Counties / South Carolina / Spartanburg County

Spartanburg County, SC

FIPS 45083 · population 347,852 · part of Spartanburg, SC

$280k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$280k
▲ 2.0% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
Median asking rent
$1,500
▲ 2.1% year over year
Zillow ZORI · direct
Gross yield
6.4%
annual rent ÷ price, before costs
derived: rent × 12 ÷ price ✓
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,187
market rent is 1.26x the standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+62.3%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+2.0%FHFA HPI2025+3.5%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$233k
Surveyed gross rent$1,084
Rent burden 30%+49.7%
Median year built1990
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
8.7%vacant
144,170estimated housing units
Occupied tenure27.0% renter
owner 73.0%renter 27.0%
Structure mix74.6% single-family
Single-family 74.6%20+ units 3.6%Mobile home 12.2%Other 9.6%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs157,558▲ 1.3% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments8,559annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,195▲ 4.4% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorManufacturing29.0% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+1.3%WEEKLY WAGE+4.4%Manufacturing29.0%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Spartanburg’s tension is a modestly appreciating value-and-rent setup against a visibly softer listing market and flood-sensitive operating uncertainty. It merits deeper diligence for investors able to verify insurance, drainage, and submarket rents; buyers relying on rapid resale or untested expense assumptions should be cautious. Zillow’s median home value rose 1.99%, while FHFA’s repeat-transaction HPI rose 3.47%; both point upward, but they are distinct measures and vintages, not a combined appreciation rate.

02Housing economics

Zillow measures a $280,440 median home value and $1,500 median asking rent, supporting the supplied 6.42% gross yield before costs. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR is $1,187, a payment standard rather than market asking rent; it cannot substitute for the measured rent. An effective property-tax rate of 0.55% and median annual tax of $1,274 contextualize carrying costs, but insurance, repairs, financing, vacancy, and property-specific tax bills are not published, preventing net-yield underwriting.

03Demand & competition

MLS listing evidence adds negotiation risk rather than proof of completed demand: active listings were 1,937, up 17%, median marketing time was 54 days, and 20.01% of listings had price cuts. Inbound tax-return households exceeded outbound households and incoming movers’ average AGI exceeded outgoing movers’, but county-level migration does not identify renter demand by neighborhood. Investors made 363 of 6,138 purchases, or 5.91%, a limited countywide buyer-competition signal. Annual QCEW records show covered workplace employment and average weekly covered-worker wage increased; Manufacturing is the largest disclosed private supersector, not the entire economy.

04Risk & next checks

Inland flood is the dominant hazard, and modeled climate loss equals 0.11% of building value per year; it is a model, not an insurance quote or a property loss estimate. The thesis can fail if flood coverage or drainage makes expenses materially worse, if listing concessions carry into closed transactions, or if county figures conceal weak rental demand in a target area. Next checks are flood-zone and claims records, insurance quotes, comparable leased rents and vacancies, closed sales, and property-level taxes.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Spartanburg County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Greer city*41.5KSpartanburg city38.9KBoiling Springs CDP12.9KValley Falls CDP8.2KLyman town6.5KWoodruff city4.5KDuncan town4.3KSaxon CDP4.1K
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

39 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Greer cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    41,536
  2. 02
    Spartanburg cityIncorporated place
    38,910
  3. 03
    Boiling Springs CDPCensus-designated place
    12,936
  4. 04
    Valley Falls CDPCensus-designated place
    8,239
  5. 05
    Lyman townIncorporated place
    6,547
  6. 06
    Woodruff cityIncorporated place
    4,538
  7. 07
    Duncan townIncorporated place
    4,310
  8. 08
    Saxon CDPCensus-designated place
    4,085
  9. 09
    Southern Shops CDPCensus-designated place
    3,797
  10. 10
    Whitney CDPCensus-designated place
    3,685
  11. 11
    Wellford cityIncorporated place
    3,515
  12. 12
    Arcadia CDPCensus-designated place
    3,426
Show 27 more places
  1. 13
    Inman cityIncorporated place
    3,166
  2. 14
    Hilltop CDPCensus-designated place
    2,950
  3. 15
    Roebuck CDPCensus-designated place
    2,902
  4. 16
    Arkwright CDPCensus-designated place
    2,816
  5. 17
    Landrum cityIncorporated place
    2,620
  6. 18
    Ben Avon CDPCensus-designated place
    2,487
  7. 19
    Pacolet townIncorporated place
    2,419
  8. 20
    Mayo CDPCensus-designated place
    2,305
  9. 21
    Reidville townIncorporated place
    2,194
  10. 22
    Cowpens townIncorporated place
    1,840
  11. 23
    Fairforest CDPCensus-designated place
    1,727
  12. 24
    Camp Croft CDPCensus-designated place
    1,586
  13. 25
    Drayton CDPCensus-designated place
    1,452
  14. 26
    Inman Mills CDPCensus-designated place
    923
  15. 27
    Chesnee cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    896
  16. 28
    Clifton CDPCensus-designated place
    792
  17. 29
    Campobello townIncorporated place
    776
  18. 30
    Startex CDPCensus-designated place
    668
  19. 31
    Converse CDPCensus-designated place
    463
  20. 32
    Pauline CDPCensus-designated place
    447
  21. 33
    Enoree CDPCensus-designated place
    370
  22. 34
    Glenn Springs CDPCensus-designated place
    236
  23. 35
    Glendale CDPCensus-designated place
    211
  24. 36
    Central Pacolet townIncorporated place
    206
  25. 37
    Fingerville CDPCensus-designated place
    204
  26. 38
    Cross Anchor CDPCensus-designated place
    98
  27. 39
    Gramling CDPCensus-designated place
    95

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.108% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.55%

$1,274 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+3,137

10,397 in · 7,260 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$3,620

$61,951 arriving · $58,331 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors5.9%

363 of 6,138 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings1,937▲ 17.0% year over year
Median days on market54▲ 3.3% year over year
Listings price-reduced20.0%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▼ 3.4% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

Same metro

The other counties in Spartanburg, SC

A metro is an average of these. Which side of a county line a property sits on can change the tax bill, the hazard profile and the tenant pool.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Spartanburg County347,852$280k$1,5006.4%inland flooding
Union County26,885$136kn/an/ainland flooding
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Flood insurance, drainage, or prior-loss conditions could make operating costs materially higher than county-level inputs indicate.
  2. MLS price reductions may persist into closed transactions and weaken acquisition value assumptions.
  3. County migration and employment evidence may not translate into renter depth or rent stability in the target submarket.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Is HUD Fair Market Rent evidence of current market asking rent?

No. The HUD two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard; the separately published $1,500 figure is the median asking rent.

How much buyer participation came from investors?

Investors made 363 of 6,138 purchases, representing 5.91% of purchases.

What does the QCEW labor evidence measure?

It measures annual covered employment at workplaces in the county and average weekly wages for covered workers; it is not resident employment or an unemployment measure.