Counties / Michigan / Leelanau County

Leelanau County, MI

FIPS 26089 · population 22,734 · part of Traverse City, MI

$662k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$662k
▲ 0.6% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
ACS median gross rent
$1,228
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,497
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+85.1%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+0.6%FHFA HPI2025+9.5%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$458k
Surveyed gross rent$1,228
Rent burden 30%+39.5%
Median year built1988
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
38.8%vacant
15,759estimated housing units
Occupied tenure8.4% renter
owner 91.6%renter 8.4%
Structure mix93.1% single-family
Single-family 93.1%20+ units 0.7%Mobile home 2.3%Other 3.9%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs7,359▲ 10.5% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments882annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$976▲ 5.1% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorLeisure and hospitality22.5% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+10.5%WEEKLY WAGE+5.1%Leisure and hospitality22.5%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Leelanau’s underwriting tension is conflicting price signals: Zillow’s 2026-06 county median home value was $662,102, up 0.60%, while FHFA’s 2025 annual repeat-transaction HPI rose 9.47%. They are neither the same labeled period nor equivalent measures: the HPI tracks repeat transactions, not a dollar home value. Rent-dependent buyers should investigate income coverage, and buyers treating the index as current value growth should be cautious; neither establishes a closed-sale price.

02Housing economics

Market rent is not published, so gross yield cannot be computed. HUD’s $1,497 two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard, not market asking rent, and cannot fill that gap. The recorded price must also be tested against the 0.68% effective property-tax rate and $3,118 median annual tax. Without market rent, lease terms, operating expenses, or property-specific tax bills, the record cannot establish rent coverage, net yield, or a carrying-cost margin.

03Demand & competition

Realtor.com’s 2026-06 MLS listing-market evidence shows 125 active listings, down 4.94%, with a 34-day median marketing time and 14.83% of listings price-reduced. Less visible supply sits alongside seller concessions; it does not prove buyer demand or closed-sale pricing. Tax-return data show a positive net household inflow and higher average AGI for in-movers than out-movers, but neither proves tenant demand. Investor purchases were 20 of 287 total purchases, a limited but present non-owner-occupant buyer cohort.

04Risk & next checks

Inland flood is the dominant hazard, and modeled building-value loss is 0.08% annually; that county-level estimate is not a parcel loss, insurance quote, or dollar projection. QCEW shows annual covered employment at county workplaces and a rising covered-worker wage, with leisure and hospitality the largest disclosed private supersector; it is neither resident employment nor unemployment. Next checks are parcel flood exposure and insurance, signed market rents, operating costs, tax bills, and closed-sale comparables; their absence prevents a property-level return, resilience, and exit-price conclusion.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Leelanau County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Traverse City city*15.6KGreilickville CDP1.5KSuttons Bay village555Northport village465Leland CDP400Empire village341Glen Arbor CDP336Omena CDP305
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

11 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Traverse City cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    15,593
  2. 02
    Greilickville CDPCensus-designated place
    1,519
  3. 03
    Suttons Bay villageIncorporated place
    555
  4. 04
    Northport villageIncorporated place
    465
  5. 05
    Leland CDPCensus-designated place
    400
  6. 06
    Empire villageIncorporated place
    341
  7. 07
    Glen Arbor CDPCensus-designated place
    336
  8. 08
    Omena CDPCensus-designated place
    305
  9. 09
    Maple City CDPCensus-designated place
    183
  10. 10
    Lake Leelanau CDPCensus-designated place
    124
  11. 11
    Cedar CDPCensus-designated place
    23

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.077% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.68%

$3,118 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+19

762 in · 743 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$16,157

$130,938 arriving · $114,781 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors7.0%

20 of 287 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings125▼ 4.9% year over year
Median days on market34▲ 3.8% year over year
Listings price-reduced14.8%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▲ 5.7% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; for a rent figure, the Traverse City, MI page covers the wider market.
Same metro

The other counties in Traverse City, MI

A metro is an average of these. Which side of a county line a property sits on can change the tax bill, the hazard profile and the tenant pool.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Leelanau County22,734$662kn/an/ainland flooding
Grand Traverse County96,166$423k$1,9755.6%inland flooding
Benzie County18,310$417kn/an/ainland flooding
Kalkaska County18,239$228kn/an/ainland flooding
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Unpublished market rent and operating costs could make the apparent purchase economics unsupported once property-level income and expenses are known.
  2. County-level inland-flood loss modeling may differ materially from a specific parcel’s exposure, insurance availability, and mitigation needs.
  3. MLS listing conditions and repeat-transaction index gains may not translate into an achievable closed-sale exit price for a particular property.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be calculated from this record?

No. Measured market rent is not published, and HUD Fair Market Rent is a payment standard rather than market asking rent.

What does the record show about investor buyer competition?

Non-owner-occupant purchases were a minority of total purchases, indicating some investor presence but not broad proof of investor-led demand.

What does the flood metric measure?

It is a county-level modeled annual building-value loss ratio, not a parcel-specific loss estimate, insurance quote, or dollar projection.