Counties / Missouri / Schuyler County

Schuyler County, MO

FIPS 29197 · population 4,038 · part of Kirksville, MO

$181k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$181k
▲ 13.2% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
ACS median gross rent
$382
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$888
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

One annual series is unavailable
FHFA five-year cumulativen/anot annualized · through n/a
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+13.2%FHFA HPIperiod n/an/a
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$138k
Surveyed gross rent$382
Rent burden 30%+19.6%
Median year built1964
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
31.2%vacant
1,899estimated housing units
Occupied tenure20.1% renter
owner 79.9%renter 20.1%
Structure mix80.6% single-family
Single-family 80.6%20+ units 0.7%Mobile home 9.8%Other 8.8%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs895▲ 10.4% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments101annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$836▲ 5.4% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorManufacturing52.2% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+10.4%WEEKLY WAGE+5.4%Manufacturing52.2%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Schuyler County has a difficult screen: Zillow’s county 2026-06 median home value was $180,973, up 13.24% year over year, but no FHFA annual HPI observation is published to check that direction with a repeat-transaction index. Caution fits appreciation-sensitive or value-add buyers; they should inspect closed-sale comparables, property condition and financing rather than treat the Zillow movement as a sale-price trend. The county-level record supports screening, not a property valuation.

02Housing economics

Housing economics cannot yet be tied to income. Market rent is not published, so gross yield cannot be computed. The $888 HUD two-bedroom FMR is a monthly payment standard, not county asking rent or a substitute for it. The effective property-tax rate is 0.79%, and median annual property tax is $1,083; these are carrying-cost context, not a parcel-specific tax estimate or evidence that the median tax applies to Zillow’s median home value.

03Demand & competition

Demand and buyer competition are also qualified. The supplied 2025 annual QCEW reports 895 covered jobs at county workplaces, an increase of 10.36% from its prior annual average; it is neither resident employment nor unemployment. Manufacturing, the largest disclosed private supersector, accounts for 52.23% of total private covered jobs, creating a concentration question rather than a full-economy description. Net migration was -32 tax-return households, while incoming movers’ average AGI was $5,467 below that of outgoing movers. Of 20 purchase mortgages, one was to a non-occupant, or 5%; the small count limits inference about investor competition. Realtor.com MLS listing metrics are not published, preventing a read on visible supply, concessions or marketing time.

04Risk & next checks

Inland flood is the dominant hazard. The modeled climate-loss ratio is 0.13% of building value expected lost per year; it is not a site-specific flood outcome or an insurance quote. Underwriters should next obtain parcel flood-zone, elevation and insurance evidence, market asking rents and lease comparables, assessed-value and tax details, closed-sale comparables, and Realtor.com MLS history. Those omissions prevent property-level cash-flow, exit-liquidity and hazard-cost conclusions.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Schuyler County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Lancaster city742Queen City city650Greentop city*331Downing city277Glenwood village205
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

5 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Lancaster cityIncorporated place
    742
  2. 02
    Queen City cityIncorporated place
    650
  3. 03
    Greentop cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    331
  4. 04
    Downing cityIncorporated place
    277
  5. 05
    Glenwood villageIncorporated place
    205

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.126% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.79%

$1,083 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-32

60 in · 92 out

Arriving vs leaving income−$5,467

$44,533 arriving · $50,000 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors5.0%

1 of 20 mortgages

investorother financed
No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; for a rent figure, the Kirksville, MO page covers the wider market.
Same metro

The other counties in Kirksville, MO

A metro is an average of these. Which side of a county line a property sits on can change the tax bill, the hazard profile and the tenant pool.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Schuyler County4,038$181kn/an/ainland flooding
Adair County25,301$198k$7164.3%inland flooding
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Market rent, lease terms, vacancy and operating costs are not published, preventing property cash-flow underwriting.
  2. QCEW workplace-job growth may not translate into resident housing demand, while manufacturing concentration exposes the job base to one disclosed sector.
  3. Inland-flood exposure and modeled losses can vary materially by parcel, while flood-zone, elevation and insurance evidence is absent.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be calculated from this record?

No. Market rent is not published, and HUD FMR is a payment standard rather than market asking rent.

What does the employment evidence measure?

It measures annual covered employment at workplaces in the county, not resident employment, unemployment or a forecast.

Does the climate-loss figure establish a property’s flood cost?

No. It is a modeled county-level expected building-value loss ratio and not a parcel-specific flood or insurance estimate.