States / New York
State rental intelligence

New York rental market data

A source-traced view across 23 metro markets and 62 counties. State figures below are labelled medians and totals—not a made-up statewide investment score.

18/23 metros scored62/62 counties with FEMA risk14 sources used in this analysis
Median scored metro64.0out of 100 · 18 measured metros
New York identity diorama showing regional landscape, cities, housing, and infrastructure
Median metro home value$235kmedian across published metro values
Median metro rent$1,458monthly · published metro values
Median gross yield7.1%annual rent ÷ price · before costs
Median job trend▲ 0.6%trailing 12-month metro employment
Direct monthly rental evidence

New York rent market dynamics

Apartment List measures recent leases, rental vacancy and listing time separately. These figures do not replace Zillow, Census or Realtor measures elsewhere on this page.

Recent-lease rent$2,0182026-07 · ▲ 2.6% year over year
Rental Vacancy Index3.6%2026-07 · −1.0 pp in 12 months
Time on market25 days2026-07 · −2 days in 12 months
US recent-lease rent$1,3882026-07 · ▼ 1.1% year over year
Rent and rental vacancy through timesolid state series · dashed national series · no interpolation across missing observations
Recent-lease rent$2,132$1,543$954Rental Vacancy Index7.9%5.2%2.5%2017-012021-102026-07New YorkUnited States
State research brief

Tight recent-lease signals coexist with a measured 71,938-person net outflow, making local demand durability the central screen.

Updated 2026-08-08 · evidence current to the releases listed below.

New York’s July 2026 Apartment List measures point in the same direction across three separate series: recent-lease rent rose 2.6% year over year to $2,018, the Vacancy Index fell from 4.6% to 3.6%, and time on market shortened by 2 days to 24.7 days. The corresponding national series showed rent down 1.1%, vacancy at 7.2% and time on market at 30 days. This is credible evidence of comparatively tight state-level lease conditions, but it does not establish the same balance in every local market.

The counter-signal is demand depth. Migration data covering all 62 counties recorded 446,620 people moving in and 518,558 moving out, a net loss of 71,938, or 3.6 per 1,000 residents. Employment was still positive at the measured-metro median, but growth varied widely. Screening therefore needs to distinguish local rent support from a broad state signal and test acquisition price, exit liquidity, tenant affordability, taxes and physical risk separately.

01

Recent-lease rent rose 2.6%, the Vacancy Index fell to 3.6% and time on market shortened to 24.7 days → treat rental tightness as a state-level lead, then verify local achieved rents and vacancy.

02

County migration summed to a 71,938-person net outflow while measured-metro job growth remained positive at the median → require local employment and household evidence rather than assuming statewide demand durability.

03

Metro median rent growth trailed price growth by 0.2 percentage points, but selected local rent gains reached 11.0% to 16.8% → test whether recent asking-rent acceleration is repeatable before relying on the supplied gross yields.

04

Metro resale time ranged from 12 to 77 days between the 10th and 90th percentiles, with Auburn, NY, at 98 days → stress marketing time, price reductions and sale proceeds separately from rental lease-up.

05

County effective property-tax rates ranged from 1.40% to 2.50% between the 10th and 90th percentiles → underwrite taxes at the local property level rather than applying a single state assumption.

01
Direct state rental dynamics

Lease indicators tightened while the national series loosened

The direct state recent-lease rent measure increased from $1,966 to $2,018, a 2.6% gain. Separately, the Vacancy Index declined by 1 percentage point to 3.6%, while rental time on market fell from 26.7 to 24.7 days. Rent growth exceeded the national series by 3.7 percentage points; state vacancy was 3.6 percentage points lower and marketing time was 5.3 days shorter.

The agreement among the three measures supports a tight state-level rental screen. They remain distinct series with different coverage, however, and cannot show whether a specific metro, property type or price point has the same occupancy and lease-up conditions.

Evidence: Apartment List Rent Estimates — recent-lease rent index · Apartment List Time on Market — listing liquidity · Apartment List Vacancy Index — rental vacancy

02
Employment and household movement

Out-migration tempers otherwise positive job readings

County migration coverage is complete across all 62 counties, and the totals show 71,938 more people moving out than moving in. The rate was negative 3.6 per 1,000 residents. That is a meaningful counter-signal to the current rental tightness, although the migration period and rental period do not coincide.

Employment was not uniformly weak. Across 23 measured metros, year-over-year job growth had a 0.6% median and ranged from about 0.01% at the 10th percentile to 1.49% at the 90th. Cortland, NY, Watertown, NY, and Olean, NY posted measured gains of 3.0%, 1.7% and 1.5%, respectively. Local employment evidence can therefore offset the migration concern in some screens, but it does not erase the aggregate outflow.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — population · BLS CES — payroll employment · BLS LAUS — resident employment · IRS SOI — county migration and mover income

03
Price and rent momentum

Near-even metro medians mask double-digit local rent gains

Across the measured distributions, metro asking-rent growth had a 5.2% median among 18 metros, while home-value growth had a 5.4% median among 23. The supplied difference was negative 0.2 percentage points. At that level, rents were broadly keeping pace with prices rather than creating a clear statewide yield expansion.

Several highlighted markets were much less balanced. Ogdensburg, NY, recorded 16.8% rent growth against 4.8% price growth; Jamestown, NY, recorded 15.0% against 4.8%; and Oneonta, NY, recorded 11.0% against 3.4%. Their supplied gross yields were 9.4%, 6.4% and 8.4%, respectively. Because these are asking rents and gross yields, screening should verify achieved rents, concessions, vacancy and operating costs rather than capitalize the recent growth rates directly.

Evidence: Zillow ZHVI — metro home values · Zillow ZORI — metro market rents

04
Supply and resale conditions

Exit liquidity ranges from quick sales to 98-day marketing

Resale conditions are widely dispersed. Across 21 measured metros, the 10th-to-90th percentile range was 12 to 77 days on market, 2.4 to 6.6 months of supply and 17.6% to 28.6% of listings with price drops. Auburn, NY, was slower still at 98 days, with 5.5 months of supply, a 25.1% price-drop share and a 94.9% sale-to-list ratio. Elmira, NY, and Oneonta, NY, also had marketing times of 82 and 77 days.

Permitting is uneven in both scale and intensity. The median across 23 metros was 186 permitted units, while New York, NY, recorded 58,152, or 2.94 per 1,000 residents. Ithaca, NY, recorded 352 permits but a higher rate of 3.37 per 1,000. Permits are authorizations, not completed units or confirmed rental supply, so they identify where additional construction screening is needed rather than establish future competition.

Evidence: Census Building Permits Survey — permitted units · Redfin Data Center — inventory, days on market, and price cuts

05
Housing stock and tenant conditions

Heavy renter burdens sit beside vacancy that may not be rental availability

Across all 62 counties, the median share of renters paying at least 30% of income toward rent was 48.4%, with a 10th-to-90th percentile range of 41.5% to 57.2%. The highlighted burdens were higher in Rockland County at 62.5%, Putnam County at 62.3% and Bronx County at 60.1%. This limits what current tightness alone can establish about room for additional rent increases.

ACS housing vacancy is a different concept from the Apartment List Vacancy Index. Hamilton County had 69.4% total housing vacancy and an 84.5% single-family share; Sullivan County and Delaware County had vacancy rates of 37.1% and 36.1%. These figures can include units outside the active rental market and cannot be treated as available apartments. Property-level screening needs usable rental inventory, seasonal status and condition data that the county totals do not provide.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock

06
Physical risk and property tax

One leading-hazard label covers every county, but tax and loss ratios remain local

Measured effective property-tax rates across 62 counties had a 2.04% median and ranged from 1.40% at the 10th percentile to 2.50% at the 90th. The highlighted rates were 2.92% in Allegany County, 2.72% in Orleans County and 2.65% in Cattaraugus County. That dispersion can materially change net income even where gross rent and acquisition price appear attractive.

FEMA classified inland flood as the mutually exclusive leading-hazard label in all 62 counties, but the label does not mean every parcel has flood exposure. The highlighted FEMA loss ratios were 0.25% in Allegany County and 0.22% in both Chenango County and Delaware County. These county measures support local insurance and site-risk review; they do not replace parcel-level flood, elevation, building-condition or coverage analysis.

Evidence: FEMA National Risk Index — hazard loss ratios · Census ACS 5-year — effective property tax

State ZIP rental intelligence

How direct rental evidence varies inside New York

The distribution uses 21 current published ZIP reports across 8 cities and 9 counties. Twelve measured counter-signals are shown below; this is not a statewide neighborhood ranking.

Published ZIP rent range$1,383$4,609full direct-ZORI report cohort
Median rent / income44.7%annual asking rent ÷ ACS household income
Median one-year growth▲ 5.7%exact direct Zillow endpoints
Renter households covered341,224across published ZCTA matches
01 · RENT DISPERSIONRepresentative direct ZIP ZORI
Horizontal bars compare direct Zillow asking-rent indexes for the twelve representative published ZIP reports.10025$4,60911215$4,20511206$3,96011221$3,62810035$3,18711226$3,03411220$2,60610467$2,50414222$1,52612180$1,52414607$1,41814213$1,383
02 · AFFORDABILITY PRESSURERent / income × observed burden
Horizontal position is annual Zillow asking rent divided by ACS median household income. Vertical position is the ACS share of renter households paying thirty percent or more.56.9%50.3%43.7%37.1%30.5%104671122611206112211002511220112151003512180146071421314222Annual asking rent / ACS household income →ACS renter burden share →
03 · PATH QUALITYOne-year growth × variability
Each point compares exact one-year Zillow asking-rent growth with annualized variability from the direct monthly series.6.4%5.1%3.7%2.3%0.9%104671122611206112211002511220112151003512180146071421314222Exact one-year Zillow rent growth →Annualized monthly variability →
WHAT THE STATE DISTRIBUTION SAYS

At the June 2026 reading, the 21 current published direct-evidence ZIP reports show a wide observed Zillow asking-rent index range: $1,383 to $4,609, a $3,226 spread around a $3,033 median. The endpoints, 14213 in Buffalo and 10025 in New York, frame a practical screening question: which reported areas fit a household's current rent budget and bedroom need, and how much change in the index is acceptable? This is a comparative distribution of published direct-evidence reports, not a claim about every New York ZIP, neighborhood, or rental property. The median is a midpoint among reports rather than a recommended price or a measure of what is currently available.

Affordability and renter burden answer different questions. Matching the current index to ACS median household income produces an asking-rent-to-income proxy from 22.4% to 84.8%, with a 44.7% median; it is a ratio, not a household budget result. It asks whether an area-level current index is large relative to an area-level income midpoint, not whether a particular renter can secure housing at that price. The ACS share of renter households with a 30%-plus burden ranges from 33.0% to 54.4%, with a 48.3% median. ZIP 10035 has the highest current-income proxy without the highest burden share, whereas 10467 has the highest burden share. Income, median gross rent, and burden are ACS 2024 five-year survey estimates for ZCTAs, which are statistical areas rather than identical USPS delivery ZIPs.

Rent momentum is also distinct from variability. In the direct monthly Zillow series, one-year growth ranges from 2.9% to 11.7%, and the median is 5.7%; annualized volatility ranges from 1.9% to 5.4%, with a 3.0% median. The category labels have counter-signals that matter more than any label. ZIP 10467 pairs the strongest one-year increase with the highest volatility, while 11215 is accelerating despite below-median volatility. A higher recent growth rate therefore should not be read as a smoother rent path, and volatility does not establish future direction.

The HUD comparison is a separate benchmark, not a second asking-rent series. Current ZORI relative to HUD's two-bedroom FMR/SAFMR standard ranges from 89.5% to 176.2% across the published reports; 12180 is below its applicable benchmark while 10025 is far above its own. HUD's figure is an administrative bedroom standard delivered through its ZIP crosswalk, whereas ZORI is an observed asking-rent index. It cannot identify the rent, bedroom match, lease terms, condition, or availability of a particular home. Use the gap for a standardized reference check only, then verify any property-specific facts separately rather than treating an area-level index or FMR as a listing quote.

Representative direct evidence

Twelve useful contrasts, every one traceable

The statewide summaries use all 21 qualifying reports. The table preserves measured extremes in rent, affordability, burden, momentum, volatility and the HUD benchmark gap.

ZIP reportPlaceZillow rent1Y growthRent / incomeBurden 30%+VariabilityHUD 2BR gap
10467New York$2,504▲ 11.7%60.9%54.4%5.4%▲ 95.7%
11226New York$3,034▲ 2.9%44.9%48.3%2.5%▲ 116.0%
11206New York$3,960▲ 5.1%77.4%50.0%3.6%▲ 151.4%
11221New York$3,628▲ 5.4%50.8%49.4%2.9%▲ 138.7%
10025New York$4,609▲ 6.4%50.8%44.9%3.0%▲ 176.2%
11220New York$2,606▲ 7.9%44.7%53.4%3.0%▲ 99.6%
11215New York$4,205▲ 7.8%27.1%33.0%2.5%▲ 160.7%
10035New York$3,187▲ 7.4%84.8%51.4%3.0%▲ 121.8%
12180Troy$1,524▲ 5.7%24.1%46.0%3.2%▲ 89.5%
14607Rochester$1,418▲ 4.9%28.5%42.1%1.9%▲ 90.1%
14213Buffalo$1,383▲ 4.5%30.8%50.3%3.9%▲ 105.6%
14222Buffalo$1,526▲ 4.7%22.4%43.2%2.8%▲ 100.4%
READ BEFORE USING

ZORI is an observed monthly asking-rent index, not a transaction record, lease quote, or count of available homes. Its geographic reading cannot establish the rent, unit configuration, condition, incentives, or availability of any individual rental property.

ACS income, gross-rent, vacancy, and burden fields are 2024 five-year ZCTA survey estimates, while ZORI is a June 2026 direct monthly series. ZCTAs are statistical areas rather than USPS delivery ZIPs, and HUD FMR/SAFMR is an administrative bedroom standard, so comparisons are contextual rather than like-for-like.

SOURCE LEDGERCensus ACS five-year — ZCTA housing and incomeACS 2024 5-year ZCTA · pulled 2026-08-08HUD USPS crosswalk and Small Area FMRs — ZIP rent fallbackZIP-CBSA 2025Q4 + SAFMR FY2026 · pulled 2026-07-26Zillow ZORI — ZIP market rentsZORI ZIP 2026-06 · pulled 2026-08-08
Evidence selected for New York

The ranges behind the analysis

Each row keeps its own unit and shows the measured 10th percentile, median and 90th percentile. A single-value row is labelled directly.

Employment and household movementDo jobs, household movement and mover income point in the same direction?
10th pct.median90th pct.Job change0.0%0.6%1.5%Net migration / 1k-3.6Net household movement-71,938
Price and rent momentumAre home values and asking rents moving together or separating?
10th pct.median90th pct.Home-value change3.5%5.4%7.2%Asking-rent change2.7%5.2%12.2%Rent minus price-0.2%
Supply and resale conditionsWhat do permits, inventory, marketing time and price cuts say about pressure?
10th pct.median90th pct.Permits / 1k1.01.42.7Months of supply2.4×4.2×6.6×Days on market12 days42 days77 daysListings with cuts17.6%22.3%28.6%
Shape of the state

Distribution before conclusion

A statewide median can hide a wide spread. These SVG charts render at build time and carry no chart library or browser-side data request.

Metro score distribution18 scored metros · median 64.0
00–19120–39440–591360–79080–100
County evidence coverageEvery gap stays visible as missing—not estimated
79%49/62Rent100%62/62Climate100%62/62Migration
Highest measured metro gross yieldsscreening metric only · before expenses and financing
Ogdensburg9.3%Corning8.8%Elmira8.4%Oneonta8.4%Binghamton7.9%Cortland7.8%Batavia7.6%
Metro leaderboard

Markets touching New York

Multi-state CBSAs appear in every member state. Score is still a metro score; no value is reweighted into a statewide ranking.

#MetroScorePriceRentYieldJobs
1Cortland, NY79$209k$1,3657.8%▲ 3.0%
2Syracuse, NY76$272k$1,6147.1%▲ 1.2%
3Albany, NY75$378k$1,6795.3%▲ 0.8%
4Watertown, NY74$236k$1,4677.4%▲ 1.7%
5Ogdensburg, NY72$151k$1,1739.3%▲ 0.1%
6Jamestown, NY70$182k$9726.4%▲ 0.2%
7Binghamton, NY68$205k$1,3487.9%▲ 1.3%
8Rochester, NY67$291k$1,5806.5%▲ 0.4%
9Buffalo, NY65$295k$1,4615.9%▲ 0.6%
10Kingston, NY63$451k$2,0695.5%▲ 1.3%
11Oneonta, NY63$221k$1,5498.4%▲ 1.0%
12Elmira, NY61$164k$1,1558.4%▲ 0.0%

Showing the top 12 scored metros of 23. Unscored metros remain discoverable through the national rankings.

Below the metro line

Largest counties in New York

County figures join on the five-digit FIPS code. The table uses measured local values and prints “n/a” wherever a publisher has no record.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Kings County, NY2,631,580$957k$3,8084.8%inland flooding
Queens County, NY2,323,052$744k$3,2565.3%inland flooding
New York County, NY1,629,477$1217k$4,8334.8%inland flooding
Suffolk County, NY1,530,146$727k$3,3495.5%inland flooding
Bronx County, NY1,404,779$500k$2,8476.8%inland flooding
Nassau County, NY1,389,591$860k$3,5645.0%inland flooding
Westchester County, NY999,677$879k$3,1844.3%inland flooding
Erie County, NY950,622$304k$1,4985.9%inland flooding
Monroe County, NY753,753$298k$1,5786.4%inland flooding
Richmond County, NY494,956$731k$2,7024.4%inland flooding
Onondaga County, NY471,129$289k$1,6626.9%inland flooding
Orange County, NY406,616$470k$2,2565.8%inland flooding
County yield sample49/62counties have the rent needed to compute yield
Statewide net migration−71,938IRS tax-return households summed across counties
Median investor share8.4%among counties with HMDA purchase records
Bear case

What can break the thesis

  1. The direct Apartment List readings are state series and may conceal weak metros, property types or rent tiers.
  2. The migration data cover 2022-2023, while the rental measures are from July 2026, so their coexistence does not establish a current causal relationship.
  3. Zillow rents are asking-rent measures, and supplied yields are gross; neither establishes collected rent or net operating return.
  4. Coverage is incomplete for several local measures: metro rent growth covers 18 of 23 metros, county rent covers 49 of 62 counties, and Realtor.com conditions cover 51 counties; county listing-price coverage is missing.
  5. County hazard labels and loss ratios do not establish parcel exposure, while ACS effective tax rates may not equal the tax burden after a particular acquisition or reassessment.
Investor questions

Before underwriting a property

Are recent rent, vacancy and rental marketing time moving together?

Yes at the direct state-series level. Recent-lease rent rose 2.6%, the separate Vacancy Index fell by 1 percentage point to 3.6%, and the separate time-on-market series shortened by 2 days to 24.7 days.

Does net out-migration invalidate the rental-tightness signal?

No, but it weakens a broad demand thesis. All-county migration summed to a 71,938-person net outflow, while job growth remained positive at a 0.6% measured-metro median. The packet supports local screening, not a conclusion that one measure overrides the other.

Where is recent asking-rent growth most separated from price growth?

Among the highlighted metros, Ogdensburg, NY, had 16.8% rent growth versus 4.8% price growth; Jamestown, NY, had 15.0% versus 4.8%; and Oneonta, NY, had 11.0% versus 3.4%. These are asking-rent and home-value measures, not proof of achieved property returns.

Do high county vacancy rates mean many apartments are available?

Not necessarily. The ACS measure covers total housing vacancy, not Apartment List rental vacancy. Hamilton County’s 69.4% ACS vacancy rate, for example, sits beside an 84.5% single-family share and cannot establish the amount of usable rental inventory.

Does the inland-flood label mean every New York property is flood-exposed?

No. Inland flood is the mutually exclusive leading-hazard label for each of the 62 counties, not a parcel-level exposure finding. Site-specific flood, elevation, insurance and building data remain necessary.