Where city rents and home values break from their wider metro
Which published US cities carry a rent or home-value premium or discount relative to the direct Zillow index for their linked metro?
City limits and metropolitan areas answer different housing questions. This atlas compares like-for-like Zillow index families in the same release month, then keeps rent, home value and gross yield separate.
- Cities reviewed
- 450 finite starting corpus
- Direct city–metro rows
- 432 272 linked metros
- Both indexes discounted
- 215 city rent and home value below metro index
- Median yield gap
- ▲ 0.1% city minus metro gross yield
A metro headline can conceal a very different city-level price and rent relationship
The finite published corpus starts with 450 city briefs. Exactly 432 have a stored metro link and complete, month-aligned city and metro Zillow indexes. The other 18remain outside every result rather than inheriting a nearby value.
San Francisco, CAhas the largest city rent premium in the current set at ▲ 33.3%. At the other end, Joliet, ILcarries a ▼ 29.1% rent gap relative to its linked metro index.
Premium and discount describe two Zillow index levels at different boundaries. They do not label a city cheap, expensive, good or bad.
Rent and home values do not always move to the same side of metro parity. That is why the chart keeps both axes visible and reports the yield difference separately. Use the interactive explorer to search the complete set, then open the city and metro pages before applying property-level expenses or financing.
City premium or discount relative to its linked metro
Right means a higher city home-value index; up means a higher city rent index. Zero lines mean parity with the wider metro.
The first 24 rows, with a path to the underlying market
| Gap rank | City | Linked metro | Rent gap | Home-value gap | Yield gap | Release | Open |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Princeton, NJ30,756 people | Trenton, NJ | ▲ 32.0%$3,461 vs $2,622 | ▲ 117.7%$987k vs $453k | ▼ 2.7% | 2026-06 | Inspect |
| 2 | Mount Pleasant, SC93,993 people | Charleston, SC | ▲ 17.4%$2,425 vs $2,066 | ▲ 103.3%$887k vs $436k | ▼ 2.4% | 2026-06 | Inspect |
| 3 | Franklin, TN87,133 people | Nashville, TN | ▲ 17.8%$2,132 vs $1,810 | ▲ 102.8%$929k vs $458k | ▼ 2.0% | 2026-06 | Inspect |
| 4 | Scottsdale, AZ243,821 people | Phoenix, AZ | ▲ 25.4%$2,173 vs $1,733 | ▲ 92.0%$858k vs $447k | ▼ 1.6% | 2026-06 | Inspect |
| 5 | Santa Barbara, CA87,779 people | Santa Maria, CA | ▲ 20.4%$3,967 vs $3,294 | ▲ 83.9%$1835k vs $998k | ▼ 1.4% | 2026-06 | Inspect |
| 6 | Frisco, TX219,304 people | Dallas, TX | ▲ 11.2%$1,861 vs $1,673 | ▲ 78.9%$656k vs $367k | ▼ 2.1% | 2026-06 | Inspect |
| 7 | Naperville, IL150,692 people | Chicago, IL | ▲ 1.5%$2,310 vs $2,275 | ▲ 76.8%$636k vs $360k | ▼ 3.2% | 2026-06 | Inspect |
| 8 | Detroit, MI638,530 people | Detroit, MI | ▼ 10.7%$1,356 vs $1,518 | ▼ 71.6%$77k vs $272k | ▲ 14.4% | 2026-06 | Inspect |
| 9 | West Chester, PA20,666 people | Philadelphia, PA | ▲ 14.2%$2,201 vs $1,928 | ▲ 71.5%$677k vs $395k | ▼ 2.0% | 2026-06 | Inspect |
| 10 | Flint, MI80,175 people | Flint, MI | ▼ 10.9%$969 vs $1,087 | ▼ 66.6%$67k vs $199k | ▲ 10.9% | 2026-06 | Inspect |
| 11 | Redwood City, CA82,447 people | San Francisco, CA | ▲ 19.6%$3,949 vs $3,301 | ▲ 65.0%$1885k vs $1142k | ▼ 1.0% | 2026-06 | Inspect |
| 12 | Kirkland, WA92,621 people | Seattle, WA | ▲ 15.7%$2,626 vs $2,269 | ▲ 64.7%$1227k vs $745k | ▼ 1.1% | 2026-06 | Inspect |
| 13 | Jackson, MS146,631 people | Jackson, MS | ▼ 14.7%$1,270 vs $1,489 | ▼ 60.2%$86k vs $216k | ▲ 9.5% | 2026-06 | Inspect |
| 14 | Youngstown, OH59,331 people | Youngstown, OH | ▲ 3.9%$1,087 vs $1,046 | ▼ 59.7%$73k vs $180k | ▲ 11.0% | 2026-06 | Inspect |
| 15 | Irvine, CA311,690 people | Los Angeles, CA | ▲ 15.8%$3,390 vs $2,927 | ▲ 58.9%$1538k vs $968k | ▼ 1.0% | 2026-06 | Inspect |
| 16 | Annapolis, MD40,720 people | Baltimore, MD | ▲ 23.9%$2,398 vs $1,936 | ▲ 55.4%$633k vs $408k | ▼ 1.2% | 2026-06 | Inspect |
| 17 | Chapel Hill, NC61,607 people | Durham, NC | ▲ 4.3%$1,763 vs $1,691 | ▲ 54.5%$642k vs $416k | ▼ 1.6% | 2026-06 | Inspect |
| 18 | Baltimore, MD573,243 people | Baltimore, MD | ▼ 7.1%$1,799 vs $1,936 | ▼ 52.7%$193k vs $408k | ▲ 5.5% | 2026-06 | Inspect |
| 19 | Cleveland, OH366,097 people | Cleveland, OH | ▼ 3.0%$1,430 vs $1,474 | ▼ 52.5%$121k vs $256k | ▲ 7.2% | 2026-06 | Inspect |
| 20 | Lancaster, CA169,169 people | Los Angeles, CA | ▼ 17.9%$2,403 vs $2,927 | ▼ 51.7%$468k vs $968k | ▲ 2.5% | 2026-06 | Inspect |
| 21 | Palmdale, CA164,634 people | Los Angeles, CA | ▼ 7.1%$2,720 vs $2,927 | ▼ 47.8%$506k vs $968k | ▲ 2.8% | 2026-06 | Inspect |
| 22 | Carlsbad, CA114,373 people | San Diego, CA | ▲ 19.0%$3,560 vs $2,991 | ▲ 47.5%$1388k vs $941k | ▼ 0.7% | 2026-06 | Inspect |
| 23 | Birmingham, AL198,173 people | Birmingham, AL | ▼ 7.0%$1,359 vs $1,462 | ▼ 47.1%$140k vs $264k | ▲ 5.0% | 2026-06 | Inspect |
| 24 | Sugar Land, TX110,016 people | Houston, TX | ▲ 25.3%$2,065 vs $1,648 | ▲ 46.4%$452k vs $309k | ▼ 0.9% | 2026-06 | Inspect |
The visible table is intentionally limited for reading. The CSV contains every row that passes the printed inclusion rule.
Inclusion first, interpretation second.
Start with the finite set of current published RentMarker city briefs. Include a city only when it has a stored metro link, direct Zillow city and metro ZHVI and ZORI values, verified gross yields and month-aligned release periods. Do not infer a link or fill a missing value from another geography.
Methodology version: v15Method
- Rent premium or discount divides city ZORI by linked-metro ZORI and subtracts one; home-value premium or discount applies the same calculation to ZHVI.
- Gross yield is monthly ZORI multiplied by 12 and divided by ZHVI at each geography; the yield gap is city yield minus metro yield in percentage points.
- Rows are ordered by the largest absolute rent-or-home-value gap. The four sign groups are descriptive and never become a recommendation score.
Counter-signals
- A city premium can reflect housing mix, amenity access or boundary composition and does not prove better investment performance.
- A rent discount can coexist with weaker demand, higher expenses or substantial differences among neighborhoods and property types.
- Gross yield excludes taxes, insurance, vacancy, maintenance, management and financing; the metro index is not a property comp.
Limitations
- ZORI and ZHVI are Zillow market indexes, not simple averages, appraisals, transaction prices or the rent for a specific unit.
- City and metro boundaries overlap by design: the city is part of the wider metro, so the comparison is contextual rather than independent.
- Only current city briefs with complete direct evidence enter the atlas; excluded cities remain missing rather than estimated.
Every input release used by this study
Release and retrieval dates stay visible so a reader can tell whether two measures describe the same moment.