States / Washington
State rental intelligence

Washington rental market data

A source-traced view across 21 metro markets and 39 counties. State figures below are labelled medians and totals—not a made-up statewide investment score.

20/21 metros scored39/39 counties with FEMA risk13 sources used in this analysis
Median scored metro43.0out of 100 · 20 measured metros
Washington identity diorama showing regional landscape, cities, housing, and infrastructure
Median metro home value$457kmedian across published metro values
Median metro rent$1,777monthly · published metro values
Median gross yield4.3%annual rent ÷ price · before costs
Median job trend▲ 0.1%trailing 12-month metro employment
State research brief

Asking rents rose 2.9% at the measured-metro median while home values rose 0.3%, creating a 2.6-percentage-point spread despite only modest employment and migration support.

Updated 2026-07-31 · evidence current to the releases listed below.

Washington’s clearest measured asymmetry is rent growth without comparable home-value growth. Across 20 metros with rent-growth data, the median increase was 2.9%, and the measured range ran from 1.0% at the 10th percentile to 5.8% at the 90th. Across 21 metros, median home-value growth was 0.3%, with a range from -1.0% to 1.4%. These are distributions, not results for every locality.

The spread makes rent durability more important than appreciation in initial screening, but it does not establish strong cash flow. Median measured gross yield was 4.3% before operating costs, while median job growth was 0.15% and net migration was 9,821, or 1.26 people per 1,000 residents. Positive migration and several stronger local job markets are counter-signals, but the packet cannot establish collected rents, unit-level vacancy, operating expenses, financing costs or net yield.

01

2.9% median asking-rent growth versus 0.3% home-value growth → screen for locally verifiable rent durability rather than relying on appreciation

02

4.3% median gross yield before expenses → require property-level operating costs and financing terms before treating rent momentum as cash flow

03

0.15% median job growth alongside positive net migration of 1.26 per 1,000 residents → distinguish locally supported demand from broad rent momentum

04

3.3 months of median supply with a 32.5% price-drop share → test whether resale friction creates acquisition leverage without undermining exit liquidity

05

County hazard-loss and tax distributions vary materially → obtain parcel-level insurance, hazard and tax evidence before final underwriting

01
Price and rent momentum

Rents are separating from values across the measured metro range

The measured-metro medians show asking-rent growth of 2.9% and home-value growth of 0.3%, a 2.6-percentage-point difference. Rent growth remained positive from 1.0% at the 10th percentile to 5.8% at the 90th, while home-value growth ranged from -1.0% to 1.4%. That pattern supports rent-led screening more than an appreciation-led case.

Aberdeen shows the sharpest named split: asking rent rose 7.6% while value fell 1.1%, with a 5.7% gross yield. Pullman combined 6.9% rent growth, 0.3% value growth and a 5.4% yield. Centralia’s rent rose 5.7% and value rose 1.9%, but its gross yield was only 3.9%. The examples show why momentum and yield must be tested separately; asking-rent growth does not establish collected-rent growth or net return.

Evidence: Zillow ZHVI — metro home values · Zillow ZORI — metro market rents

02
Entry cost and affordability

Entry prices leave limited room between headline rent growth and gross yield

The measured-metro median home value was $457,178 and median asking rent was $1,777 per month. Gross yields had a 4.3% median and ran from 3.9% at the 10th percentile to 5.0% at the 90th. The median price-to-income ratio was 5.7, with a measured range of 5.1 to 7.1, so lower purchase prices do not automatically produce wide cash-flow margins.

Median rent-to-income was 24.6%, and the median asking-rent-to-Fair-Market-Rent ratio was 111.7%; the latter ranged from 94.7% to 129.6%. Pullman illustrates the tenant-side constraint: its 5.4% gross yield coincided with rent equal to 32.8% of measured income. Aberdeen paired a 5.7% yield with 29.0%, while Shelton paired a 5.0% yield with 27.5%. These ratios are screening indicators, not proof of tenant affordability or achievable rent for a specific unit.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — household income · HUD Fair Market Rents — Section 8 standard · Zillow ZHVI — metro home values · Zillow ZORI — metro market rents

03
Employment and household movement

Positive household movement offsets a subdued employment median only partly

Across 21 measured metros, employment growth had a median of 0.15% and ranged from -0.9% at the 10th percentile to 1.2% at the 90th. That is a weak statewide distributional backdrop for assuming recent asking-rent gains will be equally durable everywhere.

The counter-signal is positive household movement and several local employment standouts. All 39 counties contributed migration data, showing net migration of 9,821, or 1.26 people per 1,000 residents. Aberdeen recorded 1.8% job growth, while Centralia and Kennewick each measured about 1.2%. These figures identify places for deeper demand checks, but they do not show household formation, renter tenure, occupation mix or neighborhood-level absorption.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — population · BLS CES — payroll employment · BLS LAUS — resident employment · IRS SOI — county migration and mover income

04
Supply and resale conditions

Resale friction creates negotiating room while permit pressure varies sharply

Across 20 measured resale markets, the medians were 3.3 months of supply, 21.5 days on market, a 32.5% price-drop share and a 99.4% sale-to-list ratio. The 90th-percentile readings reached 5.7 months of supply and 43.3 days on market. Moses Lake was slower at 60 days and 6.1 months of supply, although its sale-to-list ratio remained 99.3%. Walla Walla recorded 43 days, 4.9 months of supply, a 37.5% price-drop share and a 97.2% sale-to-list ratio.

Permitting adds a different pressure. The measured-metro median was 4.1 permitted units per 1,000 residents, versus 10.4 in Wenatchee, 9.6 in Kennewick and 7.6 in Ellensburg. Slow resale can improve acquisition negotiating conditions, but permits do not identify completion timing, rental tenure or direct competition with a target property. The packet also reports resale conditions for 20 metros while permit coverage reaches 21, so the measures are not perfectly aligned.

Evidence: Census Building Permits Survey — permitted units · Redfin Data Center — inventory, days on market, and price cuts

05
Housing stock and tenant conditions

High renter burden coexists with vacancy figures that do not measure available rentals

Across 39 counties, the median ACS vacancy rate was 9.9%, with a range from 5.0% at the 10th percentile to 23.2% at the 90th. Median renter share was 29.0%. At the same time, the median share of renters spending at least 30% of income on rent was 48.1%, and the measured range was 42.1% to 56.7%.

The county examples show why headline vacancy and rental tightness cannot be treated as equivalents. Wahkiakum County had 6.7% vacancy and a 16.8% renter share, yet 77.4% of renters met the burden threshold. Whitman County had 15.3% vacancy, a 53.2% renter share and 61.9% renter burden; Whatcom County had 9.2%, 36.3% and 60.1%, respectively. San Juan County’s 35.6% vacancy coincided with a 22.0% renter share and an 89.2% single-family share. The packet does not separate these headline vacant units into long-term rentals available to a target tenant segment.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock

06
Physical risk and property tax

County hazard-loss ratios and tax burdens require separate property-level checks

Across 39 counties, the median expected hazard-loss ratio was 0.23%, with a range from 0.13% at the 10th percentile to 0.41% at the 90th. Kittitas County measured 0.50%, Grays Harbor County 0.49% and Okanogan County 0.46%. FEMA’s mutually exclusive leading-hazard labels identify inland flood for 26 counties, earthquake for 10 and wildfire for 3; these are county labels, not parcel-level exposure findings.

The median effective property-tax rate was 0.73%, with a measured range from 0.60% to 0.84%. Pierce County measured 0.91% and a $4,770 median tax, Thurston County 0.88% and $4,209, and Walla Walla County 0.85% and $3,492. County loss ratios and tax medians can flag underwriting questions, but they do not provide a property assessment, insurance quote, deductible, mitigation cost or parcel-specific tax bill.

Evidence: FEMA National Risk Index — hazard loss ratios · Census ACS 5-year — effective property tax

Evidence selected for Washington

The ranges behind the analysis

Each row keeps its own unit and shows the measured 10th percentile, median and 90th percentile. A single-value row is labelled directly.

Price and rent momentumAre home values and asking rents moving together or separating?
10th pct.median90th pct.Home-value change-1.0%0.3%1.4%Asking-rent change1.0%2.9%5.8%Rent minus price2.6%
Entry cost and affordabilityHow far do local prices, rents, incomes and HUD rent standards stretch?
10th pct.median90th pct.Gross yield3.9%4.3%5.0%Price / income5.1×5.7×7.1×Rent / income22.6%24.6%29.3%Home value$358K$457K$622K
Employment and household movementDo jobs, household movement and mover income point in the same direction?
10th pct.median90th pct.Job change-0.9%0.1%1.1%Net migration / 1k1.3Net household movement9,821
Shape of the state

Distribution before conclusion

A statewide median can hide a wide spread. These SVG charts render at build time and carry no chart library or browser-side data request.

Metro score distribution20 scored metros · median 43.0
00–19820–391040–59260–79080–100
County evidence coverageEvery gap stays visible as missing—not estimated
72%28/39Rent100%39/39Climate100%39/39Migration
Highest measured metro gross yieldsscreening metric only · before expenses and financing
Aberdeen5.7%Pullman5.4%Shelton5.0%Moses Lake4.9%Yakima4.9%Olympia4.7%Kennewick4.6%
Metro leaderboard

Markets touching Washington

Multi-state CBSAs appear in every member state. Score is still a metro score; no value is reweighted into a statewide ranking.

#MetroScorePriceRentYieldJobs
1Centralia, WA62$438k$1,4113.9%▲ 1.2%
2Pullman, WA60$334k$1,5155.4%▼ 0.5%
3Oak Harbor, WA59$647k$2,0523.8%▲ 0.8%
4Aberdeen, WA56$327k$1,5595.7%▲ 1.8%
5Shelton, WA54$457k$1,9115.0%▲ 1.0%
6Mount Vernon, WA53$590k$2,1434.4%▲ 0.5%
7Kennewick, WA52$443k$1,7044.6%▲ 1.1%
8Spokane, WA49$425k$1,5474.4%▲ 0.1%
9Yakima, WA48$358k$1,4504.9%▲ 0.2%
10Bremerton, WA44$588k$2,0844.3%▼ 0.4%
11Ellensburg, WA42$499k$1,7774.3%▲ 0.8%
12Longview, WA42$424k$1,3743.9%▲ 0.1%

Showing the top 12 scored metros of 21. Unscored metros remain discoverable through the national rankings.

Below the metro line

Largest counties in Washington

County figures join on the five-digit FIPS code. The table uses measured local values and prints “n/a” wherever a publisher has no record.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
King County, WA2,287,171$858k$2,3303.3%earthquake
Pierce County, WA930,319$573k$1,9624.1%earthquake
Snohomish County, WA844,430$754k$2,2323.5%earthquake
Spokane County, WA549,056$429k$1,5464.3%inland flooding
Clark County, WA516,959$554k$1,8744.1%inland flooding
Thurston County, WA299,067$534k$2,0844.7%earthquake
Kitsap County, WA277,881$588k$2,0844.3%earthquake
Yakima County, WA257,152$358k$1,4504.9%inland flooding
Whatcom County, WA230,503$622k$1,9983.9%inland flooding
Benton County, WA212,905$452k$1,7134.5%inland flooding
Skagit County, WA131,328$590k$2,1434.4%inland flooding
Cowlitz County, WA112,360$424k$1,3743.9%inland flooding
County yield sample28/39counties have the rent needed to compute yield
Statewide net migration+9,821IRS tax-return households summed across counties
Median investor share5.6%among counties with HMDA purchase records
Sources used in this analysis

Measured releases, not a global source count

Only sources supporting the selected evidence modules are listed here.

Bear case

What can break the thesis

  1. The rent series measures asking rents, while gross yield excludes vacancy, concessions, maintenance, management, insurance, taxes and financing.
  2. Median metro employment growth was only 0.15%, so recent rent gains may lack equally strong labor-market support across the measured markets.
  3. Permits are not completed rental units and do not reveal tenure, delivery timing or direct competition with a target property.
  4. ACS headline vacancy can include housing that is not available to long-term renters, making it unsuitable as a standalone occupancy assumption.
  5. Coverage is uneven: rent growth is reported for 20 metros while price growth covers 21, and resale measures also cover 20 rather than every measured metro.
Investor questions

Before underwriting a property

Does the evidence support a rent-led Washington screening thesis?

Yes, within measured coverage: median metro asking-rent growth was 2.9% versus 0.3% home-value growth, a 2.6-percentage-point spread. It supports further screening, not a conclusion about collected rent or net return.

Which named metro combines rent momentum with a stronger measured yield and job signal?

Aberdeen combined 7.6% asking-rent growth, a 1.1% home-value decline, a 5.7% gross yield and 1.8% job growth. Those measures make it a candidate for deeper review, but they do not establish property condition, tenant quality or operating income.

Do current resale conditions offer buyers negotiating room?

Some measured markets show it. Moses Lake had 60 days on market and 6.1 months of supply, while Walla Walla had a 97.2% sale-to-list ratio and a 37.5% price-drop share. Conditions differ by metro and do not establish the discount available on a specific property.

Does high county vacancy disprove rental demand?

No. The median ACS vacancy rate was 9.9%, but the packet does not identify how much of that stock was available for long-term rental. County renter burden remained high, with a 48.1% median, so vacancy and tenant pressure must be evaluated separately.

What Washington-specific evidence gaps remain before underwriting?

Rent-growth coverage reaches 20 measured metros versus 21 for prices, and resale coverage also reaches 20. The packet lacks property-level collected rents, concessions, operating expenses, unit-level vacancy, permit completions, parcel hazard exposure, insurance terms and actual tax bills.