Counties / Washington / Snohomish County

Snohomish County, WA

FIPS 53061 · population 844,430 · part of Seattle, WA

$754k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
Direct county rent answer

What does rent cost in Snohomish County, WA?

The latest county-level Zillow ZORI is $2,232 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

County Zillow ZORI$2,2322026-06 · up 1.7% year over year
County ACS gross rent$1,949ACS 2024 5-year · occupied-renter survey
HUD two-bedroom FMR$2,501FY2026 · administrative standard
HUD Fair Market Rent by bedroom count in Snohomish County
BedroomsHUD monthly FMRGeographyMeasurement boundary
Studio$2,074Snohomish County, WAHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
1 bedroom$2,146Snohomish County, WAHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
2 bedrooms$2,501Snohomish County, WAHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
3 bedrooms$3,272Snohomish County, WAHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
4 bedrooms$3,847Snohomish County, WAHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.

Zillow asking rent, ACS gross rent and HUD FMR describe different housing universes. They remain separate and no metro, city or neighboring-county value replaces missing county evidence.Zillow pulled 2026-07-26 · HUD pulled 2026-07-26

The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$754k
▼ 1.9% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
Median asking rent
$2,232
▲ 1.7% year over year
Zillow ZORI · direct
Gross yield
3.5%
annual rent ÷ price, before costs
derived: rent × 12 ÷ price ✓
HUD 2-bed standard
$2,501
market rent is 0.89x the standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

The annual signals disagree
FHFA five-year cumulative+50.8%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06−1.9%FHFA HPI2025+1.3%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-08-02.
Owner-reported value$696k
Surveyed gross rent$1,949
Rent burden 30%+53.7%
Median year built1990
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
4.6%vacant
331,530estimated housing units
Occupied tenure31.8% renter
owner 68.2%renter 31.8%
Structure mix68.8% single-family
Single-family 68.8%20+ units 10.3%Mobile home 4.6%Other 16.3%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs299,337▲ 0.6% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments21,014annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,621▲ 5.5% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorManufacturing21.7% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+0.6%WEEKLY WAGE+5.5%Manufacturing21.7%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2021-2025; latest 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-08-02. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

Resident income

How local income has compounded

BEA per-capita personal income divides all personal income by the county population. It is broader than wages, but it is not household income or a measure of what renters can afford.

Per-capita personal income19692024
Per-capita personal income history for Snohomish CountyA line chart of annual BEA per-capita personal income from 1969 through 2024.$0k$40k$80k196919972024$4k$78k
Nominal annual dollars; not adjusted for inflation. A rising line can reflect wage, business-income, transfer-income and investment-income changes together.
Renter affordability

Who carries the heaviest rent burden

HUD CHAS separates renter households by income relative to local HAMFI. Moderate burden means housing costs above 30% through 50% of income; severe burden means more than 50%.

Share of renter households in each income band2018-2022
Renter cost burden by HAMFI income band in Snohomish CountyFive horizontal bars show moderate and severe housing cost burden shares among renter households in each HUD income band.0%25%50%75%100%At or below 30% HAMFI22,01078.2% burdened30–50% HAMFI17,35082.2% burdened50–80% HAMFI19,71557.2% burdened80–100% HAMFI11,92520.1% burdenedAbove 100% HAMFI25,7153.5% burdened
Moderate: >30% to 50%Severe: >50%
Each percentage uses HUD’s published subtotal for that income band. For disclosure, HUD keeps 0 as 0, publishes 1–7 households as 4 and rounds 8 or more to the nearest 5. Independently rounded categories can differ from their displayed sum and are not forced into a percentage.
Direct local rental evidence

Recent leases and rental-market liquidity in Snohomish County, WA

These Apartment List observations match the exact county Census code 53061. They are kept separate from Zillow asking rent, Census occupied-home rent and wider metro measures.

Direct recent-lease rent history

Monthly overall-rent index; missing observations are not filled from another geography.

$1,986$1,879$1,7712021-082026-07
Recent-lease rent$1,9672026-07 · +0.5% year over year
Rental vacancy6.0%2026-07 · +0.5 percentage points year over year
Time on market32 days2026-07 · +6.4 days year over year
County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

County tension is a softer Zillow value reading against positive, older FHFA index evidence; modest gross yield and earthquake exposure raise the diligence bar. Investors who can verify seismic costs, rents and expenses should investigate, while buyers relying on broad momentum or low carrying costs should be cautious. Zillow’s median county home value was $753,837 in 2026-06, down 1.94% year over year. FHFA’s 2025 annual repeat-transaction HPI rose 1.33%. It is an index, not a home value; its different vintage and method cannot be merged with Zillow into one growth rate.

02Housing economics

Measured median asking rent was $2,232 per month, and the published gross yield was 3.55% before costs. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR of $2,501 is a payment standard, not a market-rent estimate, so it cannot replace measured rent or support a different yield. The effective property-tax rate was 0.77%, a carrying-cost input alongside unreported insurance, maintenance, vacancy and financing. The record supports gross, not net, return analysis; no full operating-expense evidence supports a net-yield or debt-service conclusion.

03Demand & competition

Realtor.com’s 2026-06 MLS listing-market evidence shows active listings increased 31.09% and 22.14% of listings had price reductions. These are visible supply and seller-concession signals, not closed-sale prices or proof of buyer demand. Non-occupant purchase mortgages were 820 of 9,494 purchases, or 8.64%, showing investor participation but leaving buyer type, cash activity and property mix unresolved. Net tax-return migration was 1,450, and incoming movers’ average AGI exceeded outgoing movers’ by a calculated $5,332; this is household-movement evidence, not tenant demand. The 2025 QCEW reports annual covered jobs at county workplaces, with Manufacturing the largest disclosed private supersector; it is neither resident employment nor an unemployment measure.

04Risk & next checks

Earthquake is the dominant hazard, while modeled climate loss is 0.19% of building value per year; that ratio is not a dollar-loss forecast and does not disclose an individual asset’s insured loss. County evidence cannot establish neighborhood liquidity, building vulnerability or rent durability. No property-level seismic engineering, insurance premiums and deductibles, condition, lease roll, vacancy, actual sale comparables or full operating expenses are published. Those gaps prevent net cash-flow, replacement-cost and exit-price underwriting; property-specific review is needed to address them.

County ZIP rental landscape

How asking rent and renter pressure vary inside Snohomish County, WA

This view uses 12 direct Zillow ZIP markets matched to Census ZCTAs. Each ZIP is assigned by its largest HUD residential county share; this is not an exhaustive county inventory.

Selected ZIP range$1,862$3,028Zillow asking-rent index
Monthly spread$1,166highest minus lowest selected ZIP
Observed burden range42.1%58.8%ACS renter households paying 30%+
Renter households covered77,094across the selected ZCTAs
01 · ASKING RENT LADDERDirect ZIP ZORI
Horizontal bars compare Zillow asking-rent indexes across the selected direct-evidence ZIP set.98270$3,02898258$2,95698012$2,64098026$2,49498087$2,27798037$2,20298203$2,08198043$2,07898036$1,99898201$1,99698208$1,98098204$1,862
02 · PRESSURE MATRIXRent × observed burden
Each point is one selected ZIP and ZCTA match. Horizontal position is Zillow asking rent and vertical position is the ACS renter cost-burden share.61.3%55.9%50.4%45.0%39.6%982049801298087982019803698208982709820398037980439802698258Zillow asking-rent index →ACS burden share →
03 · BENCHMARK GAPZORI vs HUD 2BR
Bars show the percentage difference between the Zillow blended asking-rent index and the local HUD two-bedroom standard. Their housing universes differ.98270+121.1%98258+118.2%98012+105.6%98026+99.7%98087+91.0%98037+88.0%98203+83.2%98043+83.1%98036+79.9%98201+79.8%98208+79.2%98204+74.5%
WHAT THE LOCAL DISTRIBUTION SAYS

Within the selected direct-evidence ZIP/ZCTA set, the immediate decision is which current asking-rent tier fits a household's budget, rather than treating the county as a single market. Zillow ZORI, a typical observed asking-rent index, ranges in June 2026 from $1,862 in ZIP 98204 to $3,028 in ZIP 98270—a $1,166 spread—with a $2,141.50 median across the shown areas. The county ZORI is $2,232 and grew 1.69% year over year, but selected-area changes range from a 0.21% decline to a 4.38% gain. The practical comparison is therefore not simply lowest versus highest rent: compare the current asking-rent tier, its recent direction, and the budget standard appropriate to the actual unit sought.

Each source answers a different question. Zillow's range above describes current typical asking rents, while the ACS five-year ZCTA survey reports median gross rent, a survey estimate rather than a current asking-rent quote. In the shown set, ACS median gross rent ranges from $1,556 to $2,373, compared with a county ACS median of $1,949. HUD's FY2026 two-bedroom Fair Market Rent is instead an administrative standard: $2,501 throughout the displayed areas. ZORI is 74.45% to 121.07% of that standard, so a ZIP's relation to HUD is a screening comparison—not evidence that an asking-rent index represents a two-bedroom unit or that a household will pay either measure. Keep the Zillow, ACS, and HUD values side by side rather than averaging or substituting one for another.

Affordability and supply indicators complicate a price-only ranking. Among shown ZCTAs, the ACS share of renters spending at least thirty percent of income on rent runs from 42.10% to 58.79%, versus 53.66% countywide. This burden statistic is a survey outcome for renter households, not a calculation based on ZORI or FMR. ACS vacancy estimates range from 2.14% to 9.69%, while the county value is 4.62%. A lower vacancy estimate can coexist with a higher asking-rent index, and a higher estimate does not establish the availability, condition, lease terms, or bedroom mix of a specific unit. Households weighing the lower ZORI end against a particular unit should test both the advertised all-in price and the local burden/vacancy context, without treating either ACS estimate as a live listing count.

Coverage and geography set the limits of this comparison. The display contains 12 of 19 eligible direct-ZORI ZIP/ZCTA matches, selected by renter-household ordering rather than as an exhaustive inventory, and they cover 77,094 renter households. Census ZCTAs are statistical areas, not the same as USPS delivery ZIPs. ZIPs that cross county lines are displayed in Snohomish County when its HUD residential-address share is largest; every listed share is at least 99.79%. Consequently, the figures support ZIP-level screening, not boundary-precise conclusions. Before deciding on a property, verify the address and delivery ZIP, unit bedroom count, advertised base rent, utilities and recurring fees, availability date, lease term, income qualification, and whether the relevant program uses the applicable HUD bedroom-specific standard. Compare those unit facts with Zillow's typical index, not as a forecast or a promised rent.

Selected ZIP evidence

Keep each source universe visible

19 ZIP profiles passed the county gate; the 12 with the most renter households are shown.

ZIP / ZCTAZillow asking rentACS gross rentHUD 2BRBurden 30%+VacancyIncome screenHUD county share
98204$1,862$1,794$2,50157.6%4.9%$74k100.0%
98012$2,640$2,373$2,50145.2%2.7%$106k100.0%
98087$2,277$2,127$2,50157.0%5.4%$91k100.0%
98201$1,996$1,556$2,50152.7%9.7%$80k100.0%
98036$1,998$1,779$2,50158.8%4.6%$80k100.0%
98208$1,980$1,968$2,50157.8%2.5%$79k100.0%
98270$3,028$1,918$2,50150.1%2.1%$121k100.0%
98203$2,081$1,823$2,50143.9%7.4%$83k100.0%
98037$2,202$1,871$2,50152.8%2.8%$88k100.0%
98043$2,078$2,004$2,50146.8%3.5%$83k99.8%
98026$2,494$1,957$2,50142.1%2.8%$100k100.0%
98258$2,956$2,199$2,50151.4%3.7%$118k100.0%
READ BEFORE USING

Zillow ZORI is a typical observed asking-rent index; ACS ZCTA figures are five-year survey estimates; and HUD Fair Market Rent is a bedroom-specific administrative standard. None is a live property quote or a substitute for lease-level verification.

The selected direct-evidence set is not an exhaustive county inventory. ZCTAs are not USPS delivery ZIPs, and ZIPs crossing county boundaries are assigned for display using the largest HUD residential-address share, rather than every individual address.

SOURCE LEDGERCensus ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stockACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30Census ACS five-year — ZCTA housing and incomeACS 2024 5-year ZCTA · pulled 2026-08-08HUD Fair Market Rents — Section 8 standardFY2026 FMR · pulled 2026-07-26HUD-USPS ZIP-to-county residential-address crosswalkHUD-USPS 2026Q1 · pulled 2026-08-09Zillow ZHVI and ZORI — county values and rentscounty ZHVI/ZORI 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-26Zillow ZORI — ZIP market rentsZORI ZIP 2026-06 · pulled 2026-08-08
Cities & communities

Where people live within Snohomish County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Everett city111.8KMarysville city73KBothell city*49.6KEdmonds city42.7KLake Stevens city40.3KLynnwood city40.1KMill Creek East CDP25.5KEastmont CDP23.7K
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

67 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Everett cityIncorporated place
    111,845
  2. 02
    Marysville cityIncorporated place
    73,002
  3. 03
    Bothell cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    49,610
  4. 04
    Edmonds cityIncorporated place
    42,735
  5. 05
    Lake Stevens cityIncorporated place
    40,253
  6. 06
    Lynnwood cityIncorporated place
    40,110
  7. 07
    Mill Creek East CDPCensus-designated place
    25,453
  8. 08
    Eastmont CDPCensus-designated place
    23,721
  9. 09
    North Lynnwood CDPCensus-designated place
    23,339
  10. 10
    Mountlake Terrace cityIncorporated place
    23,104
  11. 11
    Martha Lake CDPCensus-designated place
    22,634
  12. 12
    Silver Firs CDPCensus-designated place
    22,306
Show 55 more places
  1. 13
    Bothell West CDPCensus-designated place
    22,029
  2. 14
    Mukilteo cityIncorporated place
    21,323
  3. 15
    Arlington cityIncorporated place
    21,095
  4. 16
    Mill Creek cityIncorporated place
    20,956
  5. 17
    Monroe cityIncorporated place
    19,755
  6. 18
    Lake Stickney CDPCensus-designated place
    15,890
  7. 19
    Bothell East CDPCensus-designated place
    14,578
  8. 20
    Maltby CDPCensus-designated place
    10,910
  9. 21
    Alderwood Manor CDPCensus-designated place
    10,266
  10. 22
    Picnic Point CDPCensus-designated place
    10,261
  11. 23
    Snohomish cityIncorporated place
    10,239
  12. 24
    Stanwood cityIncorporated place
    8,373
  13. 25
    Woods Creek CDPCensus-designated place
    6,943
  14. 26
    Brier cityIncorporated place
    6,545
  15. 27
    Sultan cityIncorporated place
    6,116
  16. 28
    Lake Goodwin CDPCensus-designated place
    5,536
  17. 29
    Chain Lake CDPCensus-designated place
    4,950
  18. 30
    Granite Falls cityIncorporated place
    4,659
  19. 31
    Larch Way CDPCensus-designated place
    4,424
  20. 32
    Esperance CDPCensus-designated place
    4,189
  21. 33
    Three Lakes CDPCensus-designated place
    4,055
  22. 34
    Canyon Creek CDPCensus-designated place
    3,910
  23. 35
    Bunk Foss CDPCensus-designated place
    3,627
  24. 36
    Warm Beach CDPCensus-designated place
    3,442
  25. 37
    Lake Cassidy CDPCensus-designated place
    3,292
  26. 38
    Clearview CDPCensus-designated place
    3,254
  27. 39
    High Bridge CDPCensus-designated place
    3,196
  28. 40
    Lochsloy CDPCensus-designated place
    3,029
  29. 41
    Sisco Heights CDPCensus-designated place
    3,015
  30. 42
    Meadowdale CDPCensus-designated place
    3,009
  31. 43
    Arlington Heights CDPCensus-designated place
    2,727
  32. 44
    Bryant CDPCensus-designated place
    2,648
  33. 45
    Fobes Hill CDPCensus-designated place
    2,569
  34. 46
    Gold Bar cityIncorporated place
    2,390
  35. 47
    Cathcart CDPCensus-designated place
    2,064
  36. 48
    Kayak Point CDPCensus-designated place
    1,883
  37. 49
    Cavalero CDPCensus-designated place
    1,591
  38. 50
    Monroe North CDPCensus-designated place
    1,456
  39. 51
    Darrington townIncorporated place
    1,412
  40. 52
    Sunday Lake CDPCensus-designated place
    1,375
  41. 53
    Machias CDPCensus-designated place
    1,276
  42. 54
    Woodway cityIncorporated place
    1,251
  43. 55
    Lake Ketchum CDPCensus-designated place
    1,235
  44. 56
    Lake Bosworth CDPCensus-designated place
    907
  45. 57
    Lake Roesiger CDPCensus-designated place
    815
  46. 58
    May Creek CDPCensus-designated place
    791
  47. 59
    Swede Heaven CDPCensus-designated place
    746
  48. 60
    Startup CDPCensus-designated place
    555
  49. 61
    North Sultan CDPCensus-designated place
    355
  50. 62
    Oso CDPCensus-designated place
    245
  51. 63
    Verlot CDPCensus-designated place
    224
  52. 64
    Index townIncorporated place
    173
  53. 65
    Northwest Stanwood CDPCensus-designated place
    72
  54. 66
    Hat Island CDPCensus-designated place
    0
  55. 67
    Silvana CDPCensus-designated place
    0

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardearthquake

0.191% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.77%

$5,364 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+1,450

23,331 in · 21,881 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$5,332

$99,673 arriving · $94,341 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors8.6%

820 of 9,494 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings2,138▲ 31.1% year over year
Median days on market37▲ 19.7% year over year
Listings price-reduced22.1%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▼ 1.7% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

Same metro

The other counties in Seattle, WA

A metro is an average of these. Which side of a county line a property sits on can change the tax bill, the hazard profile and the tenant pool.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Snohomish County844,430$754k$2,2323.5%earthquake
King County2,287,171$858k$2,3303.3%earthquake
Pierce County930,319$573k$1,9624.1%earthquake
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Property-level seismic vulnerability, insurance availability and deductibles may differ materially from the county hazard measure.
  2. Unpublished vacancy, maintenance, insurance and financing costs could make gross yield a poor proxy for net cash flow.
  3. County-level listings, migration and investor data may not describe the specific neighborhood, property type or buyer pool.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

What is the measured market-rent figure, and is it the HUD FMR?

Measured median asking rent is $2,232 per month. The $2,501 two-bedroom HUD FMR is a payment standard, not an asking-rent estimate.

What did the supplied price measures show?

Zillow’s county median home value was down 1.94% year over year in 2026-06, while FHFA’s 2025 annual repeat-transaction HPI was up 1.33%.

What hazard measure is available for the county?

Earthquake is the dominant hazard, and modeled climate loss is 0.19% of building value per year.