Counties / Massachusetts / Essex County

Essex County, MA

FIPS 25009 · population 813,054 · part of Boston, MA

$737k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
Direct county rent answer

What does rent cost in Essex County, MA?

The latest county-level Zillow ZORI is $2,632 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

County Zillow ZORI$2,6322026-06 · up 1.7% year over year
County ACS gross rent$1,756ACS 2024 5-year · occupied-renter survey
HUD two-bedroom FMR$2,941FY2026 · administrative standard
HUD Fair Market Rent by bedroom count in Essex County
BedroomsHUD monthly FMRGeographyMeasurement boundary
Studio$2,359Essex County, MAHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
1 bedroom$2,476Essex County, MAHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
2 bedrooms$2,941Essex County, MAHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
3 bedrooms$3,526Essex County, MAHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
4 bedrooms$3,894Essex County, MAHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.

Zillow asking rent, ACS gross rent and HUD FMR describe different housing universes. They remain separate and no metro, city or neighboring-county value replaces missing county evidence.Zillow pulled 2026-07-26 · HUD pulled 2026-07-26

The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$737k
▲ 1.7% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
Median asking rent
$2,632
▲ 1.7% year over year
Zillow ZORI · direct
Gross yield
4.3%
annual rent ÷ price, before costs
derived: rent × 12 ÷ price ✓
HUD 2-bed standard
$2,941
market rent is 0.90x the standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+49.5%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+1.7%FHFA HPI2025+4.8%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-08-02.
Owner-reported value$619k
Surveyed gross rent$1,756
Rent burden 30%+56.9%
Median year built1960
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
5.0%vacant
329,776estimated housing units
Occupied tenure36.5% renter
owner 63.5%renter 36.5%
Structure mix56.5% single-family
Single-family 56.5%20+ units 11.7%Mobile home 0.4%Other 31.4%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs326,352▲ 0.8% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments29,562annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,502▲ 3.4% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorEducation and health services26.0% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+0.8%WEEKLY WAGE+3.4%Education and health services26.0%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2021-2025; latest 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-08-02. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

Resident income

How local income has compounded

BEA per-capita personal income divides all personal income by the county population. It is broader than wages, but it is not household income or a measure of what renters can afford.

Per-capita personal income19692024
Per-capita personal income history for Essex CountyA line chart of annual BEA per-capita personal income from 1969 through 2024.$0k$45k$90k196919972024$4k$87k
Nominal annual dollars; not adjusted for inflation. A rising line can reflect wage, business-income, transfer-income and investment-income changes together.
Renter affordability

Who carries the heaviest rent burden

HUD CHAS separates renter households by income relative to local HAMFI. Moderate burden means housing costs above 30% through 50% of income; severe burden means more than 50%.

Share of renter households in each income band2018-2022
Renter cost burden by HAMFI income band in Essex CountyFive horizontal bars show moderate and severe housing cost burden shares among renter households in each HUD income band.0%25%50%75%100%At or below 30% HAMFI40,50573.3% burdened30–50% HAMFI21,12077.4% burdened50–80% HAMFI21,24038.9% burdened80–100% HAMFI9,42012.9% burdenedAbove 100% HAMFI20,4054.6% burdened
Moderate: >30% to 50%Severe: >50%
Each percentage uses HUD’s published subtotal for that income band. For disclosure, HUD keeps 0 as 0, publishes 1–7 households as 4 and rounds 8 or more to the nearest 5. Independently rounded categories can differ from their displayed sum and are not forced into a percentage.
Direct local rental evidence

Recent leases and rental-market liquidity in Essex County, MA

These Apartment List observations match the exact county Census code 25009. They are kept separate from Zillow asking rent, Census occupied-home rent and wider metro measures.

Direct recent-lease rent history

Monthly overall-rent index; missing observations are not filled from another geography.

$1,927$1,775$1,6232021-082026-07
Recent-lease rent$1,9082026-07 · -0.8% year over year
Rental vacancy6.2%2026-07 · +1.1 percentage points year over year
Time on marketn/an/a
County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Essex County’s decision tension is a high entry basis against a modest gross income return: Zillow’s 2026-06 median home value was $736,528, versus median asking rent of $2,632 per month and a published 4.29% gross yield before operating costs. Income-focused investors should investigate expense and financing coverage; buyers relying on appreciation should be cautious because this county-level evidence does not establish net cash flow. It is a screening frame, not submarket underwriting.

02Housing economics

Zillow’s 2026-06 home-value measure rose 1.72% year over year. That direction is corroborated, but not on a common interval, by FHFA’s 2025 repeat-transaction HPI, up 4.84% annually; the index is not a home value and should not be averaged with Zillow’s change. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard, not asking rent, so it cannot replace the measured market rent or generate another yield. The 1.04% effective property-tax rate further reduces the relevance of gross yield; insurance, maintenance, debt and vacancy costs are not published.

03Demand & competition

Realtor.com’s 2026-06 MLS listing market looks less tight, not necessarily weaker in closed sales: median listing price was down 2.71% year over year, active listings were up 20.41%, and 14.93% had price cuts. These are asking-price, visible-supply and seller-concession indicators, rather than sale prices or standalone proof of buyer demand. Tax-return migration showed a net outflow of 1,820 households, although incoming movers’ average AGI exceeded outgoing movers’ by $4,723. Investor purchase mortgages were 586 of 6,710 total purchase mortgages, an 8.73% share; most purchases remained outside the investor category.

04Risk & next checks

The dominant inland-flood hazard pairs with modeled annual climate loss of 0.12% of building value; this is a modeled loss ratio, not a property-specific loss estimate. QCEW records annual-average covered employment at county workplaces in 2025, with education and health services the largest disclosed private supersector, not the whole economy. QCEW is neither resident employment nor a demand forecast. Next checks are parcel flood exposure and insurance, submarket rent and operating statements, debt terms, and closed-sale comparables. Missing vacancy, expense, insurance and closed-sale data prevent net-yield, debt-coverage and exit-price conclusions.

County ZIP rental landscape

How asking rent and renter pressure vary inside Essex County, MA

This view uses 12 direct Zillow ZIP markets matched to Census ZCTAs. Each ZIP is assigned by its largest HUD residential county share; this is not an exhaustive county inventory.

Selected ZIP range$2,229$2,846Zillow asking-rent index
Monthly spread$617highest minus lowest selected ZIP
Observed burden range45.4%64.5%ACS renter households paying 30%+
Renter households covered73,511across the selected ZCTAs
01 · ASKING RENT LADDERDirect ZIP ZORI
Horizontal bars compare Zillow asking-rent indexes across the selected direct-evidence ZIP set.01845$2,84601960$2,81201915$2,77301970$2,74201905$2,63601930$2,54601844$2,50701843$2,39901840$2,36001902$2,33401830$2,27401832$2,229
02 · PRESSURE MATRIXRent × observed burden
Each point is one selected ZIP and ZCTA match. Horizontal position is Zillow asking rent and vertical position is the ACS renter cost-burden share.67.0%61.0%54.9%48.9%42.9%019020197001960018430191501844019300183001905018320184001845Zillow asking-rent index →ACS burden share →
03 · BENCHMARK GAPZORI vs HUD 2BR
Bars show the percentage difference between the Zillow blended asking-rent index and the local HUD two-bedroom standard. Their housing universes differ.01845+123.2%01960+121.7%01915+120.0%01970+118.6%01905+114.1%01930+110.2%01844+108.5%01843+103.8%01840+102.1%01902+101.0%01830+98.4%01832+96.5%
WHAT THE LOCAL DISTRIBUTION SAYS

Zillow’s June 2026 typical observed asking-rent index across the 12 selected direct-evidence ZIP/ZCTA matches runs from $2,229 in 01832 to $2,846 in 01845, a $617 spread and a $2,526.50 median. Essex County’s Zillow index is $2,632 after 1.7% year-over-year growth. That county reading supplies broad context, not a substitute for a ZIP-specific index. The practical question is therefore not simply which selected area posts the lowest index, but whether the current asking-rent range for a suitable available unit fits the household’s budget, bedroom need, lease terms, and search timing. Zillow is an index of typical observed asking rents, rather than a quote for any one unit.

Zillow, ACS, and HUD answer different questions and should stay separate. ACS 2024 five-year survey estimates put selected-ZCTA median gross rent from $1,411 in 01930 to $2,223 in 01845, with $1,756 for the county. These gross-rent figures describe surveyed occupied units over the ACS period; they are neither June asking-rent indexes nor a measure of today’s advertised supply. Within the displayed ZIP rows, the FY2026 two-bedroom HUD standard is $2,311, while the county two-bedroom FMR is $2,941. Set beside the Zillow index, 01832 is about 3.5% below its ZIP HUD standard and 01845 about 23.2% above it. This is a side-by-side benchmark screen, not a bedroom-matched market-rent estimate, lease quote, or statement of likely contract rent.

ACS also provides distinct household-condition indicators for affordability and availability screening. Selected renter burden shares range from 45.4% to 64.5%, against 56.9% countywide, while ACS vacancy rates span 1.45% to 9.57%, against 5.04% for the county. The high-burden 01830 reading also carries a 6.80% vacancy estimate. This combination argues against using vacancy as a shortcut for affordability: burden and vacancy should be considered together as separate survey signals, not as cause and effect. A lower vacancy share is not proof that a particular unit cannot be found, and a higher share does not establish concessions, current availability, or a lower household rent burden.

Finally, this is a selected direct-evidence screen rather than an exhaustive county inventory. ZCTAs are statistical areas, not USPS delivery ZIPs, and ZIPs can cross county lines. The display assigns each ZIP to Essex County when it has the largest HUD residential-address share; that crosswalk rule does not mean every address in the ZIP is county-only. Before acting on a property, verify its exact address and county assignment, live asking rent, bedroom count, lease term, utilities and fees, current availability, and any relevant HUD-program or income-eligibility requirements. These property-level checks determine whether a listing actually fits the decision at hand.

Selected ZIP evidence

Keep each source universe visible

22 ZIP profiles passed the county gate; the 12 with the most renter households are shown.

ZIP / ZCTAZillow asking rentACS gross rentHUD 2BRBurden 30%+VacancyIncome screenHUD county share
01902$2,334$1,673$2,31154.7%2.7%$93k100.0%
01970$2,742$1,836$2,31152.1%5.7%$110k100.0%
01960$2,812$1,950$2,31154.8%2.7%$112k100.0%
01843$2,399$1,746$2,31152.1%2.2%$96k100.0%
01915$2,773$1,770$2,31151.5%3.8%$111k100.0%
01844$2,507$1,749$2,31145.4%2.6%$100k100.0%
01930$2,546$1,411$2,31152.4%9.6%$102k100.0%
01830$2,274$1,644$2,31164.5%6.8%$91k100.0%
01905$2,636$1,869$2,31156.3%6.0%$105k100.0%
01832$2,229$1,648$2,31152.7%3.4%$89k100.0%
01840$2,360$1,413$2,31156.4%1.4%$94k100.0%
01845$2,846$2,223$2,31150.3%4.7%$114k100.0%
READ BEFORE USING

Zillow, ACS, and HUD are not interchangeable: Zillow is a June 2026 observed asking-rent index, ACS is a 2024 five-year survey, and HUD FMR is an FY2026 bedroom-specific administrative standard. Differences should not be averaged or read as a single rent series.

Census ZCTAs are statistical areas rather than USPS delivery ZIPs. ZIPs may cross county lines; this packet assigns a ZIP to Essex County using its largest HUD residential-address share. The selected direct-evidence set is not exhaustive, so it cannot establish countywide rankings or complete availability.

SOURCE LEDGERCensus ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stockACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30Census ACS five-year — ZCTA housing and incomeACS 2024 5-year ZCTA · pulled 2026-08-08HUD Fair Market Rents — Section 8 standardFY2026 FMR · pulled 2026-07-26HUD-USPS ZIP-to-county residential-address crosswalkHUD-USPS 2026Q1 · pulled 2026-08-09Zillow ZHVI and ZORI — county values and rentscounty ZHVI/ZORI 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-26Zillow ZORI — ZIP market rentsZORI ZIP 2026-06 · pulled 2026-08-08
Cities & communities

Where people live within Essex County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Lynn city101.7KLawrence city88.7KHaverhill city67.7KPeabody city54.7KMethuen city53.5KSalem city44.8KBeverly city42.7KGloucester city30.1K
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

24 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Lynn cityIncorporated place
    101,709
  2. 02
    Lawrence cityIncorporated place
    88,736
  3. 03
    Haverhill cityIncorporated place
    67,698
  4. 04
    Peabody cityIncorporated place
    54,695
  5. 05
    Methuen cityIncorporated place
    53,475
  6. 06
    Salem cityIncorporated place
    44,795
  7. 07
    Beverly cityIncorporated place
    42,665
  8. 08
    Gloucester cityIncorporated place
    30,075
  9. 09
    Saugus CDPCensus-designated place
    28,773
  10. 10
    Danvers CDPCensus-designated place
    28,098
  11. 11
    Marblehead CDPCensus-designated place
    20,413
  12. 12
    Newburyport cityIncorporated place
    18,652
Show 12 more places
  1. 13
    Amesbury cityIncorporated place
    17,403
  2. 14
    Swampscott CDPCensus-designated place
    15,277
  3. 15
    Lynnfield CDPCensus-designated place
    13,064
  4. 16
    Andover CDPCensus-designated place
    9,451
  5. 17
    Salisbury CDPCensus-designated place
    5,656
  6. 18
    Ipswich CDPCensus-designated place
    4,924
  7. 19
    Rockport CDPCensus-designated place
    4,704
  8. 20
    Nahant CDPCensus-designated place
    3,325
  9. 21
    Topsfield CDPCensus-designated place
    2,624
  10. 22
    Boxford CDPCensus-designated place
    2,284
  11. 23
    Rowley CDPCensus-designated place
    1,708
  12. 24
    Essex CDPCensus-designated place
    1,688

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.117% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.04%

$6,430 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-1,820

16,132 in · 17,952 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$4,723

$105,193 arriving · $100,470 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors8.7%

586 of 6,710 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings1,133▲ 20.4% year over year
Median days on market32▲ 31.3% year over year
Listings price-reduced14.9%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▼ 2.7% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

Same metro

The other counties in Boston, MA

A metro is an average of these. Which side of a county line a property sits on can change the tax bill, the hazard profile and the tenant pool.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Essex County813,054$737k$2,6324.3%inland flooding
Middlesex County1,638,365$833k$3,2604.7%inland flooding
Suffolk County785,121$763k$3,4235.4%inland flooding
Norfolk County730,082$786k$2,9704.5%inland flooding
Plymouth County535,075$662k$2,7545.0%inland flooding
Rockingham County319,082$637k$2,5634.8%inland flooding
Strafford County132,575$519k$2,1645.0%inland flooding
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. County-level rent, tax burden and flood exposure may differ materially from conditions at a target parcel.
  2. Unpublished vacancy, operating expenses, insurance and financing terms could make the gross-yield screen inconsistent with net cash flow.
  3. MLS listing changes may not translate into closed-sale pricing or liquidity.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can HUD two-bedroom FMR be used as market rent?

No. The record identifies FMR as a payment standard, while the county rent measure is median asking rent.

What does QCEW employment represent?

It represents annual-average covered jobs at workplaces in the county, not resident employment or a demand forecast.

What evidence is missing for a net-return conclusion?

Vacancy, operating expenses, insurance costs, debt terms and property-level conditions are not published.