ZIP reports / KS / 66047
ZIP rental intelligence · 2026-06

ZIP 66047, Lawrence, KS

Asking rent, household capacity, housing stock and local context—kept at their original geographic and measurement scopes.

Direct local rent answer

What does rent cost in ZIP 66047?

The latest Zillow ZORI for ZIP 66047 is $1,490 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical observed asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

Zillow asking-rent index$1,4902026-06 · up 6.3% year over year
ACS median gross rent$1,147ACS 2024 5-year survey · ±$71 margin of error
HUD two-bedroom standard$1,182Administrative FMR/SAFMR · not asking rent
Bedroom-level rent benchmarks in ZIP 66047
BedroomsModelled asking-rent lensHUD standardHow to use it
Studio$1,128ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$895HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
1 bedroom$1,268ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,006HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
2 bedrooms$1,490ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,182HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
3 bedrooms$2,072ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,644HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
4 bedrooms$2,500ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,983HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.

Bedroom estimates are modelled, not observed rents. Zillow, Census ACS and HUD describe different housing universes and remain separate throughout this report.Zillow pulled 2026-08-08

Median household income$65,392ACS 2024 5-year · ±$7,721 MOE
Renter share54.2%4,932 renter households
Rent burden 30%+51.9%2,562 observed households
Housing vacancy2.1%196 of 9,291 units
Six views · one local decision

Read the measures together, without merging them

ZORI tracks observed asking rent, ACS describes occupied renter homes, and HUD publishes an administrative benchmark. The charts preserve those differences and add wider context only where the geography is named.

Three definitions of rent

Useful as a spread, not interchangeable observations.

Three rent measures for ZIP 66047Zillow asking-rent index$1,490ACS median gross rent$1,147HUD two-bedroom standard$1,182

Affordability screen

Annual income implied by 30% of the current ZIP ZORI.

Income screen for ZIP 66047ACS median household income$65,392Income at 30% of ZIP ZORI$59,600

Bedroom ladder

Modelled from ZIP ZORI using the local HUD ladder.

Modelled bedroom rent ladder for ZIP 66047Studio$1,128One bedroom$1,268Two bedrooms$1,490Three bedrooms$2,072Four bedrooms$2,500

Observed renter burden

ACS ZCTA households with computable gross-rent burden.

Observed renter cost burden in ZCTA 6604730% or more of income2,562 householdsBelow 30%2,370 households

ZIP versus wider rent context

Each bar retains its own ZIP, city, county or metro scope.

Asking-rent context for ZIP 66047ZIP 66047$1,490Lawrence city$1,288Douglas County county$1,294Lawrence, KS metro$1,294

Monthly asking-rent history

Direct Zillow ZORI observations over the latest five years. Missing months remain visible gaps.

Five-year direct Zillow asking-rent history for ZIP 66047; missing months remain gaps$1,552$1,365$1,178$9922021-062024-012026-06
Five-year change
41.6%exact same-month endpoints
Largest observed drawdown
1.1%peak to a later observed month
Annualized monthly variability
1.9%62 consecutive returns
Monthly coverage
98.5%64 of 65 months
Decision brief

What the evidence says for ZIP 66047

A rent-versus-resale split is the key starting point in 66047. This five-digit label is both Zillow’s ZIP market identifier and a matched Census ZCTA; a ZCTA is a statistical area and is not identical to a USPS delivery ZIP. Zillow ZORI for the ZIP is $1,490, up 6.25% year over year. ZORI is a typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types, so it is a market index rather than a quote for one available home. Annualized ZORI divided by the ZIP median sold price produces a 4.68% cross-source screening ratio only. It is not a property-level operating measure and cannot stand in for property economics or reconcile the rental and resale datasets.

Behind that current rent level, exact same-month annualized ZORI changes were 6.25% over 1 year, 5.82% over 3 years, and 7.20% over 5 years. The most recent direction therefore confirms, rather than breaks from, a longer record of positive growth, although the recent pace sits below the full five-year pace. Backward-looking monthly-return volatility annualized to 1.88%, maximum drawdown was -1.10%, and history coverage was 98.46%. In the transparent national history discovery ranks, momentum ranked 156, stability 72, and the combined balanced measure 14, where lower ranks are higher. These are measurements, not forecasts or investment recommendations. The contained variability and shallow drawdown support somewhat more confidence in one current index snapshot than a highly erratic series would, while never guaranteeing persistence.

ACS answers a different question. The matched Census ZCTA’s ACS 2024 five-year survey puts median gross rent at $1,147, with a reported margin of error of $71, and gross rent covers occupied renter homes plus selected utilities. Current ZORI is 29.9% above that survey median, a difference that can reflect definition, timing, utility treatment, and the surveyed occupied-home universe; it does not establish a change in the rent of a specific unit. At their named wider scopes, the City of Lawrence city-context rent is $1,288, while Douglas County county-context rent and the Lawrence, KS metro-context rent are each $1,294. Those city, county, and metro values are context only, not substitutes for the ZIP-level asking-rent index or ZCTA survey.

Bedroom figures are constructed rather than observed rental comps. The FY2026 local HUD bedroom ladder runs from $895 for a studio to $1,983 for four bedrooms; HUD FMR/SAFMR is an administrative, bedroom-specific standard rather than asking rent. Scaling the ZIP ZORI by that local ladder creates modelled monthly ZIP estimates from $1,128 for a studio to $2,500 for four bedrooms. The modelled two-bedroom estimate is $1,490, aligned mechanically with the HUD two-bedroom standard of $1,182. These are modelled estimates, never measured bedroom rents, and they should not be treated as evidence of a unit’s actual availability, lease terms, utilities, or condition.

An income screen gives another view but remains mechanical. At a 30% rent-to-income screen, annual income needed to support the current index is $59,600. The ZCTA’s ACS median household income is $65,392, placing the ZIP asking-rent-to-income arithmetic at 27.3% using that area-wide median. This screen is arithmetic, not advice and not an applicant qualification rule; household income and rent obligations vary materially within a survey geography. The more direct burden signal is still substantial: ACS reports 2,562 of 4,932 occupied renter homes with rent burden at or above the threshold, or 51.9%. That burden count has a reported margin of error of 567. The survey burden describes households in aggregate and cannot prove anything about a particular dwelling or household.

Housing composition cautions against reading either a ZORI index or the burden share as a vacancy count. In the matched ZCTA survey, the stock totals 9,291 housing units and the vacancy rate is 2.1%. There are 5,410 single-family units, while the renter share of occupied homes is 54.2%; large multifamily structures are a separately counted part of the stock as well. These ACS counts describe a five-year survey geography, not a live listing feed. In particular, the vacancy statistic cannot establish that a suitable unit is open, its asking price, its bedroom count, or whether it is offered to a given household. It instead sets a structural backdrop for the renter and rent-burden measures.

Resale evidence supplies the clearest challenge to a rent-only reading. Redfin’s direct rolling-three-month ZIP for-sale observation reports a $382,414 median sold price, up 26.44% year over year. It records 37 homes sold with median marketing time of 33 days, inventory of 61 homes that was 15.63% higher than a year earlier, and 5.0 months of supply. Average sale-to-list was 99.34%, and 19.46% of sales closed above list. This is direct ZIP resale evidence, not rental transactions, rental comps, or property economics. The materially faster resale price increase confirms a rent-versus-sale split, while rising inventory and supply above the Lawrence, KS metro context challenge any assumption that smooth rent growth or the income screen signals proportionately constrained resale supply.

No series here can identify the rent or sale economics of a particular property. Zillow blends types into a typical asking-rent index; ACS is a five-year sample of occupied renter homes with selected utilities; HUD supplies a non-market administrative standard; and Redfin tracks completed resale activity in a rolling window. Before applying these aggregates to an address, verify the current advertised rent and availability, bedroom configuration, property type, lease length, utility allocation, mandatory fees, concessions, furnishings, condition, and comparable nearby live listings. For a sale comparison, verify the specific closing date, list price, sale price, financing or concession terms where disclosed, and physical comparability. Does the actual unit’s documented rent package and bedroom profile match the assumptions behind this ZIP-level screen?

Decision signals

What deserves a closer property-level check

Stable rent history, not an outlook

At the stated endpoint, ZORI is $1,490 after a 6.25% year-over-year rise. Exact same-month history shows 6.25%, 5.82%, and 7.20% annualized changes across the one-, three-, and five-year windows. Annualized variability of 1.88%, a -1.10% maximum drawdown, and 98.46% coverage describe the recorded path. The balanced national discovery rank of 14 is historical, not an outlook.

Survey rent trails the asking-rent index

The matched Census ZCTA ACS 2024 five-year estimate puts median gross rent at $1,147, with a $71 margin of error, versus a current $1,490 ZORI. ACS includes selected utilities and covers occupied renter homes, while ZORI is an asking-rent index blended across rental types. The 29.9% difference therefore compares unlike source universes rather than measuring a premium on the same units.

Resale moved faster than rent

Redfin’s direct rolling-three-month ZIP resale observation shows a $382,414 median sold price, 26.44% higher year over year, despite inventory rising 15.63% to 61 homes. With 37 sales, 33 median days on market, and 5.0 months of supply, the resale record contains a different signal mix than ZORI. It is evidence on completed for-sale transactions, not rental availability, rent collection, or rental property economics.

Area-wide affordability remains mixed

The area-wide 30% screen requires $59,600 of annual income for the current ZORI, while ACS reports a $65,392 median household income. Yet 51.9% of occupied renter homes meet the burden threshold. The arithmetic and burden figures support context-setting only: they do not qualify applicants, describe a particular lease, or establish the affordability of a specific home.

  • Zillow asking-rent, ACS gross-rent, HUD standard, and Redfin resale measures use different units, populations, and timing; direct comparisons can look precise while describing non-comparable housing experiences.
  • Modelled bedroom estimates inherit the ZIP index and HUD ladder rather than lease-level observations. Unit size, included utilities, concessions, furnishing, property type, and condition can create substantial deviations.
  • Redfin’s rolling resale window records completed sales, not rental transactions. Median prices and sale-to-list signals can be influenced by the mix of homes that sold and cannot establish property economics.
  • ZCTA burden and vacancy statistics are survey aggregates with sampling uncertainty. They cannot determine whether any particular renter is burdened or whether a specific dwelling is vacant, available, suitable, or affordable.
Direct ZIP resale evidence

For-sale liquidity inside ZIP 66047

Redfin reports these as a rolling three-month ZIP observation through 2026-06-30. They describe the for-sale market, not rental vacancy or the rent of a particular property.

Median sale price$382,414+26.4% year over year
Homes sold37rolling three-month observation
Median days on market33 daysfor-sale listing absorption
Months of supply5.0resale inventory relative to sales pace

Activity and available supply

Direct ZIP counts remain separate because each describes a different stage of the resale funnel.

Direct resale activity for ZIP 66047Active listings140Inventory61Pending sales68Homes sold37

Counter-signals before underwriting

A price alone does not reveal how quickly buyers are absorbing available homes.

Inventory direction

61 observed inventory · +15.6% year over year.

Price realization

99.3% average sale-to-list ratio · 19.5% sold above original list.

Early absorption

58.9% went off market within two weeks; compare this with 33 median days on market.

Measurement boundary

Small ZIP samples can move sharply. This rolling period smooths monthly noise but does not replace current address-level sale and rent comparables.

Redfin Data Center · updated 2026-07-03 · exact five-digit ZIP key. Implausible source values are withheld as n/a rather than repaired or inherited from a broader geography.

Wider market evidence

Listing and rental liquidity around the ZIP

These measures are not ZIP observations. They are labelled county or metro context so they can challenge the local story without being copied into it.

Douglas County listing conditions

233 active Realtor.com listings · 40 median days on market · 13.1% price-reduced share · 2026-06.

Lawrence, KS resale supply

4.1 months of supply · 35 median days on market · 23.2% listings with price drops · Redfin 2026-05-01.

Apartment List metro liquidity

n/a reported apartment vacancy · n/a. These are direct metro observations and do not describe a particular ZIP unit.

Property-level next step

Compare live same-bedroom listings, concessions, utilities, condition and days listed inside ZIP 66047. The report frames the market; it does not replace a rent roll, lease review or address-level comparable set.

Questions this report can answer

Scope-aware answers

Why is Zillow asking rent higher than ACS gross rent?

The two sources represent different populations and concepts. Zillow ZORI is a current typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types, while ACS reports median gross rent for occupied renter homes over a five-year survey and includes selected utilities. The difference is therefore a source-universe contrast, not a unit-level rent change or proof that either measure is incorrect.

Are the bedroom figures observed rents?

No. The studio-through-four-bedroom figures are modelled monthly ZIP estimates produced by scaling the current ZIP ZORI with the local HUD bedroom ladder. HUD FMR/SAFMR is a bedroom-specific administrative standard, not asking rent. The resulting figures organize comparison by bedroom size, but they do not measure advertised rents, signed leases, utilities, or unit condition.

How should the Redfin resale figures be interpreted?

Redfin’s median sold price, sales count, days on market, inventory, months of supply, and sale-to-list metrics all come from a direct rolling-three-month ZIP for-sale observation. They describe resale liquidity and pricing signals only. They cannot be used as rental comps or blended into ZORI as though they were lease transactions.

What property-level facts remain necessary?

At the address level, verify the advertised rent, availability date, bedrooms, property type, lease term, utility responsibility, mandatory fees, concessions, furnishings, and condition. For a sale comparison, verify the actual closing record, list history, disclosed concessions, physical comparability, and whether the relevant observations fall within the intended time frame.