Counties / Virginia / Pulaski County

Pulaski County, VA

FIPS 51155 · population 33,687 · part of Blacksburg, VA

$230k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$230k
▲ 4.8% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
ACS median gross rent
$813
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$921
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+56.8%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+4.8%FHFA HPI2025+7.0%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$192k
Surveyed gross rent$813
Rent burden 30%+42.5%
Median year built1975
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
15.2%vacant
17,056estimated housing units
Occupied tenure26.6% renter
owner 73.4%renter 26.6%
Structure mix75.8% single-family
Single-family 75.8%20+ units 1.0%Mobile home 12.5%Other 10.7%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs13,754▼ 7.8% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments875annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,053▲ 3.8% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorManufacturing34.1% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS−7.8%WEEKLY WAGE+3.8%Manufacturing34.1%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Pulaski County’s decision tension is a rising Zillow value measure against a softer visible MLS asking market and contracting covered employment. In the Zillow observation labeled 2026-06, the county median home value was $230,075, up 4.78% year over year; Realtor.com’s median MLS listing price was down 7.28%, and both observations carry the 2026-06 label. Those are different measures—value estimate versus asking-price evidence—not a sale-price contradiction. Buyers reliant on exit liquidity should investigate list-to-close results and submarket inventory; cash-flow underwriters should be cautious until rents are verified.

02Housing economics

No measured market rent is published, so gross yield cannot be computed. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard, not an asking-rent estimate, and cannot fill that gap. Carrying-cost review starts with the 0.63% effective property-tax rate and $1,202 median annual tax, then parcel assessment and insurance. FHFA’s 2025 repeat-transaction HPI rose 7.03% annually. It is a different appreciation measure from Zillow; its annual vintage and transaction method cannot be averaged with Zillow’s change.

03Demand & competition

Demand evidence is mixed and remains county-level. QCEW’s annual workplace count shows 13,754 covered jobs, down 7.81%; this is neither resident employment nor unemployment. Manufacturing is the largest disclosed private supersector, concentrating exposure that should be tested by employer and tenant mix. Net migration was positive but only 25 tax-return households; incoming movers’ average income exceeded outgoing movers’ by $1,456. Investors represented 5.71% of 368 purchases, a limited but identifiable competing buyer segment rather than all demand.

04Risk & next checks

Risk limits are material: inland flood is the dominant hazard, and modeled expected annual climate loss is 0.13% of building value; this model should direct parcel flood, elevation, insurance and deductible checks, not establish a property loss. Evidence does not publish market rent, closed-sale prices, rent growth, insurance quotes, property condition, financing terms, or neighborhood vacancy. Those gaps prevent gross-yield calculation, exit-price validation, and a parcel-level all-in carrying-cost conclusion.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Pulaski County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Pulaski town8.9KDublin town2.7KFairlawn CDP2.5KParrott CDP401Draper CDP348New River CDP268Belspring CDP152Snowville CDP77
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

10 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Pulaski townIncorporated place
    8,893
  2. 02
    Dublin townIncorporated place
    2,671
  3. 03
    Fairlawn CDPCensus-designated place
    2,488
  4. 04
    Parrott CDPCensus-designated place
    401
  5. 05
    Draper CDPCensus-designated place
    348
  6. 06
    New River CDPCensus-designated place
    268
  7. 07
    Belspring CDPCensus-designated place
    152
  8. 08
    Snowville CDPCensus-designated place
    77
  9. 09
    Hiwassee CDPCensus-designated place
    72
  10. 10
    Allisonia CDPCensus-designated place
    40

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.129% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.63%

$1,202 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+25

779 in · 754 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$1,456

$55,326 arriving · $53,870 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors5.7%

21 of 368 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings95▲ 4.4% year over year
Median days on market57▲ 13.0% year over year
Listings price-reduced16.6%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▼ 7.3% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; for a rent figure, the Blacksburg, VA page covers the wider market.
Same metro

The other counties in Blacksburg, VA

A metro is an average of these. Which side of a county line a property sits on can change the tax bill, the hazard profile and the tenant pool.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Pulaski County33,687$230kn/an/ainland flooding
Montgomery County99,101$350k$1,6845.8%inland flooding
Radford city16,726$265k$1,4956.8%inland flooding
Giles County16,557$211kn/an/ainland flooding
Floyd County15,593$284kn/an/ainland flooding
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Closed-sale pricing could differ from the softer MLS asking-price evidence.
  2. Verified rents and property-level operating costs may not support the assumed cash-flow case.
  3. Flood exposure, insurance cost and mitigation needs can vary materially by parcel.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be calculated from this record?

No. Market rent is not published, and HUD FMR cannot substitute for market rent.

Is the reported employment figure a resident labor-market measure?

No. It is QCEW annual covered employment at workplaces in the county.

How much purchase activity was attributed to investors?

Investors represented 5.71% of 368 purchases.