ZIP reports / WI / 53202
ZIP rental intelligence · 2026-06

ZIP 53202, Milwaukee, WI

Asking rent, household capacity, housing stock and local context—kept at their original geographic and measurement scopes.

Direct local rent answer

What does rent cost in ZIP 53202?

The latest Zillow ZORI for ZIP 53202 is $1,688 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical observed asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

Zillow asking-rent index$1,6882026-06 · up 3.4% year over year
ACS median gross rent$1,259ACS 2024 5-year survey · ±$70 margin of error
HUD two-bedroom standard$1,338Administrative FMR/SAFMR · not asking rent
Bedroom-level rent benchmarks in ZIP 53202
BedroomsModelled asking-rent lensHUD standardHow to use it
Studio$1,296ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,027HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
1 bedroom$1,412ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,119HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
2 bedrooms$1,688ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,338HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
3 bedrooms$2,079ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,648HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
4 bedrooms$2,251ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,784HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.

Bedroom estimates are modelled, not observed rents. Zillow, Census ACS and HUD describe different housing universes and remain separate throughout this report.Zillow pulled 2026-08-08

Median household income$71,034ACS 2024 5-year · ±$5,206 MOE
Renter share78.6%13,243 renter households
Rent burden 30%+40.6%5,374 observed households
Housing vacancy11.1%2,107 of 18,957 units
Six views · one local decision

Read the measures together, without merging them

ZORI tracks observed asking rent, ACS describes occupied renter homes, and HUD publishes an administrative benchmark. The charts preserve those differences and add wider context only where the geography is named.

Three definitions of rent

Useful as a spread, not interchangeable observations.

Three rent measures for ZIP 53202Zillow asking-rent index$1,688ACS median gross rent$1,259HUD two-bedroom standard$1,338

Affordability screen

Annual income implied by 30% of the current ZIP ZORI.

Income screen for ZIP 53202ACS median household income$71,034Income at 30% of ZIP ZORI$67,520

Bedroom ladder

Modelled from ZIP ZORI using the local HUD ladder.

Modelled bedroom rent ladder for ZIP 53202Studio$1,296One bedroom$1,412Two bedrooms$1,688Three bedrooms$2,079Four bedrooms$2,251

Observed renter burden

ACS ZCTA households with computable gross-rent burden.

Observed renter cost burden in ZCTA 5320230% or more of income5,374 householdsBelow 30%7,869 households

ZIP versus wider rent context

Each bar retains its own ZIP, city, county or metro scope.

Asking-rent context for ZIP 53202ZIP 53202$1,688Milwaukee city$1,469Milwaukee County county$1,520Milwaukee-Waukesha, WI metro$1,552

Monthly asking-rent history

Direct Zillow ZORI observations over the latest five years. Missing months remain visible gaps.

Five-year direct Zillow asking-rent history for ZIP 53202; missing months remain gaps$1,730$1,602$1,474$1,3452021-062023-122026-06
Five-year change
21.5%exact same-month endpoints
Largest observed drawdown
3.9%peak to a later observed month
Annualized monthly variability
2.4%112 consecutive returns
Monthly coverage
99.1%114 of 115 months
Decision brief

What the evidence says for ZIP 53202

At the June 2026 endpoint, this ZIP's typical Zillow asking-rent index was $1,688 per month, setting up the central tension between a current market-facing measure and older occupied-home survey evidence. Zillow ZORI is a ZIP-level, typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types, not a quote for every listing. Exact same-month annualized changes were 3.36% over 1 year, 2.84% over 3 years, and 3.96% over 5 years. The latest pace exceeds the medium-run rate but trails the longer-run rate; that still-positive pattern confirms a stable-growth path more than it breaks from one. It does not establish future rent movement, returns, or an investment case.

The history has broad, but not complete, coverage: annualized monthly-return variability was 2.40%, maximum drawdown was -3.86%, and coverage was 99.13%. Those backward-looking measurements describe a contained recorded path, supporting more confidence in the current index snapshot than a sharply swinging series would warrant while leaving listing-level uncertainty intact. Its momentum, stability, and balanced discovery ranks are 944, 526, and 392, respectively, among history-eligible ZIPs nationally; lower rank is higher. These are transparent discovery comparisons, not forecasts or investment recommendations, and they do not show a property's likely performance.

Source choice materially changes the level. The five-digit label 53202 is both a Zillow ZIP market identifier and a Census ZCTA match; a ZCTA is a statistical area and is not identical to a USPS delivery ZIP. The ACS 2024 five-year survey puts median gross rent at $1,259 for occupied renter homes and includes selected utilities, making ZORI 34.1% higher on this cross-source comparison. That ACS measure is not a current asking-rent series. HUD's two-bedroom FMR/SAFMR standard is $1,338, and ZORI is 26.2% above it; FMR/SAFMR is an administrative bedroom-specific standard, not asking rent. For wider context only, the City of Milwaukee city-context rent is $1,469.47, Milwaukee County county-context rent is $1,520, and Milwaukee-Waukesha, WI metro-context rent is $1,552. These city, county, and metro figures are context, not substitutes for the ZIP index.

Bedroom figures resolve sizing only through a model, not through separate ZIP observations. Scaling the ZIP ZORI by the local HUD ladder produces modelled monthly estimates of $1,296 for a studio, $1,412 for one bedroom, $1,688 for two bedrooms, $2,079 for three bedrooms, and $2,251 for four bedrooms. They are modelled estimates, never measured bedroom rents. The ladder preserves HUD's local bedroom relationship while anchoring its level to ZORI; it does not show that any available unit asks those amounts. The packet provides no observed bedroom-level asking-rent sample, utility treatment, concession data, or unit attributes to validate an individual listing.

Income framing creates a different tension. The 30% required-income screen converts the ZIP index to $67,520 in annual household income, while the matched ZCTA's median household income is $71,034; the index-to-income arithmetic is 28.5%. This is a screen derived from aggregate figures, not advice and not an applicant qualification rule. Separately, the ACS survey counts 13,243 renter households, of which 5,374, or 40.6%, report gross-rent burdens at or above 30% of household income. Those burden data describe surveyed households and cannot prove what any tenant pays, whether a particular unit is affordable, or how a future applicant will qualify.

Stock and vacancy describe an area-level rental setting, not the competitiveness or condition of a specific address. The matched ZCTA contains 18,957 housing units, including 13,737 in large multifamily structures. Its overall vacancy rate is 11.1%, and 1,160 units are recorded as vacant for rent. The documented renter occupancy and multifamily concentration provide scale for the survey, but a vacant-for-rent count is not evidence that a particular home is available, comparable, priced at ZORI, or offered on stated terms. Nor does the area-wide vacancy rate establish concessions, turnover, or landlord behavior for a given building.

Several limits keep the figures from becoming property conclusions. ZORI records a blended typical asking-rent index, ACS summarizes occupied renter homes in a multiyear survey, and HUD supplies administrative standards; their timing, populations, utility treatment, and intended uses differ. ACS margins of error also apply to its estimates. History is measured only through the stated Zillow endpoint and is backward-looking. For a property-level reading, confirm the advertised bedroom count, current asking rent, whether utilities are included, lease duration, fees, concessions, availability date, and whether the listing remains active. Compare those listing facts with the appropriate source universe rather than treating any area average or modelled ladder as a quote. The deciding question is: does the specific listing's documented rent and terms match the household's own budget and needs?

Decision signals

What deserves a closer property-level check

Stable path, not a projection

ZORI reached $1,688 in June 2026 after a 3.36% one-year gain. Same-month annualized growth was 2.84% across three years and 3.96% across five years. With 2.40% annualized volatility and a 3.86% maximum drawdown, the historical record looks contained, but it remains a backward-looking index series rather than a forecast.

Three rent measures answer different questions

The $1,259 ACS median gross rent is not a competing current asking-rent quote: it comes from a five-year survey of occupied renter homes and includes selected utilities. The two-bedroom HUD FMR of $1,338 is an administrative standard. Both sit below ZORI, but each answers a different question and should remain separate.

Aggregate income screen sits near the median

At the 30% arithmetic screen, ZORI implies $67,520 of annual income, compared with a ZCTA median household income of $71,034. Meanwhile, 40.6% of surveyed renter households report spending at least 30% of income on gross rent. This aggregate burden statistic cannot determine affordability or qualification for a given applicant.

Multifamily stock is substantial, but availability is unproven

Within the matched ZCTA, 13,737 of 18,957 housing units are in large multifamily structures, and 1,160 vacant units are for rent. The 11.1% area-wide vacancy rate and this stock mix describe scale and composition only. They cannot verify current availability, asking terms, concessions, or condition at an individual property.

  • Cross-source level risk: the Zillow, ACS gross-rent, and HUD standard figures cover different populations, timing, utility treatment, and purposes, so percentage gaps should not be interpreted as direct listing discounts or premiums.
  • Historical-path risk: the high coverage, low variability, and ranks summarize recorded Zillow index history through the endpoint, but they cannot capture unobserved listing changes or assure continuation of past patterns.
  • Stock risk: vacant-for-rent units and the area vacancy rate are aggregate survey measures. They do not indicate whether a particular building has an open unit, acceptable terms, or comparable included utilities.
  • Bedroom-model risk: estimates rely on scaling the ZIP index by a HUD ladder. Any listed home may differ because its stated bedroom count, utilities, lease terms, fees, concessions, or availability are not in the packet.
Direct ZIP resale evidence

For-sale liquidity inside ZIP 53202

Redfin reports these as a rolling three-month ZIP observation through 2026-06-30. They describe the for-sale market, not rental vacancy or the rent of a particular property.

Median sale price$304,931-3.2% year over year
Homes sold119rolling three-month observation
Median days on market58 daysfor-sale listing absorption
Months of supply4.2resale inventory relative to sales pace

Activity and available supply

Direct ZIP counts remain separate because each describes a different stage of the resale funnel.

Direct resale activity for ZIP 53202Active listings294Inventory163Pending sales124Homes sold119

Counter-signals before underwriting

A price alone does not reveal how quickly buyers are absorbing available homes.

Inventory direction

163 observed inventory · +32.9% year over year.

Price realization

98.6% average sale-to-list ratio · 17.3% sold above original list.

Early absorption

28.9% went off market within two weeks; compare this with 58 median days on market.

Measurement boundary

Small ZIP samples can move sharply. This rolling period smooths monthly noise but does not replace current address-level sale and rent comparables.

Redfin Data Center · updated 2026-07-03 · exact five-digit ZIP key. Implausible source values are withheld as n/a rather than repaired or inherited from a broader geography.

Wider market evidence

Listing and rental liquidity around the ZIP

These measures are not ZIP observations. They are labelled county or metro context so they can challenge the local story without being copied into it.

Milwaukee County listing conditions

1,688 active Realtor.com listings · 33 median days on market · 14.1% price-reduced share · 2026-06.

Milwaukee-Waukesha, WI resale supply

2.1 months of supply · 38 median days on market · 15.6% listings with price drops · Redfin 2026-05-01.

Apartment List metro liquidity

5.2% reported apartment vacancy · n/a. These are direct metro observations and do not describe a particular ZIP unit.

Property-level next step

Compare live same-bedroom listings, concessions, utilities, condition and days listed inside ZIP 53202. The report frames the market; it does not replace a rent roll, lease review or address-level comparable set.

Questions this report can answer

Scope-aware answers

Why is Zillow ZORI higher than the ACS median gross rent?

They are different evidence universes. The June Zillow value is a typical observed ZIP asking-rent index blended across rental types. ACS reports a five-year survey median gross rent among occupied renter homes and includes selected utilities. Different timing, sampled population, and rent definitions make the gap descriptive, not a contradiction.

Are the bedroom figures observed rents for available apartments?

No. The studio-through-four-bedroom figures are modelled monthly estimates produced by scaling ZIP ZORI with the local HUD ladder. HUD FMR/SAFMR itself is a bedroom-specific administrative standard, not asking rent. Neither series measures the advertised rent for a particular comparable unit.

Does the required-income screen determine whether someone qualifies for a lease?

No. The screen simply divides the annualized ZIP index by 30% to state an aggregate income amount. It is arithmetic, not financial advice, a recommendation, or a landlord's applicant qualification rule. Actual affordability depends on the household and the listing's documented total terms.

How should vacancy and historical metrics be used together?

Both should be read as area-level or index-level context. ACS vacancy does not confirm availability at a selected property, and Zillow history is backward-looking. The reported coverage, variability, drawdown, and discovery ranks can frame confidence in a current index snapshot, but cannot forecast rents or property outcomes.