Counties / Colorado / Clear Creek County

Clear Creek County, CO

FIPS 08019 · population 9,262 · part of Denver, CO

$565k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$565k
▼ 1.4% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
Median asking rent
$2,146
▲ 0.8% year over year
Zillow ZORI · direct
Gross yield
4.6%
annual rent ÷ price, before costs
derived: rent × 12 ÷ price ✓
HUD 2-bed standard
$2,089
market rent is 1.03x the standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+38.6%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06−1.4%FHFA HPI2025−4.5%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$609k
Surveyed gross rent$1,467
Rent burden 30%+58.8%
Median year built1976
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
19.6%vacant
5,814estimated housing units
Occupied tenure18.4% renter
owner 81.6%renter 18.4%
Structure mix84.0% single-family
Single-family 84.0%20+ units 0.9%Mobile home 4.5%Other 10.6%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs3,429▲ 3.2% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments404annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,322▲ 4.8% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorLeisure and hospitality40.7% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+3.2%WEEKLY WAGE+4.8%Leisure and hospitality40.7%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Clear Creek County presents an income-versus-liquidity tension: published rent is edging up while both available value signals are declining. Investors able to verify property-level rent, expenses and flood coverage should investigate; buyers relying on quick resale or headline listing prices should be cautious. Zillow’s county home-value observation for 2026-06 fell 1.36% year over year. FHFA’s repeat-transaction HPI for 2025 fell 4.51% annually. Those are different sources and periods: the HPI is an index, not a home value, so neither establishes a sale-price trend by itself.

02Housing economics

At the Zillow county observation, median home value was $564,705 and median asking market rent was $2,146 per month, producing the supplied 4.56% gross yield before costs. HUD’s separately supplied two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard rather than asking rent and must not substitute for the published market-rent measure. The effective property-tax rate is 0.39%; that adds a carrying-cost input, but insurance, maintenance, vacancy and financing are not published, preventing net-yield or cash-flow underwriting.

03Demand & competition

Realtor.com’s MLS listing-market evidence complicates entry timing: active inventory increased 10.64%, median marketing time reached 54 days, and 27.11% of listings carried price reductions. These are visible-supply, marketing-time and seller-concession indicators—not closed-sale prices or standalone proof of buyer demand. The migration record shows positive net movement and higher average AGI for inbound than outbound moving households, but it does not identify tenants, neighborhoods or timing. Non-occupant mortgages accounted for 13 of 132 purchases, or 9.85%, showing recorded investor participation rather than all buyer activity. QCEW reports gains in annual covered workplace employment and average weekly wage; leisure and hospitality is its largest disclosed private supersector, not the whole county economy.

04Risk & next checks

Inland flood is the dominant hazard, and modeled annual expected building-value loss is 0.50%. This county-level model is not a parcel loss estimate or an insurance quote and should be paired with flood-zone, elevation, prior-loss and coverage checks. Missing closed-sale comparables, unit-level rent history, operating and insurance costs, vacancy and property condition prevent a conclusion on achievable net income, exit value or resilience.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Clear Creek County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Idaho Springs city2KGeorgetown town1.1KUpper Bear Creek CDP954Floyd Hill CDP841Upper Witter Gulch CDP731Empire town672Central city*525Pine Valley CDP392
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

14 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Idaho Springs cityIncorporated place
    1,986
  2. 02
    Georgetown townIncorporated place
    1,053
  3. 03
    Upper Bear Creek CDPCensus-designated place
    954
  4. 04
    Floyd Hill CDPCensus-designated place
    841
  5. 05
    Upper Witter Gulch CDPCensus-designated place
    731
  6. 06
    Empire townIncorporated place
    672
  7. 07
    Central cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    525
  8. 08
    Pine Valley CDPCensus-designated place
    392
  9. 09
    Brook Forest CDPCensus-designated place · spans 2 counties
    355
  10. 10
    Downieville-Lawson-Dumont CDPCensus-designated place
    345
  11. 11
    Echo Hills CDPCensus-designated place
    180
  12. 12
    Silver Plume townIncorporated place
    127
Show 2 more places
  1. 13
    Blue Valley CDPCensus-designated place
    120
  2. 14
    St. Mary's CDPCensus-designated place
    68

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.499% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.39%

$2,350 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+25

460 in · 435 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$21,558

$96,861 arriving · $75,303 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors9.8%

13 of 132 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings130▲ 10.6% year over year
Median days on market54▲ 17.6% year over year
Listings price-reduced27.1%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▼ 2.2% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

Same metro

The other counties in Denver, CO

A metro is an average of these. Which side of a county line a property sits on can change the tax bill, the hazard profile and the tenant pool.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Clear Creek County9,262$565k$2,1464.6%inland flooding
Denver County718,877$546k$1,8894.2%inland flooding
Arapahoe County659,844$516k$1,8214.2%hail
Jefferson County579,377$629k$1,9813.8%inland flooding
Adams County530,225$486k$1,8564.6%hail
Douglas County377,150$712k$2,3063.9%inland flooding
Broomfield County76,304$629k$2,0353.9%inland flooding
Elbert County27,874$686kn/an/ainland flooding
Park County17,907$527k$2,6436.0%wildfire
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Median asking rent may not be achievable for a specific property, causing gross yield to overstate income.
  2. MLS conditions may not reflect closed-sale liquidity or a specific neighborhood’s buyer pool.
  3. Parcel flood exposure and insurance availability may differ materially from the county-level modeled loss ratio.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Does HUD Fair Market Rent establish market asking rent?

No. The record identifies the two-bedroom FMR as a payment standard and separately publishes median asking market rent.

What does QCEW measure in this record?

It measures annual covered jobs at workplaces in the county and a covered-worker average weekly wage, not resident employment.

Can this record establish net cash flow?

No. Operating costs, insurance, financing, vacancy, property condition and unit-specific flood exposure are not published.