ZIP reports / CA / 94080
ZIP rental intelligence · 2026-06

ZIP 94080, South San Francisco, CA

Asking rent, household capacity, housing stock and local context—kept at their original geographic and measurement scopes.

Direct local rent answer

What does rent cost in ZIP 94080?

The latest Zillow ZORI for ZIP 94080 is $4,091 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical observed asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

Zillow asking-rent index$4,0912026-06 · up 8.6% year over year
ACS median gross rent$2,809ACS 2024 5-year survey · ±$140 margin of error
HUD two-bedroom standard$3,604Administrative FMR/SAFMR · not asking rent
Bedroom-level rent benchmarks in ZIP 94080
BedroomsModelled asking-rent lensHUD standardHow to use it
Studio$2,821ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,485HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
1 bedroom$3,379ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,977HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
2 bedrooms$4,091ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$3,604HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
3 bedrooms$5,226ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$4,604HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
4 bedrooms$5,417ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$4,772HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.

Bedroom estimates are modelled, not observed rents. Zillow, Census ACS and HUD describe different housing universes and remain separate throughout this report.Zillow pulled 2026-08-08

Median household income$136,733ACS 2024 5-year · ±$8,111 MOE
Renter share41.1%9,023 renter households
Rent burden 30%+50.2%4,530 observed households
Housing vacancy7.1%1,688 of 23,654 units
Six views · one local decision

Read the measures together, without merging them

ZORI tracks observed asking rent, ACS describes occupied renter homes, and HUD publishes an administrative benchmark. The charts preserve those differences and add wider context only where the geography is named.

Three definitions of rent

Useful as a spread, not interchangeable observations.

Three rent measures for ZIP 94080Zillow asking-rent index$4,091ACS median gross rent$2,809HUD two-bedroom standard$3,604

Affordability screen

Annual income implied by 30% of the current ZIP ZORI.

Income screen for ZIP 94080ACS median household income$136,733Income at 30% of ZIP ZORI$163,640

Bedroom ladder

Modelled from ZIP ZORI using the local HUD ladder.

Modelled bedroom rent ladder for ZIP 94080Studio$2,821One bedroom$3,379Two bedrooms$4,091Three bedrooms$5,226Four bedrooms$5,417

Observed renter burden

ACS ZCTA households with computable gross-rent burden.

Observed renter cost burden in ZCTA 9408030% or more of income4,530 householdsBelow 30%4,493 households

ZIP versus wider rent context

Each bar retains its own ZIP, city, county or metro scope.

Asking-rent context for ZIP 94080ZIP 94080$4,091South San Francisco city$4,084San Mateo County county$3,760San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley, CA metro$3,301

Monthly asking-rent history

Direct Zillow ZORI observations over the latest five years. Missing months remain visible gaps.

Five-year direct Zillow asking-rent history for ZIP 94080; missing months remain gaps$4,205$3,859$3,514$3,1682021-062023-122026-06
Five-year change
24.7%exact same-month endpoints
Largest observed drawdown
9.5%peak to a later observed month
Annualized monthly variability
3.2%97 consecutive returns
Monthly coverage
100.0%98 of 98 months
Decision brief

What the evidence says for ZIP 94080

At the June 2026 Zillow endpoint, this ZIP shows a $4,091 monthly ZORI, up 8.6% on the exact same-month comparison. The immediate tension is between that asking-rent level and the household-income screen: annualized ZORI requires $163,640 of income at the 30% benchmark, versus an ACS median household income of $136,733; the resulting arithmetic share is 35.9%. Zillow ZORI is a typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types, rather than an executed lease, a utility-inclusive tenant payment, or a quote for a particular unit. The 30% required-income screen is arithmetic only, not advice and not an applicant qualification rule. It frames the data gap without establishing affordability for any individual household.

Direct for-sale evidence points in the same direction but must not be folded into rent evidence. Redfin's direct rolling-three-month ZIP resale observation records a median sold price of $1,293,708, 6.7% above a year earlier, with 93 homes sold and a median 15 days on market. Its inventory measure is 35 homes and months of supply is 1.2; average sale-to-list is 107.7%, while 76.7% of sales cleared above list. These are for-sale market and liquidity observations, not rental transactions or rent comps. Annualized ZIP ZORI divided by median sold price is 3.8%, only a cross-source screening ratio rather than property-level economics. The resale signals align with higher current asking rent, yet they do not erase the income-screen tension in paragraph one.

Backward-looking ZORI history characterizes the acceleration more clearly. Exact same-month annualized change is 8.61% over one year, compared with 4.47% over three years and 4.51% over five years. Recent direction therefore confirms the longer upward path but accelerates beyond both longer comparison rates; it is not a forecast or investment recommendation. Annualized monthly-return variability is 3.22%, and the historical maximum drawdown was -9.48%. Coverage is 100% across 98 ZORI observations and 97 consecutive monthly returns. Transparent national discovery ranks among history-eligible ZIPs are 183 for momentum, 1,938 for stability, and 536 for the balanced measure, where a lower rank is higher. The variability and drawdown mean a reader should not give one current rent snapshot the confidence implied by a smooth long-run average.

The ZORI-to-survey gap is material because the evidence universes answer different questions. In the matched Census ZCTA, ACS median gross rent is $2,809, making the current ZIP asking-rent index 45.6% higher. ACS is a five-year survey of occupied renter homes, and median gross rent includes selected utilities; it is neither an asking-rent series nor a current listing measure. The local HUD two-bedroom FMR/SAFMR standard is $3,604, with ZORI 13.5% above it. HUD FMR/SAFMR is an administrative, bedroom-specific standard, not asking rent. These comparisons identify measurement differences, not a claim that any one household pays the current index or HUD amount.

Bedroom figures are best read as a sizing device rather than observed market medians. Scaling ZIP ZORI through the local HUD ladder produces modelled monthly estimates of $2,821 for a studio, $3,379 for one bedroom, $4,091 for two bedrooms, $5,226 for three bedrooms, and $5,417 for four bedrooms. They are modelled estimates, never measured bedroom rents: the ZIP ZORI is the base index, and the local HUD ladder supplies the relative bedroom pattern. Because that pattern comes from an administrative standard, actual listings can differ by configuration, included utilities, lease terms, and other unreported unit-level features.

Housing-stock and burden figures offer context without proving present availability. The ZCTA contains 23,654 housing units and a 7.1% vacancy rate, while renters account for 41.1% of occupied homes. Of renter households, 4,53050.2%—reported spending at least 30% of income on rent in the ACS survey. There are 732 units classified vacant for rent, a category that does not establish current availability, advertised price, condition, or suitability for a particular household. Structure counts include 16,146 single-family units and 3,933 units in large multifamily buildings. Taken together, burden, vacancy, and structure categories describe the surveyed ZCTA housing base; none proves the price, vacancy, or burden of any specific property or lease.

Broader-place comparisons are context only, not substitutes for ZIP measures. In South San Francisco city context, the asking-rent figure is $4,084; in San Mateo County context, it is $3,760; and in the San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley, CA metro context, it is $3,301. The ZIP index is near the city context but above the county and metro context. These are broader geographies and aggregated context series, so they do not change the ZIP ZORI reading, the matched-ZCTA survey findings, or the direct ZIP resale observation. Their role is to locate the reported values by named scope rather than turn city, county, or metro information into property evidence.

Interpretation should retain the geographic and data limits. The five-digit 94080 label is both a Zillow ZIP market identifier and a Census ZCTA match, but a ZCTA is a statistical area and is not identical to a USPS delivery ZIP. The ACS figures also carry the supplied margins of error. Neither an index, five-year survey, administrative standard, history series, nor rolling resale summary supplies a unit-specific lease or purchase record. Concrete property-level checks are the actual bedroom count and configuration, current advertised rent and concessions, which utilities and charges are included, lease start and term, current listing status, and, for a sale comparison, condition, sale date, and list-to-sale history. Do the actual unit records match the assumptions behind these broad screens?

Decision signals

What deserves a closer property-level check

Asking-rent level creates an income-screen tension

The current Zillow reading places the ZIP's blended asking-rent index above both the ACS gross-rent median and the income amount implied by the 30% arithmetic screen. That is a population-level comparison, not evidence that a particular applicant, listed unit, or lease is unaffordable. It matters because it creates the report's central tension before broader-geography or resale measures are considered.

Recent ZORI growth is faster, but not smooth

Current rent growth is faster than the ZIP's three- and five-year annualized changes, so the recent move extends rather than reverses the longer upward pattern. Complete stated observation coverage supports the historical calculation, yet the reported variability and drawdown caution against treating the latest ZORI reading as a stable representation of every rental type or month.

Resale signals are firm but remain a separate universe

ZIP resale evidence is concurrently firm on several direct measures: sales price rose, marketing time was short, supply was limited, and transactions often cleared above list. Those conditions are contained within Redfin's for-sale observation. They corroborate the direction of higher price signals but cannot validate rents, property operations, tenant demand, or the arithmetic affordability screen.

Surveyed stock context does not establish live availability

ACS shows a housing base with substantial renter presence, measured vacancy, and a large share of renter households at or above the burden threshold. The vacant-for-rent count is a survey category, not live availability. ZCTA boundaries, the survey period, supplied margins of error, and property-level variation restrict how precisely these values map to a single building.

  • ZORI is a blended asking-rent index across rental types, so a particular unit's bedroom count, utility treatment, concessions, timing, and condition may produce a materially different advertised or leased amount.
  • ACS estimates are for a matched ZCTA and span a five-year survey period, while the postal delivery ZIP can have different boundaries; survey margins and timing prevent a one-to-one listing comparison.
  • The history series has full stated coverage but still describes prior index behavior. Recent acceleration, variability, and maximum drawdown cannot determine a future asking-rent path or a specific property's leasing outcome.
  • Redfin measures closed resale activity in a rolling ZIP window. Price, marketing-time, inventory, and list signals cannot supply rental comps, operating costs, financing terms, taxes, or an economic result for any individual property.
Direct ZIP resale evidence

For-sale liquidity inside ZIP 94080

Redfin reports these as a rolling three-month ZIP observation through 2026-06-30. They describe the for-sale market, not rental vacancy or the rent of a particular property.

Median sale price$1,293,708+6.7% year over year
Homes sold93rolling three-month observation
Median days on market15 daysfor-sale listing absorption
Months of supply1.2resale inventory relative to sales pace

Activity and available supply

Direct ZIP counts remain separate because each describes a different stage of the resale funnel.

Direct resale activity for ZIP 94080Active listings151Inventory35Pending sales104Homes sold93

Counter-signals before underwriting

A price alone does not reveal how quickly buyers are absorbing available homes.

Inventory direction

35 observed inventory · -34.3% year over year.

Price realization

107.7% average sale-to-list ratio · 76.7% sold above original list.

Early absorption

49.9% went off market within two weeks; compare this with 15 median days on market.

Measurement boundary

Small ZIP samples can move sharply. This rolling period smooths monthly noise but does not replace current address-level sale and rent comparables.

Redfin Data Center · updated 2026-07-03 · exact five-digit ZIP key. Implausible source values are withheld as n/a rather than repaired or inherited from a broader geography.

Wider market evidence

Listing and rental liquidity around the ZIP

These measures are not ZIP observations. They are labelled county or metro context so they can challenge the local story without being copied into it.

San Mateo County listing conditions

735 active Realtor.com listings · 36 median days on market · 10.2% price-reduced share · 2026-06.

San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley, CA resale supply

n/a · n/a · n/a listings with price drops · Redfin 2026-05-01.

Apartment List metro liquidity

3.3% reported apartment vacancy · 20 days on market. These are direct metro observations and do not describe a particular ZIP unit.

Property-level next step

Compare live same-bedroom listings, concessions, utilities, condition and days listed inside ZIP 94080. The report frames the market; it does not replace a rent roll, lease review or address-level comparable set.

Questions this report can answer

Scope-aware answers

Why do the Zillow and ACS rent figures differ?

They measure distinct evidence universes and timing. Zillow is a ZIP-level current asking-rent index blended across rental types. ACS describes occupied renter homes in the matched ZCTA over a five-year survey and defines gross rent with selected utilities. The difference is therefore not a rent-growth calculation, tenant payment record, or unit-specific quote.

Are the studio-through-four-bedroom figures actual observed rents?

No. They are modelled ZIP estimates generated by scaling ZORI with the local HUD bedroom ladder. The HUD inputs are administrative standards rather than market quotes. The ladder standardizes the relative bedroom pattern in this screen, but it cannot replace verification of a unit's advertised rent, configuration, utility terms, or concessions.

What does the historical series say about confidence in the current ZORI value?

The history establishes that recent same-month growth is stronger than the longer annualized path and that stated coverage is complete in the supplied series. However, annualized monthly-return variability and the maximum drawdown show past movement around that path. It is backward-looking measurement, not a forecast, and cannot determine the next asking-rent reading.

Does Redfin's resale evidence establish the economics of a rental property?

No. Redfin's rolling ZIP resale series records completed for-sale outcomes, not rental transactions. The annualized ZORI-to-median-sold-price calculation is only a cross-source screen; it does not include a property's actual lease, operating facts, or sale-specific characteristics. Property-level comparability would require unit and transaction records that are absent from these broad measures.