Across the measured metro set, median asking-rent growth was 4.9% versus 2.2% for home values. That spread can improve a top-line rental screen, but the demand evidence is restrained: median metro job growth was -0.09%, while net migration across 133 county-level areas was only 608 people, or 0.07 per 1,000 residents.
The practical split is local rather than statewide. Some metros combine faster rent growth with attractive gross yields, while others show long marketing times, excess for-sale supply or weak sale-to-list results. These figures support screening markets for rent momentum, employment, liquidity and affordability together; they do not establish realized rent, occupancy, operating expenses, parcel-level hazard exposure or future performance.
