States / Massachusetts
State rental intelligence

Massachusetts rental market data

A source-traced view across 6 metro markets and 14 counties. State figures below are labelled medians and totals—not a made-up statewide investment score.

6/6 metros scored14/14 counties with FEMA risk13 sources used in this analysis
Median scored metro50.5out of 100 · 6 measured metros
Massachusetts identity diorama showing regional landscape, cities, housing, and infrastructure
Median metro home value$510kmedian across published metro values
Median metro rent$2,171monthly · published metro values
Median gross yield5.3%annual rent ÷ price · before costs
Median job trend▼ 0.3%trailing 12-month metro employment
State research brief

Median asking-rent growth exceeded median home-value growth by 0.9 percentage points across the measured metros even as median job growth and county migration were negative.

Updated 2026-07-31 · evidence current to the releases listed below.

Across six measured metros, median asking-rent growth was 3.0% while median home-value growth was 2.0%. That revenue signal conflicts with a 0.3% decline in median metro employment and net county migration of negative 15,378 people, or negative 2.2 per 1,000 residents.

The demand picture is not uniformly weak: Barnstable Town recorded 2.5% job growth and 3.0% rent growth. Screening should therefore require local employment support, achievable rent evidence and tenant-capacity checks rather than relying on the statewide direction. The packet cannot establish neighborhood demand, achieved lease rents, property expenses, net yield, insurance cost or parcel-level hazard exposure.

01

Six-metro median rent growth of 3.0% versus 2.0% value growth → separate achievable-rent underwriting from appreciation assumptions.

02

Net county migration of negative 15,378 and median metro job growth of negative 0.3% → require local demand evidence rather than relying on rent momentum alone.

03

Median renter burden of 54.0% and median market rent at 118.3% of Fair Market Rent → stress-test tenant capacity and collection assumptions.

04

Vacancy above 36.0% in Barnstable County, Dukes County and Nantucket County alongside low renter shares and high single-family shares → do not read total vacancy as available long-term rental supply.

05

Pittsfield's 4.0 months of supply and 97.7% sale-to-list ratio versus Springfield's 1.9 months and 102.2% → use locality-specific resale assumptions.

01
Price and rent momentum

Rent growth leads value growth, but entry price still controls yield

The six-metro median shows rents rising 3.0% against 2.0% home-value growth, a 0.9 percentage-point spread. The 10th-to-90th percentile range was 2.3% to 3.9% for rents and 1.4% to 3.1% for values, so both measures remained positive through those distribution bands.

Springfield paired 4.2% rent growth with 3.0% value growth, a calculated gap of 1.2 percentage points, and a 6.0% gross yield. Barnstable Town paired 3.0% rent growth with 1.1% value growth, a calculated gap of 1.9 points, but its gross yield was only 4.2%. Faster rent growth therefore does not by itself identify the stronger income entry point.

Evidence: Zillow ZHVI — metro home values · Zillow ZORI — metro market rents

02
Employment and household movement

Population outflow and soft median employment challenge the rent signal

Across 14 counties, 182,377 people moved in and 197,755 moved out, producing net migration of negative 15,378. The corresponding rate was negative 2.2 per 1,000 residents. Mover income provided a modest counter-signal: aggregate incoming adjusted gross income exceeded outgoing adjusted gross income by $5,069.

Employment was also uneven. Median year-over-year job growth across six metros was negative 0.3%, with a 10th-to-90th percentile range of negative 0.6% to 1.2%. Barnstable Town was the clear named counter-signal at 2.5%, while Worcester was negative 0.03% and Springfield was negative 0.25%. Local employment evidence is therefore necessary before treating rent growth as durable demand support.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — population · BLS CES — payroll employment · BLS LAUS — resident employment · IRS SOI — county migration and mover income

03
Housing stock and tenant conditions

High coastal vacancy does not translate cleanly into long-term rental slack

The median vacancy rate across 14 counties was 6.9%, but the 90th percentile reached 51.1%. Nantucket County had 58.3% vacancy, 28.2% renter share and 87.2% single-family share. Dukes County had 57.5% vacancy, 17.9% renter share and 93.2% single-family share; Barnstable County had 36.4% vacancy, 18.9% renter share and 86.7% single-family share. These stock profiles mean total vacancy should not be treated as available long-term rental inventory.

Tenant pressure remains material despite those high-vacancy counties. The county median share of renters paying at least 30% of income toward rent was 54.0%, with a 10th-to-90th percentile range of 48.2% to 57.2%. Barnstable County reached 59.7%. Screening should separate stock vacancy from rentable supply and test proposed rents against local household capacity.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock

04
Entry cost and affordability

Springfield offers the strongest named gross yield with the tightest income burden

Median gross yield across six metros was 5.3%, with a 10th-to-90th percentile range of 4.6% to 5.7%. Median rent consumed 31.0% of median household income, while the median price-to-income ratio was 5.73. Market rent was 118.3% of the two-bedroom Fair Market Rent at the median, ranging from 109.3% to 132.3% across the same percentile band.

Among the three named yield markets, Springfield had the highest gross yield at 6.0%, but also the highest rent-to-income ratio at 32.1%. Pittsfield and Worcester each showed 5.3% gross yield, with rent-to-income ratios of 27.9% and 27.1%, respectively. Springfield's revenue-to-price relationship is stronger before expenses, but its household-income measure leaves less apparent room for rent increases.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — household income · HUD Fair Market Rents — Section 8 standard · Zillow ZHVI — metro home values · Zillow ZORI — metro market rents

05
Supply and resale conditions

Pittsfield has a visibly softer resale path than Springfield

Across five metros with resale measures, median supply was 2.5 months, median marketing time was 21 days, median sale-to-list was 100.9% and the median price-drop share was 23.5%. Pittsfield was softer than that center: 4.0 months of supply, 41 days on market and a 97.7% sale-to-list ratio. Springfield showed 1.9 months, 21 days and 102.2%, respectively.

The indicators do not all point in the same direction. Springfield's price-drop share was 23.5%, above Pittsfield's 21.8%, despite Springfield's tighter inventory and stronger sale-to-list result. Permitting also varied across six metros, with the 10th-to-90th percentile rate spanning 0.89 to 2.35 permitted units per 1,000 residents. Permits do not identify unit type, completion timing or the amount that will enter the rental market, so exit and competition assumptions must remain metro-specific.

Evidence: Census Building Permits Survey — permitted units · Redfin Data Center — inventory, days on market, and price cuts

06
Physical risk and property tax

Nantucket's higher measured loss ratio comes with a lower tax rate

In the mutually exclusive county leading-hazard classification, inland flood was the top label for 13 counties and hurricane for one. The median FEMA climate-loss ratio across 14 counties was 0.107%, with a 10th-to-90th percentile range of 0.088% to 0.164%. These are county screening measures, not evidence that a particular parcel has the leading hazard or the countywide loss ratio.

Effective property-tax rates ranged from 0.55% at the 10th percentile to 1.43% at the 90th, with a 1.06% median and median tax of $5,123. Nantucket County paired a 0.357% climate-loss ratio with a 0.25% tax rate and $3,974 median tax. Hampden County paired a lower 0.129% loss ratio with a higher 1.49% tax rate and $4,455 median tax. Neither pairing captures insurance premiums, property condition or parcel-level mitigation.

Evidence: FEMA National Risk Index — hazard loss ratios · Census ACS 5-year — effective property tax

Evidence selected for Massachusetts

The ranges behind the analysis

Each row keeps its own unit and shows the measured 10th percentile, median and 90th percentile. A single-value row is labelled directly.

Price and rent momentumAre home values and asking rents moving together or separating?
10th pct.median90th pct.Home-value change1.4%2.0%3.1%Asking-rent change2.3%3.0%3.9%Rent minus price0.9%
Employment and household movementDo jobs, household movement and mover income point in the same direction?
10th pct.median90th pct.Job change-0.6%-0.3%1.2%Net migration / 1k-2.2Net household movement-15,378
Housing stock and tenant conditionsWhat kind of housing exists, how much is vacant and how burdened are renters?
10th pct.median90th pct.Vacancy rate4.5%6.9%51.1%Renter share20.0%31.7%38.4%Rent burden 30%+48.2%54.0%57.2%Single-family share54.3%64.0%87.0%
Shape of the state

Distribution before conclusion

A statewide median can hide a wide spread. These SVG charts render at build time and carry no chart library or browser-side data request.

Metro score distribution6 scored metros · median 50.5
00–19120–39440–59160–79080–100
County evidence coverageEvery gap stays visible as missing—not estimated
86%12/14Rent100%14/14Climate100%14/14Migration
Highest measured metro gross yieldsscreening metric only · before expenses and financing
Springfield6.0%Worcester5.3%Pittsfield5.3%Boston5.2%Providence4.9%Barnstable Town4.2%
Metro leaderboard

Markets touching Massachusetts

Multi-state CBSAs appear in every member state. Score is still a metro score; no value is reweighted into a statewide ranking.

#MetroScorePriceRentYieldJobs
1Barnstable Town, MA64$773k$2,7254.2%▲ 2.5%
2Providence, RI52$532k$2,1724.9%▼ 0.3%
3Springfield, MA51$382k$1,9046.0%▼ 0.3%
4Worcester, MA50$487k$2,1705.3%▼ 0.0%
5Pittsfield, MA40$398k$1,7705.3%▼ 0.3%
6Boston, MA35$747k$3,2105.2%▼ 0.8%
Below the metro line

Largest counties in Massachusetts

County figures join on the five-digit FIPS code. The table uses measured local values and prints “n/a” wherever a publisher has no record.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Middlesex County, MA1,638,365$833k$3,2604.7%inland flooding
Worcester County, MA867,788$507k$2,1855.2%inland flooding
Essex County, MA813,054$737k$2,6324.3%inland flooding
Suffolk County, MA785,121$763k$3,4235.4%inland flooding
Norfolk County, MA730,082$786k$2,9704.5%inland flooding
Bristol County, MA582,270$557k$2,0404.4%inland flooding
Plymouth County, MA535,075$662k$2,7545.0%inland flooding
Hampden County, MA462,815$359k$1,7735.9%inland flooding
Barnstable County, MA231,668$773k$2,7254.2%inland flooding
Hampshire County, MA162,028$461k$2,2395.8%inland flooding
Berkshire County, MA129,430$398k$1,7705.3%inland flooding
Franklin County, MA70,944$380k$1,7695.6%inland flooding
County yield sample12/14counties have the rent needed to compute yield
Statewide net migration−15,378IRS tax-return households summed across counties
Median investor share9.6%among counties with HMDA purchase records
Sources used in this analysis

Measured releases, not a global source count

Only sources supporting the selected evidence modules are listed here.

Bear case

What can break the thesis

  1. Massachusetts coverage is limited to six metros and 14 counties; county rent and gross-yield measures cover only 12 counties, while metro resale measures cover five markets, so the distributions do not establish conditions in every locality.
  2. Migration, housing-stock, employment, rent and listing measures use different reference periods, which prevents treating their alignment as simultaneous or causal.
  3. Asking-rent indices and gross yields do not establish achieved lease rents, concessions, vacancy losses, operating expenses, financing costs or net operating income.
  4. County vacancy includes housing outside the available long-term rental pool, so it can overstate usable leasing supply in Barnstable County, Dukes County and Nantucket County.
  5. County FEMA ratios and leading-hazard labels omit parcel characteristics and insurance quotes; lower measured property tax also does not offset unmeasured physical-risk costs.
Investor questions

Before underwriting a property

Do rising rents show uniformly strong rental demand?

No. Median rent growth was 3.0%, but median metro job growth was negative 0.3% and county migration totaled negative 15,378. Barnstable Town's 2.5% job growth is a genuine local counter-signal.

Which named metro has the strongest gross-yield screen?

Springfield at 6.0%, compared with 5.3% in Pittsfield and Worcester. Springfield also had the highest rent-to-income ratio of the three at 32.1%, so the yield advantage comes with a tighter affordability measure.

Can high county vacancy be treated as available rental inventory?

No. Nantucket County, Dukes County and Barnstable County combined very high vacancy with renter shares below 29.0% and single-family shares above 86.0%. The packet does not identify how much vacant stock is available for long-term leasing.

Where does the measured resale exit look softer?

Pittsfield had 4.0 months of supply, 41 days on market and a 97.7% sale-to-list ratio, compared with Springfield's 1.9 months, 21 days and 102.2%.

Does the FEMA evidence establish a property's hazard exposure?

No. It supplies county climate-loss ratios and one mutually exclusive leading-hazard label per county. Parcel exposure, mitigation, condition and insurance cost remain unmeasured.