ZIP reports / NC / 28806
ZIP rental intelligence · 2026-06

ZIP 28806, Asheville, NC

Asking rent, household capacity, housing stock and local context—kept at their original geographic and measurement scopes.

Direct local rent answer

What does rent cost in ZIP 28806?

The latest Zillow ZORI for ZIP 28806 is $1,800 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical observed asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

Zillow asking-rent index$1,8002026-06 · up 0.6% year over year
ACS median gross rent$1,239ACS 2024 5-year survey · ±$102 margin of error
HUD two-bedroom standard$1,835Administrative FMR/SAFMR · not asking rent
Bedroom-level rent benchmarks in ZIP 28806
BedroomsModelled asking-rent lensHUD standardHow to use it
Studio$1,409ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,436HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
1 bedroom$1,642ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,674HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
2 bedrooms$1,800ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,835HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
3 bedrooms$2,188ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,231HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
4 bedrooms$3,019ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$3,078HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.

Bedroom estimates are modelled, not observed rents. Zillow, Census ACS and HUD describe different housing universes and remain separate throughout this report.Zillow pulled 2026-08-08

Median household income$63,273ACS 2024 5-year · ±$5,352 MOE
Renter share40.1%6,651 renter households
Rent burden 30%+54.7%3,641 observed households
Housing vacancy24.6%5,427 of 22,031 units
Six views · one local decision

Read the measures together, without merging them

ZORI tracks observed asking rent, ACS describes occupied renter homes, and HUD publishes an administrative benchmark. The charts preserve those differences and add wider context only where the geography is named.

Three definitions of rent

Useful as a spread, not interchangeable observations.

Three rent measures for ZIP 28806Zillow asking-rent index$1,800ACS median gross rent$1,239HUD two-bedroom standard$1,835

Affordability screen

Annual income implied by 30% of the current ZIP ZORI.

Income screen for ZIP 28806ACS median household income$63,273Income at 30% of ZIP ZORI$72,000

Bedroom ladder

Modelled from ZIP ZORI using the local HUD ladder.

Modelled bedroom rent ladder for ZIP 28806Studio$1,409One bedroom$1,642Two bedrooms$1,800Three bedrooms$2,188Four bedrooms$3,019

Observed renter burden

ACS ZCTA households with computable gross-rent burden.

Observed renter cost burden in ZCTA 2880630% or more of income3,641 householdsBelow 30%3,010 households

ZIP versus wider rent context

Each bar retains its own ZIP, city, county or metro scope.

Asking-rent context for ZIP 28806ZIP 28806$1,800Asheville city$1,688Buncombe County county$1,678Asheville, NC metro$1,688

Monthly asking-rent history

Direct Zillow ZORI observations over the latest five years. Missing months remain visible gaps.

Five-year direct Zillow asking-rent history for ZIP 28806; missing months remain gaps$1,889$1,707$1,526$1,3442021-062023-122026-06
Five-year change
28.2%exact same-month endpoints
Largest observed drawdown
3.9%peak to a later observed month
Annualized monthly variability
3.1%101 consecutive returns
Monthly coverage
100.0%102 of 102 months
Decision brief

What the evidence says for ZIP 28806

At the stated June 2026 endpoint, ZIP 28806's current Zillow Observed Rent Index, or ZORI, is $1,800 per month. ZORI is a ZIP-level typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types, so it summarizes asking rents rather than quoting a specific available unit. The arithmetic 30% required-income screen converts that monthly figure to $72,000 annually, above the matched ZCTA's ACS median household income of $63,273; the asking-rent-to-income screen is 34.1%. It is arithmetic, not advice or an applicant qualification rule. This five-digit label is both a Zillow ZIP market identifier and a Census ZCTA match. A ZCTA is a Census statistical area and is not identical to a USPS delivery ZIP.

Backward-looking Zillow ZIP ZORI history moderates the current snapshot. Exact same-month growth was 0.6% over one year, 1.4% annualized over three years, and 5.1% annualized over five years. Thus, the latest direction remains positive and confirms the longer upward path, but its pace is far below the earlier multiyear rate rather than a continuation of it. The series has full available coverage, with 102 observations. Its monthly-return series annualizes to 3.1% variability, which supports more confidence in the broad level than in a finely precise current-price reading. Separately, the largest peak-to-trough decline was 3.9%, showing that the index has experienced setbacks. Transparent national discovery ranks were 2,013 for momentum, 1,719 for stability, and 2,206 for the balanced score, where lower ranks are higher; these organize past measurements only, not a forecast or investment call.

Cross-source comparisons are informative only when their populations remain separate. The matched ZCTA ACS 2024 five-year survey puts median gross rent at $1,239, a measure of occupied renter homes that includes selected utilities; current ZORI is 45.3% higher, which does not make the two measures interchangeable. HUD's FY2026 two-bedroom FMR/SAFMR standard is $1,835. That HUD figure is an administrative, bedroom-specific standard rather than an asking-rent observation. Applying the local HUD bedroom ladder to ZIP ZORI produces modelled monthly estimates of $1,409 for a studio, $1,642 for one bedroom, $1,800 for two bedrooms, $2,188 for three bedrooms, and $3,019 for four bedrooms. These are scaled modelled estimates, never measured bedroom rents.

Broader comparisons show that the ZIP index sits above surrounding rent contexts: the City of Asheville context and Asheville, NC metro context each show $1,688, while Buncombe County context shows $1,678; each is wider-area context, not ZIP rental data. The City of Asheville context has a higher renter share than this ZIP, while Buncombe County context has a lower renter share. The Asheville, NC metro context also reports higher median household income than the matched ZCTA, but its aggregate rent-to-income measure cannot resolve affordability for this ZIP. These city, county, and metro figures frame differing geographic scopes rather than substituting for a ZIP unit market.

ACS housing counts show 22,031 units and 5,427 vacant units, yielding a 24.6% vacancy rate. The stock includes 13,966 single-family units and a much smaller large-multifamily segment, a composition measure rather than a count of rental availability. Of 6,651 occupied renter homes in the ACS estimate, 3,641 reported gross-rent burdens at or above the threshold used in the required-income screen, or 54.7%. Gross rent in that burden measure includes selected utilities and reflects occupied households, unlike ZORI's asking-rent index. The burden result and vacancy total are area-level conditions; neither proves the price, condition, vacancy, utility treatment, or payment burden of any particular unit.

The June-end direct rolling-three-month Redfin ZIP resale observation points to a for-sale market that is not moving with the earlier long rent run in a simple way. Median sold price was $431,902, down 1.2% year over year, with 156 homes sold and a median 71 days on market. Inventory was 288 homes, up 3.3%, and months of supply stood at 5.6. The average sale-to-list ratio was 97.9%, while 14.5% of homes sold above list. Those are resale liquidity and pricing signals, not rental transactions or rental comps. They challenge any attempt to read historical asking-rent appreciation as an unqualified signal of current for-sale strength.

Annualizing ZIP ZORI and dividing it by the Redfin median sale price produces a 5.0% cross-source screening ratio only. It does not measure property cash flows, expenses, financing, taxes, repairs, vacancy, or a transaction-specific outcome. The useful tension is narrower: asking-rent history remains positive but has decelerated, while direct resale evidence shows price softness alongside rising inventory and a lengthy observed marketing period. The required-income screen and ACS burden share provide a separate household-stress context, not proof that either rent levels or resale conditions will change. Different dates, dwelling mixes, and source definitions prevent a single combined market statistic.

Before translating this ZIP screen to a property, a property-level file would need the marketed asking rent, bedroom count, unit size, utility responsibility, concessions, lease term, and availability date, plus genuinely comparable current listings. It would also need condition, renovation status, included features, property-specific occupancy, and recent nearby closed-sales details if a resale comparison is relevant. ACS is a five-year survey with sampling uncertainty, HUD is a standard, ZORI is an index, and Redfin is a rolling resale observation; none verifies a particular unit. The key unresolved question is whether a specific unit's current terms and comparables align with the broad ZIP index rather than merely sharing its label.

Decision signals

What deserves a closer property-level check

Asking-rent index is materially above occupied-home rent survey

Current ZIP ZORI is a blended asking-rent index, while the matched ZCTA ACS median gross rent reflects occupied renter homes and includes selected utilities. The difference between them is large, but it primarily demonstrates unlike source populations and timing. HUD's bedroom standards add a separate administrative reference. Treat the scaled studio-through-four-bedroom figures as modelled estimates, not evidence of measured rents for vacant units.

Positive rent history has slowed sharply

Same-month ZORI gains were positive across one, three, and five years, but the latest annual pace lagged the longer runs. Full observed history supports continuity of measurement, while variability and a past drawdown mean a single current index observation should be read as an index level with normal movement, not a precise rent guarantee or a future trajectory.

Aggregate affordability pressure does not identify a unit outcome

The simple required-income math exceeds matched-ZCTA median household income, and more than half of ACS renter homes met the gross-rent burden threshold. These are broad screens only: ACS represents surveyed occupied households, has sampling uncertainty, and includes selected utilities in gross rent. The area's vacancy figure and housing-unit composition do not verify availability, pricing, or affordability for a particular listing.

Resale evidence challenges a simple rent-growth interpretation

Redfin's rolling three-month ZIP observations show resale price easing, inventory, marketing time, supply, and below-list average sale-to-list conditions. That creates a tension with the still-positive but slowing asking-rent history. The resale series observes sales rather than leases, so it can contextualize for-sale liquidity, but it cannot supply rental comps, operating economics, or a prediction.

  • The sources describe incompatible populations and purposes: Zillow reflects a blended asking-rent index, ACS reflects occupied households, HUD sets administrative standards, and Redfin records resale outcomes. A merged figure would obscure rather than resolve those distinctions.
  • The income and burden screens are aggregate arithmetic derived from survey values. They do not account for household composition, income documentation, assets, lease rules, utility bills, concessions, or the terms offered for a specific available home.
  • The complete historical ZORI sequence records past monthly index movement, including slower recent appreciation and a drawdown. It does not establish future asking rents, lease renewals, market direction, or the timing of any resale outcome.
  • Vacancy totals and for-sale inventory are aggregates with different definitions from a rental listing. They cannot prove that a particular unit is vacant, rentable, comparable, legally usable, or available on the terms assumed in a screen.
Direct ZIP resale evidence

For-sale liquidity inside ZIP 28806

Redfin reports these as a rolling three-month ZIP observation through 2026-06-30. They describe the for-sale market, not rental vacancy or the rent of a particular property.

Median sale price$431,902-1.2% year over year
Homes sold156rolling three-month observation
Median days on market71 daysfor-sale listing absorption
Months of supply5.6resale inventory relative to sales pace

Activity and available supply

Direct ZIP counts remain separate because each describes a different stage of the resale funnel.

Direct resale activity for ZIP 28806Active listings446Inventory288Pending sales182Homes sold156

Counter-signals before underwriting

A price alone does not reveal how quickly buyers are absorbing available homes.

Inventory direction

288 observed inventory · +3.3% year over year.

Price realization

97.9% average sale-to-list ratio · 14.5% sold above original list.

Early absorption

34.0% went off market within two weeks; compare this with 71 median days on market.

Measurement boundary

Small ZIP samples can move sharply. This rolling period smooths monthly noise but does not replace current address-level sale and rent comparables.

Redfin Data Center · updated 2026-07-03 · exact five-digit ZIP key. Implausible source values are withheld as n/a rather than repaired or inherited from a broader geography.

Wider market evidence

Listing and rental liquidity around the ZIP

These measures are not ZIP observations. They are labelled county or metro context so they can challenge the local story without being copied into it.

Buncombe County listing conditions

1,732 active Realtor.com listings · 59 median days on market · 26.3% price-reduced share · 2026-06.

Asheville, NC resale supply

6.2 months of supply · 64 median days on market · 29.2% listings with price drops · Redfin 2026-05-01.

Apartment List metro liquidity

11.0% reported apartment vacancy · n/a. These are direct metro observations and do not describe a particular ZIP unit.

Property-level next step

Compare live same-bedroom listings, concessions, utilities, condition and days listed inside ZIP 28806. The report frames the market; it does not replace a rent roll, lease review or address-level comparable set.

Questions this report can answer

Scope-aware answers

Why is the ZIP asking-rent index above ACS median gross rent?

The Zillow measure is a blended asking-rent index, whereas ACS is a five-year survey of occupied renter homes and its gross-rent measure includes selected utilities. Differences in timing, sampled population, rent definition, and geography mean the gap is a source-scope comparison, not a contradiction or a unit-level price gap.

Are the studio-through-four-bedroom figures measured rents?

No. The bedroom figures are modelled estimates generated by scaling the ZIP ZORI with the local HUD ladder. HUD FMR/SAFMR values are bedroom-specific administrative standards, not observations of advertised units. Accordingly, the estimates provide transparent size scaling but do not substitute for live listing comparables or signed leases.

What does the 30% required-income screen show?

The calculation annualizes the current ZORI and divides by the specified share of income; it is arithmetic only. Comparing it with matched-ZCTA median income and ACS burden results flags aggregate pressure, but it is neither financial advice nor an applicant qualification rule, and it cannot determine any household's ability to pay.

Does Redfin resale evidence validate a rent estimate?

No. Redfin's ZIP data are direct rolling-three-month for-sale and resale observations covering sold prices, sales pace, inventory, supply, and sale-to-list behavior. They can contextualize liquidity and create a cross-market tension with rent history, but they are not rental transactions, rental comparables, unit operating statements, or forecasts.