Cities / Wisconsin / Spans 3 counties / Milwaukee
Milwaukee cityscape
City housing brief · Incorporated place

Milwaukee, WI

City evidence stays city-level. County, metro and national records appear separately to explain the wider market without changing the city figures.

City gross yield7.6%ZORI × 12 ÷ ZHVI · before costs
Direct city rent answer

What does rent cost in Milwaukee, WI?

The latest city-level Zillow ZORI for Milwaukee is $1,469 per month in 2026-06. It measures a typical asking-rent market across rental types—not an arithmetic average or an address-level rent estimate.

City Zillow ZORI$1,4692026-06 · up 4.7% year over year
City ACS gross rent$1,059ACS 2024 5-year occupied-renter survey
HUD two-bedroom contextn/aCity intersects 3 counties; no county selected
How to read the rent answer for Milwaukee
MeasureCurrent valueGeographyMeasurement boundary
Zillow ZORI$1,469Milwaukee cityTypical observed asking-rent index; not a unit quote.
Census ACS gross rent$1,059Milwaukee citySurvey estimate for occupied renter homes, including specified utilities.
HUD 2BR FMRn/aNo single countyAdministrative bedroom standard; wider context, never substituted as city rent.

For a property decision, match bedroom count, condition, utilities, concessions, lease timing and nearby comparable listings. Wider county and metro evidence below stays explicitly labelled.Zillow pulled 2026-07-29

For within-city variation, inspect the published ZIP rental landscape rather than treating one citywide value as uniform.

City market snapshot

Four figures that frame the city

Typical home value
$231k
▲ 3.4% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · 2026-06
Observed market rent
$1,469
▲ 4.7% year over year
Zillow ZORI · 2026-06
Entry affordability
4.3x
home value ÷ household income
Zillow + Census ACS
Population
566,973
▼ 4.6% between ACS vintages
ACS 2024 5-year
Decision brief

What the city-level evidence says

01Decision frame

Milwaukee’s current Zillow ZHVI typical home value is $231,388.50, while ZORI typical observed market rent is $1,469.47 monthly. Their implied city gross yield is 7.62%, before every operating cost. Relative to ACS median household income, ZHVI is 4.27x income and annual ZORI is 32.51% of income. These are screening ratios, not a net return or a household-specific affordability test.

02Housing stock

The ACS city survey counts 259,101 housing units; renters occupy 58.19% of occupied units, while the citywide housing-stock vacancy rate is 10.26%. ACS reports a $184,000 median value for surveyed owner-occupied housing and $1,059 median gross rent for surveyed renter-occupied housing, with gross rent including selected utilities. Those ACS medians differ in concept and period from Zillow’s typical value and observed market rent, so they should not be averaged or substituted.

03City depth

Direct city depth is mixed: 50.86% of renter households meet the ACS rent-burden threshold. Single-family homes are 43.44% of all units and large multifamily buildings are 17.61%, while 37.74% of vacant units are classified as for rent. These survey shares describe stock and vacancy reasons, not available investment inventory or lease-up speed. Population fell 4.64% between overlapping ACS vintages; this is not an annual rate and may reflect boundary changes. Median household income is $54,234, the poverty rate is 22.78%, and unemployment is 6.16%; these are descriptive demand constraints, not causes of property performance.

04Wider context

Milwaukee County’s reported property-tax rate is 1.93%, a county expense context rather than a citywide or parcel-specific rate. Washington County’s reported property-tax rate is 1.10%, applicable as context only to property there. Waukesha County’s reported property-tax rate is 1.14%, likewise requiring location-specific use. The broader Milwaukee metro recorded a jobs decline of 0.88%, while the broader Milwaukee metro market showed 2.1 months of supply and a 101.74% sale-to-list ratio. The national Freddie Mac thirty-year mortgage rate was 6.58%, a financing benchmark rather than Milwaukee borrowing terms.

05Limits & next checks

Underwriting remains limited by citywide and wider-area aggregates, mismatched survey and market measures, and gross yield’s omission of expenses, downtime and financing. For a candidate property, verify its exact county and parcel tax bill, attainable unit-level rent, current occupancy and lease terms, tenant-paid utilities, insurance, maintenance, management, capital work and closing costs. Inspect physical condition, confirm permitted use and unit count, obtain insurance and loan quotes, and test cash flow with property-specific vacancy, collections and repair assumptions.

Housing system

Market movement and the stock underneath it

Five-year path

Price and rent, rebased to 100

ZHVI +36.6%ZORI +30.8%
13711695202120222023202420252026
Each series starts at 100 so their direction can be compared without pretending that a home value and a monthly rent share the same unit.
Housing stock

Tenure and vacancy

ACS
58.2%RENTER
Owner occupied41.8%
Renter occupied58.2%
Vacant units10.3%

Median structure year 1953

Tenure uses occupied units; vacancy uses all housing units.
Measurement matrix

Two sources, two different questions

SourceHome valueMonthly rent
Zillow market index$231.4K$1.5K
ACS occupied housing$184K$1.1K
Zillow measures current market indexes. ACS reports surveyed owner value and gross rent for occupied housing. The rows are context, not interchangeable estimates.
Direct local rental evidence

Recent leases and rental-market liquidity in Milwaukee, WI

These Apartment List observations match the exact city Census code 5553000. They are kept separate from Zillow asking rent, Census occupied-home rent and wider metro measures.

Direct recent-lease rent history

Monthly overall-rent index; missing observations are not filled from another geography.

$1,193$1,108$1,0232021-082026-07
Recent-lease rent$1,1932026-07 · +4.1% year over year
Rental vacancy6.4%2026-07 · -3.4 percentage points year over year
Time on marketn/an/a
Direct city depth

Households and housing form behind the medians

Median household income$54k

Annual ACS household measure.

Rent-to-income screen32.5%

Annual ZORI divided by ACS median income.

ACS rent burden50.9%

Renters paying at least 30% of household income toward gross rent.

Average household size2.37

People per occupied housing unit.

Single-family stock43.4%

Detached and attached one-unit structures.

Large multifamily stock17.6%

Housing in structures with 20 or more units.

Vacant and for rent37.7%

Share of vacant units listed by ACS as for rent, not a market vacancy rate.

Unemployment6.2%

Share of the civilian labor force.

Poverty22.8%

ACS population for whom poverty status is determined.

These are citywide context measures. They cannot tell you the rent, vacancy, expenses or tenant demand for a particular neighborhood or property.
ZIP rental landscape

How asking rent and renter pressure vary inside Milwaukee

This view uses 12 direct Zillow ZIP markets matched to Census ZCTAs. It is a selected evidence set, not a neighborhood ranking or an exhaustive city inventory.

Selected ZIP range$1,061$1,688Zillow asking-rent index
Monthly spread$627highest minus lowest selected ZIP
Observed burden range34.4%55.0%ACS renter households paying 30%+
Renter households covered100,819across the selected ZCTAs
01 · ASKING RENT LADDERDirect ZIP ZORI
Horizontal bars compare Zillow asking-rent indexes across the selected direct-evidence ZIP set.53202$1,68853207$1,60953204$1,45853218$1,39953221$1,39053209$1,38653208$1,34053212$1,27153219$1,21153225$1,19953216$1,14253215$1,061
02 · PRESSURE MATRIXRent × observed burden
Each point is one selected ZIP and ZCTA match. Horizontal position is Zillow asking rent and vertical position is the ACS renter cost-burden share.57.5%51.1%44.7%38.3%31.9%532025320953204532155321253218532085322153207532165322553219Zillow asking-rent index →ACS burden share →
03 · BENCHMARK GAPZORI vs HUD 2BR
Bars show the percentage difference between the Zillow blended asking-rent index and the local HUD two-bedroom standard. Their housing universes differ.53202+126.2%53207+120.3%53204+109.0%53218+104.6%53221+103.9%53209+103.6%53208+100.1%53212+95.0%53219+90.5%53225+89.6%53216+85.4%53215+79.3%
WHAT THE LOCAL DISTRIBUTION SAYS

Within the selected direct-evidence set, Milwaukee’s current asking-rent landscape is broad rather than tightly clustered. The 12 ZIP/ZCTA matches—chosen from 20 eligible matches in renter-household order—cover 100,819 renter households, but are not a complete geographic inventory. Zillow’s typical observed asking-rent index ranges from $1,061 in ZIP 53215 to $1,688 in ZIP 53202; the displayed median is $1,363 and the spread is $627. The initial decision question is whether a prospective unit’s quoted rent, bedroom count, and lease terms fit a household budget near this range. At those endpoints, holding the index rent to 30% of income implies annual screening incomes of $42,440 and $67,520, respectively; that is not a qualification or availability finding.

That ZORI readout must not be combined with the other rent series. ACS 2024 five-year ZCTA median gross rent is a survey estimate, not a current asking-rent index: across the displayed areas it runs from $936 to $1,259. HUD’s FY 2026 bedroom-specific FMR is instead an administrative standard, set at $1,338 for every record shown. June 2026 ZORI stands at 79.3% to 126.2% of that FMR. Those percentages describe the gap between distinct measures; they do not establish that a particular dwelling with a given bedroom count is priced at, eligible for, or comparable to the FMR.

Burden and vacancy create a separate trade-off screen, not a count of live listings. In the city’s ACS five-year context, 50.9% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent and the vacancy rate is 10.3%. Across the displayed ZCTAs, the burden share ranges from 34.4% to 55.0%, while vacancy ranges from 3.4% to 15.3%. A lower vacancy estimate indicates a smaller measured share of vacant units, but it does not reveal the number, rent, or suitability of units currently offered. Likewise, a lower burden share is not evidence that a specific listing is affordable. Weigh both measures alongside the actual quote and household finances rather than ranking areas on either measure alone.

Boundaries, time periods, and selection constrain ZIP-level interpretation. Census ZCTAs are statistical areas rather than USPS delivery ZIPs, so their ACS measures do not map perfectly to the ZIP geography used for ZORI and the HUD crosswalk. The direct-evidence selection is limited to eligible matches and is not an exhaustive geographic inventory. Before choosing a property, verify the address, actual asking rent, bedroom configuration, availability date, lease length, utilities, deposits, fees, concessions, parking, income rules, and program requirements. These aggregates cannot establish unit condition or quality, identify a currently available home, or support a rent forecast; property-level documentation controls.

Selected ZIP evidence

Keep each source universe visible

20 ZIP profiles passed the city gate; the 12 with the most renter households are shown.

ZIP / ZCTAZillow asking rentACS gross rentHUD 2BRBurden 30%+VacancyIncome screen
53202$1,688$1,259$1,33840.6%11.1%$68k
53209$1,386$988$1,33854.0%11.1%$55k
53204$1,458$1,004$1,33847.9%7.8%$58k
53215$1,061$977$1,33845.9%9.1%$42k
53212$1,271$1,055$1,33850.3%12.5%$51k
53218$1,399$1,067$1,33853.1%7.8%$56k
53208$1,340$936$1,33842.6%15.3%$54k
53221$1,390$1,119$1,33847.0%3.4%$56k
53207$1,609$1,197$1,33834.4%6.1%$64k
53216$1,142$990$1,33855.0%11.2%$46k
53225$1,199$1,115$1,33843.0%10.4%$48k
53219$1,211$995$1,33841.4%4.4%$48k
READ BEFORE USING

ACS ZCTA figures are five-year survey estimates for statistical areas, and ZCTAs are not identical to USPS delivery ZIPs. Geographic correspondence and survey timing therefore limit address-level comparisons with ZIP-based Zillow ZORI and the HUD crosswalk.

HUD FMR is an administrative bedroom-specific standard rather than an asking-rent observation, while Zillow ZORI is a typical index rather than a live listing. Verify unit rent, bedrooms, fees, utilities, availability, lease provisions, and eligibility directly with the property.

SOURCE LEDGERCensus ACS five-year — ZCTA housing and incomeACS 2024 5-year ZCTA · pulled 2026-08-08HUD USPS crosswalk and Small Area FMRs — ZIP rent fallbackZIP-CBSA 2025Q4 + SAFMR FY2026 · pulled 2026-07-26Zillow ZORI — ZIP market rentsZORI ZIP 2026-06 · pulled 2026-08-08
Curated city comparisons

Milwaukee in direct city-to-city decisions

Each comparison keeps both records inside city limits and opens only when the pair differs materially on multiple decision signals.

Browse all city comparisons →
Regional alternative

Chicago, IL vs Milwaukee, WI

Lake Michigan city alternatives whose direct records differ materially on yield, entry price, renter pressure, housing form and demand risk.

gross yieldentry pricerenter pressurehousing stocklocal demand risk
Chicago home value
$336k
Chicago gross yield
8.6%
Same-state decision

Madison, WI vs Milwaukee, WI

Wisconsin alternatives with large differences across acquisition cost, gross yield, affordability, renter pressure, housing form and local demand risk.

gross yieldentry pricebuyer affordabilityrenter pressurehousing stocklocal demand risk
Madison home value
$435k
Madison gross yield
4.6%
Closest market alternatives

Three useful contrasts, not a synthetic winner

The peer set broadens the decision without mixing geographies. Price, rent and housing characteristics remain city-level for every place.

Comparable market profile

Entry price, rent and gross yield

Milwaukee, WIWauwatosa, WIMadison, WIKansas City, MO
Typical home valueZillow ZHVIMilwaukee$231.4KWauwatosa$435.5KMadison$435.4KKansas City$257.4KObserved market rentZillow ZORI / monthMilwaukee$1.5KWauwatosa$1.7KMadison$1.7KKansas City$1.4KGross yieldZORI × 12 ÷ ZHVIMilwaukee7.6%Wauwatosa4.7%Madison4.6%Kansas City6.7%
Bars begin at zero within each measure. Gross yield is a screening ratio before financing, taxes, insurance, vacancy, maintenance or management costs.
Same metro01

Wauwatosa, WI

Compared with Milwaukee, typical home value is $204k higher, monthly rent is $253 higher, and gross yield is 2.9 percentage points lower.

Rent burden 30%+
43.1%
Renter share
39.2%
One-unit stock
58.0%
20+ unit stock
20.3%
Same state02

Madison, WI

Compared with Milwaukee, typical home value is $204k higher, monthly rent is $187 higher, and gross yield is 3.1 percentage points lower.

Rent burden 30%+
50.2%
Renter share
54.0%
One-unit stock
44.9%
20+ unit stock
28.7%
Closest data profile03

Kansas City, MO

Compared with Milwaukee, typical home value is $26k higher, monthly rent is $26 lower, and gross yield is 0.9 percentage points lower.

Rent burden 30%+
50.1%
Renter share
44.6%
One-unit stock
65.5%
20+ unit stock
14.7%

These are analytical alternatives, not recommendations. The structural measures come from Census ACS; price and rent use the Zillow releases shown on each card and in the source ledger below.

Wider market context

What surrounds the city without being mistaken for it

The layers below answer different questions. County records describe listing, migration, financing and hazard conditions around the city; metro records describe jobs, supply and permits; the mortgage rate is national.

Same measure, wider boundary

City marker against intersecting counties

CityCounty range
Typical home value$296.7K$512.3K$231.4KObserved market rent$1.5K$1.8K$1.5K
Both levels use Zillow indexes, but the county records cover land and housing outside the city. The comparison supplies context; it does not replace the city value.
Same Zillow index families

City limits versus the linked metro

MilwaukeeMetro
Observed market rentMetro $1.6KCity $1.5K · -5.3%Typical home valueMetro $394KCity $231.4K · -41.3%Gross yieldMetro 4.7%City 7.6% · +61.1%
Zillow ZORI and ZHVI use the same release month at both boundaries. Gross yield is rent × 12 ÷ home value; the metro contains the city and is context, not a substitute.

Search all direct city–metro gaps in the interactive atlas.

COUNTY LAYER

All 3 intersecting counties

Rows stay separate; no unweighted county average is presented as a city fact.

2026-06
Active listings
1,688
Listing DOM
33 days
FHFA one-year
▲ 5.8%
Net migration
-1,848
Investor share
14.2%
Effective property tax
1.93%
Top hazard
inland flooding
Expected loss ratio
0.08%
2026-06
Active listings
377
Listing DOM
39 days
FHFA one-year
▲ 5.9%
Net migration
-74
Investor share
5.2%
Effective property tax
1.10%
Top hazard
inland flooding
Expected loss ratio
0.08%
2026-06
Active listings
1,102
Listing DOM
31 days
FHFA one-year
▲ 5.4%
Net migration
342
Investor share
4.4%
Effective property tax
1.14%
Top hazard
inland flooding
Expected loss ratio
0.09%
METRO LAYER

Milwaukee, WI

Open metro analysis →
Job growth▼ 0.9%12m to 2026-06
Permitted units3,2622026 YTD through M06
Permits / 1,0002.1broader metro population
Months of supply2.12026-05-01
Median DOM38 daysRedfin metro tracker
Price drops15.6%Redfin metro tracker
Wider-context figures are not inputs to the city gross yield and are never used to fill a missing city price, rent or ACS measure.
What can break the thesis

Three checks before using the city averages

  1. 01

    Gross yield excludes operating costs, vacancy, capital work and financing.

  2. 02

    Citywide vacancy and ACS vacancy reasons do not establish lease-up for a specific unit.

  3. 03

    Population, poverty and unemployment measures are descriptive and may not predict property results.

Questions answered

Quick reading guide

Can ACS median gross rent be blended with Zillow ZORI?

No. ACS covers surveyed occupied housing and includes selected utilities; Zillow measures typical observed market rent using a different concept and period.

Which county tax rate should be used?

None by default. Confirm the property’s exact county and parcel tax bill; each county figure is context only.

Does the headline yield estimate cash return?

No. It is annual Zillow rent divided by Zillow value before operating costs and does not include financing.

Sources and geography

What belongs to this city page

Census recognizes this as Milwaukee city. The place intersects 3 counties (Milwaukee County, Washington County, Waukesha County); population and ACS measures are place-wide.