ZIP reports / CA / 91911
ZIP rental intelligence · 2026-06

ZIP 91911, Chula Vista, CA

Asking rent, household capacity, housing stock and local context—kept at their original geographic and measurement scopes.

Direct local rent answer

What does rent cost in ZIP 91911?

The latest Zillow ZORI for ZIP 91911 is $2,775 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical observed asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

Zillow asking-rent index$2,7752026-06 · up 1.0% year over year
ACS median gross rent$2,078ACS 2024 5-year survey · ±$62 margin of error
HUD two-bedroom standard$2,820Administrative FMR/SAFMR · not asking rent
Bedroom-level rent benchmarks in ZIP 91911
BedroomsModelled asking-rent lensHUD standardHow to use it
Studio$2,116ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,150HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
1 bedroom$2,273ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,310HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
2 bedrooms$2,775ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,820HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
3 bedrooms$3,700ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$3,760HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
4 bedrooms$4,477ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$4,550HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.

Bedroom estimates are modelled, not observed rents. Zillow, Census ACS and HUD describe different housing universes and remain separate throughout this report.Zillow pulled 2026-08-08

Median household income$82,350ACS 2024 5-year · ±$3,222 MOE
Renter share47.9%12,188 renter households
Rent burden 30%+62.4%7,611 observed households
Housing vacancy7.0%1,926 of 27,366 units
Six views · one local decision

Read the measures together, without merging them

ZORI tracks observed asking rent, ACS describes occupied renter homes, and HUD publishes an administrative benchmark. The charts preserve those differences and add wider context only where the geography is named.

Three definitions of rent

Useful as a spread, not interchangeable observations.

Three rent measures for ZIP 91911Zillow asking-rent index$2,775ACS median gross rent$2,078HUD two-bedroom standard$2,820

Affordability screen

Annual income implied by 30% of the current ZIP ZORI.

Income screen for ZIP 91911ACS median household income$82,350Income at 30% of ZIP ZORI$111,000

Bedroom ladder

Modelled from ZIP ZORI using the local HUD ladder.

Modelled bedroom rent ladder for ZIP 91911Studio$2,116One bedroom$2,273Two bedrooms$2,775Three bedrooms$3,700Four bedrooms$4,477

Observed renter burden

ACS ZCTA households with computable gross-rent burden.

Observed renter cost burden in ZCTA 9191130% or more of income7,611 householdsBelow 30%4,577 households

ZIP versus wider rent context

Each bar retains its own ZIP, city, county or metro scope.

Asking-rent context for ZIP 91911ZIP 91911$2,775Chula Vista city$3,008San Diego County county$2,991San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad, CA metro$2,991

Monthly asking-rent history

Direct Zillow ZORI observations over the latest five years. Missing months remain visible gaps.

Five-year direct Zillow asking-rent history for ZIP 91911; missing months remain gaps$2,907$2,572$2,238$1,9032021-062023-122026-06
Five-year change
37.9%exact same-month endpoints
Largest observed drawdown
2.7%peak to a later observed month
Annualized monthly variability
3.2%110 consecutive returns
Monthly coverage
100.0%111 of 111 months
Decision brief

What the evidence says for ZIP 91911

The central signal in 91911 is a current asking-rent index below its wider benchmarks rather than a sharp local rent decline. Zillow’s ZIP-market ZORI was $2,775 at the June endpoint, a 0.98% year-over-year increase. ZORI is a typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types, not a lease-level quote or a bedroom-specific measure. For citywide context, Chula Vista’s Zillow rent was $3,007.69; for countywide and metro-wide context, San Diego County and the San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad metro were each $2,991. Those are wider-area context series, not substitutes for the ZIP figure. The five-digit label is both a Zillow ZIP market identifier and a Census ZCTA match; a ZCTA is a statistical area and is not identical to a USPS delivery ZIP.

The affordability screen cuts in another direction. The matched Census ZCTA ACS five-year median gross rent was $2,078, a survey result for occupied renter homes that includes selected utilities. That differs from ZORI’s asking-rent universe: the current index is materially above the ACS median, a gap that should not be read as a rent change for a matched set of homes. At 30% of gross income, $2,775 monthly translates arithmetically to $111,000 annual income; the ZCTA’s median household income is $82,350, making the same screen 40.44% of that benchmark. This required-income screen is arithmetic, not advice, an applicant qualification rule, or evidence of what any household pays. The ACS burden measure separately reports that 62.45% of renter households cross that burden threshold; it is a broad household statistic, not proof about a particular advertised unit.

Bedroom framing is deliberately modelled rather than observed. Scaling ZIP ZORI by the local HUD ladder produces monthly modelled estimates of $2,116 for a studio, $2,273 for one bedroom, $2,775 for two bedrooms, $3,700 for three bedrooms, and $4,477 for four bedrooms. The underlying HUD FMR/SAFMR ladder is an administrative, bedroom-specific standard—not asking rent—and is the scaling input rather than a sample of local advertised units. Thus the close two-bedroom relationship reflects the method and common benchmark, not a measured ZIP two-bedroom rent or a claim that a particular unit can rent at either value. The estimates should remain attached to their stated bedroom categories and source period; they do not replace an actual listing’s layout, utilities, or asking price.

History puts the small current increase in perspective. The Zillow record has complete 100% coverage, comprising 111 monthly observations and 110 consecutive monthly returns through the stated endpoint. Exact same-month annualized change was 0.98% over one year, 1.31% over three years, and 6.63% over five years. Positive movement at each horizon confirms the broader upward path, yet the current rate is slower than the middle- and longer-horizon rates, so it signals deceleration rather than acceleration. At 3.18%, annualized monthly-return variability means that a lone current ZORI reading deserves measured confidence because monthly movement has varied. The 2.72% maximum drawdown instead marks the worst peak-to-trough retreat in the observed record; it tempered but did not reverse the longer path. Transparent national discovery ranks among history-eligible ZIPs were 1,934 for momentum, 1,889 for stability, and 2,243 for balanced performance; lower ranks are higher. They are backward-looking measurements, not forecasts or investment recommendations.

The matched ZCTA’s housing base is substantial but mixed: 27,366 housing units, with 15,475 single-family units and 4,815 in large multifamily structures. Renter-occupied homes make up 47.91% of occupied units, giving renter data meaningful weight alongside owner occupancy. The 7.04% vacancy rate is a stock-wide Census measure, while 441 units are reported vacant for rent. Neither statistic establishes availability, condition, price, or competition for any particular unit. The citywide Chula Vista vacancy context was lower, but that is not a ZIP leasing observation and cannot resolve whether a listing is open. Census estimates describe the matched ZCTA and a survey period, rather than a live inventory feed; the counts should therefore inform market framing, not unit-level conclusions.

Direct ZIP resale evidence offers a separate, partly offsetting signal. Redfin’s direct rolling-three-month ZIP observation shows a $778,824 median sold price, up 3.84% year over year, across 100 homes sold; typical marketing time was 24 days. Inventory was 67 homes and months of supply were 2.0. The average sale-to-list ratio was 99.57%, while 49.53% of sold homes went above list price. These are for-sale outcomes—not rental transactions, rental comparable evidence, or property economics. Higher sale prices, short marketing time, and near-list execution make resale activity appear firmer than the slow current rent gain. That firmness sits alongside, rather than explains, the stretched household screen and burden measure. Annualized ZIP ZORI divided by median sold price equals a 4.28% cross-source screening ratio only; it is not a cap rate, net return, expected return, or property yield.

The decision tension is not resolved by treating these sources as interchangeable. The ZIP asking-rent index sits below the city, county, and metro context measures, but the household screen and burden share show a more stretched ZCTA income-and-occupancy backdrop. History remains positive but slower, so it does not validate an assumption that the current asking index will rapidly close the context gap. Conversely, resale price strength is a separate for-sale observation and cannot turn the rent-to-price screen into property income. This combination supports a cautious reading of the current snapshot: it is useful as a ZIP-level asking benchmark, yet its relevance depends on rental type, bedroom count, lease terms, and the precise universe being compared.

Before relying on this ZIP screen, verify that the exact address is represented by the market identifier despite the ZCTA–USPS distinction, then compare the live advertised rent with the relevant modelled bedroom estimate rather than assuming ZORI is the unit’s rent. Confirm bedroom count, included utilities, lease duration, availability, listing date, and condition. For a sale-side check, confirm the property’s actual sale or list status, price, and marketing history rather than applying ZIP resale medians to it. Recheck source dates because the ACS survey, HUD standard, Zillow index, history series, and Redfin resale observation have different designs and update schedules. None of these aggregated measures establishes a specific unit’s vacancy, affordability, rent, or resale outcome.

Decision signals

What deserves a closer property-level check

Current rent sits below wider Zillow contexts

Zillow’s current ZIP asking-rent index is below the named city, county, and metro context values even though its latest annual movement remains positive. That makes the local rent signal one of relative positioning and slower growth, not an observed decline. Because ZORI blends rental types, it should anchor ZIP-level comparison rather than substitute for a unit quote.

Affordability evidence reflects a different universe

ACS gross rent, household income, and burden statistics come from the matched ZCTA’s occupied renter households, while ZORI reflects asking rents. Their gap is decision-relevant because the arithmetic income screen is above the ZCTA household-income benchmark and burden is widespread. It does not show the rent or qualification outcome for a specific household, address, or lease.

History is positive but the latest pace is slower

Complete historical coverage shows positive annualized movement across the short, middle, and longer windows, but the latest pace trails the earlier windows. Monthly variation means the latest ZORI needs more than mechanical confidence, while the observed drawdown describes a contained historical retreat. Discovery ranks help locate this ZIP among eligible records only; they do not predict rent.

Resale firmness does not create rental comparable evidence

Redfin’s direct resale snapshot shows price growth, quick marketing, limited months of supply, and near-list execution, but it is a for-sale dataset. The resale firmness challenges any simplistic reading of slower asking-rent growth, yet it does not supply rental comparable evidence. The rent-to-price figure is appropriate only as a cross-source screen and does not measure property income.

  • The ZCTA boundary is statistical and can differ from a USPS delivery ZIP. A property must be checked against its exact address and source coverage before ZIP or ZCTA aggregates are applied.
  • ZORI blends property types and the bedroom figures are mechanically modelled from a HUD standard. Actual rent can differ with size, condition, utilities, lease terms, and availability.
  • ACS estimates are survey-based and describe occupied renters across a multi-year period, while vacancy and burden figures cannot prove the status or cost of a specific listing.
  • The resale measures are rolling ZIP for-sale observations. They do not provide rental transactions, operating evidence, or proof that the cross-source screening ratio applies to any property.
Direct ZIP resale evidence

For-sale liquidity inside ZIP 91911

Redfin reports these as a rolling three-month ZIP observation through 2026-06-30. They describe the for-sale market, not rental vacancy or the rent of a particular property.

Median sale price$778,824+3.8% year over year
Homes sold100rolling three-month observation
Median days on market24 daysfor-sale listing absorption
Months of supply2.0resale inventory relative to sales pace

Activity and available supply

Direct ZIP counts remain separate because each describes a different stage of the resale funnel.

Direct resale activity for ZIP 91911Active listings190Inventory67Pending sales103Homes sold100

Counter-signals before underwriting

A price alone does not reveal how quickly buyers are absorbing available homes.

Inventory direction

67 observed inventory · +23.4% year over year.

Price realization

99.6% average sale-to-list ratio · 49.5% sold above original list.

Early absorption

44.5% went off market within two weeks; compare this with 24 median days on market.

Measurement boundary

Small ZIP samples can move sharply. This rolling period smooths monthly noise but does not replace current address-level sale and rent comparables.

Redfin Data Center · updated 2026-07-03 · exact five-digit ZIP key. Implausible source values are withheld as n/a rather than repaired or inherited from a broader geography.

Wider market evidence

Listing and rental liquidity around the ZIP

These measures are not ZIP observations. They are labelled county or metro context so they can challenge the local story without being copied into it.

San Diego County listing conditions

5,739 active Realtor.com listings · 43 median days on market · 17.9% price-reduced share · 2026-06.

San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad, CA resale supply

2.6 months of supply · 24 median days on market · 31.5% listings with price drops · Redfin 2026-05-01.

Apartment List metro liquidity

6.6% reported apartment vacancy · 29 days on market. These are direct metro observations and do not describe a particular ZIP unit.

Property-level next step

Compare live same-bedroom listings, concessions, utilities, condition and days listed inside ZIP 91911. The report frames the market; it does not replace a rent roll, lease review or address-level comparable set.

Questions this report can answer

Scope-aware answers

How can 91911 be both a ZIP market and a ZCTA match?

A Zillow ZIP market identifier supplies the asking-rent series, while the matched Census ZCTA supplies ACS survey statistics. The shared label supports comparison, but the ZCTA is a statistical approximation rather than a USPS delivery geography. Address-level eligibility, delivery ZIP, and inclusion in each source should therefore be checked independently.

Are the bedroom rents observed local rents?

No. Each bedroom amount is a modelled monthly ZIP estimate produced by scaling the ZIP ZORI with the local HUD ladder. HUD FMR/SAFMR is an administrative bedroom-specific standard, and ZORI is a blended asking-rent index. Neither identifies the actual advertised rent, included utilities, condition, or lease terms of a particular home.

What does the historical record say about the next year?

The historical series documents past same-month rent movement, return variation, drawdown, coverage, and discovery ranks through its endpoint. Its latest pace can be compared with earlier horizons, but none of those backward-looking calculations forecasts future asking rents, applicant outcomes, resale conditions, or an investment result.

Why is the rent-to-price figure not a property yield?

The numerator is an annualized ZIP asking-rent index and the denominator is a median price from ZIP resale sales. They are separate aggregate series rather than matched rent and sale observations for one property. The resulting figure is only a cross-source screening ratio; it is not a cap rate, net return, expected return, property yield, or investment forecast.