Texarkana, TX
Texarkana merits investigation by yield-focused buyers who can underwrite flat employment and water risk; growth-dependent buyers and those unwilling to assess flood exposure should avoid it.
Why this market scores where it does
Written from the figures on this page and then checked against them: every number below had to appear in the source record or recompute from two that did, or the text was rewritten.
Texarkana merits investigation by yield-focused buyers who can underwrite flat employment and water risk; growth-dependent buyers and those unwilling to assess flood exposure should avoid it. A $181,504 median value paired with $1,228 asking rent produces an 8.12% gross yield, while rent rose 5.28% and values rose 1.4%.
Opportunity comes from manageable tenant burden: rent equals 26.49% of median income. But the demand base is not clearly expanding: CES employment rose only 0.06%, and tax filings show net migration of -23 households. That mix supports testing current cash flow, not paying for unproven growth.
Execution risk remains meaningful. Inventory stands at 5.2 months, median days on market is 57, and price drops are 20.69%, giving buyers room to scrutinize pricing but also signaling softer resale conditions. Inland flood is the dominant hazard, with an annual climate loss ratio of 0.1559%, so property-level insurance and exposure checks are essential.
Frequently Asked Investor Questions
What are the headline acquisition and rent figures?
Do migration filings show household growth?
How much purchase activity is investor-associated?
Investor Quick Takeaways
Computed from the current Zillow rent and home-value medians.
Zillow ZORI rent growth trend over trailing 12 months.
Originated investment purchase share (CFPB HMDA).
Annualized loss ratio evaluated for flood & hurricane risk.
Test the market, then test the deal
Keep Texarkana as the starting point or move into a more specific property and rent check.
The current market in eight signals
Fast-moving Redfin conditions sit beside the slower fundamentals so a buyer can separate today's negotiating climate from the long-run investment case.
What each component measures
Weights are published, not hidden, and the arithmetic is shown. Five components, each measured as a national percentile across all tracked metros.
| Signal | Score | Weight | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Job growth | 46 | 30% | 13.80 |
| Rent trend | 76 | 25% | 19.00 |
| Affordability | 38 | 15% | 5.70 |
| Supply pressure | 27 | 15% | 4.05 |
| Climate risk | 41 | 15% | 6.15 |
| Published score | 49 | ||
Job: CES employment rose 0.06% -> labor-market momentum offers little support for a growth-led demand case.
Rent: asking rent rose 5.28% and gross yield is 8.12% -> rental income is the market’s strongest operating signal.
Affordability: rent is 26.49% of income and value is 3.26 times income -> screen each deal against local earning capacity rather than assuming low acquisition cost ensures affordability.
Supply: 5.2 months of inventory, 57 median days on market, and 20.69% price drops -> buyers may have negotiating room, but exit liquidity needs scrutiny.
Climate: inland flood is the dominant hazard and the annual loss ratio is 0.1559% -> flood exposure belongs in property-level underwriting.
What this market costs and what it earns
Every derived ratio below recomputes from the same source record used by the article and score.
What is being built, and for whom
Permits are the 12-to-24 month early warning. The total matters less than the mix: apartments compete with a rental the day they open.
Demand, and the competition for it
Tax filings say how many households moved and what they earn; mortgage disclosures say how many local purchases went to someone who will not live there. Moves between counties inside this metro are netted out of both flow figures.
What would make this a bad buy
Generated from the same figures with the instruction to argue against the score, and published unedited. A page that only agrees with itself is an advertisement.
Three ways the case breaks
- Housing demand could disappoint because CES employment grew just 0.06% and net migration was -23 households.
- Resale execution could disappoint because inventory was 5.2 months, median days on market was 57, and price drops were 20.69%.
- Inland flood is the dominant hazard, and the annual climate loss ratio is 0.1559%, leaving asset-level exposure and insurance costs to verify.
Move from the metro average to local evidence
County pages carry tax, migration, listing and hazard records. City pages appear only where direct city price, rent and Census evidence pass the publication gate.
No city in this metro has passed the current city evidence gate.
Metros that behave like Texarkana
Nearest neighbours on price level, income, yield and job growth — not on geography. Every market page gets a different peer set, which is the point.
| Metro | Score | Price | Rent | Yield | Job Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Texarkana, TX (Target) | 49 | $182k | $1,228 | 8.1% | ▲ 0.1% |
| Alexandria, LA | 47 | $174k | $1,128 | 7.8% | ▼ 0.1% |
| Florence, SC | 30 | $197k | $1,280 | 7.8% | ▼ 0.1% |
| Sumter, SC | 49 | $209k | $1,504 | 8.6% | ▲ 0.3% |
| Clarksburg, WV | 45 | $161k | $1,113 | 8.3% | ▲ 0.1% |
Where every figure came from
“Checked nightly” means every source is re-pulled and re-verified each night. It does not mean every source moves nightly — the release column tells you how fresh each number can possibly be.
| Dataset Source | Method | Release Period | Pulled Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Census ACS 5-year — household income | direct | ACS 2024 5-year | 2026-07-26 |
| Census ACS 5-year — population | direct | ACS 2024 5-year | 2026-07-26 |
| BLS CES — payroll employment | direct | CES SM current | 2026-07-26 |
| BLS LAUS — resident employment | direct | LAUS current | 2026-07-26 |
| BLS QCEW — county employment and wages | direct | annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 | 2026-07-31 |
| OMB/BLS delineation — metro geography | direct | OMB July 2023 delineation | 2026-07-30 |
| Census Building Permits Survey — permitted units | direct | BPS through 2026 | 2026-07-26 |
| Census ACS 5-year — city population, households and housing | direct | ACS 2024 5-year | 2026-07-29 |
| Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock | direct | ACS 2024 5-year | 2026-07-30 |
| Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities | direct | ACS 2024 5-year | 2026-07-30 |
| FEMA National Risk Index — hazard loss ratios | modelled | NRI counties (FEMA ArcGIS) | 2026-07-26 |
| FHFA House Price Index — annual county appreciation | direct | annual county HPI 2025 | 2026-07-28 |
| HMDA / CFPB — purchases by occupancy type | direct | HMDA 2024 purchase originations | 2026-07-26 |
| HUD Fair Market Rents — Section 8 standard | direct | FY2026 FMR | 2026-07-26 |
| HUD USPS crosswalk and Small Area FMRs — ZIP rent fallback | direct | ZIP-CBSA 2025Q4 + SAFMR FY2026 | 2026-07-26 |
| IRS SOI — county migration and mover income | direct | SOI migration 2022-2023 | 2026-07-26 |
| Freddie Mac PMMS — mortgage rates | direct | week of 2026-07-23 | 2026-07-27 |
| Census ACS 5-year — effective property tax | direct | ACS 2024 5-year | 2026-07-27 |
| Realtor.com Economic Research — county listing inventory | direct | county inventory 2026-06 | 2026-07-28 |
| Redfin Data Center — inventory, days on market, and price cuts | direct | metro tracker through 2026-05-01 | 2026-07-26 |
| Zillow ZHVI and ZORI — county values and rents | direct | county ZHVI/ZORI 2026-06 | 2026-07-26 |
| Zillow ZHVI — metro home values | direct | Metro_zhvi_uc_sfrcondo_tier_0.33_0.67_sm_sa_month.csv | 2026-07-26 |
| Zillow ZHVI — city home values | direct | zillow_zhvi_city.csv | 2026-07-29 |
| Zillow ZORI — metro market rents | direct | Metro_zori_uc_sfrcondomfr_sm_sa_month.csv | 2026-07-26 |
| Zillow ZORI — city market rents | direct | zillow_zori_city.csv | 2026-07-29 |
| Zillow ZORI — ZIP market rents | direct | ZORI ZIP 2026-06 | 2026-07-26 |