Cities / Texas / Spans 2 counties / Odessa
Odessa cityscape
City housing brief · Incorporated place

Odessa, TX

City evidence stays city-level. County, metro and national records appear separately to explain the wider market without changing the city figures.

City gross yield7.3%ZORI × 12 ÷ ZHVI · before costs
City market snapshot

Four figures that frame the city

Typical home value
$253k
▲ 5.4% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · 2026-06
Observed market rent
$1,537
▼ 4.2% year over year
Zillow ZORI · 2026-06
Entry affordability
3.5x
home value ÷ household income
Zillow + Census ACS
Population
115,322
▼ 3.7% between ACS vintages
ACS 2024 5-year
Decision brief

What the city-level evidence says

01Decision frame

Odessa’s Zillow ZHVI typical city home value is $253,500, while Zillow ZORI typical observed market rent is $1,537 a month. Those measures imply a 7.3% gross yield, calculated before every operating cost, vacancy, capital expense and financing charge. The ZHVI is 3.45x the ACS median household income, and annual ZORI equals 25.1% of that income. This is a screening frame, not a property return: achievable rent, acquisition price and expenses can differ materially.

02Housing stock

The city has 49,871 housing units, with a 6.4% citywide vacancy rate; renters occupy 40.2% of occupied units. ACS reports a $223,100 median home value and $1,315 median gross rent for surveyed occupied housing, with gross rent including contract rent and selected utilities. Those ACS measures describe a different population and period from Zillow’s typical value and observed market rent, so they should not be blended. Citywide vacancy and tenure do not establish lease-up speed for a specific property.

03City depth

Direct city evidence points to both demand and underwriting constraints. Among renters, 55.6% are burdened at or above the ACS rent-burden threshold. Single-family homes are 66.0% of city housing units, while large multifamily properties are 10.8%; these ACS structure shares do not identify purchasable inventory. For-rent units account for 33.0% of vacant units, not all units. Population is 3.7% lower across the overlapping ACS vintages, while median household income is $73,472, poverty is 16.2% and unemployment is 5.9%. The population comparison is not annualized and may reflect boundary changes.

04Wider context

In Ector County, county listing context shows a 51-day median listing period and a 21.8% price-reduced share, indicating room for deal-specific negotiation without measuring Odessa alone. Midland County county context separately shows 47 days and 28.5% price-reduced, also not a city measure. The broader Odessa metro had 31.2% price drops, a 97.7% sale-to-list ratio and 0.03% job growth; each is metro context with distinct denominators. The 6.58% mortgage rate is national financing context, not an Odessa borrowing quote.

05Limits & next checks

Underwriting is limited by city-level typicals and survey aggregates: none establishes a subject property’s condition, legal use, tenant quality, attainable rent or recurring costs. Because Odessa intersects Ector County and Midland County, confirm the subject address’s county rather than applying either county record broadly. Next, verify current rent and sale comparables, inspection findings, utility responsibility, taxes, insurance and climate exposure, expected downtime, management, maintenance and capital reserves, then obtain property-specific financing terms and test cash flow under weaker rent and longer vacancy.

Housing system

Market movement and the stock underneath it

Five-year path

Price and rent, rebased to 100

ZHVI +14.1%ZORI +31.7%
13711695202120222023202420252026
Each series starts at 100 so their direction can be compared without pretending that a home value and a monthly rent share the same unit.
Housing stock

Tenure and vacancy

ACS
40.2%RENTER
Owner occupied59.8%
Renter occupied40.2%
Vacant units6.4%

Median structure year 1980

Tenure uses occupied units; vacancy uses all housing units.
Measurement matrix

Two sources, two different questions

SourceHome valueMonthly rent
Zillow market index$253.5K$1.5K
ACS occupied housing$223.1K$1.3K
Zillow measures current market indexes. ACS reports surveyed owner value and gross rent for occupied housing. The rows are context, not interchangeable estimates.
Direct city depth

Households and housing form behind the medians

Median household income$73k

Annual ACS household measure.

Rent-to-income screen25.1%

Annual ZORI divided by ACS median income.

ACS rent burden55.6%

Renters paying at least 30% of household income toward gross rent.

Average household size2.43

People per occupied housing unit.

Single-family stock66.0%

Detached and attached one-unit structures.

Large multifamily stock10.8%

Housing in structures with 20 or more units.

Vacant and for rent33.0%

Share of vacant units listed by ACS as for rent, not a market vacancy rate.

Unemployment5.9%

Share of the civilian labor force.

Poverty16.2%

ACS population for whom poverty status is determined.

These are citywide context measures. They cannot tell you the rent, vacancy, expenses or tenant demand for a particular neighborhood or property.
Closest market alternatives

Three useful contrasts, not a synthetic winner

The peer set broadens the decision without mixing geographies. Price, rent and housing characteristics remain city-level for every place.

Comparable market profile

Entry price, rent and gross yield

Odessa, TXMidland, TXTyler, TXDearborn, MI
Typical home valueZillow ZHVIOdessa$253.5KMidland$331.8KTyler$255.4KDearborn$255.1KObserved market rentZillow ZORI / monthOdessa$1.5KMidland$1.6KTyler$1.4KDearborn$1.7KGross yieldZORI × 12 ÷ ZHVIOdessa7.3%Midland5.9%Tyler6.4%Dearborn8.0%
Bars begin at zero within each measure. Gross yield is a screening ratio before financing, taxes, insurance, vacancy, maintenance or management costs.
Shared county01

Midland, TX

Compared with Odessa, typical home value is $78k higher, monthly rent is $97 higher, and gross yield is 1.4 percentage points lower.

Rent burden 30%+
52.9%
Renter share
34.9%
One-unit stock
68.0%
20+ unit stock
10.2%
Same state02

Tyler, TX

Compared with Odessa, typical home value is $2k higher, monthly rent is $165 lower, and gross yield is 0.8 percentage points lower.

Rent burden 30%+
49.0%
Renter share
44.6%
One-unit stock
66.1%
20+ unit stock
9.2%
Closest data profile03

Dearborn, MI

Compared with Odessa, typical home value is $2k higher, monthly rent is $168 higher, and gross yield is 0.7 percentage points higher.

Rent burden 30%+
64.3%
Renter share
31.6%
One-unit stock
79.5%
20+ unit stock
8.9%

These are analytical alternatives, not recommendations. The structural measures come from Census ACS; price and rent use the Zillow releases shown on each card and in the source ledger below.

Wider market context

What surrounds the city without being mistaken for it

The layers below answer different questions. County records describe listing, migration, financing and hazard conditions around the city; metro records describe jobs, supply and permits; the mortgage rate is national.

Same measure, wider boundary

City marker against intersecting counties

CityCounty range
Typical home value$255.5K$333K$253.5KObserved market rent$1.6K$1.6K$1.5K
Both levels use Zillow indexes, but the county records cover land and housing outside the city. The comparison supplies context; it does not replace the city value.
COUNTY LAYER

All 2 intersecting counties

Rows stay separate; no unweighted county average is presented as a city fact.

2026-06
Active listings
604
Listing DOM
51 days
FHFA one-year
▲ 3.1%
Net migration
337
Investor share
6.2%
Effective property tax
1.27%
Top hazard
inland flooding
Expected loss ratio
0.13%
2026-06
Active listings
692
Listing DOM
47 days
FHFA one-year
▲ 3.8%
Net migration
818
Investor share
5.5%
Effective property tax
1.23%
Top hazard
inland flooding
Expected loss ratio
0.11%
METRO LAYER

Odessa, TX

Open metro analysis →
Job growth▲ 0.0%12m to 2026-06
Permitted units1,3282026 YTD through M06
Permits / 1,0008.1broader metro population
Months of supply154.02026-05-01
Median DOM67 daysRedfin metro tracker
Price drops31.2%Redfin metro tracker
Wider-context figures are not inputs to the city gross yield and are never used to fill a missing city price, rent or ACS measure.
What can break the thesis

Three checks before using the city averages

  1. 01

    The city gross yield excludes operating costs, vacancy, capital expenses and financing, so it can materially overstate property cash flow.

  2. 02

    The city population comparison spans overlapping ACS vintages and may reflect boundary changes, so it cannot establish a current demand trend.

  3. 03

    Ector County county records differ from Midland County county records, so using either without verifying the property address can misstate taxes and market context.

Questions answered

Quick reading guide

Does the city gross yield equal an expected property return?

No. It annualizes Zillow observed market rent against Zillow typical home value before every operating cost, vacancy allowance, capital expense and financing charge.

Can ACS median gross rent validate a property’s achievable market rent?

No. ACS median gross rent covers surveyed occupied housing and includes selected utilities, while Zillow ZORI measures typical observed market rent for a different population and period.

What should be verified before underwriting a specific address?

Confirm whether the address is in Ector County or Midland County, then use that county’s taxes and hazard context; also verify property rent comparables, condition, utilities, insurance, downtime, reserves and financing.

Sources and geography

What belongs to this city page

Census recognizes this as Odessa city. The place intersects 2 counties (Ector County, Midland County); population and ACS measures are place-wide.