ZIP reports / WA / 98201
ZIP rental intelligence · 2026-06

ZIP 98201, Everett, WA

Asking rent, household capacity, housing stock and local context—kept at their original geographic and measurement scopes.

Direct local rent answer

What does rent cost in ZIP 98201?

The latest Zillow ZORI for ZIP 98201 is $1,996 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical observed asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

Zillow asking-rent index$1,9962026-06 · up 4.4% year over year
ACS median gross rent$1,556ACS 2024 5-year survey · ±$82 margin of error
HUD two-bedroom standard$2,501Administrative FMR/SAFMR · not asking rent
Bedroom-level rent benchmarks in ZIP 98201
BedroomsModelled asking-rent lensHUD standardHow to use it
Studio$1,655ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,074HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
1 bedroom$1,713ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,146HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
2 bedrooms$1,996ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,501HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
3 bedrooms$2,611ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$3,272HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
4 bedrooms$3,070ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$3,847HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.

Bedroom estimates are modelled, not observed rents. Zillow, Census ACS and HUD describe different housing universes and remain separate throughout this report.Zillow pulled 2026-08-08

Median household income$74,554ACS 2024 5-year · ±$6,789 MOE
Renter share55.4%7,820 renter households
Rent burden 30%+52.7%4,118 observed households
Housing vacancy9.7%1,513 of 15,617 units
Six views · one local decision

Read the measures together, without merging them

ZORI tracks observed asking rent, ACS describes occupied renter homes, and HUD publishes an administrative benchmark. The charts preserve those differences and add wider context only where the geography is named.

Three definitions of rent

Useful as a spread, not interchangeable observations.

Three rent measures for ZIP 98201Zillow asking-rent index$1,996ACS median gross rent$1,556HUD two-bedroom standard$2,501

Affordability screen

Annual income implied by 30% of the current ZIP ZORI.

Income screen for ZIP 98201ACS median household income$74,554Income at 30% of ZIP ZORI$79,840

Bedroom ladder

Modelled from ZIP ZORI using the local HUD ladder.

Modelled bedroom rent ladder for ZIP 98201Studio$1,655One bedroom$1,713Two bedrooms$1,996Three bedrooms$2,611Four bedrooms$3,070

Observed renter burden

ACS ZCTA households with computable gross-rent burden.

Observed renter cost burden in ZCTA 9820130% or more of income4,118 householdsBelow 30%3,702 households

ZIP versus wider rent context

Each bar retains its own ZIP, city, county or metro scope.

Asking-rent context for ZIP 98201ZIP 98201$1,996Everett city$1,946Snohomish County county$2,232Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA metro$2,269

Monthly asking-rent history

Direct Zillow ZORI observations over the latest five years. Missing months remain visible gaps.

Five-year direct Zillow asking-rent history for ZIP 98201; missing months remain gaps$2,061$1,861$1,661$1,4612021-062023-122026-06
Five-year change
30.7%exact same-month endpoints
Largest observed drawdown
2.8%peak to a later observed month
Annualized monthly variability
2.6%122 consecutive returns
Monthly coverage
100.0%123 of 123 months
Decision brief

What the evidence says for ZIP 98201

In June 2026, ZIP 98201’s Zillow Observed Rent Index (ZORI) stood at $1,996, up 4.4% year over year, but its context position was mixed. The Everett city-context asking-rent index was $1,946, the Snohomish County context asking-rent index was $2,232, and the Seattle–Tacoma–Bellevue, WA metro-context asking-rent index was $2,269. Current ZIP asking rent therefore sat somewhat above city context yet below county and metro context. ZORI is a typical observed asking-rent index for the ZIP, blended across rental types; it is not a lease quote, a count of available units, or a measure of every tenant’s housing costs. That cross-geography position describes the index only and does not establish an individual property’s market rent.

The backward-looking ZORI path broadly supports the supplied stable-growth classification. Exact same-month annualized changes were 4.4% over one year, 3.0% over three years, and 5.5% over five years. The latest pace is stronger than the three-year path but below the five-year pace, so recent direction confirms the longer upward trajectory rather than breaking from it. The history record had complete coverage, with 123 observations and 122 consecutive monthly returns. Monthly movements produced 2.6% annualized variability, which supports more confidence in the current index than a highly erratic series would. Still, the historical maximum drawdown was 2.8%, showing that the index has not risen without interruption. Transparent national discovery ranks among history-eligible ZIPs were 734 for momentum, 858 for stability, and 399 for the balanced measure, where lower is higher. These are backward-looking discovery measurements, not forecasts or investment recommendations.

Bedroom figures require an explicit modelling distinction. Scaling the ZIP ZORI with the local HUD ladder produces modelled monthly estimates—not measured bedroom rents—of $1,655 for a studio, $1,713 for one bedroom, $1,996 for two bedrooms, $2,611 for three bedrooms, and $3,070 for four bedrooms. The local FY2026 HUD two-bedroom FMR/SAFMR standard is $2,501. HUD FMR/SAFMR is an administrative, bedroom-specific standard rather than asking rent, while ZORI is blended across rental types. The scaled ladder can organize a bedroom comparison, but it cannot identify a particular unit’s condition, utility treatment, concessions, availability, or lease terms.

The affordability tension is clearer when the asking-rent index is kept separate from the ACS survey. In the matched Census ZCTA’s ACS 2024 five-year survey, median gross rent was $1,556 and includes selected utilities; that occupied-renter-home measure was 28.3% below current ZORI. Median household income was $74,554. Applying a 30% required-income screen to the current ZORI produces $79,840 and an asking-rent-to-income ratio of 32.1%. This screen is arithmetic, not advice and not an applicant qualification rule. ACS also estimated that 4,118 of 7,820 renter households, or 52.7%, spent at least 30% of income on rent. That burden measure does not prove the affordability of any particular unit or household.

Survey housing-stock evidence adds another caution to a simple rent reading. The matched ZCTA reported 15,617 housing units, including 1,513 vacant units, for a 9.7% overall vacancy rate. Renters occupied 55.4% of occupied homes, and ACS structure counts show single-family units outnumbered large multifamily units. This mix matters because a blended asking-rent index can reflect several property types rather than a uniform apartment market. Overall vacancy is not the same as active rental availability: it includes multiple vacant-use categories and cannot establish that a specific home is ready to lease, competitively priced, or comparable with the ZORI basket.

Scope separation is essential in this ZIP. The five-digit 98201 label is both Zillow’s ZIP market identifier and a Census ZCTA match, but a ZCTA is a statistical area and is not identical to a USPS delivery ZIP. ACS is a five-year survey of occupied homes, Zillow measures asking-rent conditions, and HUD supplies an administrative rent standard. The Everett city, Snohomish County, and Seattle–Tacoma–Bellevue metro values are wider context only, not substitutes for ZIP evidence. Differences between the current asking-rent index, the ACS gross-rent median, and the HUD ladder should therefore be read as differences in population, timing, and purpose rather than as competing measurements of one identical rent.

The for-sale evidence presents a counterweight to the rising rent history. Redfin’s direct rolling-three-month ZIP resale observation reported a $564,847 median sold price, down 0.5% year over year, with 90 homes sold and a median marketing time of 8 days. Inventory was 82 homes and months of supply were 2.7. Sale-to-list signals remained firm: the average sale-to-list ratio was 100.44%, and 43.2% of sales closed above list price. This is ZIP-level resale evidence, not rental transactions or rental comparables. The small sale-price decline challenges a simple interpretation of rising asking rents, while the short marketing time and above-list share show that resale liquidity and pricing signals were not uniformly weak.

Annualized ZIP ZORI divided by median sold price creates a 4.24% cross-source screening ratio only. It cannot represent a cap rate, net return, expected return, or property yield because it does not contain property-specific operating costs, financing, taxes, repairs, concessions, or realized lease terms. A property-level review would need current unit asking prices, actual bedroom count, utility responsibility, condition, availability, lease structure, list-price history, and relevant transaction comparables. The key unresolved question is whether a specific property’s verified rent and expenses align with the blended ZIP index and the separate resale signals, rather than merely resembling one headline metric.

Decision signals

What deserves a closer property-level check

Asking-rent growth remains intact

The current ZIP asking-rent index increased from the prior year and sits above the city-context index while remaining below county and metro context. The historical path also shows growth across each supplied same-month horizon. Recent growth is firmer than the medium-term pace, although it does not exceed the longer historical rate.

Affordability measures point to a meaningful gap

Current asking rent exceeds the ACS gross-rent median, which measures occupied renter homes and includes selected utilities. The arithmetic income screen also sits above the ZCTA median household income, while the ACS burden measure shows that a substantial share of renter households face elevated rent-to-income pressure. These are area-level measures, not household determinations.

Bedroom values are modelled, not observed

The studio-through-four-bedroom ladder is generated by scaling the blended ZIP asking-rent index with local HUD bedroom relationships. It is useful for comparing relative bedroom tiers, but it is not a set of measured rents from active listings. HUD’s standard is administrative and should not be substituted for an asking-rent comp.

Resale signals are mixed rather than uniformly soft

The direct ZIP resale median slipped slightly from the prior year, challenging a one-direction interpretation of rent growth. At the same time, marketing time, sales volume, supply, and sale-to-list measures indicate active resale conditions. Those findings belong only to the for-sale market and should not be converted into rental transaction evidence.

  • Because ZORI blends asking rents across rental types, it may not match a particular apartment, house, bedroom count, condition level, concession package, utility arrangement, or current availability status.
  • The ACS figures describe a matched statistical ZCTA and surveyed occupied homes over a multi-year period, so they can differ from both the Zillow ZIP market area and a USPS delivery ZIP.
  • The burden, vacancy, and income measures are area-level survey statistics with uncertainty and composition effects; none establishes a specific tenant’s financial position or a specific unit’s leaseability.
  • The resale screening ratio joins rent and sale-price sources with different transaction universes, and it omits property-specific costs and terms that would be necessary for any property-level economic analysis.
Direct ZIP resale evidence

For-sale liquidity inside ZIP 98201

Redfin reports these as a rolling three-month ZIP observation through 2026-06-30. They describe the for-sale market, not rental vacancy or the rent of a particular property.

Median sale price$564,847-0.5% year over year
Homes sold90rolling three-month observation
Median days on market8 daysfor-sale listing absorption
Months of supply2.7resale inventory relative to sales pace

Activity and available supply

Direct ZIP counts remain separate because each describes a different stage of the resale funnel.

Direct resale activity for ZIP 98201Active listings190Inventory82Pending sales106Homes sold90

Counter-signals before underwriting

A price alone does not reveal how quickly buyers are absorbing available homes.

Inventory direction

82 observed inventory · +27.7% year over year.

Price realization

100.4% average sale-to-list ratio · 43.2% sold above original list.

Early absorption

59.2% went off market within two weeks; compare this with 8 median days on market.

Measurement boundary

Small ZIP samples can move sharply. This rolling period smooths monthly noise but does not replace current address-level sale and rent comparables.

Redfin Data Center · updated 2026-07-03 · exact five-digit ZIP key. Implausible source values are withheld as n/a rather than repaired or inherited from a broader geography.

Wider market evidence

Listing and rental liquidity around the ZIP

These measures are not ZIP observations. They are labelled county or metro context so they can challenge the local story without being copied into it.

Snohomish County listing conditions

2,138 active Realtor.com listings · 37 median days on market · 22.1% price-reduced share · 2026-06.

Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA resale supply

n/a · n/a · n/a listings with price drops · Redfin 2026-05-01.

Apartment List metro liquidity

6.0% reported apartment vacancy · 31 days on market. These are direct metro observations and do not describe a particular ZIP unit.

Property-level next step

Compare live same-bedroom listings, concessions, utilities, condition and days listed inside ZIP 98201. The report frames the market; it does not replace a rent roll, lease review or address-level comparable set.

Questions this report can answer

Scope-aware answers

Why does the current asking-rent index differ from ACS median gross rent?

They measure different populations and concepts. Zillow ZORI is a typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types, whereas ACS median gross rent is a five-year survey measure for occupied renter homes and includes selected utilities. A difference between them does not identify an error or prove a market change.

Are the bedroom rent figures direct rental observations?

No. The bedroom figures are modelled estimates created by scaling the ZIP-level ZORI using the local HUD bedroom ladder. They should help distinguish relative bedroom tiers, but they do not replace verified listing rents, executed leases, unit condition details, or property-specific utility and concession information.

What does the resale data say about the rental market?

It does not directly describe rental transactions. The Redfin block is a rolling three-month ZIP resale observation covering sold prices, sales activity, marketing time, inventory, supply, and sale-to-list outcomes. It can provide a separate for-sale market comparison, but it is not a source of rental comps or property operating economics.

How should the required-income and burden measures be used?

The required-income figure is a mechanical calculation that applies a rent-to-income threshold to the current asking-rent index. It is not affordability advice, a tenant screening policy, or an applicant qualification rule. The ACS burden share is likewise an area-level survey statistic rather than evidence about any individual household or property.