Home/Rankings/Rising rent + falling vacancy
Rent + vacancy screen · constrained national screen

Rental markets where rents rose as vacancy tightened

Direct Apartment List metro observations identify markets where recent-lease rent rose while the vacancy index fell over the same twelve months.

Question answeredWhich directly matched metro rental markets combine positive twelve-month rent growth with a declining vacancy index?
Visual ranking

The leading ten, with one metric encoded.

The chart stays intentionally narrow: it shows the ordering metric, while the table and counter-signals keep the rest of the decision visible.

Top ten markets by recent-lease rent growthHorizontal bars begin at zero and display the ten highest-ranked qualifying market areas. Exact values appear beside every bar.TOP TEN · BARS BEGIN AT ZERO1. San Francisco, CA+9.4%2. San Jose, CA+7.7%3. Virginia Beach, VA+5.8%4. Boise City, ID+5.7%5. Reno, NV+5.4%6. Milwaukee, WI+4.1%7. Sioux Falls, SD+2.6%8. Corpus Christi, TX+2.6%9. Charleston, SC+2.1%10. Baton Rouge, LA+2.1%Top ten markets by recent-lease rent growthMobile ranking chart with the market, exact value and zero-based bar together on each row.TOP TEN · BARS BEGIN AT ZERO1. San Francisco, CA+9.4%2. San Jose, CA+7.7%3. Virginia Beach, VA+5.8%4. Boise City, ID+5.7%5. Reno, NV+5.4%6. Milwaukee, WI+4.1%7. Sioux Falls, SD+2.6%8. Corpus Christi, TX+2.6%9. Charleston, SC+2.1%10. Baton Rouge, LA+2.1%
Ordering follows the inclusion and ranking rule on this page. Bar length encodes only recent-lease rent growth and does not combine the counter-signals.
Current leaderSan Francisco, CA

Recent-lease rent growth: +9.4%.

Top-ten midpoint+4.7%

The median of the ten displayed leaders, not a national threshold.

Published depth20 markets

The table preserves the counter-metrics needed before opening a market brief.

Evidence table

Top twenty qualifying market areas.

Each row links to the full metro evidence. Figures retain the units and concepts named in the column headers.

RankMarket areaRent changeVacancy indexVacancy changeTime on market
#1San Francisco, CA+9.4%3.3%−1.4 pp19.7
#2San Jose, CA+7.7%3.9%−1.5 pp22
#3Virginia Beach, VA+5.8%4.1%−1.2 pp17.7
#4Boise City, ID+5.7%4.4%−2.3 ppn/a
#5Reno, NV+5.4%4.7%−0.1 ppn/a
#6Milwaukee, WI+4.1%5.2%−1.6 ppn/a
#7Sioux Falls, SD+2.6%8.8%−0.6 ppn/a
#8Corpus Christi, TX+2.6%8.6%−0.4 ppn/a
#9Charleston, SC+2.1%6.7%−1.2 pp25.3
#10Baton Rouge, LA+2.1%5.9%−0.9 ppn/a
#11Des Moines, IA+2.1%7.1%−0.1 ppn/a
#12Wilmington, NC+2.1%6.8%−1.9 ppn/a
#13Albany, NY+1.9%2.6%−1.5 ppn/a
#14St. Louis, MO+1.8%6.3%−0.4 pp24.7
#15Detroit, MI+1.5%4.3%−0.3 pp21
#16Philadelphia, PA+1.4%5.4%−0.0 pp27
#17Chattanooga, TN+1.3%6.6%−0.4 ppn/a
#18Clarksville, TN+1.2%6.2%−1.5 ppn/a
#19Pensacola, FL+1.2%7.6%−0.7 ppn/a
#20Spokane, WA+1.1%5.1%−0.0 ppn/a
Method and limits

What this order means—and what it does not.

This is a repeatable screening order, not an investment recommendation, forecast or property-level estimate.

Inclusion and ordering rule: Include a RentMarker metro only when Apartment List publishes an overall rent estimate for the current release and the same month one year earlier plus a current and year-earlier Vacancy Index, and its published metro FIPS code exactly equals the stored OMB CBSA code. Time on market is optional and remains unavailable where not published.

How it is calculated

  1. Twelve-month rent growth divides the current overall Apartment List rent estimate by the same metro's estimate twelve months earlier and subtracts one.
  2. Vacancy change subtracts the year-earlier Vacancy Index from the current index and is reported in percentage points; no occupancy rate is inferred.
  3. Current time on market and its twelve-month change use only direct published monthly observations. Missing time-on-market rows remain NULL and do not remove an otherwise complete rent-vacancy metro.
  4. The four descriptive groups use only the signs of rent growth and vacancy change. Rows are ordered by rent growth, not by a composite score or forecast.

Counter-signals to carry

  • Higher rent growth with falling vacancy is consistent with tighter rental conditions, but does not identify the cause or predict future rent.
  • Rising vacancy can reflect new supply, seasonal turnover, local demand change or measurement noise; time on market provides a second liquidity lens only where coverage exists.
  • A metro average can hide large differences by neighborhood, bedroom count, property quality and lease date.

Limits before use

  • Apartment List estimates use recent lease transactions observed in its platform and a repeat-rent methodology; they are not Zillow ZORI, Realtor listing medians, HUD FMR or Census gross rent.
  • The vacancy index and time-on-market series have smaller geographic coverage than rent estimates. Missing values are not zero, estimated or filled from another source.
  • Published monthly rent estimates are rounded dollars, so recomputed growth can differ slightly from a publisher summary calculated on unrounded internal estimates.
Next decision

Move from a market screen to a property test.

Open the market evidence first, then replace market-wide typicals with the candidate property’s actual price, rent and operating assumptions.