ZIP reports / AZ / 85206
ZIP rental intelligence · 2026-06

ZIP 85206, Mesa, AZ

Asking rent, household capacity, housing stock and local context—kept at their original geographic and measurement scopes.

Direct local rent answer

What does rent cost in ZIP 85206?

The latest Zillow ZORI for ZIP 85206 is $1,626 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical observed asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

Zillow asking-rent index$1,6262026-06 · down 3.0% year over year
ACS median gross rent$1,818ACS 2024 5-year survey · ±$49 margin of error
HUD two-bedroom standard$1,990Administrative FMR/SAFMR · not asking rent
Bedroom-level rent benchmarks in ZIP 85206
BedroomsModelled asking-rent lensHUD standardHow to use it
Studio$1,291ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,580HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
1 bedroom$1,397ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,710HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
2 bedrooms$1,626ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,990HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
3 bedrooms$2,165ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,650HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
4 bedrooms$2,402ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,940HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.

Bedroom estimates are modelled, not observed rents. Zillow, Census ACS and HUD describe different housing universes and remain separate throughout this report.Zillow pulled 2026-08-08

Median household income$75,607ACS 2024 5-year · ±$4,444 MOE
Renter share36.3%5,995 renter households
Rent burden 30%+52.7%3,158 observed households
Housing vacancy13.5%2,585 of 19,109 units
Six views · one local decision

Read the measures together, without merging them

ZORI tracks observed asking rent, ACS describes occupied renter homes, and HUD publishes an administrative benchmark. The charts preserve those differences and add wider context only where the geography is named.

Three definitions of rent

Useful as a spread, not interchangeable observations.

Three rent measures for ZIP 85206Zillow asking-rent index$1,626ACS median gross rent$1,818HUD two-bedroom standard$1,990

Affordability screen

Annual income implied by 30% of the current ZIP ZORI.

Income screen for ZIP 85206ACS median household income$75,607Income at 30% of ZIP ZORI$65,040

Bedroom ladder

Modelled from ZIP ZORI using the local HUD ladder.

Modelled bedroom rent ladder for ZIP 85206Studio$1,291One bedroom$1,397Two bedrooms$1,626Three bedrooms$2,165Four bedrooms$2,402

Observed renter burden

ACS ZCTA households with computable gross-rent burden.

Observed renter cost burden in ZCTA 8520630% or more of income3,158 householdsBelow 30%2,837 households

ZIP versus wider rent context

Each bar retains its own ZIP, city, county or metro scope.

Asking-rent context for ZIP 85206ZIP 85206$1,626Mesa city$1,549Maricopa County county$1,729Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ metro$1,733

Monthly asking-rent history

Direct Zillow ZORI observations over the latest five years. Missing months remain visible gaps.

Five-year direct Zillow asking-rent history for ZIP 85206; missing months remain gaps$1,735$1,652$1,569$1,4862021-062023-122026-06
Five-year change
6.4%exact same-month endpoints
Largest observed drawdown
4.3%peak to a later observed month
Annualized monthly variability
3.5%135 consecutive returns
Monthly coverage
99.3%137 of 138 months
Decision brief

What the evidence says for ZIP 85206

ZIP 85206 presents a current-rent versus broader-context tension rather than a simple strength signal. Zillow’s June ZIP ZORI is $1,626, down 2.96% from a year earlier. ZORI is a typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types, not a lease-level rent survey. The 85206 label is both a Zillow ZIP market identifier and a matched Census ZCTA; a ZCTA is a statistical area and is not identical to a USPS delivery ZIP. In named wider-context comparisons, Mesa city’s asking-rent context is $1,549, Maricopa County’s asking-rent context is $1,729, and the Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ metro asking-rent context is $1,733. Those city, county, and metro figures are wider context only, not substitutes for this ZIP’s measurement.

The recent decline breaks from a modestly positive longer path. Exact same-month history shows a one-year annualized change of -2.96%, a three-year change of 0.01%, and a five-year change of 1.25%. That sequence indicates that the current reading is below last year’s level after a nearly flat middle period and a still-positive longer horizon; it is backward-looking evidence, not a forecast or investment recommendation. Annualized monthly-return variability is 3.53%, which reduces confidence in treating one current rent snapshot as a stable reference point. The maximum historical drawdown was 4.27%, separately showing a material peak-to-trough retreat. Coverage is 99.28%. Transparent national discovery ranks among history-eligible ZIPs are 2,756 for momentum, 2,265 for stability, and 2,800 for the balanced measure, where lower ranks are higher.

The bedroom ladder is useful for sizing a rent discussion, but it is modelled rather than measured. Scaling ZIP ZORI through the local HUD ladder produces modelled monthly estimates of $1,291 for a studio, $1,397 for one bedroom, $1,626 for two bedrooms, $2,165 for three bedrooms, and $2,402 for four bedrooms. These are not observed bedroom rents or direct unit comparables. HUD’s local two-bedroom standard is $1,990, but HUD FMR or SAFMR is an administrative, bedroom-specific standard rather than asking rent. The difference between the HUD standard and the modelled estimate therefore does not establish a market discount for any particular dwelling, lease term, condition level, or utility package.

The ACS comparison points in a different direction because it measures a different housing population. In the matched Census ZCTA’s five-year ACS survey, median gross rent is $1,818 among occupied renter homes and includes selected utilities; current ZIP ZORI is 89.4% of that figure. Median household income is $75,607. Applying the arithmetic 30% screen to the ZORI produces required annual income of $65,040 and an asking-rent-to-income ratio of 25.8%. This is a mechanical screen, not advice, an applicant qualification rule, or evidence that a household can afford a specific unit. ACS also reports 3,158 of 5,995 renter households as paying 30% or more of income toward rent, a 52.7% burden share. That aggregate burden measure cannot identify the finances of a current or prospective tenant.

Housing composition adds another reason not to equate a ZIP-wide rent index with available rental choices. The ACS ZCTA estimates 19,109 housing units and 2,585 vacant units, an all-purpose vacancy rate of 13.5%, while renters account for 36.3% of occupied homes. Its stock includes 11,772 single-family units and 2,192 units in large multifamily structures. The vacancy measure includes all vacant housing categories rather than only units being marketed for rent, so it does not prove that any listed unit is available, competitively priced, or vacant for a stated reason. The large single-family component also means the blended ZORI can reflect rental types that differ from a particular apartment, townhouse, or detached-home search.

Direct ZIP resale evidence shows a for-sale market that is also softer, but it must remain separate from rental evidence. In Redfin’s rolling three-month ZIP resale observation, the median sold price is $362,668, down 3.03% year over year. There were 169 homes sold, with a median 60 days on market. Inventory stands at 139 homes and months of supply is 2.5. Average sale-to-list is 97.8%, while 10.4% of homes sold above list. These are resale liquidity and pricing signals, not rental transactions, rental comparables, or property operating economics. Directionally, the lower resale price and below-list sale pattern align with the current rent decline, but neither series explains the other.

Annualized ZIP ZORI divided by the median sold price produces a 5.4% cross-source screening ratio. It is only a screening ratio because it combines an asking-rent index with a median resale transaction price; it cannot represent operating expenses, financing, taxes, insurance, maintenance, concessions, occupancy, or the economics of a particular property. The meaningful tension is that current asking rent is below both the ACS gross-rent benchmark and the county and metro asking-rent contexts, while rent history has turned negative and resale conditions show reduced price and slower marketing signals. At the same time, the longer rent history is not uniformly negative, so a single soft current observation deserves measured rather than categorical interpretation.

Important limits remain. ZORI is a blended ZIP asking-rent index, ACS is a lagged five-year survey of occupied homes, HUD is a payment standard, and Redfin describes completed for-sale activity over a rolling period. None identifies the rent, condition, utility responsibility, concessions, lease length, availability date, or resale history of a specific home. Concrete property-level checks include the actual advertised rent and bedroom count, included utilities and mandatory fees, lease term and concessions, current availability, unit condition, comparable asking listings, and recent closed-sale and listing history for the same property type. Which of those unit-specific facts would most change the interpretation of the ZIP-level screen?

Decision signals

What deserves a closer property-level check

Current asking-rent signal is below wider benchmarks

ZIP ZORI is below the cited Mesa city, Maricopa County, and Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler metro asking-rent contexts. That comparison describes relative position in Zillow’s asking-rent universe, not a conclusion about lease concessions, unit quality, or household affordability. The current year-over-year decline makes the lower ZIP reading more relevant than a simple cross-sectional ranking alone.

History weakens confidence in a single rent snapshot

The recent annual decline contrasts with a slightly positive five-year annualized path and a nearly flat three-year result. Monthly-return variability and the recorded drawdown indicate that ZIP ZORI has moved enough to make point-in-time interpretation less certain. The national discovery ranks are descriptive history tools, not predictions of future rent movement or performance.

Affordability screens and burden statistics answer different questions

The income screen mechanically compares current asking rent with area median household income, while ACS burden data describe surveyed renter households paying a specified share of income toward rent. Neither measure qualifies an applicant or proves the affordability of a particular unit. ACS gross rent also includes selected utilities, unlike the asking-rent index.

Resale softness is directionally consistent but not interchangeable

Redfin’s direct ZIP resale observation shows lower median sold prices, a marketing period of roughly two months, below-list average sale outcomes, and limited supply. Those facts are relevant to for-sale liquidity only. They directionally align with softer current rent history, yet cannot be converted into rent comparables, operating results, or a conclusion about an individual rental property.

  • Cross-source comparisons can mislead because Zillow measures blended asking rents, ACS measures occupied renter homes with selected utilities, HUD provides administrative standards, and Redfin records resale transactions.
  • The all-purpose vacancy rate includes vacant homes beyond rental listings. It cannot demonstrate availability, bargaining conditions, unit condition, or the reason any specific home is vacant.
  • The annualized rent-to-sale-price screen omits expenses, financing, taxes, insurance, maintenance, turnover, concessions, and actual occupancy, so it cannot describe property-level economics or outcomes.
  • Recent ZORI weakness follows a longer period that was not uniformly negative, while monthly variability and drawdown history make extrapolation from one current ZIP observation particularly uncertain.
Direct ZIP resale evidence

For-sale liquidity inside ZIP 85206

Redfin reports these as a rolling three-month ZIP observation through 2026-06-30. They describe the for-sale market, not rental vacancy or the rent of a particular property.

Median sale price$362,668-3.0% year over year
Homes sold169rolling three-month observation
Median days on market60 daysfor-sale listing absorption
Months of supply2.5resale inventory relative to sales pace

Activity and available supply

Direct ZIP counts remain separate because each describes a different stage of the resale funnel.

Direct resale activity for ZIP 85206Active listings306Inventory139Pending sales158Homes sold169

Counter-signals before underwriting

A price alone does not reveal how quickly buyers are absorbing available homes.

Inventory direction

139 observed inventory · +2.7% year over year.

Price realization

97.8% average sale-to-list ratio · 10.4% sold above original list.

Early absorption

24.7% went off market within two weeks; compare this with 60 median days on market.

Measurement boundary

Small ZIP samples can move sharply. This rolling period smooths monthly noise but does not replace current address-level sale and rent comparables.

Redfin Data Center · updated 2026-07-03 · exact five-digit ZIP key. Implausible source values are withheld as n/a rather than repaired or inherited from a broader geography.

Wider market evidence

Listing and rental liquidity around the ZIP

These measures are not ZIP observations. They are labelled county or metro context so they can challenge the local story without being copied into it.

Maricopa County listing conditions

16,056 active Realtor.com listings · 64 median days on market · 28.9% price-reduced share · 2026-06.

Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ resale supply

3.5 months of supply · 61 median days on market · 32.9% listings with price drops · Redfin 2026-05-01.

Apartment List metro liquidity

8.1% reported apartment vacancy · 33 days on market. These are direct metro observations and do not describe a particular ZIP unit.

Property-level next step

Compare live same-bedroom listings, concessions, utilities, condition and days listed inside ZIP 85206. The report frames the market; it does not replace a rent roll, lease review or address-level comparable set.

Questions this report can answer

Scope-aware answers

What does the Zillow rent figure represent?

It is Zillow’s ZIP-level ZORI, a typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types. It is not a census of signed leases, a measured rent for each bedroom count, or proof of the asking rent for a specific available property. Its value is best read as a ZIP-wide market indicator within Zillow’s source universe.

Are the bedroom rent figures direct observed rents?

No. The studio through four-bedroom figures are modelled monthly estimates created by scaling ZIP ZORI with the local HUD bedroom ladder. They are useful for a consistent sizing framework, but they are not measured bedroom rents, advertised-unit comparables, or evidence of the price and condition of any particular home.

Does the 30% income calculation determine whether someone can rent a unit?

No. The calculation simply annualizes the current ZIP asking-rent index and divides it by 30% to create an arithmetic income screen. It does not account for household size, debts, savings, credit criteria, utility obligations, fees, subsidies, lease requirements, or the actual rent for a specific property.

How should the resale data affect interpretation of the rent data?

The Redfin data provide direct ZIP evidence about completed for-sale activity, including sold prices, transaction volume, marketing time, inventory, supply, and sale-to-list outcomes. Those signals can be compared directionally with rent history, but they are not rental transactions. They cannot establish rental demand, property income, or the economics of converting a home into a rental.