ZIP reports / GA / 30501
ZIP rental intelligence · 2026-06

ZIP 30501, Gainesville, GA

Asking rent, household capacity, housing stock and local context—kept at their original geographic and measurement scopes.

Direct local rent answer

What does rent cost in ZIP 30501?

The latest Zillow ZORI for ZIP 30501 is $1,554 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical observed asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

Zillow asking-rent index$1,5542026-06 · up 1.5% year over year
ACS median gross rent$1,214ACS 2024 5-year survey · ±$52 margin of error
HUD two-bedroom standard$1,514Administrative FMR/SAFMR · not asking rent
Bedroom-level rent benchmarks in ZIP 30501
BedroomsModelled asking-rent lensHUD standardHow to use it
Studio$1,208ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,177HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
1 bedroom$1,417ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,381HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
2 bedrooms$1,554ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,514HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
3 bedrooms$1,882ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,834HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
4 bedrooms$2,183ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,127HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.

Bedroom estimates are modelled, not observed rents. Zillow, Census ACS and HUD describe different housing universes and remain separate throughout this report.Zillow pulled 2026-08-08

Median household income$64,175ACS 2024 5-year · ±$4,050 MOE
Renter share62.6%7,332 renter households
Rent burden 30%+53.7%3,938 observed households
Housing vacancy10.4%1,362 of 13,072 units
Six views · one local decision

Read the measures together, without merging them

ZORI tracks observed asking rent, ACS describes occupied renter homes, and HUD publishes an administrative benchmark. The charts preserve those differences and add wider context only where the geography is named.

Three definitions of rent

Useful as a spread, not interchangeable observations.

Three rent measures for ZIP 30501Zillow asking-rent index$1,554ACS median gross rent$1,214HUD two-bedroom standard$1,514

Affordability screen

Annual income implied by 30% of the current ZIP ZORI.

Income screen for ZIP 30501ACS median household income$64,175Income at 30% of ZIP ZORI$62,160

Bedroom ladder

Modelled from ZIP ZORI using the local HUD ladder.

Modelled bedroom rent ladder for ZIP 30501Studio$1,208One bedroom$1,417Two bedrooms$1,554Three bedrooms$1,882Four bedrooms$2,183

Observed renter burden

ACS ZCTA households with computable gross-rent burden.

Observed renter cost burden in ZCTA 3050130% or more of income3,938 householdsBelow 30%3,394 households

ZIP versus wider rent context

Each bar retains its own ZIP, city, county or metro scope.

Asking-rent context for ZIP 30501ZIP 30501$1,554Gainesville city$1,635Hall County county$1,678Gainesville, GA metro$1,678

Monthly asking-rent history

Direct Zillow ZORI observations over the latest five years. Missing months remain visible gaps.

Five-year direct Zillow asking-rent history for ZIP 30501; missing months remain gaps$1,605$1,491$1,376$1,2622021-062024-012026-06
Five-year change
19.4%exact same-month endpoints
Largest observed drawdown
4.1%peak to a later observed month
Annualized monthly variability
4.2%64 consecutive returns
Monthly coverage
98.5%66 of 67 months
Decision brief

What the evidence says for ZIP 30501

In June 2026, ZIP 30501's Zillow Observed Rent Index was $1,554 per month, up 1.47% from a year earlier. ZORI is a typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types, not a lease-specific quote. The five-digit label is both a Zillow ZIP market identifier and a matched Census ZCTA; a ZCTA is a statistical area and is not identical to a USPS delivery ZIP. At 30% of gross income, the index produces a required-income screen of $62,160; relative to the $64,175 matched-ZCTA median household income, it is 29.1%. This is arithmetic, not advice or an applicant-qualification rule.

That apparent income screen is not a household outcome. The ACS 2024 five-year matched-ZCTA survey has a different universe: occupied renter homes, and its median gross rent includes selected utilities. Its $1,214 median gross rent is 28.0% below the current ZORI. In the same survey, 53.7% of occupied renter homes met or exceeded the standard rent-burden threshold. This is the central affordability tension: the current index screen sits just below the stated share of median household income, yet a majority of surveyed renter households report a burdened position. Neither result corrects the other. ACS is a multiyear survey with sampling uncertainty, while ZORI represents an asking-rent index; neither establishes the payment, utility package, or burden for a specific unit or household.

Bedroom detail needs a separate reading from the ZIP-wide index. The supplied FY2026 HUD FMR/SAFMR ladder is an administrative, bedroom-specific standard, not asking rent. It is used to scale ZIP ZORI into modelled monthly estimates: $1,208 for a studio, $1,417 for one bedroom, the current index level for two bedrooms, $1,882 for three bedrooms, and $2,183 for four bedrooms. These are modelled estimates, never measured bedroom rents or lease quotes. The local HUD two-bedroom standard is $1,514, placing the ZIP-wide ZORI 2.6% above that standard. The numerical proximity does not convert either series into a measurement of a particular two-bedroom unit.

Against that current level, the history is positive but uneven. Exact same-month annualized ZORI change was 1.47% over one year, 0.79% over three years, and 3.61% over five years. The latest annual change therefore remains above the intermediate pace but below the longer run, partially confirming a positive path while breaking from its stronger five-year speed. The series is classified high variability: annualized monthly-return variability was 4.20%, which reduces the confidence warranted in one current rent snapshot as a stable level. Its maximum drawdown was -4.12% from peak to trough. History coverage was 98.5%. The transparent national discovery ranks among history-eligible ZIPs were 1,909 for momentum, 2,675 for stability, and 2,592 for the balanced measure; lower rank is higher. These are backward-looking measurements, not forecasts or investment recommendations.

The matched-ZCTA survey also points to a renter-led housing base without identifying current listings. It counted 13,072 housing units, of which 11,710 were occupied, producing a 10.4% all-housing vacancy rate. Renters made up 62.6% of occupied homes, and the stock contains more single-family units than large multifamily units. The survey separately counted 311 vacant-for-rent units. That category is not a live inventory feed and, alongside the broader vacancy rate, cannot prove that any particular apartment or house is available, what it costs, its condition, or its lease terms. It provides stock and vacancy context for the burden evidence rather than unit-level evidence.

Wider comparisons lean in a different direction but remain context only: the Gainesville city context rent was about $1,635, the Hall County context rent was $1,678, and the Gainesville, GA metro context rent was also $1,678. Each is above the current ZIP asking-rent index, so the ZIP is not simply mirroring those broader rent levels. The Gainesville, GA metro context's 8.2% apartment vacancy has an apartment-only scope, unlike the matched-ZCTA all-housing vacancy measure. City, county, and metro measures add scale but do not replace direct ZIP rent, survey, or resale observations.

Resale evidence confirms only part of the rent signal. In Redfin's direct rolling-three-month ZIP resale observation, median sold price was $374,915, up 2.02% year over year, across 69 homes sold; median marketing time was 51 days. For-sale inventory stood at 130 homes and months of supply at 5.7. The average sale-to-list percentage was 94.0%, while 9.0% of sales closed above list. Those are direct ZIP for-sale market signals, not rental transactions. Rising sale price and the positive current rent change point in the same direction, but the supply level and below-list average challenge any simple reading of uniformly tight conditions. Annualized ZIP ZORI divided by median sold price is a 4.97% cross-source screening ratio only, not a property-level performance measure.

The limits are practical. ZORI does not specify a property's bedroom count, condition, utilities, concessions, availability date, or lease language; ACS does not identify a current listing; HUD does not quote an asking rent; and Redfin does not describe a rental transaction. For a specific property, check the live advertised amount and availability date, confirm its bedroom count and structure type, identify included utilities and mandatory charges, and compare its listed terms with the modelled—not measured—bedroom estimate. If resale is relevant, keep a property's sale, list, and marketing records separate from its rental evidence. The unresolved question is whether the actual unit's current terms resemble the ZIP indicators' defined universes, rather than whether a ZIP average alone settles the decision.

Decision signals

What deserves a closer property-level check

Affordability measures diverge by source universe

Current ZORI is above the matched-ZCTA survey median gross rent, yet the annualized income arithmetic sits just below the stated threshold. The survey nevertheless records a majority of renter households at or above the burden threshold. This is not a contradiction to resolve by averaging: current asking-rent indexing, occupied-home survey outcomes, and household-income arithmetic answer distinct questions.

Positive rent history is not a smooth trend

Rent gains remain positive over the reported horizons, but recent speed trails the longer-term pace and the series falls in the high-variability category. Near-complete coverage supports use of the history as a record, not as a guarantee of stability. The drawdown and national discovery ranks reinforce that a current ZORI observation should be read as a moving index point.

Resale activity complicates a tight-market reading

Direct ZIP resale evidence shows transactions occurred and prices rose, but marketing time, supply, and below-list sale behavior complicate a tight-market narrative. These are for-sale observations rather than rental comps. The annualized-rent-to-sale-price calculation is useful only as a cross-source screen; it cannot establish performance for a home, an apartment, or any prospective lease.

Bedroom ladder is a model, not rent-comps evidence

HUD scaling supplies a consistent bedroom ladder around the ZIP-wide index, but it does not observe bedroom-specific listings. The stock and vacancy survey broadens the picture of renter occupancy and vacant-for-rent units, while retaining ZCTA survey limits. A property-level reading still requires current terms, charges, unit type, and availability to be verified independently.

  • Zillow's ZIP index blends rental types and should not be treated as a quote for a particular bedroom count, building type, lease term, or available address; the index does not identify a specific available unit.
  • The matched ZCTA's survey median, renter burden, household income, stock, and vacancy figures have a five-year survey scope and sampling uncertainty; they do not identify the terms or financial stress of an individual tenancy.
  • High historical variability and a recorded drawdown mean that even near-complete observation coverage does not make a single current ZORI point a stable long-run benchmark or a forward-looking projection.
  • Redfin's rolling resale measures concern for-sale transactions and listings. Price, supply, and sale-to-list signals cannot be substituted for rental comps, lease availability, or a property-level performance calculation.
Direct ZIP resale evidence

For-sale liquidity inside ZIP 30501

Redfin reports these as a rolling three-month ZIP observation through 2026-06-30. They describe the for-sale market, not rental vacancy or the rent of a particular property.

Median sale price$374,915+2.0% year over year
Homes sold69rolling three-month observation
Median days on market51 daysfor-sale listing absorption
Months of supply5.7resale inventory relative to sales pace

Activity and available supply

Direct ZIP counts remain separate because each describes a different stage of the resale funnel.

Direct resale activity for ZIP 30501Active listings238Inventory130Pending sales74Homes sold69

Counter-signals before underwriting

A price alone does not reveal how quickly buyers are absorbing available homes.

Inventory direction

130 observed inventory · +11.2% year over year.

Price realization

94.0% average sale-to-list ratio · 9.0% sold above original list.

Early absorption

12.2% went off market within two weeks; compare this with 51 median days on market.

Measurement boundary

Small ZIP samples can move sharply. This rolling period smooths monthly noise but does not replace current address-level sale and rent comparables.

Redfin Data Center · updated 2026-07-03 · exact five-digit ZIP key. Implausible source values are withheld as n/a rather than repaired or inherited from a broader geography.

Wider market evidence

Listing and rental liquidity around the ZIP

These measures are not ZIP observations. They are labelled county or metro context so they can challenge the local story without being copied into it.

Hall County listing conditions

1,142 active Realtor.com listings · 59 median days on market · 24.6% price-reduced share · 2026-06.

Gainesville, GA resale supply

4.4 months of supply · 47 median days on market · 33.3% listings with price drops · Redfin 2026-05-01.

Apartment List metro liquidity

8.2% reported apartment vacancy · n/a. These are direct metro observations and do not describe a particular ZIP unit.

Property-level next step

Compare live same-bedroom listings, concessions, utilities, condition and days listed inside ZIP 30501. The report frames the market; it does not replace a rent roll, lease review or address-level comparable set.

Questions this report can answer

Scope-aware answers

Why does the asking-rent index differ from ACS median gross rent?

ZORI is a typical asking-rent index blended across rental types, while ACS reports a five-year survey median for occupied renter homes and includes selected utilities. The price concepts, time windows, and populations differ. The burden statistic is a household survey outcome, while the income screen is simply arithmetic.

Are the bedroom figures measured rents for available units?

No. The bedroom figures are modelled estimates created by scaling the ZIP-wide ZORI with the supplied local HUD bedroom ladder. HUD is a bedroom-specific administrative standard rather than asking rent. These figures can organize a comparison by bedroom count, but they do not document any property's listed, signed, or collected rent.

How should the rent history influence confidence in the current index?

The history documents same-month changes, variability, drawdown, coverage, and discovery ranks through the stated endpoint. Its positive multi-horizon changes establish a backward-looking path, while high variability and the peak-to-trough decline show that the path was not smooth. It supports context for the current index but does not forecast future rents or prescribe an action.

Why cannot the resale screen determine a property-level result?

Redfin measures completed for-sale activity and listing-market signals in a rolling ZIP resale window, while ZORI is an asking-rent index. Dividing annualized ZORI by median sold price combines two distinct sources. The result does not contain property-specific charges, lease terms, condition, bedroom count, or transaction matching, so it remains a screening ratio rather than a property conclusion.