Counties / Kansas / Osage County

Osage County, KS

FIPS 20139 · population 15,744 · part of Topeka, KS

$214k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$214k
▲ 5.6% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
ACS median gross rent
$785
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,057
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

The annual signals disagree
FHFA five-year cumulative+52.2%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+5.6%FHFA HPI2025−1.5%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$157k
Surveyed gross rent$785
Rent burden 30%+41.8%
Median year built1974
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
12.3%vacant
7,337estimated housing units
Occupied tenure17.6% renter
owner 82.3%renter 17.6%
Structure mix84.8% single-family
Single-family 84.8%20+ units 1.1%Mobile home 8.5%Other 5.6%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs2,914▼ 0.9% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments362annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$765▲ 2.5% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities27.8% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS−0.9%WEEKLY WAGE+2.5%Trade, transportation, and utilities27.8%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Osage County presents a valuation cross-check rather than a clean momentum case. Zillow’s 2026-06 county median home value was $214,439 and rose year over year, while FHFA’s 2025 repeat-transaction HPI fell 1.49% annually. These are different vintages and methods, not one appreciation measure. Underwriters willing to verify rents, sale comps, and flood exposure should investigate; those requiring a settled county price trend should be cautious.

02Housing economics

Housing economics cannot yet turn the home value into a gross-yield test: market rent is not published. HUD’s $1,057 FMR is a payment standard, not asking rent, so it cannot supply rent or yield. The 1.49% effective property-tax rate identifies a carrying-cost item, but without market rents, insurance, maintenance, financing, and parcel assessment data, neither operating margin nor tax-to-rent burden can be underwritten.

03Demand & competition

Realtor.com’s 2026-06 MLS evidence describes the visible listing market, not closed sales. There were 29 active listings, with a 40-day median marketing time; 18.26% had price reductions. Lean visible supply alongside reductions calls for sale-to-list and transaction-volume checks rather than treating listings as proof of buyer demand. Migration produced a calculated net gain of 5, and incoming movers’ average AGI exceeded outgoing movers’ by $7,272. That modest, higher-income inflow is a demand clue, not proof of housing absorption.

04Risk & next checks

Annual QCEW workplace employment declined in 2025; it is neither resident employment nor unemployment. Trade, transportation, and utilities is the largest disclosed private supersector, not the county’s whole economy, so employer and industry concentration need validation. Investor participation was 9.77% of 174 purchases, a limited competitive-share signal rather than evidence of all-cash activity. Inland flood is the stated dominant hazard, and modeled annual climate loss is 0.16% of building value; neither replaces parcel flood-zone, elevation, insurance-quote, or claims review. Next checks are market-rent and lease comps, closed-sale comps, assessment records, and property-specific hazard costs.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Osage County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Osage City city2.8KCarbondale city1.3KOverbrook city1.1KBurlingame city1KLyndon city1KScranton city911Vassar CDP832Quenemo city353
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

10 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Osage City cityIncorporated place
    2,828
  2. 02
    Carbondale cityIncorporated place
    1,341
  3. 03
    Overbrook cityIncorporated place
    1,113
  4. 04
    Burlingame cityIncorporated place
    1,046
  5. 05
    Lyndon cityIncorporated place
    1,023
  6. 06
    Scranton cityIncorporated place
    911
  7. 07
    Vassar CDPCensus-designated place
    832
  8. 08
    Quenemo cityIncorporated place
    353
  9. 09
    Melvern cityIncorporated place
    352
  10. 10
    Olivet cityIncorporated place
    180

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.155% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.49%

$2,343 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+5

413 in · 408 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$7,272

$53,598 arriving · $46,326 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors9.8%

17 of 174 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings29▼ 10.8% year over year
Median days on market40▼ 32.2% year over year
Listings price-reduced18.3%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▲ 14.3% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; for a rent figure, the Topeka, KS page covers the wider market.
Same metro

The other counties in Topeka, KS

A metro is an average of these. Which side of a county line a property sits on can change the tax bill, the hazard profile and the tenant pool.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Osage County15,744$214kn/an/ainland flooding
Shawnee County178,025$210k$1,2857.3%inland flooding
Jefferson County18,349$297kn/an/ainland flooding
Jackson County13,341$263kn/an/ainland flooding
Wabaunsee County7,009$259kn/an/ainland flooding
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Unpublished market rent prevents gross-yield and rent-coverage testing; HUD FMR cannot fill the gap.
  2. Zillow and FHFA point in different directions across different periods and methods, while MLS measures are not closed-sale evidence.
  3. County-level modeled flood loss does not establish a property’s exposure, insurance cost, elevation, or damage history.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be calculated from this record?

No. County market rent is not published, and HUD FMR is a payment standard rather than asking rent.

Do the Zillow and FHFA measures establish one appreciation trend?

No. Zillow is a county home-value observation labeled 2026-06, while FHFA is a repeat-transaction annual HPI labeled 2025.

Does the flood evidence quantify a specific property’s exposure?

No. It identifies inland flood as the dominant county hazard and supplies modeled county-level building-value loss, not parcel exposure, insurance, or claims data.