ZIP reports / TX / 77479
ZIP rental intelligence · 2026-06

ZIP 77479, Sugar Land, TX

Asking rent, household capacity, housing stock and local context—kept at their original geographic and measurement scopes.

Direct local rent answer

What does rent cost in ZIP 77479?

The latest Zillow ZORI for ZIP 77479 is $2,208 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical observed asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

Zillow asking-rent index$2,2082026-06 · down 1.0% year over year
ACS median gross rent$2,063ACS 2024 5-year survey · ±$156 margin of error
HUD two-bedroom standard$2,360Administrative FMR/SAFMR · not asking rent
Bedroom-level rent benchmarks in ZIP 77479
BedroomsModelled asking-rent lensHUD standardHow to use it
Studio$1,796ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,920HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
1 bedroom$1,852ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,980HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
2 bedrooms$2,208ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,360HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
3 bedrooms$2,966ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$3,170HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
4 bedrooms$3,705ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$3,960HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.

Bedroom estimates are modelled, not observed rents. Zillow, Census ACS and HUD describe different housing universes and remain separate throughout this report.Zillow pulled 2026-08-08

Median household income$156,735ACS 2024 5-year · ±$7,034 MOE
Renter share17.3%5,161 renter households
Rent burden 30%+46.9%2,420 observed households
Housing vacancy3.9%1,205 of 31,067 units
Six views · one local decision

Read the measures together, without merging them

ZORI tracks observed asking rent, ACS describes occupied renter homes, and HUD publishes an administrative benchmark. The charts preserve those differences and add wider context only where the geography is named.

Three definitions of rent

Useful as a spread, not interchangeable observations.

Three rent measures for ZIP 77479Zillow asking-rent index$2,208ACS median gross rent$2,063HUD two-bedroom standard$2,360

Affordability screen

Annual income implied by 30% of the current ZIP ZORI.

Income screen for ZIP 77479ACS median household income$156,735Income at 30% of ZIP ZORI$88,320

Bedroom ladder

Modelled from ZIP ZORI using the local HUD ladder.

Modelled bedroom rent ladder for ZIP 77479Studio$1,796One bedroom$1,852Two bedrooms$2,208Three bedrooms$2,966Four bedrooms$3,705

Observed renter burden

ACS ZCTA households with computable gross-rent burden.

Observed renter cost burden in ZCTA 7747930% or more of income2,420 householdsBelow 30%2,741 households

ZIP versus wider rent context

Each bar retains its own ZIP, city, county or metro scope.

Asking-rent context for ZIP 77479ZIP 77479$2,208Sugar Land city$2,065Fort Bend County county$1,991Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX metro$1,648

Monthly asking-rent history

Direct Zillow ZORI observations over the latest five years. Missing months remain visible gaps.

Five-year direct Zillow asking-rent history for ZIP 77479; missing months remain gaps$2,314$2,179$2,043$1,9082021-062023-122026-06
Five-year change
12.4%exact same-month endpoints
Largest observed drawdown
5.7%peak to a later observed month
Annualized monthly variability
2.4%137 consecutive returns
Monthly coverage
100.0%138 of 138 months
Decision brief

What the evidence says for ZIP 77479

Rent and resale are sending different near-term signals in ZIP 77479. In June 2026, Zillow’s Observed Rent Index is $2,208 per month. This is a ZIP-level typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types, not a quoted rent for a specified address, lease, or bedroom count. The five-digit Zillow market label also matches a Census ZCTA; however, a ZCTA is a statistical area and is not identical to a USPS delivery ZIP. That boundary and source distinction matters when comparing this asking-rent signal with survey, administrative, and resale evidence.

The direct rolling-three-month ZIP resale observation presents a firmer for-sale backdrop than the rent trend alone might suggest. Redfin reports a $578,059 median sold price, up 2.9% year over year, with 239 homes sold and a median 25 days on market. Inventory was 319 homes while active listings totaled 658, and months of supply stood at 4.1. The average sale-to-list ratio was 97.27%, 12.94% of sales closed above list, and 37.02% went off market within two weeks. These are ZIP resale-market signals, not rental transactions or rental comparables. Annualized ZIP ZORI divided by the median sold price produces a 4.6% cross-source screening ratio only, rather than a property-level performance measure. Rising resale prices therefore challenge a simple reading of the cooling rent series.

Comparisons require separate evidence universes. The matched ACS ZCTA five-year survey places median gross rent at $2,063; it covers occupied renter homes and includes selected utilities, unlike Zillow’s asking-rent index. HUD’s local two-bedroom fair-market-rent standard is $2,360, an administrative bedroom-specific benchmark rather than asking rent. For wider context only, Sugar Land city-context rent is $2,065, Fort Bend County context rent is $1,991, and Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX metro-context rent is $1,648. The ZIP asking index is above the ACS gross-rent median but below the HUD two-bedroom standard, illustrating why none of these series should be treated as interchangeable market quotes.

The bedroom figures are modelled estimates produced by scaling ZIP ZORI with the local HUD ladder; they are not measured bedroom rents. That method produces estimates of $1,796 for a studio, $1,852 for one bedroom, $2,208 for two bedrooms, $2,966 for three bedrooms, and $3,705 for four bedrooms. The underlying HUD ladder runs from $1,920 for a studio to $3,960 for four bedrooms. Its role is to impose a locally structured bedroom relationship on the blended Zillow index. An actual listing can differ because its bedroom count, property type, lease terms, included utilities, condition, and concessions may not match the ZIP-wide blend or the HUD-derived scaling pattern.

The required-income screen is arithmetic, not advice and not an applicant qualification rule. Applying a 30% rent-to-income threshold to the current asking-rent index implies $88,320 in annual income. The matched ZCTA’s median household income is $156,735, and the mechanical annual asking-rent-to-income comparison is 16.9%. Those figures describe broad distributional context rather than the circumstances of a renter household. ACS also reports that 46.9% of renter households pay at least thirty percent of income toward gross rent. That burden measure includes occupied renters in the survey universe and does not establish affordability, burden, or eligibility for a particular unit.

The matched ZCTA ACS housing base is predominantly single-family. Of 31,067 housing units, 27,899 are single-family and 2,007 are in large multifamily structures. The survey counts 29,862 occupied units and 1,205 vacant units, producing a 3.9% vacancy rate. Renter occupancy totals 5,161 households, or 17.3% of occupied homes, which frames the rent index as a signal within a largely owner-occupied stock. Of the vacant units, 417 are designated for rent. That count is not proof that a particular rental is available, comparable, or vacant, but it does distinguish units classified for rent from the broader stock of vacant housing.

History supports the cooling label but does not make a forecast. Exact same-month ZORI change was a 1.0% decline over one year, breaking from the positive three-year annualized pace of 0.47% and the five-year annualized pace of 2.37%. Monthly rent returns had annualized variability of 2.36%, which suggests relatively limited month-to-month movement in the observed index. Separately, the series experienced a 5.67% maximum peak-to-trough drawdown, showing that contained typical variation did not eliminate meaningful downward episodes. Coverage is 100% across 138 observations, strengthening confidence in the continuity of this historical snapshot while not turning it into an address-level forecast. Transparent national discovery ranks were 2,541 for momentum, 470 for stability, and 1,883 for the balanced measure; lower ranks are higher, and these are descriptive discovery tools rather than investment signals.

The central decision tension is therefore not resolved by any single statistic: asking-rent history has recently softened, while ZIP resale prices increased and the resale market recorded active transaction flow. Zillow does not report a property-specific lease, ACS does not measure current asking rents, HUD does not provide market asking-rent quotes, and Redfin does not describe rental transactions. A property-level review would need the actual advertised rent, verified bedroom count, lease duration, included utilities, concessions, available date, property condition, and whether the address falls within the relevant market geography. Which of those property-specific facts would explain a listing’s departure from the broad ZIP index?

Decision signals

What deserves a closer property-level check

Cooling rent history contrasts with current resale strength

Zillow’s June ZIP index is a broad typical asking-rent signal, not a contract rent for a specified home. The exact same-month history shows a recent decline after positive longer annualized paths, making the cooling label evidence-based but backward-looking. Complete monthly coverage and relatively contained variability support use of the index as a market snapshot, while the prior drawdown and type blending limit address-level precision.

Resale indicators remain in a distinct for-sale universe

Redfin’s direct rolling-three-month ZIP observation records sale prices, transaction count, marketing time, inventory, supply, and sale-to-list behavior. Those figures indicate active resale liquidity and price appreciation, but they are not rental transactions, rental comparables, or evidence of operating economics. The contrast between higher resale pricing and a softer rent index is a meaningful screening tension rather than proof of a future market outcome.

Three rent benchmarks answer different questions

Zillow ZORI measures a blended typical asking-rent index across rental types. ACS median gross rent is a five-year survey result for occupied renter homes and includes selected utilities. HUD fair market rent is an administrative bedroom-specific standard. The ZIP modelled bedroom ladder uses the HUD relationship to scale ZORI, so it is useful for structured comparison but must not be read as measured asking rent by bedroom.

Owner-heavy stock does not eliminate renter affordability pressure

The matched ZCTA has a relatively small renter share within predominantly single-family housing, yet the ACS burden measure shows that a substantial share of renter households spend at least thirty percent of income on gross rent. Broad median income and required-income arithmetic provide context, not household underwriting. Vacancy and renter-burden statistics cannot establish the availability or affordability of any specific rental address.

  • ZORI is blended across rental types, so a particular property’s bedroom count, condition, included utilities, lease structure, and concessions can depart materially from the ZIP index.
  • ACS figures are survey estimates for a matched statistical area, include margins of error, and represent occupied renter homes rather than current advertised rents or USPS delivery boundaries.
  • Redfin resale measures describe sold homes and listing-market behavior over a rolling period; they do not establish rental demand, property operating costs, or terms for a particular lease.
  • Historical rent changes, variability, drawdown, and discovery ranks are backward-looking measurements. They cannot determine future rent movement, resale prices, household affordability, or an individual property outcome.
Direct ZIP resale evidence

For-sale liquidity inside ZIP 77479

Redfin reports these as a rolling three-month ZIP observation through 2026-06-30. They describe the for-sale market, not rental vacancy or the rent of a particular property.

Median sale price$578,059+2.9% year over year
Homes sold239rolling three-month observation
Median days on market25 daysfor-sale listing absorption
Months of supply4.1resale inventory relative to sales pace

Activity and available supply

Direct ZIP counts remain separate because each describes a different stage of the resale funnel.

Direct resale activity for ZIP 77479Active listings658Inventory319Pending sales259Homes sold239

Counter-signals before underwriting

A price alone does not reveal how quickly buyers are absorbing available homes.

Inventory direction

319 observed inventory · -4.4% year over year.

Price realization

97.3% average sale-to-list ratio · 12.9% sold above original list.

Early absorption

37.0% went off market within two weeks; compare this with 25 median days on market.

Measurement boundary

Small ZIP samples can move sharply. This rolling period smooths monthly noise but does not replace current address-level sale and rent comparables.

Redfin Data Center · updated 2026-07-03 · exact five-digit ZIP key. Implausible source values are withheld as n/a rather than repaired or inherited from a broader geography.

Wider market evidence

Listing and rental liquidity around the ZIP

These measures are not ZIP observations. They are labelled county or metro context so they can challenge the local story without being copied into it.

Fort Bend County listing conditions

4,378 active Realtor.com listings · 41 median days on market · 20.8% price-reduced share · 2026-06.

Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX resale supply

4.2 months of supply · 49 median days on market · 36.9% listings with price drops · Redfin 2026-05-01.

Apartment List metro liquidity

8.4% reported apartment vacancy · 31 days on market. These are direct metro observations and do not describe a particular ZIP unit.

Property-level next step

Compare live same-bedroom listings, concessions, utilities, condition and days listed inside ZIP 77479. The report frames the market; it does not replace a rent roll, lease review or address-level comparable set.

Questions this report can answer

Scope-aware answers

Why do Zillow, ACS, and HUD show different rent figures?

They measure different universes. Zillow ZORI is a ZIP-level typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types. ACS median gross rent is a five-year survey measure of occupied renter homes that includes selected utilities. HUD fair market rent is an administrative, bedroom-specific standard. Differences therefore do not automatically indicate an error or a pricing opportunity.

Are the bedroom rent amounts observed rents for available units?

No. The bedroom amounts are modelled monthly ZIP estimates created by scaling the blended Zillow asking-rent index with the local HUD bedroom ladder. They provide a consistent bedroom structure for screening, but they are not measured rents from active listings, executed leases, or a defined property type.

What does the recent rent decline mean in the context of the longer history?

The one-year decline breaks from the positive three-year and five-year annualized paths, supporting a cooling classification for the latest period. It does not erase the longer history or predict the next move. Full coverage improves confidence that the history was continuously observed, while the drawdown shows that rents have previously moved downward.

How should the resale data be used alongside the rent data?

Use it as a separate ZIP for-sale observation. Median sold price, homes sold, market time, inventory, supply, and sale-to-list indicators describe resale conditions rather than rental transactions. The annualized rent-to-price calculation is only a cross-source screening ratio. Address-level comparisons require actual rent, sale details, property condition, utility treatment, and lease terms.