47.0% | 6.4% | $67k | 36.4% |
| 29405 | $2,066 | $1,253 | $1,540 | 52.6% | 13.1% | $83k | 100.0% |
| 29418 | $1,910 | $1,340 | $1,560 | 39.6% | 10.6% | $76k | 79.9% |
| 29412 | $2,309 | $1,881 | $2,130 | 53.5% | 9.0% | $92k | 100.0% |
| 29466 | $2,708 | $2,380 | $2,540 | 62.0% | 7.3% | $108k | 100.0% |
| 29401 | $3,595 | $1,790 | $2,320 | 58.7% | 27.3% | $144k | 100.0% |
| 29455 | $2,406 | $1,567 | $1,800 | 45.5% | 31.1% | $96k | 100.0% |
Open a five-digit report for asking rent, affordability, rent history and resale liquidity. Each row keeps its ZIP/ZCTA measurement scope.
| ZIP report | City label | Zillow rent | 1Y change | ACS burden 30%+ | Population |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZIP 29401 rental reportCharleston County | Charleston, SC | $3,595 | ▲ 4.4% | 58.7% | 9,339 |
| ZIP 29466 rental reportCharleston County | Mount Pleasant, SC | $2,708 | ▲ 0.9% | 62.0% | 44,942 |
| ZIP 29403 rental reportCharleston County | Charleston, SC | $2,669 | ▲ 4.2% | 57.4% | 22,533 |
| ZIP 29464 rental reportCharleston County | Mount Pleasant, SC | $2,372 | ▲ 1.6% | 49.3% | 53,045 |
| ZIP 29412 rental reportCharleston County | Charleston, SC | $2,309 | ▲ 4.2% | 53.5% | 39,256 |
| ZIP 29414 rental reportCharleston County | Charleston, SC | $1,884 | ▲ 2.6% | 42.9% | 44,727 |
| ZIP 29407 rental reportCharleston County | Charleston, SC | $1,785 | ▲ 0.8% | 43.7% | 36,706 |
Zillow ZORI is an asking-rent index. ACS burden and population describe the Census ZCTA; missing observations remain n/a.
Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.
Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.
0.479% of building value expected lost per year
$1,901 median annual bill
17,531 in · 15,608 out
$104,126 arriving · $76,482 leaving
450 of 5,850 mortgages
A metro is an average of these. Which side of a county line a property sits on can change the tax bill, the hazard profile and the tenant pool.
| County | Population | Price | Rent | Yield | Hazard |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charleston County | 420,264 | $620k | $2,156 | 4.2% | hurricane |
| Berkeley County | 246,802 | $374k | $1,995 | 6.4% | hurricane |
| Dorchester County | 167,201 | $353k | $1,760 | 6.0% | hurricane |
It uses the supplied county median asking market rent and median home value, before operating costs.
No. The supplied two-bedroom FMR is a HUD payment standard, while the record separately publishes median asking market rent.
No. Realtor.com active listings, listing-price movement, days on market, price reductions, and pending activity are not published.