Counties / Texas / Martin County

Martin County, TX

FIPS 48317 · population 5,218 · part of Midland, TX

$265k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$265k
▲ 0.5% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
ACS median gross rent
$971
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,772
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

One annual series is unavailable
FHFA five-year cumulativen/anot annualized · through n/a
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+0.5%FHFA HPIperiod n/an/a
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$175k
Surveyed gross rent$971
Rent burden 30%+30.6%
Median year built1974
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
7.6%vacant
2,135estimated housing units
Occupied tenure21.9% renter
owner 78.0%renter 21.9%
Structure mix72.8% single-family
Single-family 72.8%20+ units 0.0%Mobile home 23.5%Other 3.7%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs2,728▲ 16.5% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments245annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,476▲ 3.2% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities32.6% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+16.5%WEEKLY WAGE+3.2%Trade, transportation, and utilities32.6%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Martin County's underwriting tension is modest value growth and covered-job growth against absent rental cash-flow and sale-market-depth evidence. Zillow's 2026-06 median home value was $265,115, up 0.55%; it is a valuation estimate, not a transaction price. County QCEW for 2025 reported 2,728 annual average covered jobs, up 16.53%. Trade, transportation, and utilities, the largest disclosed private supersector, accounted for 32.62% of total private covered employment. Buyers seeking durable tenant demand should investigate employer and tenant concentration rather than treating job growth as rent growth.

02Housing economics

Measured market rent is not published, so gross yield cannot be computed from this record. HUD FMR is $1,772 per month, but it is a payment standard rather than an estimate of asking rent and cannot substitute for lease comparables. Carrying costs warrant separate diligence: the effective property-tax rate is 0.91%, while median annual property tax is $1,587; these different measures should not be converted into a property-specific bill. Current asking and signed-rent comps, assessments, insurance quotes, and operating costs are needed before setting a yield or coverage assumption.

03Demand & competition

Demand indicators are mixed and narrow. Tax-return migration showed a net loss of 5 households; average income of incoming movers was $28,512 below that of outgoing movers, a calculation from the reported averages. Investor borrowers accounted for 4 of 82 purchase mortgages, or 4.88%, indicating limited measured non-owner competition rather than a complete count of all buyers. No Realtor.com MLS listing-price, active-listing, days-on-market, or price-reduction figures are published, so visible supply, marketing time, seller concessions, and buyer demand cannot be assessed.

04Risk & next checks

Risk limits are material: inland flood is the dominant hazard, and modeled climate loss equals 0.21% of building value expected annually. This modeled ratio is not a property-level loss estimate. No FHFA annual repeat-transaction HPI is published in the record to corroborate or challenge Zillow's direction. Next checks are parcel-level flood and insurance exposure, lease evidence, employer mix, and closed-sale records; without them, price resilience and cash-flow underwriting remain unresolved.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Martin County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Midland city*136.6KStanton city2.6KAckerly city*384
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

3 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Midland cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    136,640
  2. 02
    Stanton cityIncorporated place
    2,638
  3. 03
    Ackerly cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    384

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.207% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.91%

$1,587 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-5

144 in · 149 out

Arriving vs leaving income−$28,512

$104,951 arriving · $133,463 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors4.9%

4 of 82 mortgages

investorother financed
No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; for a rent figure, the Midland, TX page covers the wider market.
Same metro

The other counties in Midland, TX

A metro is an average of these. Which side of a county line a property sits on can change the tax bill, the hazard profile and the tenant pool.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Martin County5,218$265kn/an/ainland flooding
Midland County174,801$333k$1,6205.8%inland flooding
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. No market-rent or signed-lease evidence is available, preventing gross-yield and cash-flow underwriting.
  2. Covered employment may not translate into broad tenant demand, particularly given concentrated disclosed private employment and negative net migration.
  3. Inland-flood exposure and modeled climate loss may produce property-specific insurance or operating costs not captured in county metrics.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be calculated from the supplied record?

No. Measured market rent is not published, and HUD FMR cannot be used as market rent.

What is the largest disclosed private employment concentration?

Trade, transportation, and utilities is the largest disclosed private supersector, representing 32.62% of total private covered employment.

What hazard requires parcel-level diligence?

Inland flood is the dominant hazard; modeled climate loss is 0.21% of building value expected annually.