States / Georgia
State rental intelligence

Georgia rental market data

A source-traced view across 27 metro markets and 159 counties. State figures below are labelled medians and totals—not a made-up statewide investment score.

22/27 metros scored159/159 counties with FEMA risk14 sources used in this analysis
Median scored metro42.0out of 100 · 22 measured metros
Georgia identity diorama showing regional landscape, cities, housing, and infrastructure
Median metro home value$238kmedian across published metro values
Median metro rent$1,462monthly · published metro values
Median gross yield7.2%annual rent ÷ price · before costs
Median job trend▼ 0.1%trailing 12-month metro employment
Direct monthly rental evidence

Georgia rent market dynamics

Apartment List measures recent leases, rental vacancy and listing time separately. These figures do not replace Zillow, Census or Realtor measures elsewhere on this page.

Recent-lease rent$1,3022026-07 · ▼ 0.8% year over year
Rental Vacancy Index7.6%2026-07 · −0.1 pp in 12 months
Time on market31 days2026-07 · +3 days in 12 months
US recent-lease rent$1,3882026-07 · ▼ 1.1% year over year
Rent and rental vacancy through timesolid state series · dashed national series · no interpolation across missing observations
Recent-lease rent$1,496$1,216$936Rental Vacancy Index8.4%5.7%3.0%2017-012021-102026-07GeorgiaUnited States
State research brief

Recent-lease rents are falling and listings are taking longer even while measured metro asking rents and home values retain similar annual gains, making local lease-up evidence the key screen.

Updated 2026-08-08 · evidence current to the releases listed below.

Georgia's direct Apartment List rent measure was $1,302, down 0.8% from a year earlier, while rental time on market reached 31.3 days after increasing 3.3 days. The counter-signal is that its separate Vacancy Index edged down by 0.1 percentage point to 7.6% rather than rising. Together, these measures indicate softer pricing and slower leasing, but not a broad increase in vacancy within that index.

Zillow presents a different slice of the market: asking-rent growth had a 2.2% median across 22 measured metros, nearly matching the 2.2% home-value gain across 27 metros. Positive net migration also contrasts with a slightly negative median employment change. Screening should therefore require local lease comps, concessions, tenant demand and competing-supply checks rather than treating either the state rental decline or metro medians as universal. The packet cannot establish property-level occupancy, operating costs, insurance terms or future rent performance.

01

State recent-lease rent fell 0.8% while rental time on market rose 3.3 days → test achievable rent and lease-up time without assuming statewide growth

02

Metro asking-rent and home-value growth both had 2.2% medians, but Dublin's calculated rent-growth advantage was 7.1 percentage points → use paired local rent and value comps rather than the state distribution

03

Net migration was 14,863 while median metro employment changed by negative 0.1% → require local employer and tenant-pool evidence before treating inflow as rental demand

04

Measured resale metros had 4.3 months of supply and a 28.4% median price-drop share → price acquisition and exit assumptions for uneven liquidity

05

County ACS vacancy had a 14.0% median while renter burden had a 47.5% median → distinguish vacant housing from affordable, market-ready rental stock

01
Direct state rental dynamics

Recent-lease softness has not produced a higher Vacancy Index

The state recent-lease rent measure declined from $1,312 to $1,302, a 0.8% annual drop. Separately, rental time on market increased from 28.0 to 31.3 days. That combination makes assumed rent increases and rapid lease-up difficult to support without property-level evidence.

The Vacancy Index supplies a genuine counter-signal: it decreased by about 0.1 percentage point to 7.6%, although the current index remained 0.4 percentage point above the national measure. Rent, vacancy and marketing time are separate Apartment List series; their combination can flag screening pressure but cannot identify which Georgia metros, property types or rent bands account for it.

Evidence: Apartment List Rent Estimates — recent-lease rent index · Apartment List Time on Market — listing liquidity · Apartment List Vacancy Index — rental vacancy

02
Price and rent momentum

Dublin exposes the local rent-value split hidden by matching medians

Across the measured metros, asking-rent growth had a 2.2% median and ranged from 0.6% at the 10th percentile to 5.3% at the 90th. Home-value growth also had a 2.2% median, but its range ran from a 0.8% decline to a 4.4% gain. The similar medians therefore conceal materially different local paths.

Dublin illustrates the separation: asking rent rose 9.1% while home value increased 2.0%, a calculated gap of 7.1 percentage points, with a reported gross yield of 7.3%. That pairing warrants closer review, but asking-rent growth does not prove realized renewal growth, occupancy or net yield. Rent-growth coverage also reaches only 22 of the 27 metros with home-value observations.

Evidence: Zillow ZHVI — metro home values · Zillow ZORI — metro market rents

03
Employment and household movement

Positive migration meets a flat employment distribution

Measured movement across all 159 counties produced net migration of 14,863, or 1.4 people per 1,000 residents. Incoming mover AGI exceeded outgoing mover AGI by $569,945. These are supportive household-flow signals, but they are aggregates and do not show where incoming households rented or what housing they could afford.

Employment is less uniformly supportive. The median annual metro change was negative 0.1%, with the measured range running from negative 1.8% at the 10th percentile to positive 1.9% at the 90th. Milledgeville, Athens and Dublin were counterexamples at 2.3%, 2.3% and 2.2%, respectively. A viable screen should connect a property's tenant pool to local employment and household movement rather than use the positive statewide migration total alone.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — population · BLS CES — payroll employment · BLS LAUS — resident employment · IRS SOI — county migration and mover income

04
Supply and resale conditions

Dublin and Hinesville carry the clearest measured liquidity checks

Across 24 measured resale metros, the median was 4.3 months of supply, 52.5 days on market, a 28.4% price-drop share and a 97.5% sale-to-list ratio. Those figures describe resale conditions rather than rental listing time, but they matter for acquisition negotiations and eventual exit liquidity.

Dublin stood at 6.7 months of supply, 76 days on market, a 34.6% price-drop share and a 96.5% sale-to-list ratio. Hinesville combined 6.6 months of supply and 75 days on market with 11.5 permitted units per 1,000 residents. Permits are not completed rental units, so the packet cannot establish direct competition; they identify where pipeline and resale conditions deserve simultaneous review.

Evidence: Census Building Permits Survey — permitted units · Redfin Data Center — inventory, days on market, and price cuts

05
Housing stock and tenant conditions

High county vacancy can coexist with severe renter burden

ACS vacancy across 159 counties had a 14.0% median and ranged from 6.3% at the 10th percentile to 26.1% at the 90th. Meanwhile, the median share of renters spending at least 30% of income on rent was 47.5%, reaching 56.8% at the 90th percentile. Vacancy therefore does not automatically indicate affordable or usable rental availability.

Hancock County makes the tension explicit: its ACS vacancy rate was 41.2%, while 72.2% of renters were burdened and renters represented 20.7% of households. ACS vacancy covers the housing stock and is not the Apartment List Vacancy Index or a count of market-ready rentals. Property screening still needs unit condition, vacancy reason, achievable rent and the depth of the local renter pool.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock

06
Physical risk and property tax

Hazard-loss and property-tax burdens separate sharply by county

FEMA assigns inland flood as the mutually exclusive leading-hazard label for 138 counties and hurricane for 21. Across counties, the median climate loss ratio was 0.12% and the 90th percentile was 0.21%. These labels and ratios are county-level screening measures, not evidence that a particular parcel is exposed.

McIntosh County had a 0.61% climate loss ratio and a 0.80% property-tax rate. Stewart County showed a different cost pattern: a 1.53% property-tax rate and a 0.09% climate loss ratio. The county median property-tax rate was 0.86%, with a 90th percentile of 1.12%. This dispersion requires separate parcel, insurance and tax verification because the packet does not provide policy quotes, deductibles or building-specific exposure.

Evidence: FEMA National Risk Index — hazard loss ratios · Census ACS 5-year — effective property tax

State ZIP rental intelligence

How direct rental evidence varies inside Georgia

The distribution uses 31 current published ZIP reports across 13 cities and 8 counties. Twelve measured counter-signals are shown below; this is not a statewide neighborhood ranking.

Published ZIP rent range$1,215$2,241full direct-ZORI report cohort
Median rent / income27.0%annual asking rent ÷ ACS household income
Median one-year growth▲ 1.7%exact direct Zillow endpoints
Renter households covered262,086across published ZCTA matches
01 · RENT DISPERSIONRepresentative direct ZIP ZORI
Horizontal bars compare direct Zillow asking-rent indexes for the twelve representative published ZIP reports.30309$2,24131401$2,19930305$2,12230317$2,04830315$1,89130338$1,81530318$1,80430096$1,67730324$1,65130060$1,56230093$1,33831907$1,215
02 · AFFORDABILITY PRESSURERent / income × observed burden
Horizontal position is annual Zillow asking rent divided by ACS median household income. Vertical position is the ACS share of renter households paying thirty percent or more.72.9%63.5%54.1%44.7%35.2%300963031830093303093032431907303053031530060303383140130317Annual asking rent / ACS household income →ACS renter burden share →
03 · PATH QUALITYOne-year growth × variability
Each point compares exact one-year Zillow asking-rent growth with annualized variability from the direct monthly series.5.3%4.3%3.2%2.2%1.1%300963031830093303093032431907303053031530060303383140130317Exact one-year Zillow rent growth →Annualized monthly variability →
WHAT THE STATE DISTRIBUTION SAYS

Georgia’s within-state picture is wide even before moving from ZIP reports to individual listings. In the current published direct-evidence distribution, June 2026 Zillow ZORI asking rent runs from $1,215 to $2,241, against a $1,802 median—a $1,026 spread. Columbus ZIP 31907 sits at the low endpoint and Atlanta ZIP 30309 at the high endpoint, a useful contrast rather than a statewide ranking. The practical renter question is which local asking-rent level fits a household’s budget and income, and whether its recent path is acceptable; no single Georgia figure answers that. ZORI is an observed asking-rent index, so it should not be read as the price of a specific available unit.

Affordability screen and renter burden tell related but distinct stories. Across the distribution, annualized current asking rent equals 16.1% to 50.3% of ACS median household income, with a 27.0% median. That comparison combines current Zillow asking rent with an area-level income estimate, rather than reporting what an individual household pays. At the low end, Dunwoody ZIP 30338 still has an ACS five-year estimate of 45.4% of renter households at or above the 30% gross-rent burden threshold. Norcross ZIP 30093 instead combines a 33.2% ratio with a 70.4% burden share. The contrast argues for reading prospective asking-rent pressure alongside the distribution of current renter burdens, not substituting either one for the other.

Recent rent direction also should not be mistaken for predictability. Direct monthly Zillow calculations show one-year growth from −4.6% to 4.8%, with a 1.7% median, while annualized volatility ranges from 2.1% to 4.3% and centers on 3.2%. High-variability Norcross ZIP 30093 is at the negative-growth endpoint and has 3.5% volatility. Marietta ZIP 30060, by contrast, has near-flat momentum but the distribution’s highest volatility. Atlanta ZIP 30317 is at the growth endpoint alongside 3.3% volatility. Direction summarizes the net change over a period; volatility measures the variability of the intervening monthly series. A positive growth rate therefore does not establish a smooth path, and a decline does not by itself establish a low-volatility market.

HUD’s supplied FMR/SAFMR comparison is best used as a bedroom-specific administrative benchmark. The asking-rent-to-HUD ratio indicates whether the ZIP-level ZORI reading is below or above that standard, but it does not convert the standard into a market asking rent or a household affordability finding. HUD values can support program or benchmark context; Zillow measures observed asking-rent conditions, and ACS summarizes survey-based ZCTA housing and income conditions. Neither geography nor measure identifies the rent, bedroom count, lease terms, utilities, concessions, availability, or condition of a particular property. Census ZCTAs are statistical areas rather than USPS delivery ZIP codes, and the statewide distribution includes only current published direct-evidence ZIP reports, not every ZIP, neighborhood, or rental home.

Representative direct evidence

Twelve useful contrasts, every one traceable

The statewide summaries use all 31 qualifying reports. The table preserves measured extremes in rent, affordability, burden, momentum, volatility and the HUD benchmark gap.

ZIP reportPlaceZillow rent1Y growthRent / incomeBurden 30%+VariabilityHUD 2BR gap
30096Duluth$1,677▼ 0.5%27.0%61.2%3.1%▲ 75.9%
30318Atlanta$1,804▲ 2.9%26.0%48.2%3.2%▲ 88.0%
30093Norcross$1,338▼ 4.6%33.2%70.4%3.5%▲ 68.6%
30309Atlanta$2,241▲ 3.2%23.6%44.3%2.8%▲ 82.1%
30324Atlanta$1,651▲ 1.7%21.5%53.4%3.2%▲ 62.3%
31907Columbus$1,215▲ 2.0%26.8%51.5%2.1%▲ 111.7%
30305Atlanta$2,122▲ 2.8%23.8%37.7%3.0%▲ 87.3%
30315Atlanta$1,891▲ 4.6%44.6%54.4%3.8%▲ 155.0%
30060Marietta$1,562▼ 0.5%27.8%49.1%4.3%▲ 94.1%
30338Dunwoody$1,815▲ 3.8%16.1%45.4%3.1%▲ 73.2%
31401Savannah$2,199▲ 0.3%50.3%54.1%3.4%▲ 130.9%
30317Atlanta$2,048▲ 4.8%22.8%50.8%3.3%▲ 106.1%
READ BEFORE USING

Zillow ZORI is an observed asking-rent index derived from its ZIP series. It is not a record of lease transactions, advertised unit availability, a representative quote for every dwelling, or the rent that a particular household will be offered.

ACS figures are five-year survey estimates for ZCTAs, which are statistical areas not identical to USPS delivery ZIPs. HUD FMR/SAFMR values are administrative bedroom standards. The distribution contains only current published direct-evidence ZIP reports, not all state ZIPs, neighborhoods, listings, or rental properties.

SOURCE LEDGERCensus ACS five-year — ZCTA housing and incomeACS 2024 5-year ZCTA · pulled 2026-08-08HUD USPS crosswalk and Small Area FMRs — ZIP rent fallbackZIP-CBSA 2025Q4 + SAFMR FY2026 · pulled 2026-07-26Zillow ZORI — ZIP market rentsZORI ZIP 2026-06 · pulled 2026-08-08
Evidence selected for Georgia

The ranges behind the analysis

Each row keeps its own unit and shows the measured 10th percentile, median and 90th percentile. A single-value row is labelled directly.

Price and rent momentumAre home values and asking rents moving together or separating?
10th pct.median90th pct.Home-value change-0.8%2.1%4.4%Asking-rent change0.6%2.2%5.3%Rent minus price0.0%
Employment and household movementDo jobs, household movement and mover income point in the same direction?
10th pct.median90th pct.Job change-1.8%-0.1%1.9%Net migration / 1k1.4Net household movement14,863
Supply and resale conditionsWhat do permits, inventory, marketing time and price cuts say about pressure?
10th pct.median90th pct.Permits / 1k2.35.211.4Months of supply2.9×4.3×6.3×Days on market41 days53 days76 daysListings with cuts22.3%28.4%34.6%
Shape of the state

Distribution before conclusion

A statewide median can hide a wide spread. These SVG charts render at build time and carry no chart library or browser-side data request.

Metro score distribution22 scored metros · median 42.0
00–191020–391140–59060–79180–100
County evidence coverageEvery gap stays visible as missing—not estimated
45%71/159Rent100%159/159Climate100%159/159Migration
Highest measured metro gross yieldsscreening metric only · before expenses and financing
Thomasville8.7%Waycross8.2%Hinesville8.1%LaGrange7.9%Vidalia7.8%Albany7.5%Macon7.4%
Metro leaderboard

Markets touching Georgia

Multi-state CBSAs appear in every member state. Score is still a metro score; no value is reweighted into a statewide ranking.

#MetroScorePriceRentYieldJobs
1Dublin, GA83$176k$1,0637.2%▲ 2.2%
2Milledgeville, GA59$235k$1,2806.5%▲ 2.3%
3Athens, GA56$374k$1,6705.3%▲ 2.3%
4LaGrange, GA56$206k$1,3527.9%▲ 1.4%
5Macon, GA55$202k$1,2547.4%▲ 0.5%
6Augusta, GA51$254k$1,5067.1%▲ 0.5%
7Statesboro, GA50$285k$1,5096.3%▲ 0.7%
8Columbus, GA47$212k$1,2957.3%▼ 0.2%
9Atlanta, GA46$383k$1,8545.8%▲ 0.2%
10Thomasville, GA46$230k$1,6668.7%▼ 0.2%
11Dalton, GA43$252k$1,4627.0%▼ 2.3%
12Gainesville, GA41$393k$1,6785.1%▲ 0.3%

Showing the top 12 scored metros of 27. Unscored metros remain discoverable through the national rankings.

Below the metro line

Largest counties in Georgia

County figures join on the five-digit FIPS code. The table uses measured local values and prints “n/a” wherever a publisher has no record.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Fulton County, GA1,076,561$421k$1,9075.4%inland flooding
Gwinnett County, GA979,864$411k$1,8485.4%inland flooding
Cobb County, GA775,208$429k$1,7524.9%inland flooding
DeKalb County, GA765,351$339k$1,7816.3%inland flooding
Chatham County, GA300,879$340k$1,7816.3%hurricane
Clayton County, GA298,924$231k$1,5968.3%inland flooding
Cherokee County, GA281,032$479k$2,1375.3%inland flooding
Forsyth County, GA267,287$620k$2,3124.5%inland flooding
Henry County, GA249,960$323k$1,8556.9%inland flooding
Hall County, GA212,705$393k$1,6785.1%inland flooding
Richmond County, GA206,069$197k$1,3968.5%inland flooding
Muscogee County, GA203,711$190k$1,2778.1%inland flooding
County yield sample71/159counties have the rent needed to compute yield
Statewide net migration+14,863IRS tax-return households summed across counties
Median investor share8.4%among counties with HMDA purchase records
Bear case

What can break the thesis

  1. Apartment List recent-lease rent, its Vacancy Index, its time-on-market series, Zillow asking rent, Redfin resale conditions and ACS vacancy measure different populations; combining them into one vacancy or rent trend would misstate the evidence.
  2. Local coverage is incomplete: annual metro rent growth covers 22 markets and Redfin resale measures cover 24, versus 27 metros with home-value and permit observations.
  3. Positive migration and mover AGI are aggregate flow measures, while the slightly negative median employment change leaves current tenant absorption unproven.
  4. Reported gross yields exclude operating expenses, repairs, concessions, financing and insurance, so they do not establish net returns.
  5. FEMA leading-hazard labels and county loss ratios cannot establish parcel exposure, insurability or the cost of a specific policy.
Investor questions

Before underwriting a property

Are Georgia rents currently rising or falling?

The direct state recent-lease measure fell 0.8%, while Zillow asking-rent growth had a positive 2.2% median across 22 measured metros. The series differ in definition and coverage, so the packet supports a mixed reading rather than one universal direction.

Does household movement confirm broad rental demand?

Net migration was positive at 14,863, or 1.4 per 1,000 residents, and incoming mover AGI exceeded outgoing AGI. However, median metro employment changed by negative 0.1%, so the packet does not establish broad tenant absorption.

Which highlighted metro has the clearest resale-liquidity concern?

Dublin had 6.7 months of supply, 76 days on market, a 34.6% price-drop share and a 96.5% sale-to-list ratio. These are resale measures and do not establish rental vacancy or time to lease.

Does high county vacancy imply room to raise rents?

No. Hancock County combined 41.2% ACS vacancy with 72.2% renter burden. ACS vacancy is not a count of available, market-ready rentals, and high burden can limit tenant capacity.

Can the packet price physical-risk costs for a property?

No. It identifies county-level leading hazards, climate loss ratios and property-tax rates, but it does not provide parcel exposure, insurance availability, premiums, deductibles or building condition.