ZIP reports / WA / 98513
ZIP rental intelligence · 2026-06

ZIP 98513, Olympia, WA

Asking rent, household capacity, housing stock and local context—kept at their original geographic and measurement scopes.

Direct local rent answer

What does rent cost in ZIP 98513?

The latest Zillow ZORI for ZIP 98513 is $2,409 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical observed asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

Zillow asking-rent index$2,4092026-06 · up 3.6% year over year
ACS median gross rent$1,967ACS 2024 5-year survey · ±$129 margin of error
HUD two-bedroom standard$1,960Administrative FMR/SAFMR · not asking rent
Bedroom-level rent benchmarks in ZIP 98513
BedroomsModelled asking-rent lensHUD standardHow to use it
Studio$1,890ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,538HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
1 bedroom$2,067ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,682HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
2 bedrooms$2,409ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,960HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
3 bedrooms$3,212ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,613HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
4 bedrooms$4,041ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$3,288HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.

Bedroom estimates are modelled, not observed rents. Zillow, Census ACS and HUD describe different housing universes and remain separate throughout this report.Zillow pulled 2026-08-08

Median household income$113,053ACS 2024 5-year · ±$8,494 MOE
Renter share20.5%2,804 renter households
Rent burden 30%+44.3%1,243 observed households
Housing vacancy5.7%822 of 14,479 units
Six views · one local decision

Read the measures together, without merging them

ZORI tracks observed asking rent, ACS describes occupied renter homes, and HUD publishes an administrative benchmark. The charts preserve those differences and add wider context only where the geography is named.

Three definitions of rent

Useful as a spread, not interchangeable observations.

Three rent measures for ZIP 98513Zillow asking-rent index$2,409ACS median gross rent$1,967HUD two-bedroom standard$1,960

Affordability screen

Annual income implied by 30% of the current ZIP ZORI.

Income screen for ZIP 98513ACS median household income$113,053Income at 30% of ZIP ZORI$96,360

Bedroom ladder

Modelled from ZIP ZORI using the local HUD ladder.

Modelled bedroom rent ladder for ZIP 98513Studio$1,890One bedroom$2,067Two bedrooms$2,409Three bedrooms$3,212Four bedrooms$4,041

Observed renter burden

ACS ZCTA households with computable gross-rent burden.

Observed renter cost burden in ZCTA 9851330% or more of income1,243 householdsBelow 30%1,561 households

ZIP versus wider rent context

Each bar retains its own ZIP, city, county or metro scope.

Asking-rent context for ZIP 98513ZIP 98513$2,409Olympia city$2,013Thurston County county$2,084Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA metro$2,084

Monthly asking-rent history

Direct Zillow ZORI observations over the latest five years. Missing months remain visible gaps.

Five-year direct Zillow asking-rent history for ZIP 98513; missing months remain gaps$2,478$2,267$2,056$1,8452021-062023-122026-06
Five-year change
25.8%exact same-month endpoints
Largest observed drawdown
1.2%peak to a later observed month
Annualized monthly variability
1.9%64 consecutive returns
Monthly coverage
100.0%65 of 65 months
Decision brief

What the evidence says for ZIP 98513

The five-digit label 98513 is both Zillow’s ZIP market identifier and a matched Census ZCTA. A ZCTA is a Census statistical area and is not identical to a USPS delivery ZIP. Zillow’s reported ZIP ZORI is $2,409, up 3.6% from the same month a year earlier. This is a typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types, rather than a quoted rent for every available home. By contrast, the matched ACS five-year survey reports median gross rent of $1,967 for occupied renter homes, including selected utilities. The asking-rent index therefore sits 22.5% above that survey median, a meaningful difference in source universe rather than evidence that every renter is paying the current asking level.

The backward-looking rent path is positive but has moderated slightly relative to its longer run. The one-year same-month annualized change was 3.6%, the three-year measure was 3.7%, and the five-year measure was 4.7%. Thus, recent direction confirms the broader growth path, while trailing the stronger five-year pace. Only 1.9% annualized monthly-return variability supports more confidence in the stability of a single current ZORI snapshot than a highly erratic series would. Separately, the worst peak-to-trough drawdown was 1.2%, a shallow historical setback. Coverage is complete across 65 observations. In the national history-eligible ZIP discovery universe, the momentum rank is 721, stability rank is 63, and balanced rank is 108; these are transparent discovery measures, not forecasts or investment recommendations.

Bedroom figures should be read as modelled estimates, not measured bedroom rents. The local HUD FY ladder spans from $1,538 for a studio standard to $3,288 for a four-bedroom standard. Scaling the ZIP ZORI by that local HUD ladder produces modelled monthly estimates of $1,890 for a studio, $2,067 for one bedroom, $2,409 for two bedrooms, $3,212 for three bedrooms, and $4,041 for four bedrooms. HUD fair-market-rent or small-area standards are administrative, bedroom-specific benchmarks; they are not asking-rent observations. The ladder is useful for imposing a locally consistent bedroom relationship on the ZIP-wide index, but it does not replace property-level rental evidence.

At the arithmetic 30% required-income screen, a household would need $96,360 in annual income to place the $2,409 monthly asking-rent index at that threshold. The ZCTA’s ACS median household income is $113,053, and the ZIP asking-rent-to-income calculation equals 25.6%. Neither statistic is advice, an applicant qualification rule, or proof that a particular home is affordable. The ACS burden data point to a separate occupied-renter universe: 1,243 of 2,804 renter households, or 44.3%, reported spending at least 30% of income on gross rent. That burden measure includes existing occupied households and selected utilities, so it cannot be assigned to a specific advertised unit or used as a direct reading of current applicant capacity.

The ZCTA survey describes a housing base of 14,479 units and a 5.7% vacancy rate. Its structure mix includes 12,015 single-family units and 92 units in large multifamily structures, while 144 vacant units were classified as for rent. Those counts characterize survey-period stock and vacancy categories, not a live inventory of available rentals. They also do not show lease terms, turnover, concessions, unit condition, or bedroom mix. The stock data nevertheless frame the earlier rent comparisons: a ZIP-level blended asking-rent index operates across a housing base whose measured structure composition is heavily weighted toward single-family units, while the available-rental count requires direct listing verification.

Wider geography provides context but should not replace the ZIP observations. The City of Olympia context rent is $2,013, while the Thurston County context rent and Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA metro context rent are each $2,084; each is a broader-geography comparison rather than a ZIP measurement. The ZIP’s current asking-rent index is therefore above all three contextual rent figures. At City of Olympia scope, the ACS renter burden share is 59.6%, versus 55.4% at Thurston County scope. Those city and county values describe their own resident and housing universes. They suggest that the ZIP’s lower burden share relative to these contexts should be interpreted alongside its different income, tenure, and survey composition rather than as a direct unit-level affordability conclusion.

Redfin supplies a different, direct rolling-three-month ZIP resale observation, not rental transactions. In that for-sale market, median sold price was $519,883, down 1.2% year over year, with 165 homes sold and a median 22 days on market. Inventory stood at 172 homes, up 35.5%, and months of supply were 3.2. Average sale-to-list was 99.5%, while 23.2% of sales closed above list price. These liquidity and price signals stay within the ZIP resale universe: they do not provide rental comps or operating economics. Annualized ZIP ZORI divided by the Redfin median sold price produces a 5.6% cross-source screening ratio only, not a cap rate, net return, expected return, or property yield. The resale evidence creates a notable tension with rent history: asking rents have continued rising, while the observed sold-price measure declined and inventory expanded.

The evidence has several practical limits. ZORI is an index rather than a unit quote; ACS is a five-year survey with sampling uncertainty; HUD is an administrative standard; and Redfin reflects completed ZIP resale activity over a rolling period. None establishes lease economics, tenant eligibility, property condition, repairs, financing, taxes, insurance, utilities, or the timing of a specific listing or sale. A property-level review would need current same-bedroom asking listings, effective rent after concessions, lease duration, included utilities, unit size and condition, and directly comparable nearby sale records with sale dates and property characteristics. The central unresolved question is whether a particular home’s current lease and physical attributes align with the ZIP-level index and the separate resale signals.

Decision signals

What deserves a closer property-level check

Current asking rent exceeds the occupied-renter survey median

ZIP ZORI is $2,409 and rose 3.6% over one year, while ACS median gross rent is $1,967. The difference reflects distinct evidence universes: ZORI is a blended asking-rent index, whereas ACS measures occupied renter homes and includes selected utilities. The gap should not be interpreted as a direct rent increase for every existing renter.

History is positive with relatively low variation

One-year, three-year, and five-year same-month annualized rent changes were all positive, with the most recent pace below the five-year measure. Low annualized monthly-return variability and a shallow maximum drawdown support greater confidence in the stability of the current index than a volatile history would, but the measures remain backward-looking.

Income screen and renter burden answer different questions

The arithmetic income needed to place the ZIP asking-rent index at 30% of income is below the ZCTA median household income. Yet 44.3% of surveyed renter households reported gross-rent burdens of at least 30%. The first is a current-index calculation using overall household income; the second is an ACS occupied-renter survey result.

Resale data challenge a simple rent-growth reading

Redfin’s direct ZIP resale data show a lower median sold price year over year alongside higher inventory, while Zillow’s asking-rent history remains positive. This divergence does not establish causation or property economics. It does show that rental-index momentum and for-sale market signals should be evaluated as separate evidence streams.

  • Zillow ZORI is a ZIP-level blended asking-rent index, so it may not match a particular property’s bedroom count, condition, lease term, concessions, included utilities, or current advertised availability.
  • ACS renter, income, burden, stock, and vacancy measures are survey estimates for a matched ZCTA over five years, with margins of error and timing that differ from current asking-rent observations.
  • HUD bedroom standards are administrative benchmarks rather than asking rents, and the displayed bedroom amounts are modelled estimates derived from the ZIP index and local HUD ladder.
  • Redfin resale evidence concerns completed for-sale transactions in a rolling three-month ZIP observation; it cannot demonstrate rental demand, leasing speed, unit-level affordability, or future property performance.
Direct ZIP resale evidence

For-sale liquidity inside ZIP 98513

Redfin reports these as a rolling three-month ZIP observation through 2026-06-30. They describe the for-sale market, not rental vacancy or the rent of a particular property.

Median sale price$519,883-1.1% year over year
Homes sold165rolling three-month observation
Median days on market22 daysfor-sale listing absorption
Months of supply3.2resale inventory relative to sales pace

Activity and available supply

Direct ZIP counts remain separate because each describes a different stage of the resale funnel.

Direct resale activity for ZIP 98513Active listings345Inventory172Pending sales170Homes sold165

Counter-signals before underwriting

A price alone does not reveal how quickly buyers are absorbing available homes.

Inventory direction

172 observed inventory · +35.4% year over year.

Price realization

99.5% average sale-to-list ratio · 23.2% sold above original list.

Early absorption

38.8% went off market within two weeks; compare this with 22 median days on market.

Measurement boundary

Small ZIP samples can move sharply. This rolling period smooths monthly noise but does not replace current address-level sale and rent comparables.

Redfin Data Center · updated 2026-07-03 · exact five-digit ZIP key. Implausible source values are withheld as n/a rather than repaired or inherited from a broader geography.

Wider market evidence

Listing and rental liquidity around the ZIP

These measures are not ZIP observations. They are labelled county or metro context so they can challenge the local story without being copied into it.

Thurston County listing conditions

918 active Realtor.com listings · 39 median days on market · 22.8% price-reduced share · 2026-06.

Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA resale supply

2.8 months of supply · 13 median days on market · 35.9% listings with price drops · Redfin 2026-05-01.

Apartment List metro liquidity

5.7% reported apartment vacancy · n/a. These are direct metro observations and do not describe a particular ZIP unit.

Property-level next step

Compare live same-bedroom listings, concessions, utilities, condition and days listed inside ZIP 98513. The report frames the market; it does not replace a rent roll, lease review or address-level comparable set.

Questions this report can answer

Scope-aware answers

Why does the Zillow asking-rent figure exceed ACS median gross rent?

The measures observe different populations and concepts. Zillow ZORI is a current ZIP-level typical asking-rent index blended across rental types. ACS median gross rent is a five-year survey estimate for occupied renter homes and includes selected utilities. Existing leases, survey timing, utility treatment, and rental mix can all produce a gap.

Are the bedroom rent amounts observed market rents?

No. The studio through four-bedroom figures are modelled monthly estimates. They scale the ZIP-wide Zillow ZORI using the local HUD bedroom ladder. HUD standards are administrative, bedroom-specific benchmarks and not observed asking rents, so the modelled amounts should be checked against current property-level listings.

What does the 30% required-income screen show?

It is arithmetic only: monthly ZIP asking rent is annualized and divided by 30% to produce an illustrative annual income amount. It is not lending, leasing, or applicant qualification guidance. The ACS burden result is separate because it describes surveyed occupied renter households and their reported gross-rent burdens.

How should the Redfin screening ratio be used?

The ratio divides annualized ZIP ZORI by Redfin’s direct ZIP median sold price from its rolling-three-month resale observation. It is a cross-source screening statistic, not a cap rate, net return, expected return, or property yield. Property economics would require property-specific revenue, operating costs, financing, and transaction details.