Counties / Massachusetts / Worcester County

Worcester County, MA

FIPS 25027 · population 867,788 · part of Worcester, MA

$507k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
Direct county rent answer

What does rent cost in Worcester County, MA?

The latest county-level Zillow ZORI is $2,185 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

County Zillow ZORI$2,1852026-06 · up 1.8% year over year
County ACS gross rent$1,426ACS 2024 5-year · occupied-renter survey
HUD two-bedroom FMR$1,749FY2026 · administrative standard
HUD Fair Market Rent by bedroom count in Worcester County
BedroomsHUD monthly FMRGeographyMeasurement boundary
Studio$1,206Worcester County, MAHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
1 bedroom$1,410Worcester County, MAHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
2 bedrooms$1,749Worcester County, MAHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
3 bedrooms$2,247Worcester County, MAHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
4 bedrooms$2,637Worcester County, MAHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.

Zillow asking rent, ACS gross rent and HUD FMR describe different housing universes. They remain separate and no metro, city or neighboring-county value replaces missing county evidence.Zillow pulled 2026-07-26 · HUD pulled 2026-07-26

The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$507k
▲ 1.7% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
Median asking rent
$2,185
▲ 1.8% year over year
Zillow ZORI · direct
Gross yield
5.2%
annual rent ÷ price, before costs
derived: rent × 12 ÷ price ✓
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,749
market rent is 1.25x the standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+54.6%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+1.7%FHFA HPI2025+3.4%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-08-02.
Owner-reported value$424k
Surveyed gross rent$1,426
Rent burden 30%+50.6%
Median year built1967
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
5.5%vacant
355,185estimated housing units
Occupied tenure34.2% renter
owner 65.8%renter 34.2%
Structure mix62.8% single-family
Single-family 62.8%20+ units 7.9%Mobile home 0.8%Other 28.6%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs356,041▲ 1.3% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments28,514annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,424▲ 3.3% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorEducation and health services28.7% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+1.3%WEEKLY WAGE+3.3%Education and health services28.7%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2021-2025; latest 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-08-02. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

Resident income

How local income has compounded

BEA per-capita personal income divides all personal income by the county population. It is broader than wages, but it is not household income or a measure of what renters can afford.

Per-capita personal income19692024
Per-capita personal income history for Worcester CountyA line chart of annual BEA per-capita personal income from 1969 through 2024.$0k$40k$80k196919972024$4k$72k
Nominal annual dollars; not adjusted for inflation. A rising line can reflect wage, business-income, transfer-income and investment-income changes together.
Renter affordability

Who carries the heaviest rent burden

HUD CHAS separates renter households by income relative to local HAMFI. Moderate burden means housing costs above 30% through 50% of income; severe burden means more than 50%.

Share of renter households in each income band2018-2022
Renter cost burden by HAMFI income band in Worcester CountyFive horizontal bars show moderate and severe housing cost burden shares among renter households in each HUD income band.0%25%50%75%100%At or below 30% HAMFI33,88571.0% burdened30–50% HAMFI20,15568.3% burdened50–80% HAMFI23,40540.7% burdened80–100% HAMFI10,7959.6% burdenedAbove 100% HAMFI24,2703.2% burdened
Moderate: >30% to 50%Severe: >50%
Each percentage uses HUD’s published subtotal for that income band. For disclosure, HUD keeps 0 as 0, publishes 1–7 households as 4 and rounds 8 or more to the nearest 5. Independently rounded categories can differ from their displayed sum and are not forced into a percentage.
Direct local rental evidence

Recent leases and rental-market liquidity in Worcester County, MA

These Apartment List observations match the exact county Census code 25027. They are kept separate from Zillow asking rent, Census occupied-home rent and wider metro measures.

Direct recent-lease rent history

Monthly overall-rent index; missing observations are not filled from another geography.

$1,567$1,458$1,3482021-082026-07
Recent-lease rent$1,5422026-07 · -1.6% year over year
Rental vacancy5.7%2026-07 · -0.3 percentage points year over year
Time on marketn/an/a
County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Worcester County presents a yield-versus-demand tension: published rent supports a preliminary income screen, while softer listing conditions and net outmigration counsel caution. The county merits investigation by an underwriter who can validate operations and flood exposure, rather than rely on appreciation or rent alone. Zillow’s county observation is June 2026, whereas FHFA’s repeat-transaction HPI observation is 2025; they are different vintages and methods. Zillow price growth was 1.72%, versus FHFA HPI growth of 3.36%. FHFA supports the same positive direction but is not a home value.

02Housing economics

The Zillow median home value is $507,049 against $2,185 in median monthly market asking rent, producing the supplied 5.17% gross yield before costs. It remains a screen because vacancy, concessions, insurance, maintenance, management, and financing are not published. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR is $1,749, but it is a payment standard, not an asking-rent estimate; it cannot replace measured market rent. A 1.28% effective property-tax rate and $5,438 median annual tax make carrying cost material and require parcel-level testing.

03Demand & competition

Demand evidence is mixed. Realtor.com MLS evidence shows median listing prices down 1.91% and visible active listings up 19.63%; those are asking prices and supply, not closed-sale prices or proof of buyer demand. Net migration was -1,359, and the average AGI gap between incoming and outgoing movers was -$5,624, adding demand caution. QCEW covered jobs located in the county rose 1.30%, but that is not resident employment or unemployment. Its largest disclosed private supersector is education and health services. Investors were 784 of 8,643 purchase mortgages, or 9.07%, which is participation, not market dominance.

04Risk & next checks

Risk limits are parcel-sensitive because inland flood is the dominant hazard. The modeled county climate-loss ratio is 0.10% of building value expected lost per year, but that county-level measure cannot price a specific parcel, deductible, interruption, or flood-insurance requirement. Before underwriting, obtain a parcel flood-zone and elevation review, insurance indications, rent-roll and lease comparables, closed-sale comparables, and full operating expenses. The record does not publish vacancy, realized collections, debt terms, renovation needs, or property-level hazard costs; without them, gross yield cannot become net cash flow or a reliable purchase-price conclusion.

County ZIP rental landscape

How asking rent and renter pressure vary inside Worcester County, MA

This view uses 12 direct Zillow ZIP markets matched to Census ZCTAs. Each ZIP is assigned by its largest HUD residential county share; this is not an exhaustive county inventory.

Selected ZIP range$1,603$2,452Zillow asking-rent index
Monthly spread$849highest minus lowest selected ZIP
Observed burden range42.4%56.6%ACS renter households paying 30%+
Renter households covered68,926across the selected ZCTAs
01 · ASKING RENT LADDERDirect ZIP ZORI
Horizontal bars compare Zillow asking-rent indexes across the selected direct-evidence ZIP set.01757$2,45201605$2,41901602$2,40401545$2,39901604$2,21201610$2,15701603$2,09401550$1,92801453$1,92001420$1,79801609$1,78801440$1,603
02 · PRESSURE MATRIXRent × observed burden
Each point is one selected ZIP and ZCTA match. Horizontal position is Zillow asking rent and vertical position is the ACS renter cost-burden share.59.1%54.3%49.5%44.7%39.9%016040160501610014200145301609016020155001545016030175701440Zillow asking-rent index →ACS burden share →
03 · BENCHMARK GAPZORI vs HUD 2BR
Bars show the percentage difference between the Zillow blended asking-rent index and the local HUD two-bedroom standard. Their housing universes differ.01757+140.2%01605+138.3%01602+137.4%01545+137.2%01604+126.5%01610+123.3%01603+119.7%01550+110.2%01453+109.8%01420+102.8%01609+102.2%01440+91.7%
WHAT THE LOCAL DISTRIBUTION SAYS

Within the selected direct-evidence set for Worcester County, Zillow’s June 2026 ZORI—a typical observed asking-rent index—runs from $1,603 in ZIP 01440 to $2,452 in ZIP 01757. The $849 span establishes a meaningful local rent spread, but it is not a countywide inventory of all listings. The decision question is therefore not merely which ZIP has the lowest index; it is whether a particular unit’s bedroom count, lease terms, and quoted total cost fit a household budget when rent, affordability burden, and vacancy measures give distinct signals. The selection contains 12 ZIP/ZCTA matches covering 68,926 renter households, sufficient for comparison but not a complete county map.

These sources should not be merged into a price ladder. The county ZORI is $2,185 and its annual change is 1.75%; within selected ZIP readings that have a year-over-year value, change ranges from -1.38% to 7.53%. ACS 2024 five-year survey estimates describe a different measure, median gross rent: selected ZCTAs range from $1,109 to $2,116, while the county estimate is $1,426. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR is $1,749 throughout this set; it is an administrative standard rather than asking rent. The listed Zillow-to-HUD relationship, 91.7% to 140.2%, is useful for program or budget screening, not a market-value judgment; differences among the series are not discounts or premiums.

ACS burden and vacancy estimates frame a separate trade-off. The county survey estimates that 50.6% of renter households pay 30% or more of income toward rent; across selected ZCTAs, the range is 42.4% to 56.6%. The county vacancy estimate is 5.45%, compared with a selected range of 3.36% to 11.44%. ZIP 01609 pairs the high vacancy endpoint with a 55.6% burden estimate. That combination does not establish why either measure is high, nor does a higher vacancy estimate demonstrate low rent, an available listing, or suitability for a particular household. Read these ACS measures as survey signals alongside—not combined with—the current Zillow index and HUD standard.

Geography and coverage limit precision. Census ZCTAs are statistical areas, not USPS delivery ZIPs, and ZIPs can cross county lines; display assignment uses the county with the largest HUD residential-address share. Each displayed record has a 100% primary-county share, but the direct-evidence selection is only part of 25 eligible matches and is not exhaustive. Before a leasing, assistance, or comparison decision, verify the actual address ZIP and county, unit bedroom count, quoted rent, fees and utilities, lease length, availability date, income qualification, deposit, and any program-specific rent rule. Confirm comparable units and the offer directly: neither ZORI, ACS estimates, nor FMR replaces property-level documentation.

Selected ZIP evidence

Keep each source universe visible

25 ZIP profiles passed the county gate; the 12 with the most renter households are shown.

ZIP / ZCTAZillow asking rentACS gross rentHUD 2BRBurden 30%+VacancyIncome screenHUD county share
01604$2,212$1,584$1,74944.8%8.1%$88k100.0%
01605$2,419$1,421$1,74956.5%6.8%$97k100.0%
01610$2,157$1,523$1,74956.6%8.8%$86k100.0%
01420$1,798$1,222$1,74948.3%6.1%$72k100.0%
01453$1,920$1,354$1,74947.0%4.0%$77k100.0%
01609$1,788$1,275$1,74955.6%11.4%$72k100.0%
01602$2,404$1,590$1,74950.1%4.7%$96k100.0%
01550$1,928$1,256$1,74953.7%4.5%$77k100.0%
01545$2,399$2,116$1,74942.4%4.5%$96k100.0%
01603$2,094$1,372$1,74952.9%5.1%$84k100.0%
01757$2,452$1,909$1,74955.8%3.4%$98k100.0%
01440$1,603$1,109$1,74947.3%5.7%$64k100.0%
READ BEFORE USING

Zillow ZORI is a typical observed asking-rent index for the stated period, not a catalog of every available unit or a contract-rent measure. It may not match the bedroom mix, utilities, concessions, fees, or lease conditions of a specific property.

ACS county and ZCTA figures are five-year survey estimates, and ZCTAs do not equal USPS delivery ZIPs. The selected direct-evidence set is not exhaustive; ZIP assignment follows the largest HUD residential-address county share, even where a ZIP may cross county boundaries.

SOURCE LEDGERCensus ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stockACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30Census ACS five-year — ZCTA housing and incomeACS 2024 5-year ZCTA · pulled 2026-08-08HUD Fair Market Rents — Section 8 standardFY2026 FMR · pulled 2026-07-26HUD-USPS ZIP-to-county residential-address crosswalkHUD-USPS 2026Q1 · pulled 2026-08-09Zillow ZHVI and ZORI — county values and rentscounty ZHVI/ZORI 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-26Zillow ZORI — ZIP market rentsZORI ZIP 2026-06 · pulled 2026-08-08
Cities & communities

Where people live within Worcester County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Worcester city207.1KLeominster city43.9KFitchburg city41.8KMilford CDP27.7KGardner city21.1KSouthbridge Town city17.9KWebster CDP12.2KAthol CDP8.8K
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

35 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Worcester cityIncorporated place
    207,055
  2. 02
    Leominster cityIncorporated place
    43,909
  3. 03
    Fitchburg cityIncorporated place
    41,798
  4. 04
    Milford CDPCensus-designated place
    27,731
  5. 05
    Gardner cityIncorporated place
    21,148
  6. 06
    Southbridge Town cityIncorporated place
    17,928
  7. 07
    Webster CDPCensus-designated place
    12,228
  8. 08
    Athol CDPCensus-designated place
    8,801
  9. 09
    Clinton CDPCensus-designated place
    7,658
  10. 10
    Whitinsville CDPCensus-designated place
    7,115
  11. 11
    Northborough CDPCensus-designated place
    6,392
  12. 12
    Oxford CDPCensus-designated place
    5,671
Show 23 more places
  1. 13
    Spencer CDPCensus-designated place
    5,661
  2. 14
    Westborough CDPCensus-designated place
    4,699
  3. 15
    Hopedale CDPCensus-designated place
    4,360
  4. 16
    Winchendon CDPCensus-designated place
    4,331
  5. 17
    Upton CDPCensus-designated place
    3,234
  6. 18
    Cordaville CDPCensus-designated place
    2,989
  7. 19
    East Douglas CDPCensus-designated place
    2,987
  8. 20
    North Brookfield CDPCensus-designated place
    2,659
  9. 21
    Baldwinville CDPCensus-designated place
    2,528
  10. 22
    Sturbridge CDPCensus-designated place
    2,443
  11. 23
    Fiskdale CDPCensus-designated place
    2,311
  12. 24
    South Lancaster CDPCensus-designated place
    2,177
  13. 25
    Lunenburg CDPCensus-designated place
    2,057
  14. 26
    Rutland CDPCensus-designated place
    2,019
  15. 27
    Devens CDPCensus-designated place · spans 2 counties
    1,723
  16. 28
    West Brookfield CDPCensus-designated place
    1,563
  17. 29
    South Ashburnham CDPCensus-designated place
    1,500
  18. 30
    East Brookfield CDPCensus-designated place
    1,445
  19. 31
    Warren CDPCensus-designated place
    1,426
  20. 32
    Brookfield CDPCensus-designated place
    828
  21. 33
    Barre CDPCensus-designated place
    673
  22. 34
    West Warren CDPCensus-designated place
    613
  23. 35
    Petersham CDPCensus-designated place
    312

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.098% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.28%

$5,438 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-1,359

15,603 in · 16,962 out

Arriving vs leaving income−$5,624

$77,931 arriving · $83,555 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors9.1%

784 of 8,643 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings1,368▲ 19.6% year over year
Median days on market35▲ 42.9% year over year
Listings price-reduced14.9%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▼ 1.9% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. The published gross yield could shrink if realized rent, occupancy, concessions, or operating costs differ from the asking-rent screen.
  2. Net outmigration and lower average income among incoming movers could weaken tenant or buyer demand; QCEW cannot resolve resident-income demand.
  3. A parcel’s inland-flood insurance, deductible, repair, or interruption cost could exceed the modeled county-level loss ratio.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

What is the rent measure, and can HUD FMR substitute for it?

The record provides median monthly market asking rent. HUD FMR is a two-bedroom payment standard, not an estimate of asking rent, so it should not substitute for the market measure.

Does the record establish strong buyer demand?

No. Realtor.com supplies MLS listing-market evidence rather than closed-sale demand, while migration is negative. The record therefore does not establish strong buyer demand.

What missing evidence blocks a net-cash-flow conclusion?

The record does not publish vacancy, realized collections, operating expenses, financing terms, renovation needs, or property-level flood and insurance costs.