States / Massachusetts
State rental intelligence

Massachusetts rental market data

A source-traced view across 6 metro markets and 14 counties. State figures below are labelled medians and totals—not a made-up statewide investment score.

6/6 metros scored14/14 counties with FEMA risk14 sources used in this analysis
Median scored metro50.5out of 100 · 6 measured metros
Massachusetts identity diorama showing regional landscape, cities, housing, and infrastructure
Median metro home value$510kmedian across published metro values
Median metro rent$2,171monthly · published metro values
Median gross yield5.3%annual rent ÷ price · before costs
Median job trend▼ 0.3%trailing 12-month metro employment
Direct monthly rental evidence

Massachusetts rent market dynamics

Apartment List measures recent leases, rental vacancy and listing time separately. These figures do not replace Zillow, Census or Realtor measures elsewhere on this page.

Recent-lease rent$2,0542026-07 · ▲ 0.0% year over year
Rental Vacancy Index6.6%2026-07 · +1.0 pp in 12 months
Time on market26 days2026-07 · +1 days in 12 months
US recent-lease rent$1,3882026-07 · ▼ 1.1% year over year
Rent and rental vacancy through timesolid state series · dashed national series · no interpolation across missing observations
Recent-lease rent$2,172$1,561$950Rental Vacancy Index8.9%6.1%3.3%2017-012021-102026-07MassachusettsUnited States
State research brief

Flat recent-lease rent and rising rental vacancy conflict with continued Zillow rent growth across measured metros, making local lease performance more useful than a statewide growth assumption.

Updated 2026-08-08 · evidence current to the releases listed below.

Massachusetts Apartment List recent-lease rent was $2,054, a calculated $1 increase from $2,053 a year earlier. Its separate Vacancy Index rose from 5.6% to 6.6%, while its separate time-on-market measure lengthened from 24.7 to 25.7 days. Those are signs of easing, but the counter-signal is that current vacancy remained 0.57 percentage points below the national measure and time on market was 4.3 days shorter.

Other measured layers are less reassuring. Zillow rent growth across six metros had a 3.0% median, but the median employment change was -0.26%; all 14 counties together recorded net migration of -15,378. Meanwhile, the median county measure shows 54.0% of renters spending at least 30% of income on rent. Screening should therefore distinguish lease-level pricing power from nominal rent growth and test affordability, demand and operating costs by locality. The packet does not establish one statewide investment result.

01

Apartment List rent rose 0.05% while its separate vacancy and time-on-market measures increased → avoid relying on broad statewide rent growth without local lease evidence

02

Median Zillow metro rent growth of 3.0% exceeded median home-value growth of 2.0% → screen for local rent-value separation while keeping the Zillow and Apartment List series distinct

03

Net migration of -15,378 and a -0.26% median metro employment change → stress-test tenant-demand assumptions outside locally stronger markets

04

A 54.0% median county renter-burden measure → test whether proposed rents fit local household incomes rather than treating observed rent growth as unlimited pricing power

05

Measured metro gross yields ranged from 4.6% to 5.7% between the 10th and 90th percentiles → entry pricing materially changes the initial income screen

01
Direct state rental dynamics

Recent-lease rent stalled even as rental listings took longer to clear

The direct Apartment List recent-lease rent measure increased only 0.05% to $2,054. Its separate Vacancy Index rose 0.96 percentage points to 6.6%, and its separate time-on-market series increased by 1.0 day to 25.7 days. Read separately, all three measures point away from broad statewide pricing momentum.

Measured liquidity was still firmer than the national benchmarks in the packet: vacancy was 0.57 percentage points lower and time on market was 4.3 days shorter. The state series does not identify which metro, property type or rent band produced the changes, so it cannot support the same rent assumption for every Massachusetts asset.

Evidence: Apartment List Rent Estimates — recent-lease rent index · Apartment List Time on Market — listing liquidity · Apartment List Vacancy Index — rental vacancy

02
Price and rent momentum

Zillow rent growth still outran home-value growth in the measured metros

Across six measured metros, median Zillow rent growth was 3.0%, compared with 2.0% median home-value growth. The supplied difference was 0.94 percentage points. Metro rent growth ranged from 2.3% at the 10th percentile to 3.9% at the 90th, while home-value growth ranged from 1.4% to 3.1%.

Springfield, MA recorded 4.2% rent growth and 3.0% home-value growth. Barnstable Town, MA showed a wider split, with rent up 3.0% and value up 1.1%. This is a genuine counter-signal to the flat Apartment List state result, not a combined estimate: Zillow metro rents and Apartment List recent-lease rent have different definitions and geographic coverage.

Evidence: Zillow ZHVI — metro home values · Zillow ZORI — metro market rents

03
Employment and household movement

Net out-migration and a negative median job change weaken the demand backdrop

Across all 14 counties, 182,377 movers entered and 197,755 left, producing net migration of -15,378, or -2.2 per 1,000 residents. The migration measure therefore does not reinforce a broad demand-growth thesis.

Employment was also uneven across six measured metros: the median year-over-year change was -0.26%, with a range from -0.6% at the 10th percentile to 1.2% at the 90th. Barnstable Town, MA was the clear counter-signal among the named markets at 2.5% growth, while Worcester, MA was at -0.03% and Springfield, MA at -0.25%. These figures support local demand screening but do not establish that migration caused employment or rent changes.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — population · BLS CES — payroll employment · BLS LAUS — resident employment · IRS SOI — county migration and mover income

04
Housing stock and tenant conditions

High coastal vacancy coexists with heavy renter burden

Across 14 counties, the median county ACS vacancy rate was 6.9%, but the 90th-percentile value reached 51.1%. At the same time, the median county measure shows 54.0% of renters burdened by housing costs, with a 48.2% to 57.2% 10th-to-90th-percentile range. The median county measure for year built was 1964, adding an older-stock consideration to operating-cost screens.

Barnstable County illustrates why vacancy and tenant pressure cannot be treated as opposites: its ACS vacancy rate was 36.4%, yet 59.7% of renters were burdened. Nantucket County had 58.3% vacancy and 87.2% single-family stock; Dukes County had 57.5% vacancy and 93.2% single-family stock. ACS housing-unit vacancy is not the Apartment List Vacancy Index and does not establish how many units are available for long-term tenants.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock

05
Entry cost and affordability

Springfield pairs a 6.0% gross yield with greater rent-to-income pressure

Across six metros, the median gross yield was 5.3%, with a 4.6% to 5.7% 10th-to-90th-percentile range. The median rent-to-income measure was 31.0%, showing that nominal yield and tenant affordability need to be screened together.

Springfield, MA combined a $381,545 value, $1,904 monthly rent and 6.0% gross yield, but its rent-to-income measure was 32.1%. Pittsfield, MA and Worcester, MA each showed 5.3% gross yield, with rent-to-income measures of 27.9% and 27.1%, respectively. These are gross yield ratios rather than cap rates; they do not deduct vacancy, taxes, insurance, maintenance or capital spending.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — household income and gross rent · HUD Fair Market Rents — Section 8 standard · Zillow ZHVI — metro home values · Zillow ZORI — metro market rents

06
Physical risk and property tax

Nantucket's hazard-loss ratio stands above the county distribution while tax pressure peaks elsewhere

Across 14 counties, the median FEMA climate-loss ratio was 0.11% and the 90th-percentile value was 0.16%. Nantucket County measured 0.36%, alongside a 0.25% effective property-tax rate and $3,974 median tax. Tax pressure was concentrated elsewhere: the county tax-rate distribution ran from 0.55% at the 10th percentile to 1.43% at the 90th, and Hampden County measured 1.49% with a $4,455 median tax.

In the FEMA classification, inland flood was the mutually exclusive leading-hazard label for 13 counties and hurricane for 1. These are county-level top-hazard labels, not overlapping hazard counts or evidence that a particular parcel is exposed. They support location screening but cannot replace parcel-level hazard, insurance and building-condition review.

Evidence: FEMA National Risk Index — hazard loss ratios · Census ACS 5-year — effective property tax

State ZIP rental intelligence

How direct rental evidence varies inside Massachusetts

The distribution uses 21 current published ZIP reports across 12 cities and 5 counties. Twelve measured counter-signals are shown below; this is not a statewide neighborhood ranking.

Published ZIP rent range$2,212$3,842full direct-ZORI report cohort
Median rent / income34.8%annual asking rent ÷ ACS household income
Median one-year growth▲ 2.6%exact direct Zillow endpoints
Renter households covered211,473across published ZCTA matches
01 · RENT DISPERSIONRepresentative direct ZIP ZORI
Horizontal bars compare direct Zillow asking-rent indexes for the twelve representative published ZIP reports.02118$3,84202141$3,67602119$3,54602130$3,28502128$3,19902135$3,11702148$2,80302169$2,73302150$2,62801702$2,33401852$2,27201604$2,212
02 · AFFORDABILITY PRESSURERent / income × observed burden
Horizontal position is annual Zillow asking rent divided by ACS median household income. Vertical position is the ACS share of renter households paying thirty percent or more.60.3%54.5%48.7%43.0%37.2%021690213502148021280215002130021180160401702021190185202141Annual asking rent / ACS household income →ACS renter burden share →
03 · PATH QUALITYOne-year growth × variability
Each point compares exact one-year Zillow asking-rent growth with annualized variability from the direct monthly series.6.2%5.0%3.8%2.6%1.4%021690213502148021280215002130021180160401702021190185202141Exact one-year Zillow rent growth →Annualized monthly variability →
WHAT THE STATE DISTRIBUTION SAYS

At the latest reading, the observed Zillow ZORI asking-rent index across Massachusetts’s 21 current published direct-evidence ZIP reports runs from $2,212 to $3,842, a $1,630 range around a $3,037 median. The range makes a statewide “typical rent” an incomplete starting point: the Worcester report anchors the low end of the shown reports while a Boston report anchors the high end. The practical question is therefore not simply which area has the lowest current index, but how far a local asking-rent level, household-income screen, and recent price path depart from the report-set middle. The full distribution is limited to currently published direct-evidence reports and does not represent every ZIP, neighborhood, or rental property.

Affordability screens and renter burden describe related but noninterchangeable evidence. Current ZORI asking rent divided by ACS median household income ranges from 30.0% in 02130 to 87.8% in 02119, with a 34.8% median; the corresponding annual income targets at a 30% share are $131,400 and $141,840. By contrast, the ACS share of renter households spending 30% or more of income on gross rent ranges from 39.7% to 57.8%, with a 48.6% median. A current asking-rent-to-income calculation is an illustrative market-income screen, whereas the burden statistic summarizes surveyed renter households’ gross-rent outcomes. Income, gross rent, renter-household counts, and burden are ACS 2024 five-year estimates for Census ZCTAs, statistical areas that are not identical to USPS delivery ZIPs; neither measure should be substituted for the other.

Recent momentum also should not be read as stability. In the direct monthly ZORI histories, one-year growth ranges from a 4.5% decline in Framingham to 4.5% growth in Boston, while the report-set median is 2.6% growth. Annualized volatility instead ranges from 2.4% to 5.2%, with a 3.2% median, quantifying variation in the monthly series rather than its direction. The counter-signal is apparent: the highest-volatility report is not the one with the strongest one-year growth. Worcester, for example, pairs above-median growth with below-median volatility. The historical series also record maximum drawdowns, but those backward-looking moves, category labels, and one-year rates do not forecast subsequent rents.

HUD provides a different benchmark: its two-bedroom FMR/SAFMR standard is $1,749 for the Worcester report and $2,311 for many other shown reports. Current ZORI-to-HUD comparisons run from 0.98× in Lowell to 1.66× in the high-end Boston report, with a 1.31× distribution median. This locates an asking-rent index relative to an administrative two-bedroom standard; it does not equate that standard with a property-level asking rent. It does not establish a specific unit’s rent, bedroom count, eligibility, or lease terms. Nor does the statewide distribution cover every Massachusetts ZIP, neighborhood, or rental property; it covers only reports with currently published direct evidence. ZIP- and ZCTA-based benchmarks therefore cannot substitute for an individual listing and lease review.

Representative direct evidence

Twelve useful contrasts, every one traceable

The statewide summaries use all 21 qualifying reports. The table preserves measured extremes in rent, affordability, burden, momentum, volatility and the HUD benchmark gap.

ZIP reportPlaceZillow rent1Y growthRent / incomeBurden 30%+VariabilityHUD 2BR gap
02169Quincy$2,733▲ 2.6%34.1%47.0%2.5%▲ 118.3%
02135Boston$3,117▲ 2.6%41.2%46.0%2.4%▲ 134.9%
02148Malden$2,803▼ 0.4%33.4%48.6%3.1%▲ 121.3%
02128Boston$3,199▲ 3.5%42.6%47.0%3.2%▲ 138.4%
02150Chelsea$2,628▲ 2.7%43.7%57.8%3.7%▲ 113.7%
02130Boston$3,285▲ 1.3%30.0%42.8%3.3%▲ 142.1%
02118Boston$3,842▲ 4.5%46.9%51.7%3.3%▲ 166.2%
01604Worcester$2,212▲ 4.1%36.1%44.8%2.5%▲ 126.5%
01702Framingham$2,334▼ 4.5%34.0%52.3%3.9%▲ 101.0%
02119Boston$3,546▲ 3.1%87.8%57.1%5.2%▲ 153.4%
01852Lowell$2,272▲ 2.5%33.7%48.8%2.8%▲ 98.3%
02141Cambridge$3,676▲ 1.5%34.9%39.7%3.7%▲ 159.1%
READ BEFORE USING

Zillow ZORI is an observed asking-rent index, whereas ACS housing, income, and burden values are 2024 five-year survey estimates for ZCTAs. ZCTAs are statistical areas rather than USPS delivery ZIPs, so matching labels do not make periods, populations, or geographies identical.

HUD FMR/SAFMR is an administrative bedroom standard rather than an observed property asking rent. The statewide distribution contains only ZIP reports with current published direct evidence; it does not enumerate every ZIP, neighborhood, rental property, unit type, listing, or lease arrangement in Massachusetts.

SOURCE LEDGERCensus ACS five-year — ZCTA housing and incomeACS 2024 5-year ZCTA · pulled 2026-08-08HUD USPS crosswalk and Small Area FMRs — ZIP rent fallbackZIP-CBSA 2025Q4 + SAFMR FY2026 · pulled 2026-07-26Zillow ZORI — ZIP market rentsZORI ZIP 2026-06 · pulled 2026-08-08
Evidence selected for Massachusetts

The ranges behind the analysis

Each row keeps its own unit and shows the measured 10th percentile, median and 90th percentile. A single-value row is labelled directly.

Price and rent momentumAre home values and asking rents moving together or separating?
10th pct.median90th pct.Home-value change1.4%2.0%3.1%Asking-rent change2.3%3.0%3.9%Rent minus price0.9%
Employment and household movementDo jobs, household movement and mover income point in the same direction?
10th pct.median90th pct.Job change-0.6%-0.3%1.2%Net migration / 1k-2.2Net household movement-15,378
Housing stock and tenant conditionsWhat kind of housing exists, how much is vacant and how burdened are renters?
10th pct.median90th pct.Vacancy rate4.5%6.9%51.1%Renter share20.0%31.7%38.4%Rent burden 30%+48.2%54.0%57.2%Single-family share54.3%64.0%87.0%
Shape of the state

Distribution before conclusion

A statewide median can hide a wide spread. These SVG charts render at build time and carry no chart library or browser-side data request.

Metro score distribution6 scored metros · median 50.5
00–19120–39440–59160–79080–100
County evidence coverageEvery gap stays visible as missing—not estimated
86%12/14Rent100%14/14Climate100%14/14Migration
Highest measured metro gross yieldsscreening metric only · before expenses and financing
Springfield6.0%Worcester5.3%Pittsfield5.3%Boston5.2%Providence4.9%Barnstable Town4.2%
Metro leaderboard

Markets touching Massachusetts

Multi-state CBSAs appear in every member state. Score is still a metro score; no value is reweighted into a statewide ranking.

#MetroScorePriceRentYieldJobs
1Barnstable Town, MA64$773k$2,7254.2%▲ 2.5%
2Providence, RI52$532k$2,1724.9%▼ 0.3%
3Springfield, MA51$382k$1,9046.0%▼ 0.3%
4Worcester, MA50$487k$2,1705.3%▼ 0.0%
5Pittsfield, MA40$398k$1,7705.3%▼ 0.3%
6Boston, MA35$747k$3,2105.2%▼ 0.8%
Below the metro line

Largest counties in Massachusetts

County figures join on the five-digit FIPS code. The table uses measured local values and prints “n/a” wherever a publisher has no record.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Middlesex County, MA1,638,365$833k$3,2604.7%inland flooding
Worcester County, MA867,788$507k$2,1855.2%inland flooding
Essex County, MA813,054$737k$2,6324.3%inland flooding
Suffolk County, MA785,121$763k$3,4235.4%inland flooding
Norfolk County, MA730,082$786k$2,9704.5%inland flooding
Bristol County, MA582,270$557k$2,0404.4%inland flooding
Plymouth County, MA535,075$662k$2,7545.0%inland flooding
Hampden County, MA462,815$359k$1,7735.9%inland flooding
Barnstable County, MA231,668$773k$2,7254.2%inland flooding
Hampshire County, MA162,028$461k$2,2395.8%inland flooding
Berkshire County, MA129,430$398k$1,7705.3%inland flooding
Franklin County, MA70,944$380k$1,7695.6%inland flooding
County yield sample12/14counties have the rent needed to compute yield
Statewide net migration−15,378IRS tax-return households summed across counties
Median investor share9.6%among counties with HMDA purchase records
Bear case

What can break the thesis

  1. Apartment List recent-lease rent, its Vacancy Index, its time-on-market series, Zillow rents and ACS vacancy have different definitions and coverage; combining them into one liquidity metric would be misleading.
  2. The direct state rental series does not provide metro, property-type or rent-band attribution, leaving a Massachusetts-specific gap between the state result and individual assets.
  3. The migration release covers an earlier period than the current rent and employment measures, so timing differences may weaken the apparent demand alignment.
  4. Gross yield omits taxes, insurance, vacancy, maintenance and capital spending; older county housing stock and uneven tax rates may materially reduce net income.
  5. FEMA top-hazard labels and county loss ratios do not establish parcel exposure, building resilience, insurability or the premium attached to a specific property.
Investor questions

Before underwriting a property

Does the packet establish that Massachusetts rentals are broadly oversupplied?

No. Apartment List vacancy rose to 6.6% and time on market reached 25.7 days, but vacancy remained 0.57 percentage points below the national measure and listings cleared 4.3 days faster. The state series cannot identify local oversupply.

Why does Zillow show rent growth when Apartment List rent is nearly flat?

They are separate measures with different definitions and geography. Zillow's six-metro rent series had 3.0% median growth, while Apartment List's statewide recent-lease measure rose 0.05%; the packet does not provide a basis for merging them.

Do jobs and household movement support a broad demand thesis?

Not broadly. The 14 counties recorded net migration of -15,378, and the six-metro employment median was -0.26%. Barnstable Town, MA was a local counter-signal with 2.5% job growth.

Which named market offers the strongest measured gross-yield signal?

Springfield, MA shows 6.0% gross yield on a $381,545 value and $1,904 monthly rent. Its 32.1% rent-to-income measure adds an affordability constraint, and the yield is before operating expenses.

Can high vacancy in Nantucket County or Dukes County be treated as long-term rental availability?

No. Their ACS vacancy rates were 58.3% and 57.5%, alongside single-family shares of 87.2% and 93.2%. Those housing-stock measures do not identify units available to long-term tenants or substitute for rental listing vacancy.