ZIP reports / NC / 27604
ZIP rental intelligence · 2026-06

ZIP 27604, Raleigh, NC

Asking rent, household capacity, housing stock and local context—kept at their original geographic and measurement scopes.

Direct local rent answer

What does rent cost in ZIP 27604?

The latest Zillow ZORI for ZIP 27604 is $1,649 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical observed asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

Zillow asking-rent index$1,6492026-06 · up 3.0% year over year
ACS median gross rent$1,480ACS 2024 5-year survey · ±$70 margin of error
HUD two-bedroom standard$1,720Administrative FMR/SAFMR · not asking rent
Bedroom-level rent benchmarks in ZIP 27604
BedroomsModelled asking-rent lensHUD standardHow to use it
Studio$1,438ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,500HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
1 bedroom$1,505ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,570HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
2 bedrooms$1,649ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,720HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
3 bedrooms$2,071ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,160HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
4 bedrooms$2,771ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,890HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.

Bedroom estimates are modelled, not observed rents. Zillow, Census ACS and HUD describe different housing universes and remain separate throughout this report.Zillow pulled 2026-08-08

Median household income$70,375ACS 2024 5-year · ±$5,904 MOE
Renter share45.2%8,528 renter households
Rent burden 30%+52.5%4,479 observed households
Housing vacancy11.8%2,519 of 21,386 units
Six views · one local decision

Read the measures together, without merging them

ZORI tracks observed asking rent, ACS describes occupied renter homes, and HUD publishes an administrative benchmark. The charts preserve those differences and add wider context only where the geography is named.

Three definitions of rent

Useful as a spread, not interchangeable observations.

Three rent measures for ZIP 27604Zillow asking-rent index$1,649ACS median gross rent$1,480HUD two-bedroom standard$1,720

Affordability screen

Annual income implied by 30% of the current ZIP ZORI.

Income screen for ZIP 27604ACS median household income$70,375Income at 30% of ZIP ZORI$65,960

Bedroom ladder

Modelled from ZIP ZORI using the local HUD ladder.

Modelled bedroom rent ladder for ZIP 27604Studio$1,438One bedroom$1,505Two bedrooms$1,649Three bedrooms$2,071Four bedrooms$2,771

Observed renter burden

ACS ZCTA households with computable gross-rent burden.

Observed renter cost burden in ZCTA 2760430% or more of income4,479 householdsBelow 30%4,049 households

ZIP versus wider rent context

Each bar retains its own ZIP, city, county or metro scope.

Asking-rent context for ZIP 27604ZIP 27604$1,649Raleigh city$1,579Wake County county$1,676Raleigh-Cary, NC metro$1,689

Monthly asking-rent history

Direct Zillow ZORI observations over the latest five years. Missing months remain visible gaps.

Five-year direct Zillow asking-rent history for ZIP 27604; missing months remain gaps$1,693$1,560$1,426$1,2932021-062023-122026-06
Five-year change
23.4%exact same-month endpoints
Largest observed drawdown
1.3%peak to a later observed month
Annualized monthly variability
2.2%137 consecutive returns
Monthly coverage
100.0%138 of 138 months
Decision brief

What the evidence says for ZIP 27604

The principal tension in 27604 is that the June 2026 ZIP Zillow Observed Rent Index reached $1,649 per month while direct ZIP resale evidence recorded a $349,921 median sold price, down 4.1% year over year. Zillow ZORI is a typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types, not a lease-price series for one specific home. The annualized-ZORI-to-median-sale-price screen is 5.65%; it is only a cross-source screening ratio, not a cap rate, property yield, net return, or expected return. Rising asking-rent evidence and softer resale pricing point in different directions, so neither source settles the market picture alone.

Rent history through the stated Zillow endpoint supports a stable-growth description, but its pace has varied. Exact same-month annualized ZORI change was 3.0% over one year, 1.2% over three years, and 4.3% over five years. Thus, the recent direction confirms a longer upward path, although it has not matched the stronger five-year pace. Monthly rent changes showed 2.2% annualized variability, a relatively contained movement measure for interpreting one current index reading. The largest peak-to-trough decline was 1.3%, which also limits evidence of a severe historical retreat. Coverage was complete across 138 observations and 137 consecutive monthly returns. Among history-eligible ZIPs nationally, the transparent discovery ranks were 1,406 for momentum, 290 for stability, and 597 for the balanced measure; lower ranks indicate stronger relative placement, not a forecast.

The five-digit label 27604 is both a Zillow ZIP market identifier and a matched Census ZCTA. A ZCTA is a statistical area and is not identical to a USPS delivery ZIP. The ACS matched-ZCTA median gross rent was $1,480, making the current ZORI 11.4% higher. That difference should not be read as a simple rent increase: ACS is a five-year survey of occupied renter homes and median gross rent includes selected utilities, whereas ZORI is an asking-rent index. The two sources describe distinct housing and time universes, so their gap is useful for context but not for declaring that any particular current listing is above or below a tenant-paid median.

Bedroom figures are modelled estimates created by scaling ZIP ZORI with the local HUD ladder. The resulting monthly estimates are $1,438 for a studio, $1,505 for a one-bedroom, $1,649 for a two-bedroom, $2,071 for a three-bedroom, and $2,771 for a four-bedroom. They are not measured bedroom rents, advertised comparables, or evidence that a particular unit will lease at those levels. The local HUD FMR/SAFMR ladder is an administrative bedroom-specific standard rather than asking rent; its role here is to set the relative bedroom pattern used in the model. A reader should therefore use the ladder to frame size differences, then test actual like-for-like listings separately.

At the current ZIP asking-rent index, a 30% gross-income screen requires $65,960 annually. The ACS matched-ZCTA median household income was $70,375, placing the area-wide median above that arithmetic screen. This is not advice, an applicant qualification rule, or a statement about a household’s actual budget; it simply divides annualized asking rent by the stated income share. Burden evidence adds a separate caution: 52.5% of surveyed renter households paid 30% or more of income toward rent. That statistic concerns occupied survey households, with their own income, rent, utility, and household-size circumstances. It cannot establish affordability, burden, or qualification for a specific household or unit.

Housing and vacancy data give the rent and burden screens a broader occupancy setting. The matched ZCTA had an 11.8% vacancy rate, including 834 units reported vacant for rent, while renters represented 45.2% of occupied homes. Its stock included 14,133 single-family units and 2,568 units in larger multifamily structures, indicating that the index and survey measures span more than one housing form. Vacancy is not proof that any named building has availability, concessions, or weak leasing conditions. For wider asking-rent context, Raleigh city context was $1,579, Wake County context was $1,676, and Raleigh-Cary metro context was $1,689; the ZIP index exceeds the city context but trails the county and metro contexts. Those wider figures are context only, not ZIP substitutes.

The Redfin evidence is a direct rolling-three-month ZIP resale observation, so it describes for-sale transactions rather than rental transactions. Within that resale universe, 159 homes sold, median marketing time was 34 days, inventory was 185 homes, and months of supply stood at 3.5. The average sale-to-list ratio was 99.05%, a signal that completed sales were, on average, close to list price rather than a rental pricing measure. Together with the lower median sale price noted above, these resale signals challenge a simple reading of rising ZORI as uniformly strengthening every housing measure. At the same time, recorded sales provide direct transaction activity rather than an absence of resale evidence. They do not provide rental comps, operating costs, or property-level economics.

Several limits should remain active when using this packet. ZORI blends rental types, ACS summarizes surveyed occupied renter homes in a statistical ZCTA, HUD supplies an administrative bedroom ladder, and Redfin aggregates recent ZIP resales; none replaces property-level evidence. The history measures are backward-looking measurements, not forecasts or investment recommendations, and the resale-rent screen is not a return measure. Concrete checks should compare the specific home’s advertised rent, bedroom count, lease term, utility treatment, availability date, concessions, and physical attributes with genuinely similar current listings. For a purchase-resale comparison, confirm the property type, sale condition, list history, and transaction details. Does the particular unit’s verified size and lease structure fit the modelled tier being used?

Decision signals

What deserves a closer property-level check

Rent and resale signals diverge

ZIP asking rent was rising on Zillow’s index while the direct ZIP resale median declined. That disagreement matters because the annualized rent-to-price percentage combines separate source systems with different universes. It can flag a contrast for further review, but it cannot quantify operating costs, financing, condition, tenant turnover, or a property-level outcome.

History favors stability over acceleration

The one-year rent change was stronger than the three-year change but below the five-year pace, which supports continued historical growth without showing a uniformly accelerating path. Complete monthly coverage, contained variability, and a shallow maximum drawdown increase confidence that the current ZORI reading is not based on sparse history, while remaining strictly backward-looking.

Survey affordability evidence is mixed

The arithmetic income screen sits below the matched-ZCTA median household income, yet more than half of surveyed renter households were rent burdened at the stated threshold. These findings are not contradictory because the first is a benchmark using area median income and current asking rent, while burden reflects occupied households with varied incomes, rents, utilities, and household structures.

Bedroom estimates are a sizing tool, not rent comps

The bedroom ladder applies the local HUD relative standard to the current ZIP ZORI, producing modelled estimates from studio through four-bedroom sizes. HUD standards are administrative and bedroom specific, while Zillow is an asking-rent index across rental types. Actual listing rents can differ because the model does not observe condition, lease terms, utility inclusion, availability, or concessions.

  • Zillow ZORI is a blended asking-rent index across rental types, so it may not match the asking rent, executed lease rent, amenities, condition, or concession package for a particular available home.
  • The ACS result comes from a five-year survey of occupied renter homes in a Census ZCTA, which is a statistical geography rather than an identical match to a USPS delivery ZIP.
  • HUD bedroom standards are administrative FMR/SAFMR benchmarks, not observed asking rents. Scaling ZORI with that ladder creates modelled estimates that require direct verification against comparable current listings.
  • Redfin metrics summarize recent ZIP resale activity, not rental transactions or property economics. Vacancy and renter-burden statistics also cannot prove availability, affordability, or leasing conditions for an individual unit.
Direct ZIP resale evidence

For-sale liquidity inside ZIP 27604

Redfin reports these as a rolling three-month ZIP observation through 2026-06-30. They describe the for-sale market, not rental vacancy or the rent of a particular property.

Median sale price$349,921-4.1% year over year
Homes sold159rolling three-month observation
Median days on market34 daysfor-sale listing absorption
Months of supply3.5resale inventory relative to sales pace

Activity and available supply

Direct ZIP counts remain separate because each describes a different stage of the resale funnel.

Direct resale activity for ZIP 27604Active listings385Inventory185Pending sales167Homes sold159

Counter-signals before underwriting

A price alone does not reveal how quickly buyers are absorbing available homes.

Inventory direction

185 observed inventory · +13.5% year over year.

Price realization

99.1% average sale-to-list ratio · 23.9% sold above original list.

Early absorption

36.5% went off market within two weeks; compare this with 34 median days on market.

Measurement boundary

Small ZIP samples can move sharply. This rolling period smooths monthly noise but does not replace current address-level sale and rent comparables.

Redfin Data Center · updated 2026-07-03 · exact five-digit ZIP key. Implausible source values are withheld as n/a rather than repaired or inherited from a broader geography.

Wider market evidence

Listing and rental liquidity around the ZIP

These measures are not ZIP observations. They are labelled county or metro context so they can challenge the local story without being copied into it.

Wake County listing conditions

4,147 active Realtor.com listings · 48 median days on market · 23.0% price-reduced share · 2026-06.

Raleigh-Cary, NC resale supply

3.0 months of supply · 34 median days on market · 37.7% listings with price drops · Redfin 2026-05-01.

Apartment List metro liquidity

8.2% reported apartment vacancy · 33 days on market. These are direct metro observations and do not describe a particular ZIP unit.

Property-level next step

Compare live same-bedroom listings, concessions, utilities, condition and days listed inside ZIP 27604. The report frames the market; it does not replace a rent roll, lease review or address-level comparable set.

Questions this report can answer

Scope-aware answers

Why does the Zillow rent index differ from ACS median gross rent?

They measure different evidence universes. Zillow ZORI is a typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types, while ACS median gross rent is a five-year survey measure for occupied renter homes and includes selected utilities. Differences can reflect timing, housing composition, utility treatment, and the distinction between asking rents and tenant-paid survey responses.

Are the bedroom figures actual observed rents for each unit size?

No. The bedroom figures are modelled monthly estimates calculated by scaling current ZIP ZORI with the local HUD bedroom ladder. HUD FMR/SAFMR is an administrative, bedroom-specific standard rather than an asking-rent dataset. The estimates organize relative size differences but do not substitute for verified, like-for-like current listings.

What does the rent history say about confidence in the current reading?

The history is complete across the available monthly observations, and its variability and maximum drawdown were contained relative to the longer upward path. That supports greater confidence that the current ZORI snapshot is grounded in a continuous historical series. It does not make the current value a forecast or guarantee that future rents will move similarly.

How should the rent-to-sale-price percentage be interpreted?

It is the annualized ZIP ZORI divided by the direct ZIP median sold price from Redfin’s rolling-three-month resale observation. The percentage is useful only as a cross-source screening ratio for comparing the current rent index with an aggregate resale price. It is not a cap rate, property yield, net return, expected return, or estimate of investment performance.