ZIP reports / NV / 89503
ZIP rental intelligence · 2026-06

ZIP 89503, Reno, NV

Asking rent, household capacity, housing stock and local context—kept at their original geographic and measurement scopes.

Direct local rent answer

What does rent cost in ZIP 89503?

The latest Zillow ZORI for ZIP 89503 is $1,827 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical observed asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

Zillow asking-rent index$1,8272026-06 · up 4.9% year over year
ACS median gross rent$1,438ACS 2024 5-year survey · ±$68 margin of error
HUD two-bedroom standard$1,870Administrative FMR/SAFMR · not asking rent
Bedroom-level rent benchmarks in ZIP 89503
BedroomsModelled asking-rent lensHUD standardHow to use it
Studio$1,259ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,289HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
1 bedroom$1,455ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,489HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
2 bedrooms$1,827ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,870HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
3 bedrooms$2,481ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,539HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
4 bedrooms$2,881ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,949HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.

Bedroom estimates are modelled, not observed rents. Zillow, Census ACS and HUD describe different housing universes and remain separate throughout this report.Zillow pulled 2026-08-08

Median household income$66,743ACS 2024 5-year · ±$8,903 MOE
Renter share54.4%7,172 renter households
Rent burden 30%+55.5%3,980 observed households
Housing vacancy7.0%997 of 14,192 units
Six views · one local decision

Read the measures together, without merging them

ZORI tracks observed asking rent, ACS describes occupied renter homes, and HUD publishes an administrative benchmark. The charts preserve those differences and add wider context only where the geography is named.

Three definitions of rent

Useful as a spread, not interchangeable observations.

Three rent measures for ZIP 89503Zillow asking-rent index$1,827ACS median gross rent$1,438HUD two-bedroom standard$1,870

Affordability screen

Annual income implied by 30% of the current ZIP ZORI.

Income screen for ZIP 89503ACS median household income$66,743Income at 30% of ZIP ZORI$73,080

Bedroom ladder

Modelled from ZIP ZORI using the local HUD ladder.

Modelled bedroom rent ladder for ZIP 89503Studio$1,259One bedroom$1,455Two bedrooms$1,827Three bedrooms$2,481Four bedrooms$2,881

Observed renter burden

ACS ZCTA households with computable gross-rent burden.

Observed renter cost burden in ZCTA 8950330% or more of income3,980 householdsBelow 30%3,192 households

ZIP versus wider rent context

Each bar retains its own ZIP, city, county or metro scope.

Asking-rent context for ZIP 89503ZIP 89503$1,827Reno city$1,932Washoe County county$2,004Reno, NV metro$2,004

Monthly asking-rent history

Direct Zillow ZORI observations over the latest five years. Missing months remain visible gaps.

Five-year direct Zillow asking-rent history for ZIP 89503; missing months remain gaps$1,875$1,729$1,583$1,4372021-062023-122026-06
Five-year change
23.1%exact same-month endpoints
Largest observed drawdown
1.4%peak to a later observed month
Annualized monthly variability
2.9%137 consecutive returns
Monthly coverage
100.0%138 of 138 months
Decision brief

What the evidence says for ZIP 89503

Rising asking rent is the immediate signal in 89503. At June 2026, Zillow ZORI was $1,827, a 4.9% increase from the same month a year earlier. ZORI is a typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types, so it tracks a ZIP-wide asking-market level rather than a signed lease, a particular unit, or a measured bedroom rate. The increase is meaningful as a current directional observation, but it creates an interpretive tension: rent pressure must be examined alongside household survey evidence and the separate for-sale record rather than treated as a complete account of either affordability or resale economics. This report keeps those evidence universes separate.

The five-digit label 89503 functions both as Zillow ZIP market identifier and the Census ZCTA match used here. A ZCTA is a statistical area and is not identical to a USPS delivery ZIP. In the matched ACS 2024 five-year survey, median gross rent was $1,438. That measure covers occupied renter homes and includes selected utilities; it is neither an active asking-rent series nor a measure limited to new leases. The current asking index is 27.1% above that survey median, a gap that cannot by itself show a unit-level premium, a change in utilities, or current tenant payments. The two series have different timing, populations, and rent concepts.

Bedroom figures need the same distinction. The local HUD FMR/SAFMR ladder is a FY2026 administrative, bedroom-specific standard rather than asking rent. Scaling ZIP ZORI by that local HUD ladder produces modelled monthly estimates of $1,259 for a studio, $1,455 for one bedroom, the current index level for two bedrooms, $2,481 for three bedrooms, and $2,881 for four bedrooms. These are modelled estimates, never measured bedroom rents or verified asking-rent samples. The approach preserves the local HUD size relationships while anchoring the ladder to ZIP ZORI; it does not establish what any individual layout, condition, utility package, or listing would command.

Affordability has a separate arithmetic and survey reading. Annualizing the current index and applying the 30% screen produces a required household income of $73,080. The ACS matched-ZCTA median household income is $66,743, so the annualized index equals 32.8% of that median income. This is an arithmetic screen, not advice and not an applicant qualification rule. Separately, the ACS burden estimate places 55.5% of the 7,172 occupied renter households at or above that cost threshold. That broad burden measure should not be used as proof of a particular household’s finances or of a particular unit’s all-in rent, especially because the ACS rent measure includes selected utilities.

Housing composition adds context without proving availability. In the matched ZCTA survey, the ZIP contains 14,192 housing units, of which 13,195 are occupied, for a reported 7.0% vacancy rate. Renters account for 54.4% of occupied homes, while the structure mix is 57.4% single-family and 19.0% in the supplied large-multifamily category. These categories frame the base from which the survey measures households and vacancies, but they do not identify a vacancy’s condition, tenure, rent, or market readiness. A ZIP vacancy statistic therefore cannot demonstrate that a specific home is available, nor can it establish the price or affordability of a particular rental.

Relative price context is lower in the ZIP, but it remains wider-geography context. In the Reno city scope, the rent context is $1,932; in the Washoe County scope, it is $2,004; and in the Reno, NV metro scope, it is also $2,004, compared with the ZIP index above. Those city, county, and metro figures are not substitutes for a direct ZIP observation and should not be blended with the matched ZCTA’s gross-rent or burden measures. They simply show that the current ZIP asking-rent index sits below each named broader rent context, while preserving the distinction between scope and source.

The rent history places the current increase in a longer backward-looking record. Exact same-month ZORI changes were 4.93% over one year, 2.38% annualized over three years, and 4.24% annualized over five years. Recent direction therefore confirms the longer upward path but accelerates relative to both longer windows; it is a measurement, not a forecast or investment recommendation. Annualized monthly-return variability was 2.88%, and maximum drawdown was a 1.41% decline. Coverage is complete across 138 observations and 137 consecutive monthly returns. Transparent national discovery ranks among history-eligible ZIPs are 790 for momentum, 1,385 for stability, and 759 for balance, with lower ranks higher. Full coverage supports confidence in the calculated history, while variability limits the confidence appropriate for any single current index snapshot.

Redfin supplies a different, direct ZIP resale observation: its rolling three-month record ending June 30, 2026 reports a $512,384 median sold price, up 11.6% from a year earlier. The for-sale record shows 107 homes sold, 38 median days on market, an inventory count of 75 homes, and 2.1 months of supply. Average sale-to-list was 99.1%, 29.8% of sales were above list, and 49.8% went off market within two weeks. These are resale liquidity and pricing signals, not rental transactions, rental comps, or property economics. The 4.28% annualized-ZORI-to-median-sold-price screen is only a cross-source screening ratio, not a cap rate, net return, expected return, or property yield. The faster resale price change challenges any rent-only reading of price conditions and does not resolve the separate income and burden screen. Can the exact listing’s rent, bedroom count, rental type, included utilities, lease status and availability date—and, for a sale, closing price, list history, marketing time, and condition—be verified before either broad market measure is applied to that property?

Decision signals

What deserves a closer property-level check

Asking-rent acceleration, bounded history

Zillow’s direct ZIP asking-rent history shows a current upswing that is faster than the medium- and longer-horizon same-month changes. Full observed-series coverage makes that comparison traceable, but documented return variability means the current index remains a broad market measurement rather than evidence of a repeatable rent for every property or lease.

Source gap is not a rent comp

The matched ZCTA survey’s gross-rent figure and the Zillow index answer different questions: occupied renter households with selected utilities versus typical observed asking rent across rental types. Their spread should be read as a source-universe difference that may reflect survey and lease timing, not as a unit-level premium, discount, or estimate of a new tenant’s payment.

Affordability screen and broad renter burden

The income calculation and renter-burden estimate point to pressure in the broad ZCTA household data, yet neither determines an applicant’s budget or the affordability of a particular address. The required-income figure is a mechanical screen, and burden rates describe surveyed occupied renter households rather than the costs, utility treatment, or lease terms for an available unit.

Resale strength is a separate signal

Redfin’s resale record documents a price increase alongside sales activity, reported supply, and sale-to-list outcomes in the direct ZIP for-sale market. It reinforces that resale and rental signals need separate interpretation. The annualized-rent-to-price calculation can organize cross-source screening, but it does not incorporate a property’s expenses, financing, condition, or actual rent.

  • A ZCTA-based ACS estimate is geographically and conceptually different from the Zillow ZIP identifier; it may include occupied leases and selected utilities that an active asking-rent index does not.
  • The HUD-scaled bedroom amounts are modelled from a standard ladder. They can misstate the listing-specific effect of unit size, amenities, utilities, condition, or lease terms because they are not measured bedroom rents.
  • Vacancy, renter share, and cost-burden statistics are broad survey measures. They cannot establish that a particular dwelling is vacant, rentable, affordable to a given household, or representative of the ZIP.
  • The resale screen joins a broad rent index to a median sold price from for-sale transactions. It excludes property-specific operating costs and cannot establish economics, price, or rent for an individual asset.
Direct ZIP resale evidence

For-sale liquidity inside ZIP 89503

Redfin reports these as a rolling three-month ZIP observation through 2026-06-30. They describe the for-sale market, not rental vacancy or the rent of a particular property.

Median sale price$512,384+11.6% year over year
Homes sold107rolling three-month observation
Median days on market38 daysfor-sale listing absorption
Months of supply2.1resale inventory relative to sales pace

Activity and available supply

Direct ZIP counts remain separate because each describes a different stage of the resale funnel.

Direct resale activity for ZIP 89503Active listings186Inventory75Pending sales122Homes sold107

Counter-signals before underwriting

A price alone does not reveal how quickly buyers are absorbing available homes.

Inventory direction

75 observed inventory · -17.3% year over year.

Price realization

99.1% average sale-to-list ratio · 29.8% sold above original list.

Early absorption

49.8% went off market within two weeks; compare this with 38 median days on market.

Measurement boundary

Small ZIP samples can move sharply. This rolling period smooths monthly noise but does not replace current address-level sale and rent comparables.

Redfin Data Center · updated 2026-07-03 · exact five-digit ZIP key. Implausible source values are withheld as n/a rather than repaired or inherited from a broader geography.

Wider market evidence

Listing and rental liquidity around the ZIP

These measures are not ZIP observations. They are labelled county or metro context so they can challenge the local story without being copied into it.

Washoe County listing conditions

1,242 active Realtor.com listings · 46 median days on market · 17.2% price-reduced share · 2026-06.

Reno, NV resale supply

2.8 months of supply · 39 median days on market · 21.9% listings with price drops · Redfin 2026-05-01.

Apartment List metro liquidity

4.7% reported apartment vacancy · n/a. These are direct metro observations and do not describe a particular ZIP unit.

Property-level next step

Compare live same-bedroom listings, concessions, utilities, condition and days listed inside ZIP 89503. The report frames the market; it does not replace a rent roll, lease review or address-level comparable set.

Questions this report can answer

Scope-aware answers

Why does the ACS rent statistic differ from Zillow ZORI?

Zillow and ACS represent distinct evidence universes. Zillow summarizes observed asking rents at the ZIP market level and blends rental types. ACS reports median gross rent for occupied renter homes in the matched statistical area and includes selected utilities. Their divergence can reflect timing, population, geography, and definitions; it is not a measured premium for a current listing.

Are the bedroom amounts observed rents for available units?

No. The bedroom figures are modelled estimates, created by scaling ZIP ZORI with the local HUD ladder. HUD is an administrative bedroom-specific standard, not a record of current asking rents. The resulting ladder retains size relationships from that standard, but cannot verify rent for a unit with a particular layout, utility package, condition, or lease structure.

What does the required-income and burden evidence establish?

Required income is calculated by annualizing the current asking-rent index and applying a fixed rent-share threshold. It is neither advice nor an applicant qualification criterion. The ACS burden statistic describes the share of surveyed occupied renter households meeting that threshold; it cannot determine any specific household’s budget, income, costs, or ability to rent a given home.

Why cannot the rent-to-price screen evaluate a specific property?

The ratio annualizes a broad ZIP asking-rent index and divides it by a median price from direct ZIP for-sale transactions. Those measures have different universes and do not contain property-level operating costs, financing, taxes, insurance, repairs, or actual lease terms. It is therefore only a cross-source screen, not a calculation of property economics.