ZIP reports / AZ / 85204
ZIP rental intelligence · 2026-06

ZIP 85204, Mesa, AZ

Asking rent, household capacity, housing stock and local context—kept at their original geographic and measurement scopes.

Direct local rent answer

What does rent cost in ZIP 85204?

The latest Zillow ZORI for ZIP 85204 is $1,430 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical observed asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

Zillow asking-rent index$1,4302026-06 · down 4.7% year over year
ACS median gross rent$1,566ACS 2024 5-year survey · ±$75 margin of error
HUD two-bedroom standard$1,700Administrative FMR/SAFMR · not asking rent
Bedroom-level rent benchmarks in ZIP 85204
BedroomsModelled asking-rent lensHUD standardHow to use it
Studio$1,136ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,350HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
1 bedroom$1,228ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,460HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
2 bedrooms$1,430ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,700HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
3 bedrooms$1,909ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,270HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
4 bedrooms$2,111ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,510HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.

Bedroom estimates are modelled, not observed rents. Zillow, Census ACS and HUD describe different housing universes and remain separate throughout this report.Zillow pulled 2026-08-08

Median household income$72,216ACS 2024 5-year · ±$3,216 MOE
Renter share41.8%9,731 renter households
Rent burden 30%+53.0%5,156 observed households
Housing vacancy5.0%1,239 of 24,537 units
Six views · one local decision

Read the measures together, without merging them

ZORI tracks observed asking rent, ACS describes occupied renter homes, and HUD publishes an administrative benchmark. The charts preserve those differences and add wider context only where the geography is named.

Three definitions of rent

Useful as a spread, not interchangeable observations.

Three rent measures for ZIP 85204Zillow asking-rent index$1,430ACS median gross rent$1,566HUD two-bedroom standard$1,700

Affordability screen

Annual income implied by 30% of the current ZIP ZORI.

Income screen for ZIP 85204ACS median household income$72,216Income at 30% of ZIP ZORI$57,200

Bedroom ladder

Modelled from ZIP ZORI using the local HUD ladder.

Modelled bedroom rent ladder for ZIP 85204Studio$1,136One bedroom$1,228Two bedrooms$1,430Three bedrooms$1,909Four bedrooms$2,111

Observed renter burden

ACS ZCTA households with computable gross-rent burden.

Observed renter cost burden in ZCTA 8520430% or more of income5,156 householdsBelow 30%4,575 households

ZIP versus wider rent context

Each bar retains its own ZIP, city, county or metro scope.

Asking-rent context for ZIP 85204ZIP 85204$1,430Mesa city$1,549Maricopa County county$1,729Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ metro$1,733

Monthly asking-rent history

Direct Zillow ZORI observations over the latest five years. Missing months remain visible gaps.

Five-year direct Zillow asking-rent history for ZIP 85204; missing months remain gaps$1,559$1,459$1,359$1,2592021-062023-122026-06
Five-year change
10.2%exact same-month endpoints
Largest observed drawdown
6.0%peak to a later observed month
Annualized monthly variability
2.9%137 consecutive returns
Monthly coverage
100.0%138 of 138 months
Decision brief

What the evidence says for ZIP 85204

The central tension in this ZIP is that its rent index is cooling while its observed resale price is higher. In June 2026, Zillow ZORI for the ZIP is $1,430 per month, down from the same month a year earlier. ZORI is a typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types; it is a broad ZIP signal rather than a lease record or a measured rent for one property. The rest of the evidence therefore tests whether that current asking-rent snapshot is consistent with its own history, household data and the separate for-sale record.

Zillow’s direct ZIP history through its stated endpoint records exact same-month annualized changes of -4.7% over one year, -1.2% over three years and +2.0% over five years. The recent decline therefore confirms the shorter cooling path but breaks from the longer positive five-year path. Annualized monthly-return variability is 2.9%, maximum drawdown is 6.0%, and coverage is 100%. The transparent national discovery ranks among history-eligible ZIPs are 2,867 for momentum, 1,509 for stability and 2,681 for the balanced measure, where lower is higher. These backward-looking measurements are neither forecasts nor investment recommendations. Modest variability supports some confidence in the broad current index, yet the active downtrend limits confidence that one snapshot represents a settled level.

The five-digit 85204 label is both a Zillow ZIP market identifier and a Census ZCTA match. A ZCTA is a statistical area and is not identical to a USPS delivery ZIP. The matched ACS 2024 five-year survey reports a $1,566 median gross rent, with a $75 margin of error, for occupied renter homes; gross rent includes selected utilities. That benchmark is 8.7% above current ZORI, but it is not a contradiction: ACS is a survey of occupied homes over five years, while ZORI is a current asking-rent index. Different populations, dates and utility treatment prevent either figure from becoming a direct property-level comp.

HUD provides a different reference universe again. The FY2026 HUD FMR/SAFMR bedroom ladder is an administrative, bedroom-specific standard—not asking rent—and runs from $1,350 for a studio to $2,510 for four bedrooms locally. Scaling ZIP ZORI by that local HUD ladder produces modelled monthly ZIP estimates of $1,136 for a studio, $1,228 for one bedroom, $1,430 for two bedrooms, $1,909 for three bedrooms and $2,111 for four bedrooms. These are modelled estimates, never measured bedroom rents; the two-bedroom result aligns with the index by construction and is not independent rental evidence. The ladder therefore organizes size assumptions across the same ZIP-wide ZORI signal only.

At the matched ZCTA level, median household income is $72,216. Applying a 30% required-income screen to the current ZIP asking index gives $57,200 annually, and the asking-rent-to-income ratio is 23.8%. This screen is arithmetic, not advice and not an applicant qualification rule. A separate ACS burden measure shows 5,156 of 9,731 occupied renter households, or 53.0%, reporting rent burden at or above that threshold. It describes households in the survey, not the cost, affordability or availability of a particular unit. In particular, the area-wide income median does not substitute for a renter household’s documented income or actual utility obligations.

Housing stock supplies another boundary on interpretation. The matched ZCTA contains 24,537 housing units, has a 5.0% vacancy rate and a 41.8% renter share; it includes 15,438 single-family units and 1,981 large multifamily units. For wider, non-comparable context, the City of Mesa city-scope rent context is $1,549, Maricopa County county-scope rent context is $1,729, and the Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ metro-scope rent context is $1,733. Each is above the ZIP index, but city, county and metro values are context only, not ZIP rental comps. Stock mix and vacancy describe an area aggregate and cannot establish that a particular unit is vacant, rentable, appropriately priced or suitable.

The Redfin block is a direct rolling-three-month ZIP resale observation at its stated endpoint, so it describes for-sale activity, not rental transactions. Median sold price was $421,405, up 2.8% year over year, across 113 homes sold with 38 median days on market. Inventory stood at 82 homes, down 18.3% year over year, and months of supply was 2.2. The average sale-to-list ratio was 98.8%, while 20.9% of sales closed above list. These resale liquidity and pricing signals challenge any reading of rent cooling as a whole-housing direction: resale price and inventory moved differently from the ZIP asking-rent history. They neither measure rental demand nor explain why the series diverge.

Annualized ZIP ZORI divided by the Redfin median sold price is a 4.1% cross-source screening ratio only. It is not a cap rate, net return, expected return or property yield, because it joins a broad asking-rent index to a resale median without property expenses, operations or unit matching. Concrete property-level checks are the actual advertised rent and concessions, lease term, utility allocation, bedroom count, condition, occupancy status and availability date; separately, confirm the parcel’s sale, listing and condition records. Check the exact geographic match before using ZCTA, HUD or ZIP evidence. Does the specific property’s documented rent, size and terms align with the broad index and modelled ladder, or do the aggregate measures mask material unit-level differences?

Decision signals

What deserves a closer property-level check

Rent cooling and resale-price divergence

Zillow’s current asking-rent index is declining on both the latest one-year comparison and the three-year annualized comparison, whereas the five-year comparison remains positive. The history’s moderate return variability and full coverage make the index informative as a ZIP-wide time series, but they do not convert it into a property-specific rent or a forecast. Redfin resale price movement runs in the opposite recent direction.

Three rent universes require separate interpretation

The current Zillow index, ACS gross-rent median and HUD ladder answer different questions. ZORI is typical observed asking rent across blended rental types. ACS surveys occupied renter homes and includes selected utilities. HUD is a bedroom-specific administrative standard. The bedroom figures are modelled by applying the HUD ladder to ZORI, so their apparent precision should not be mistaken for measured studio, one-bedroom or larger-unit rents.

Area affordability screens do not describe a unit

The arithmetic screen places current ZIP asking rent below the matched ZCTA’s median household income when expressed as a share, while more than half of surveyed renter households meet the ACS burden threshold. This juxtaposition is not a unit-level affordability conclusion: household incomes, utility allocations, lease terms and current availability are not known for a particular rental. The ZCTA’s vacancy and tenure figures are likewise area aggregates, not availability evidence.

Resale liquidity is distinct from rental evidence

Redfin’s rolling ZIP resale observation provides separate evidence on closings, marketing time, supply and sale-to-list outcomes. It should not be used as rent comparables. Dividing annualized ZORI by resale median price creates a cross-source screening ratio only; it omits expenses and mismatches properties, timing and transaction universe. The diverging resale and rent movements are a signal to keep the two evidentiary tracks separate.

  • ZORI is a ZIP-wide blended asking-rent index. A specific property may differ because its bedroom count, utility treatment, lease terms, concessions, condition and current availability are not supplied in the index.
  • The ACS ZCTA survey is a five-year, occupied-household measure with selected utilities, and the ZCTA boundary is statistical rather than a USPS delivery ZIP. It may not match a current listing’s geography or timing.
  • The HUD-scaled bedroom ladder is modelled rather than observed. It can organize a size comparison, but it cannot verify actual bedroom rents, concession-adjusted pricing, lease duration or a unit’s utility responsibility.
  • The resale figures reflect a rolling direct ZIP for-sale observation, not rental transactions. Sales mix, property condition and closing timing are unavailable, so the screening ratio cannot establish property economics or future results.
Direct ZIP resale evidence

For-sale liquidity inside ZIP 85204

Redfin reports these as a rolling three-month ZIP observation through 2026-06-30. They describe the for-sale market, not rental vacancy or the rent of a particular property.

Median sale price$421,405+2.8% year over year
Homes sold113rolling three-month observation
Median days on market38 daysfor-sale listing absorption
Months of supply2.2resale inventory relative to sales pace

Activity and available supply

Direct ZIP counts remain separate because each describes a different stage of the resale funnel.

Direct resale activity for ZIP 85204Active listings206Inventory82Pending sales128Homes sold113

Counter-signals before underwriting

A price alone does not reveal how quickly buyers are absorbing available homes.

Inventory direction

82 observed inventory · -18.3% year over year.

Price realization

98.8% average sale-to-list ratio · 20.9% sold above original list.

Early absorption

29.5% went off market within two weeks; compare this with 38 median days on market.

Measurement boundary

Small ZIP samples can move sharply. This rolling period smooths monthly noise but does not replace current address-level sale and rent comparables.

Redfin Data Center · updated 2026-07-03 · exact five-digit ZIP key. Implausible source values are withheld as n/a rather than repaired or inherited from a broader geography.

Wider market evidence

Listing and rental liquidity around the ZIP

These measures are not ZIP observations. They are labelled county or metro context so they can challenge the local story without being copied into it.

Maricopa County listing conditions

16,056 active Realtor.com listings · 64 median days on market · 28.9% price-reduced share · 2026-06.

Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ resale supply

3.5 months of supply · 61 median days on market · 32.9% listings with price drops · Redfin 2026-05-01.

Apartment List metro liquidity

8.1% reported apartment vacancy · 33 days on market. These are direct metro observations and do not describe a particular ZIP unit.

Property-level next step

Compare live same-bedroom listings, concessions, utilities, condition and days listed inside ZIP 85204. The report frames the market; it does not replace a rent roll, lease review or address-level comparable set.

Questions this report can answer

Scope-aware answers

What does the current ZORI measure for 85204?

At June 2026, ZORI reports a typical observed asking-rent index for the ZIP across blended rental types. It is useful as a broad current asking signal and as a consistently tracked historical series. It does not identify the advertised rent, utilities, lease arrangement, bedroom count or condition of an individual available property.

Why does the ACS median gross rent exceed current ZORI?

The ACS figure comes from the matched ZCTA’s five-year survey of occupied renter homes and includes selected utilities, whereas ZORI is a current ZIP asking-rent index. Different dates, populations and rent definitions can create a gap without indicating an error, a rent concession or the price of any specific unit.

How should the required-income and burden figures be read?

The required-income figure simply divides annualized ZIP asking rent by the stated 30% share. It is an arithmetic comparison, not advice or an applicant qualification test. The ACS burden share instead summarizes surveyed renter households at or above that threshold; it cannot prove that a particular renter or unit experiences the same burden.

What does Redfin add, and what can the screening ratio not show?

Redfin adds a direct rolling-three-month ZIP resale view of sold prices, closed-sale volume, marketing time, inventory, supply and sale-to-list outcomes. Those are for-sale observations, not rental comps. Annualized ZORI divided by the resale median price is only a cross-source screen; without operating costs, property matching and unit terms, it cannot describe property economics.