Counties / Minnesota / Chisago County

Chisago County, MN

FIPS 27025 · population 57,991 · part of Minneapolis, MN

$393k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$393k
▲ 2.6% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
Median asking rent
$1,350
n/a year over year
Zillow ZORI · direct
Gross yield
4.1%
annual rent ÷ price, before costs
derived: rent × 12 ÷ price ✓
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,709
market rent is 0.79x the standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+39.9%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+2.6%FHFA HPI2025+2.3%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$352k
Surveyed gross rent$1,186
Rent burden 30%+52.5%
Median year built1992
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
7.1%vacant
22,998estimated housing units
Occupied tenure14.1% renter
owner 85.9%renter 14.1%
Structure mix87.1% single-family
Single-family 87.1%20+ units 4.3%Mobile home 4.7%Other 4.0%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs16,257▲ 1.0% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments1,386annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,150▲ 3.4% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorEducation and health services28.2% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+1.0%WEEKLY WAGE+3.4%Education and health services28.2%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Chisago County’s tension is price momentum against a listing market that merits a cautious exit assumption. Investors needing near-term rent coverage or predictable resale timing should be cautious; investigators should test submarket rents, taxes and flood exposure. Zillow’s county median home value was $392,620 in 2026-06, up 2.57% year over year. Separately, FHFA’s repeat-transaction HPI rose in 2025. It supports direction, but is not a home value or the same observation period as Zillow.

02Housing economics

Median asking rent was $1,350 monthly, producing the supplied 4.13% gross yield before costs. This is measured market rent. HUD’s $1,709 two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard—not an asking-rent estimate. The effective property-tax rate was 1.07%, and median annual tax was $3,780. Absent operating expenses, vacancy, financing, condition and rent distribution, net yield, debt coverage and unit-level affordability cannot be concluded.

03Demand & competition

MLS listing-market evidence is more cautious than the value measures. Realtor.com showed 202 active listings in 2026-06, up 30.42% year over year; marketing time was 44 days, up 18.24%, and 18.87% of listings had reductions. These are visible supply and seller-concession measures; listing prices are asks, not transactions. Tax-return inflows exceeded outflows and arrivals had higher average AGI, while investor purchases were a small share of total purchases. These are county signals, not proof of neighborhood tenant demand. QCEW is workplace-based covered employment; education and health services is its largest disclosed private supersector, not the whole economy.

04Risk & next checks

Inland flood is the dominant hazard, with modeled expected annual building-value loss of 0.13%. That county-level model is neither an insurance quote nor a parcel determination, so maps, prior losses, coverage, deductibles and elevation require review. The thesis could fail if supply and concessions produce weaker achieved pricing, property-specific costs erode gross yield, or flood protection and insurance vary materially by parcel. Missing closed-sale prices, sale-to-list outcomes, unit-type rent comps, vacancy, insurance and tax assessments prevent conclusions about exit value, stabilized net cash flow and individual-property risk.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Chisago County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
North Branch city11.6KWyoming city8.1KChisago City city5.9KLindstrom city5KStacy city4.4KRush City city3.3KShafer city1.2KTaylors Falls city1.2K
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

10 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    North Branch cityIncorporated place
    11,565
  2. 02
    Wyoming cityIncorporated place
    8,087
  3. 03
    Chisago City cityIncorporated place
    5,899
  4. 04
    Lindstrom cityIncorporated place
    4,978
  5. 05
    Stacy cityIncorporated place
    4,384
  6. 06
    Rush City cityIncorporated place
    3,295
  7. 07
    Shafer cityIncorporated place
    1,186
  8. 08
    Taylors Falls cityIncorporated place
    1,167
  9. 09
    Harris cityIncorporated place
    776
  10. 10
    Center City cityIncorporated place
    651

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.132% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.07%

$3,780 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+82

1,797 in · 1,715 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$5,717

$69,252 arriving · $63,535 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors4.0%

32 of 797 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings202▲ 30.4% year over year
Median days on market44▲ 18.2% year over year
Listings price-reduced18.9%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▲ 4.1% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

Same metro

The other counties in Minneapolis, MN

A metro is an average of these. Which side of a county line a property sits on can change the tax bill, the hazard profile and the tenant pool.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Chisago County57,991$393k$1,3504.1%inland flooding
Hennepin County1,269,496$396k$1,7665.3%inland flooding
Ramsey County542,945$345k$1,5255.3%inland flooding
Dakota County445,771$403k$1,6875.0%inland flooding
Anoka County370,349$380k$1,7325.5%inland flooding
Washington County276,238$451k$2,0605.5%inland flooding
Scott County154,557$450k$1,8504.9%inland flooding
Wright County148,269$399k$1,8065.4%inland flooding
Carver County110,041$496k$2,0024.8%inland flooding
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. MLS supply and seller concessions may translate into weaker achieved prices than value indicators suggest.
  2. Operating, tax, insurance or vacancy costs may materially reduce the stated pre-cost yield.
  3. Parcel flood exposure, insurance availability and mitigation costs may diverge from county-level modeled risk.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Is HUD Fair Market Rent a market asking-rent estimate?

No. The record identifies it as a two-bedroom payment standard, while market asking rent is separately published.

Does the FHFA HPI state a dollar home value?

No. It is a repeat-transaction appreciation index, not a home-value estimate.

Can stabilized net cash flow be determined from this record?

No. Operating expenses, vacancy, financing terms, insurance and property-specific tax information are not published.