Counties / Montana / Mineral County

Mineral County, MT

FIPS 30061 · population 4,959 · part of Missoula, MT

$395k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$395k
▼ 0.8% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
ACS median gross rent
$801
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,361
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

The annual signals disagree
FHFA five-year cumulative+66.8%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06−0.8%FHFA HPI2025+8.9%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$364k
Surveyed gross rent$801
Rent burden 30%+47.5%
Median year built1983
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
16.4%vacant
2,572estimated housing units
Occupied tenure18.9% renter
owner 81.1%renter 18.9%
Structure mix77.6% single-family
Single-family 77.6%20+ units 0.6%Mobile home 16.4%Other 5.4%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs1,203▼ 1.9% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments193annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$841▲ 0.5% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities38.7% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS−1.9%WEEKLY WAGE+0.5%Trade, transportation, and utilities38.7%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Mineral County’s decision tension is a soft current Zillow value signal against positive FHFA transaction-index history, with no rent evidence to test income support. The Zillow county observation for 2026-06 puts median home value at $395,432, down 0.81% year over year; FHFA’s 2025 repeat-transaction HPI rose 8.86% year over year and its cumulative five-year reading was positive. These are different methods and vintages, not one growth series. Buyers requiring current valuation support should investigate local comparable sales; buyers relying on appreciation alone should be cautious.

02Housing economics

Carrying costs add a defined but incomplete constraint: the effective property-tax rate is 0.48%, with median annual tax of $1,758. Market asking rent is not published, so gross yield cannot be computed from this record. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR of $1,361 per month is a payment standard, not an estimate of asking rent, and cannot fill that gap. Obtain lease comps, vacancy, utilities, insurance, and financing terms before testing coverage.

03Demand & competition

Demand and competition indicators are mixed. QCEW’s annual 2025 county workplace data show covered employment declined 1.88%; Trade, transportation, and utilities accounted for 38.69% of private covered jobs, making sector exposure material. Tax-return migration posted a net gain of 44 households, and average income of in-movers exceeded out-movers by $9,109, but this is a mover profile rather than proof of tenant demand. Non-occupant purchase mortgages were 6.12% of purchase mortgages, a limited participation signal rather than total investor ownership. Realtor.com listing price, active listings, days on market, reductions, and pending data are not published, preventing a read on MLS visible supply, asking-price concessions, or marketing time.

04Risk & next checks

Inland flood is the named dominant hazard, and the modeled climate-loss ratio is 0.22% of building value per year. That model is not a parcel loss estimate, but it raises the need to verify flood zone, elevation, insurance availability, deductibles, and prior claims before accepting carry assumptions. The record lacks market rent plus closed-sale, parcel, and MLS detail. Those absences prevent a defensible yield, exit-price, liquidity, and hazard-cost conclusion at the county level.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Mineral County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Superior town896Riverbend CDP592Alberton town573St. Regis CDP406Cyr CDP108De Borgia CDP40Haugan CDP26Saltese CDP17
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

8 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Superior townIncorporated place
    896
  2. 02
    Riverbend CDPCensus-designated place
    592
  3. 03
    Alberton townIncorporated place
    573
  4. 04
    St. Regis CDPCensus-designated place
    406
  5. 05
    Cyr CDPCensus-designated place
    108
  6. 06
    De Borgia CDPCensus-designated place
    40
  7. 07
    Haugan CDPCensus-designated place
    26
  8. 08
    Saltese CDPCensus-designated place
    17

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.215% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.48%

$1,758 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+44

185 in · 141 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$9,109

$63,605 arriving · $54,496 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors6.1%

3 of 49 mortgages

investorother financed
No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; for a rent figure, the Missoula, MT page covers the wider market.
Same metro

The other counties in Missoula, MT

A metro is an average of these. Which side of a county line a property sits on can change the tax bill, the hazard profile and the tenant pool.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Mineral County4,959$395kn/an/ainland flooding
Missoula County120,672$583k$1,5673.2%inland flooding
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. County-level migration data may not translate into tenant demand in the target submarket.
  2. Flood insurance, parcel exposure, and loss history may make carrying costs materially different from the county-level model.
  3. Absent lease, MLS, and closed-sale data may conceal weak cash flow or limited exit liquidity.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be calculated from the supplied record?

No. Market asking rent is not published, and HUD FMR cannot be used as market rent.

Do the supplied price measures establish one appreciation trend?

No. Zillow’s current county value direction and FHFA’s earlier repeat-transaction index direction use different methods and periods and are not directly comparable.

Does the record establish current MLS listing liquidity?

No. Realtor.com active listings, days on market, price reductions, pending activity, and listing-price figures are not published.