Counties / Wisconsin / Milwaukee County

Milwaukee County, WI

FIPS 55079 · population 926,331 · part of Milwaukee, WI

$297k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
Direct county rent answer

What does rent cost in Milwaukee County, WI?

The latest county-level Zillow ZORI is $1,520 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

County Zillow ZORI$1,5202026-06 · up 4.2% year over year
County ACS gross rent$1,101ACS 2024 5-year · occupied-renter survey
HUD two-bedroom FMR$1,338FY2026 · administrative standard
HUD Fair Market Rent by bedroom count in Milwaukee County
BedroomsHUD monthly FMRGeographyMeasurement boundary
Studio$1,027Milwaukee County, WIHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
1 bedroom$1,119Milwaukee County, WIHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
2 bedrooms$1,338Milwaukee County, WIHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
3 bedrooms$1,648Milwaukee County, WIHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
4 bedrooms$1,784Milwaukee County, WIHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.

Zillow asking rent, ACS gross rent and HUD FMR describe different housing universes. They remain separate and no metro, city or neighboring-county value replaces missing county evidence.Zillow pulled 2026-07-26 · HUD pulled 2026-07-26

The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$297k
▲ 3.4% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
Median asking rent
$1,520
▲ 4.2% year over year
Zillow ZORI · direct
Gross yield
6.2%
annual rent ÷ price, before costs
derived: rent × 12 ÷ price ✓
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,338
market rent is 1.14x the standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+56.1%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+3.4%FHFA HPI2025+5.8%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-08-02.
Owner-reported value$231k
Surveyed gross rent$1,101
Rent burden 30%+48.4%
Median year built1957
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
8.0%vacant
426,715estimated housing units
Occupied tenure50.1% renter
owner 49.9%renter 50.1%
Structure mix49.6% single-family
Single-family 49.6%20+ units 17.1%Mobile home 0.5%Other 32.9%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs466,892▼ 0.5% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments30,141annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,387▲ 4.3% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorEducation and health services28.0% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS−0.5%WEEKLY WAGE+4.3%Education and health services28.0%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2021-2025; latest 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-08-02. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

Resident income

How local income has compounded

BEA per-capita personal income divides all personal income by the county population. It is broader than wages, but it is not household income or a measure of what renters can afford.

Per-capita personal income19692024
Per-capita personal income history for Milwaukee CountyA line chart of annual BEA per-capita personal income from 1969 through 2024.$0k$35k$70k196919972024$4k$62k
Nominal annual dollars; not adjusted for inflation. A rising line can reflect wage, business-income, transfer-income and investment-income changes together.
Renter affordability

Who carries the heaviest rent burden

HUD CHAS separates renter households by income relative to local HAMFI. Moderate burden means housing costs above 30% through 50% of income; severe burden means more than 50%.

Share of renter households in each income band2018-2022
Renter cost burden by HAMFI income band in Milwaukee CountyFive horizontal bars show moderate and severe housing cost burden shares among renter households in each HUD income band.0%25%50%75%100%At or below 30% HAMFI56,85578.8% burdened30–50% HAMFI37,82075.4% burdened50–80% HAMFI41,28027.4% burdened80–100% HAMFI18,7607.6% burdenedAbove 100% HAMFI42,3252.9% burdened
Moderate: >30% to 50%Severe: >50%
Each percentage uses HUD’s published subtotal for that income band. For disclosure, HUD keeps 0 as 0, publishes 1–7 households as 4 and rounds 8 or more to the nearest 5. Independently rounded categories can differ from their displayed sum and are not forced into a percentage.
Direct local rental evidence

Recent leases and rental-market liquidity in Milwaukee County, WI

These Apartment List observations match the exact county Census code 55079. They are kept separate from Zillow asking rent, Census occupied-home rent and wider metro measures.

Direct recent-lease rent history

Monthly overall-rent index; missing observations are not filled from another geography.

$1,245$1,145$1,0442021-082026-07
Recent-lease rent$1,2452026-07 · +3.8% year over year
Rental vacancy5.1%2026-07 · -2.0 percentage points year over year
Time on marketn/an/a
County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Milwaukee County’s underwriting tension is a workable pre-cost rent-to-price relationship against softer listing conditions, tax drag, and flood exposure. It merits investigation by buyers able to verify block-level rents, taxes, and insurance; those relying on price momentum or thin expense buffers should be cautious. At Zillow’s 2026-06 county reading, median home value was $296,654 and median asking rent was $1,520 per month; supplied gross yield is 6.15% before operating costs.

02Housing economics

That yield uses measured market asking rent, not HUD FMR. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR of $1,338 is a payment standard, while measured asking rent was 13.6% above it; FMR cannot replace rent comps or recalculate yield. The 1.93% effective property-tax rate and $4,444 median annual tax make carrying costs material, although parcel assessments are not published. FHFA’s 2025 annual repeat-transaction HPI rose 5.8%; it is an index, not a dollar home value, and neither its method nor time frame should be merged with Zillow’s reading.

03Demand & competition

Realtor.com’s 2026-06 MLS evidence indicates a softer visible listing environment, not demand proof: 1,688 active listings were 17.34% higher, median marketing time was 33 days and 25.71% longer, and 14.1% of listings carried reductions. These are asking-market supply, marketing-time, and seller-concession measures, not closed-sale prices. Investors made 14.2% of purchases, indicating participation but not bid behavior. Tax-return records show more households left than arrived, and departing movers had higher average AGI. QCEW’s annual covered workplace employment slipped while its average weekly covered-worker wage rose; education and health services is the largest disclosed private supersector, not the whole county economy.

04Risk & next checks

Inland flood is the dominant hazard and aligns with a modeled annual climate-loss ratio of 0.08% of building value; this screening estimate is not a parcel premium or claim forecast. Debt terms, insurance quotes, vacancy, operating expenses, closed-sale comps, unit-level rent comps, and parcel flood exposure are not published. Their absence prevents a levered cash-flow, cap-rate, resale-value, or asset-specific hazard conclusion. Check tax bills and assessments, flood mapping and insurer terms, leases and rent comps, and recent comparable sales before fixing price or reserves.

County ZIP rental landscape

How asking rent and renter pressure vary inside Milwaukee County, WI

This view uses 12 direct Zillow ZIP markets matched to Census ZCTAs. Each ZIP is assigned by its largest HUD residential county share; this is not an exhaustive county inventory.

Selected ZIP range$1,061$1,688Zillow asking-rent index
Monthly spread$627highest minus lowest selected ZIP
Observed burden range33.7%54.0%ACS renter households paying 30%+
Renter households covered105,864across the selected ZCTAs
01 · ASKING RENT LADDERDirect ZIP ZORI
Horizontal bars compare Zillow asking-rent indexes across the selected direct-evidence ZIP set.53202$1,68853154$1,68253207$1,60953204$1,45853214$1,43553211$1,42953218$1,39953221$1,39053209$1,38653208$1,34053212$1,27153215$1,061
02 · PRESSURE MATRIXRent × observed burden
Each point is one selected ZIP and ZCTA match. Horizontal position is Zillow asking rent and vertical position is the ACS renter cost-burden share.56.5%50.2%43.9%37.5%31.2%532025320953204532155321153212532185321453208532215315453207Zillow asking-rent index →ACS burden share →
03 · BENCHMARK GAPZORI vs HUD 2BR
Bars show the percentage difference between the Zillow blended asking-rent index and the local HUD two-bedroom standard. Their housing universes differ.53202+126.2%53154+125.7%53207+120.3%53204+109.0%53214+107.2%53211+106.8%53218+104.6%53221+103.9%53209+103.6%53208+100.1%53212+95.0%53215+79.3%
WHAT THE LOCAL DISTRIBUTION SAYS

Milwaukee County's selected ZIP/ZCTA view poses a current rent-screening question rather than a single county price: which displayed locations fit a household's current asking-rent budget once individual units are checked? For direct Zillow observations in June 2026, the typical observed asking-rent index ranges from $1,061 to $1,688, a $627 difference. The selected-set median is $1,414, below county ZORI of $1,520. Year-over-year index changes span 0.2% to 12.0%, compared with 4.2% countywide. This broad level and change dispersion is useful for setting a listing-search band, not for forecasting rents or treating ZORI as a quote for every bedroom or address. The decision is therefore to test actual units against budget, household size, and total lease cost.

Three rent measures answer distinct questions. Zillow's current typical observed asking-rent index should be read beside ACS 2024 five-year ZCTA median gross rent, a survey estimate, and HUD's FY2026 two-bedroom FMR. The HUD amount is $1,338, a bedroom-specific administrative standard rather than an asking-rent estimate. Across the shown ZIPs, the direct-ZORI-to-HUD ratio runs from 79.3% to 126.2%, showing that these measures need not align. ACS median gross rent spans $936 to $1,452 in the selected ZCTAs. These are useful comparisons, not inputs for averaging or a finding that any particular unit is affordable.

Affordability and vacancy indicators create trade-offs rather than rankings. The ACS estimated share of renters paying at least 30% of income for rent ranges from 33.7% to 54.0% in the shown areas, compared with 48.4% countywide. The ACS vacancy rate ranges from 2.8% to 15.3%, versus 8.0% countywide. At 53209, a $1,386 ZORI implies $55,440 in annual income at that threshold, above its ACS median household income of $48,486; its burden rate is the selected maximum, while its vacancy rate is 11.1%. This juxtaposition does not establish that a median-income household rents at ZORI or that a vacant home is suitable or discounted. Searchers should treat burden as a recurring-cost signal and vacancy as an area-level condition measure, then verify current listings.

Coverage is limited: this view includes 12 of the 32 eligible direct-ZORI ZIP/ZCTA matches and covers 105,864 renter households, so it is not an inventory of all county rental locations. For this Milwaukee County display, the HUD-USPS crosswalk assigns each shown ZIP to the county based on its largest residential-address share. Yet delivery ZIP routes can cross county lines, while ACS ZCTA tabulation boundaries may not match the addresses served under a USPS ZIP. Before acting, verify the property's street address and county placement, live advertised rent, bedroom count for FMR relevance, utilities and mandatory fees, lease terms, and actual availability.

Selected ZIP evidence

Keep each source universe visible

32 ZIP profiles passed the county gate; the 12 with the most renter households are shown.

ZIP / ZCTAZillow asking rentACS gross rentHUD 2BRBurden 30%+VacancyIncome screenHUD county share
53202$1,688$1,259$1,33840.6%11.1%$68k100.0%
53209$1,386$988$1,33854.0%11.1%$55k100.0%
53204$1,458$1,004$1,33847.9%7.8%$58k100.0%
53215$1,061$977$1,33845.9%9.1%$42k100.0%
53211$1,429$1,287$1,33847.3%6.5%$57k100.0%
53212$1,271$1,055$1,33850.3%12.5%$51k100.0%
53218$1,399$1,067$1,33853.1%7.8%$56k100.0%
53214$1,435$1,009$1,33837.5%7.9%$57k100.0%
53208$1,340$936$1,33842.6%15.3%$54k100.0%
53221$1,390$1,119$1,33847.0%3.4%$56k100.0%
53154$1,682$1,452$1,33833.7%2.8%$67k100.0%
53207$1,609$1,197$1,33834.4%6.1%$64k100.0%
READ BEFORE USING

Zillow ZORI is a typical observed asking-rent index at June 2026, whereas ACS ZCTA figures are 2024 five-year survey estimates and HUD FMR is a FY2026 administrative bedroom-specific standard; they are not interchangeable measures.

The selected direct-evidence set includes 12 of 32 eligible ZIP/ZCTA matches and is not exhaustive. HUD's largest-residential-share assignment is only a display convention, while ZCTA boundaries can diverge from USPS delivery geography where ZIP routes cross county lines.

SOURCE LEDGERCensus ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stockACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30Census ACS five-year — ZCTA housing and incomeACS 2024 5-year ZCTA · pulled 2026-08-08HUD Fair Market Rents — Section 8 standardFY2026 FMR · pulled 2026-07-26HUD-USPS ZIP-to-county residential-address crosswalkHUD-USPS 2026Q1 · pulled 2026-08-09Zillow ZHVI and ZORI — county values and rentscounty ZHVI/ZORI 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-26Zillow ZORI — ZIP market rentsZORI ZIP 2026-06 · pulled 2026-08-08
Cities & communities

Where people live within Milwaukee County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Milwaukee city*567KWest Allis city59.6KWauwatosa city48.5KGreenfield city37.3KOak Creek city37.3KFranklin city35.9KSouth Milwaukee city20.4KCudahy city17.9K
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

19 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Milwaukee cityIncorporated place · spans 3 counties
    566,973
  2. 02
    West Allis cityIncorporated place
    59,612
  3. 03
    Wauwatosa cityIncorporated place
    48,529
  4. 04
    Greenfield cityIncorporated place
    37,345
  5. 05
    Oak Creek cityIncorporated place
    37,325
  6. 06
    Franklin cityIncorporated place
    35,886
  7. 07
    South Milwaukee cityIncorporated place
    20,442
  8. 08
    Cudahy cityIncorporated place
    17,853
  9. 09
    Whitefish Bay villageIncorporated place
    14,665
  10. 10
    Greendale villageIncorporated place
    14,594
  11. 11
    Glendale cityIncorporated place
    13,656
  12. 12
    Shorewood villageIncorporated place
    13,627
Show 7 more places
  1. 13
    Brown Deer villageIncorporated place
    12,564
  2. 14
    St. Francis cityIncorporated place
    9,004
  3. 15
    Hales Corners villageIncorporated place
    7,689
  4. 16
    Fox Point villageIncorporated place
    6,683
  5. 17
    Bayside villageIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    4,329
  6. 18
    West Milwaukee villageIncorporated place
    4,038
  7. 19
    River Hills villageIncorporated place
    1,632

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.085% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.93%

$4,444 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-1,848

18,221 in · 20,069 out

Arriving vs leaving income−$14,746

$59,618 arriving · $74,364 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors14.2%

1,217 of 8,572 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings1,688▲ 17.3% year over year
Median days on market33▲ 25.7% year over year
Listings price-reduced14.1%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▲ 4.8% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

Same metro

The other counties in Milwaukee, WI

A metro is an average of these. Which side of a county line a property sits on can change the tax bill, the hazard profile and the tenant pool.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Milwaukee County926,331$297k$1,5206.2%inland flooding
Waukesha County411,762$512k$1,7684.1%inland flooding
Washington County137,879$434k$1,4504.0%inland flooding
Ozaukee County92,966$514k$1,7054.0%inland flooding
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Parcel-specific flood insurance or mitigation costs could overwhelm the pre-cost yield.
  2. Softer MLS conditions may translate into weaker realized sale prices than county home-value evidence suggests.
  3. Outmigration, higher income among departing movers, and a slight covered-job decline may constrain tenant or buyer depth.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Is the published rent a market measure or a HUD standard?

It is median asking market rent; HUD two-bedroom FMR is separately identified as a payment standard.

Can the supplied gross yield be read as net cash flow?

No. It represents annual market rent before costs; debt, insurance, vacancy, and operating expenses are not published.

Does the record establish demand from MLS data?

No. It supplies active listings, marketing time, and reductions, which are listing-market measures rather than closed sales or proof of buyer demand.