ZIP reports / WA / 98501
ZIP rental intelligence · 2026-06

ZIP 98501, Olympia, WA

Asking rent, household capacity, housing stock and local context—kept at their original geographic and measurement scopes.

Direct local rent answer

What does rent cost in ZIP 98501?

The latest Zillow ZORI for ZIP 98501 is $1,893 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical observed asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

Zillow asking-rent index$1,8932026-06 · up 1.6% year over year
ACS median gross rent$1,697ACS 2024 5-year survey · ±$67 margin of error
HUD two-bedroom standard$1,960Administrative FMR/SAFMR · not asking rent
Bedroom-level rent benchmarks in ZIP 98501
BedroomsModelled asking-rent lensHUD standardHow to use it
Studio$1,485ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,538HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
1 bedroom$1,625ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,682HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
2 bedrooms$1,893ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,960HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
3 bedrooms$2,524ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,613HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
4 bedrooms$3,176ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$3,288HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.

Bedroom estimates are modelled, not observed rents. Zillow, Census ACS and HUD describe different housing universes and remain separate throughout this report.Zillow pulled 2026-08-08

Median household income$97,198ACS 2024 5-year · ±$4,432 MOE
Renter share38.3%7,574 renter households
Rent burden 30%+50.9%3,855 observed households
Housing vacancy4.5%934 of 20,717 units
Six views · one local decision

Read the measures together, without merging them

ZORI tracks observed asking rent, ACS describes occupied renter homes, and HUD publishes an administrative benchmark. The charts preserve those differences and add wider context only where the geography is named.

Three definitions of rent

Useful as a spread, not interchangeable observations.

Three rent measures for ZIP 98501Zillow asking-rent index$1,893ACS median gross rent$1,697HUD two-bedroom standard$1,960

Affordability screen

Annual income implied by 30% of the current ZIP ZORI.

Income screen for ZIP 98501ACS median household income$97,198Income at 30% of ZIP ZORI$75,720

Bedroom ladder

Modelled from ZIP ZORI using the local HUD ladder.

Modelled bedroom rent ladder for ZIP 98501Studio$1,485One bedroom$1,625Two bedrooms$1,893Three bedrooms$2,524Four bedrooms$3,176

Observed renter burden

ACS ZCTA households with computable gross-rent burden.

Observed renter cost burden in ZCTA 9850130% or more of income3,855 householdsBelow 30%3,719 households

ZIP versus wider rent context

Each bar retains its own ZIP, city, county or metro scope.

Asking-rent context for ZIP 98501ZIP 98501$1,893Olympia city$2,013Thurston County county$2,084Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA metro$2,084

Monthly asking-rent history

Direct Zillow ZORI observations over the latest five years. Missing months remain visible gaps.

Five-year direct Zillow asking-rent history for ZIP 98501; missing months remain gaps$1,953$1,805$1,657$1,5082021-062023-122026-06
Five-year change
21.5%exact same-month endpoints
Largest observed drawdown
1.3%peak to a later observed month
Annualized monthly variability
2.3%121 consecutive returns
Monthly coverage
100.0%122 of 122 months
Decision brief

What the evidence says for ZIP 98501

Resale and rent are moving at different speeds. In Redfin’s direct rolling-three-month ZIP for-sale observation, median sold price was $598,865, up 4.15% year over year. The observation recorded 157 homes sold, a 13-day median marketing time, and 147 homes of inventory, which was 35.13% higher than a year earlier. Months of supply stood at 2.8; the average sale-to-list ratio was 100.22%, and 32.71% of sales closed above list. These are resale-liquidity signals, not rental transactions. The annualized ZIP ZORI divided by the median sold price is a 3.79% cross-source screening ratio only. Because sale-price growth exceeded current rent growth, the resale evidence challenges a simple reading of the rent trend, without establishing any connection between the two markets.

In June 2026, Zillow’s ZIP-level ZORI at $1,893 is a typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types, rather than a measured lease for one unit. Exact same-month history classifies the path as stable growth: rent changed 1.61% over one year, compared with annualized changes of 3.01% over three years and 3.98% over five years. The current advance therefore confirms a rising direction but breaks from the faster longer-run pace; it is a historical deceleration, not a forecast. Annualized monthly-return variability of 2.26% indicates relatively narrow past month-to-month movement. Separately, the maximum observed peak-to-trough drawdown was 1.28%, a limited historical setback. Coverage is 100% across 122 observations. Transparent national discovery ranks among history-eligible ZIPs were 1,381 for momentum, 355 for stability, and 609 for balanced history; lower rank is higher. Together, the lower variability and shallow drawdown make a single current index snapshot more interpretable, while the slowing pace keeps it from representing the longer path by itself.

Geography matching matters: 98501 is both the Zillow ZIP market identifier and a matching Census ZCTA. A ZCTA is a Census statistical area and is not identical to a USPS delivery ZIP. In the ACS 2024 five-year survey, median gross rent was $1,697 for occupied renter homes and includes selected utilities. That survey median is 11.5% below the current Zillow asking-rent index. The difference is descriptive, not evidence of a particular unit’s achieved rent or of rent change: ACS samples occupied renter homes across a multiyear window, whereas ZORI describes a current typical observed asking-rent index. Neither source replaces the other, and the ACS utility treatment further limits mechanical comparison.

HUD’s supplied Fair Market Rent/Small Area Fair Market Rent ladder is a bedroom-specific administrative standard, not asking rent. Scaling the ZIP ZORI by that local HUD ladder produces modelled monthly ZIP estimates of $1,485 for a studio, $1,625 for one bedroom, $1,893 for two bedrooms, $2,524 for three bedrooms, and $3,176 for four bedrooms. These are modelled estimates, never measured bedroom rents, and they inherit the ZORI’s blended-rental-type design. The local HUD two-bedroom standard is $1,960, putting the modelled two-bedroom figure 3.4% below that administrative benchmark. This relation should not be treated as a listing comp, a lease quote, or proof of availability at any bedroom size.

The income screen yields a different tension. At a 30% rent-to-income screen, the current monthly ZORI corresponds to $75,720 of annual income. The matched ZCTA’s ACS median household income is $97,198, so annualized ZORI equals 23.4% of that median. This is arithmetic, not advice and not an applicant qualification rule; household income, utilities, and actual rent obligations vary. Yet the same ACS survey reports that 50.9% of renter households were burdened by gross rent at or above the 30% threshold. The coexistence of a below-threshold median-income screen and substantial aggregate burden cautions against using either figure as a statement about a specific household or unit.

Supply composition adds context without identifying a vacant unit’s quality or rent. The matched ZCTA counted 14,545 single-family units and 2,190 units in large multifamily structures. It had 7,574 renter-occupied homes, a 38.3% renter share, alongside 934 vacant units, or a 4.5% vacancy rate; 304 vacancies were classified for rent. These categories describe the survey’s housing inventory, not a contemporaneous apartment availability measure. In particular, vacancy does not show that a particular home is rentable, affordable, or currently offered, while structure counts do not identify the bedroom mix that generated ZORI.

For wider—not substitute—context, the City of Olympia’s citywide Zillow rent figure was about $2,013, while Thurston County’s countywide figure and the Olympia–Lacey–Tumwater, WA metro’s metropolitan figure were each $2,084; all are above the ZIP ZORI. These measures describe wider market scopes and cannot establish a ZIP-specific rent premium, a unit’s asking price, or an achieved lease. The matched ZCTA also should not be collapsed into the city’s administrative boundary or county and metro totals. Thus, the ZIP-to-broader asking-rent gap is useful chiefly as a geographic framing check, alongside the distinct ACS and HUD measures rather than as an interchangeable rent series.

Each reading has a timing and universe limit: ZORI is an index, ACS is a five-year survey, HUD is an administrative ladder, and Redfin records for-sale activity. The packet provides no unit-level lease, utility bill, concession, bedroom count, floor area, condition, tenancy, or transaction terms. A property-level review would therefore need current comparable advertisements by bedroom, stated utilities, lease duration and concessions, as well as the actual unit’s condition and occupancy status. For a sale comparison, it would need directly comparable sale records, list and contract terms, and physical characteristics rather than the ZIP median. These checks can test alignment with the indicators but cannot convert this backward-looking evidence into a forecast, recommendation, or claim about a particular property. What unit-specific terms remain unverified?

Decision signals

What deserves a closer property-level check

Stable growth has slowed

Zillow’s current $1,893 ZIP ZORI increased 1.61% over one year, but the three-year and five-year annualized changes were higher. Full history coverage, modest monthly variability, and a shallow historical drawdown support a stable-growth description. That evidence is backward-looking: it establishes deceleration relative to prior history, not a future rent path or a unit-level rent.

Resale evidence is not rental economics

Redfin’s rolling-three-month ZIP resale observation showed price growth stronger than the current ZORI increase, while the reported marketing time, supply, and sale-to-list measures described for-sale conditions. The annualized ZORI-to-price calculation is useful only as a cross-source screening ratio. It is neither a rental comp nor evidence about property-level economics.

Affordability measures conflict by source universe

ACS shows median gross rent below ZORI but a majority renter burden. This is not a contradiction resolved by choosing one series: ACS surveys occupied renter homes over five years and includes selected utilities, whereas Zillow reflects contemporary asking rents. The income screen is arithmetic, and burden cannot qualify or disqualify any applicant.

Bedroom and vacancy figures need unit-level validation

The HUD-scaled bedroom ladder makes the broad rent index easier to size, but its bedroom amounts are modelled estimates rather than observed rents. Housing-stock and vacancy statistics likewise describe the ZCTA’s survey inventory, not available units. Comparable advertisements, utility treatment, concessions, and actual property characteristics remain necessary to determine whether a particular unit aligns with ZIP indicators.

  • ZORI’s typical blended asking-rent reading cannot establish the rent, utilities, concession, lease duration, bedroom count, or occupancy status of a specific available residence, even when its history appears stable.
  • The ACS burden and gross-rent estimates describe sampled occupied renter households over a five-year period. They cannot determine affordability for a new tenant, and their utility-inclusive scope differs from current advertised asking rent.
  • Redfin’s ZIP observation covers for-sale activity, not rental transactions. Faster sale-price growth, short marketing time, and sale-to-list outcomes cannot confirm rent realization, property economics, or the timing and terms of a particular purchase or lease.
  • The vacancy rate includes all vacant housing types and reflects a survey inventory. A classified-for-rent unit may not be currently marketed, comparable in condition, or available on the terms relevant to a particular renter.
Direct ZIP resale evidence

For-sale liquidity inside ZIP 98501

Redfin reports these as a rolling three-month ZIP observation through 2026-06-30. They describe the for-sale market, not rental vacancy or the rent of a particular property.

Median sale price$598,865+4.2% year over year
Homes sold157rolling three-month observation
Median days on market13 daysfor-sale listing absorption
Months of supply2.8resale inventory relative to sales pace

Activity and available supply

Direct ZIP counts remain separate because each describes a different stage of the resale funnel.

Direct resale activity for ZIP 98501Active listings330Inventory147Pending sales183Homes sold157

Counter-signals before underwriting

A price alone does not reveal how quickly buyers are absorbing available homes.

Inventory direction

147 observed inventory · +35.1% year over year.

Price realization

100.2% average sale-to-list ratio · 32.7% sold above original list.

Early absorption

54.5% went off market within two weeks; compare this with 13 median days on market.

Measurement boundary

Small ZIP samples can move sharply. This rolling period smooths monthly noise but does not replace current address-level sale and rent comparables.

Redfin Data Center · updated 2026-07-03 · exact five-digit ZIP key. Implausible source values are withheld as n/a rather than repaired or inherited from a broader geography.

Wider market evidence

Listing and rental liquidity around the ZIP

These measures are not ZIP observations. They are labelled county or metro context so they can challenge the local story without being copied into it.

Thurston County listing conditions

918 active Realtor.com listings · 39 median days on market · 22.8% price-reduced share · 2026-06.

Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA resale supply

2.8 months of supply · 13 median days on market · 35.9% listings with price drops · Redfin 2026-05-01.

Apartment List metro liquidity

5.7% reported apartment vacancy · n/a. These are direct metro observations and do not describe a particular ZIP unit.

Property-level next step

Compare live same-bedroom listings, concessions, utilities, condition and days listed inside ZIP 98501. The report frames the market; it does not replace a rent roll, lease review or address-level comparable set.

Questions this report can answer

Scope-aware answers

Why is the ACS rent figure not a substitute for Zillow ZORI?

ACS median gross rent is a five-year survey measure for occupied renter homes and includes selected utilities. ZORI is a current ZIP asking-rent index blended across rental types. Different populations, timing, and cost treatment make their gap contextual; it does not measure a lease increase or a unit-level asking price.

How were the bedroom estimates produced?

The bedroom figures start with ZIP ZORI and apply the local HUD bedroom ladder’s proportions. Because the HUD FMR/SAFMR framework is an administrative standard and ZORI is blended, this produces modelled estimates only. The results should not be read as measured studio, one-bedroom, or larger-unit rents or evidence of supply.

What can the Redfin screening ratio tell a reader?

The ratio divides annualized ZORI by the ZIP’s median sold price in the direct resale observation. It is useful for comparing two published area indicators at a point in time. It omits property-specific expenses, financing, operating results, terms, and rent realization, so it cannot describe property economics or predict outcomes.

Does the 30% test determine renter affordability?

No. It translates an index rent into an income amount using a fixed arithmetic threshold and compares that amount with an area household median. Actual household income, utilities, lease terms, and rent obligations are not provided. ACS burden describes aggregate renters, so neither measure can establish affordability or qualification for a person or particular available unit.