States / Mississippi
State rental intelligence

Mississippi rental market data

A source-traced view across 10 metro markets and 82 counties. State figures below are labelled medians and totals—not a made-up statewide investment score.

9/10 metros scored82/82 counties with FEMA risk14 sources used in this analysis
Median scored metro45.0out of 100 · 9 measured metros
Mississippi identity diorama showing regional landscape, cities, housing, and infrastructure
Median metro home value$218kmedian across published metro values
Median metro rent$1,424monthly · published metro values
Median gross yield7.7%annual rent ÷ price · before costs
Median job trend▼ 0.4%trailing 12-month metro employment
Direct monthly rental evidence

Mississippi rent market dynamics

Apartment List measures recent leases, rental vacancy and listing time separately. These figures do not replace Zillow, Census or Realtor measures elsewhere on this page.

Recent-lease rent$1,0972026-07 · ▲ 0.6% year over year
Rental Vacancy Index5.0%2026-07 · −0.7 pp in 12 months
Time on marketn/anot published for this state
US recent-lease rent$1,3882026-07 · ▼ 1.1% year over year
Rent and rental vacancy through timesolid state series · dashed national series · no interpolation across missing observations
Recent-lease rent$1,530$1,076$622Rental Vacancy Index12.7%7.0%1.3%2017-012021-102026-07MississippiUnited States
State research brief

A lower Apartment List vacancy rate and faster measured metro rent growth in Mississippi sit against net out-migration, slightly declining median metro employment and uneven resale liquidity.

Updated 2026-08-08 · evidence current to the releases listed below.

Rental indicators are firmer than the broad demand picture, but their scopes differ. Zillow rent growth had a 4.4% median across nine measured metros, versus 1.8% median home-value growth across 10. Separately, Apartment List's Mississippi recent-lease rent rose 0.6% while its Vacancy Index fell from 5.7% to 5.0%. At the same time, median employment change across 10 metros was -0.4%, and measured county migration was -3,063 people.

For screening, the combination supports local rent and occupancy verification rather than a statewide demand conclusion. Resale conditions, renter strain and hazard-loss measures vary substantially across the covered areas. The packet cannot establish property-level occupancy, collections, condition, insurance cost or net operating income. It also supplies no Mississippi rental time-on-market figure, so the state rent and vacancy series cannot establish leasing speed.

01

Apartment List vacancy fell to 5.0% while recent-lease rent rose 0.6% → screen for locally supported occupancy before assuming broad rent acceleration

02

Measured metro rent growth exceeded home-value growth by 2.5 percentage points → gross-yield screens may improve where quoted rents are realizable

03

Median metro employment fell 0.4% and net migration was -3,063, while three highlighted metros added jobs → demand screening must remain metro-specific

04

Resale supply and marketing time were widely dispersed → acquisition models need locality-specific exit periods and discount assumptions

05

Median county renter burden was 48.9% → test achievable rent and collection durability rather than relying only on asking-rent growth

01
Direct state rental dynamics

Vacancy tightened while recent-lease rent barely increased

Apartment List's Mississippi recent-lease rent was $1,097 in July 2026, up from $1,090 a year earlier, or 0.6%. Its separate Vacancy Index fell by 0.7 percentage points, from 5.7% to 5.0%. That is a firmer occupancy signal than the small rent increase alone would suggest, but neither measure identifies which local markets or property types account for the change.

The counter-signal is relative rather than absolute: the supplied national recent-lease rent measure fell 1.1%, while Mississippi rose, and Mississippi's vacancy rate was 2.1 percentage points below the national measure. These are Apartment List series, not Zillow rent or Census vacancy. No Mississippi time-on-market observation is supplied, so they do not show how quickly vacant units leased.

Evidence: Apartment List Rent Estimates — recent-lease rent index · Apartment List Time on Market — listing liquidity · Apartment List Vacancy Index — rental vacancy

02
Price and rent momentum

Measured metro rents rose faster than home values

Zillow rent growth had a 4.4% median across nine measured metros, while home-value growth had a 1.8% median across 10. The supplied difference is 2.5 percentage points. Rent growth ranged from 2.3% at the 10th percentile to 5.9% at the 90th, whereas home-value growth ranged from -0.2% to 4.3%.

Meridian, MS illustrates the separation: measured rent rose 7.2% while home value rose 0.1%. Its supplied gross-yield screen was 13.9%, based on a $122,080 value and $1,412 monthly rent. That ratio is not a net return and does not account for vacancy, repairs, taxes, insurance, management or whether the quoted rent is achievable for a specific property.

Evidence: Zillow ZHVI — metro home values · Zillow ZORI — metro market rents

03
Employment and household movement

Broad demand is soft, but job growth has local exceptions

Employment change had a -0.4% median across 10 measured metros, with a 10th-to-90th-percentile range from -1.0% to 1.2%. Migration records covering 81 counties showed a net loss of 3,063 people, equal to -1.0 per 1,000 residents. Those measures caution against treating tighter state rental vacancy as proof of broad household-demand growth.

Local and income-based counter-signals are present. Employment rose 2.9% in Oxford, MS, 1.0% in Starkville, MS and 0.8% in Laurel, MS. Inbound mover aggregate adjusted gross income also exceeded outbound mover income by $97,027 despite the population outflow. These exceptions support market-specific screening, but they do not establish rental absorption or tenant income at an individual asset.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — population · BLS CES — payroll employment · BLS LAUS — resident employment · IRS SOI — county migration and mover income

04
Supply and resale conditions

Building volume and resale pressure do not move in lockstep

Across eight metros with Redfin supply and marketing measures, months of supply ran from 2.9 at the 10th percentile to 17.7 at the 90th. Median days on market spanned 25.7 to 82.0 over the same percentile range, and the median share with price drops was 27.6%. These distributions imply materially different resale assumptions across covered metros.

Gulfport, MS had 3,390 permitted units, or 8.05 per 1,000 residents, alongside 3.7 months of resale supply, 49 days on market and a 28.2% price-drop share. Starkville, MS presented a different mix: 9.0 months of supply and 89 days on market, but only 11.1% price drops and a 101.3% sale-to-list measure. A long marketing period therefore does not, by itself, establish the eventual discount or depth of buyer demand.

Evidence: Census Building Permits Survey — permitted units · Redfin Data Center — inventory, days on market, and price cuts

05
Housing stock and tenant conditions

High housing vacancy coexists with substantial renter strain

ACS housing vacancy across all 82 counties had a 16.8% median and a 10th-to-90th-percentile range of 10.8% to 23.5%. The median renter share was 25.1%. This is vacancy across the housing stock, not Apartment List rental vacancy, and it cannot identify whether vacant units are rentable, habitable or available at current market terms.

At the same time, the median county share of renters paying at least 30% of income toward rent was 48.9%, reaching 58.8% at the 90th percentile. The highlighted burden rates were 74.5% in Jefferson Davis County, 72.9% in Wayne County and 65.8% in Greene County. High total housing vacancy therefore does not establish affordable, usable rental supply, while the burden measures limit what can be inferred from asking-rent growth.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock

06
Physical risk and property tax

County hazard-loss and tax screens can materially alter entry economics

FEMA's mutually exclusive leading-hazard labels classify 73 counties under inland flood, eight under hurricane and one under earthquake. These counts do not overlap, but a county's leading label is not parcel-level exposure. The county FEMA loss-ratio median was 0.159%, versus 0.237% at the 90th percentile. Highlighted ratios were 0.501% in George County, 0.408% in Pearl River County and 0.397% in Jackson County.

Effective property-tax rates had a 0.69% county median and a 0.93% 90th percentile. The highlighted rates were 1.12% in Coahoma County, 1.06% in Quitman County and 1.03% in Grenada County. These measures can refine an initial expense screen, but neither FEMA county ratios nor ACS tax measures substitute for parcel quotes, current assessments or insurance terms.

Evidence: FEMA National Risk Index — hazard loss ratios · Census ACS 5-year — effective property tax

Evidence selected for Mississippi

The ranges behind the analysis

Each row keeps its own unit and shows the measured 10th percentile, median and 90th percentile. A single-value row is labelled directly.

Price and rent momentumAre home values and asking rents moving together or separating?
10th pct.median90th pct.Home-value change-0.2%1.8%4.3%Asking-rent change2.3%4.4%5.9%Rent minus price2.5%
Employment and household movementDo jobs, household movement and mover income point in the same direction?
10th pct.median90th pct.Job change-1.0%-0.4%1.2%Net migration / 1k-1.0Net household movement-3,063
Supply and resale conditionsWhat do permits, inventory, marketing time and price cuts say about pressure?
10th pct.median90th pct.Permits / 1k0.31.77.9Months of supply2.9×3.7×17.7×Days on market26 days41 days82 daysListings with cuts17.3%27.6%33.5%
Shape of the state

Distribution before conclusion

A statewide median can hide a wide spread. These SVG charts render at build time and carry no chart library or browser-side data request.

Metro score distribution9 scored metros · median 45.0
00–19320–39540–59160–79080–100
County evidence coverageEvery gap stays visible as missing—not estimated
18%15/82Rent100%82/82Climate99%81/82Migration
Highest measured metro gross yieldsscreening metric only · before expenses and financing
Meridian13.9%Columbus8.9%Laurel8.7%Jackson8.3%Gulfport7.8%Hattiesburg7.5%Tupelo7.5%
Metro leaderboard

Markets touching Mississippi

Multi-state CBSAs appear in every member state. Score is still a metro score; no value is reweighted into a statewide ranking.

#MetroScorePriceRentYieldJobs
1Oxford, MS61$413k$2,1086.1%▲ 2.9%
2Starkville, MS59$258k$1,5717.3%▲ 1.0%
3Hattiesburg, MS49$221k$1,3887.5%▼ 0.4%
4Tupelo, MS46$198k$1,2417.5%▼ 0.9%
5Gulfport, MS45$225k$1,4597.8%▲ 0.4%
6Meridian, MS41$122k$1,41213.9%▼ 2.4%
7Columbus, MS37$188k$1,3968.9%▼ 0.9%
8Jackson, MS35$216k$1,4898.3%▼ 0.8%
9Memphis, TN28$248k$1,4356.9%▼ 0.4%

Showing the top 9 scored metros of 10. Unscored metros remain discoverable through the national rankings.

Below the metro line

Largest counties in Mississippi

County figures join on the five-digit FIPS code. The table uses measured local values and prints “n/a” wherever a publisher has no record.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Hinds County, MS218,533$133k$1,30511.8%inland flooding
Harrison County, MS210,891$229k$1,4727.7%hurricane
DeSoto County, MS191,301$303k$1,6766.6%inland flooding
Rankin County, MS158,854$270k$1,6887.5%inland flooding
Jackson County, MS145,249$216k$1,4277.9%hurricane
Madison County, MS111,647$338k$1,6045.7%inland flooding
Lee County, MS83,034$215k$1,2687.1%inland flooding
Forrest County, MS78,272$191k$1,1557.3%inland flooding
Lauderdale County, MS71,504$127k$1,41213.4%inland flooding
Jones County, MS66,472$161k$1,1338.5%inland flooding
Lamar County, MS65,713$271k$1,4746.5%inland flooding
Lafayette County, MS58,327$413k$2,1086.1%inland flooding
County yield sample15/82counties have the rent needed to compute yield
Statewide net migration−3,063IRS tax-return households summed across counties
Median investor share7.3%among counties with HMDA purchase records
Bear case

What can break the thesis

  1. Apartment List recent-lease rent rose only 0.6% while the Zillow metro-rent median rose 4.4%; different definitions and coverage prevent treating either as a complete statewide rent trend.
  2. Net out-migration and a negative median metro employment change could undermine rent or occupancy performance outside the measured job-growth pockets.
  3. High renter burden may constrain additional rent increases or weaken collections even where asking-rent measures are rising.
  4. Supplied gross yields omit vacancy, concessions, repairs, management, taxes, insurance and financing, so headline ratios may not survive property underwriting.
  5. County leading-hazard labels and loss ratios do not establish parcel exposure, insurability or premiums; the packet also lacks a Mississippi rental time-on-market measure.
Investor questions

Before underwriting a property

Do the figures establish strong statewide rent growth?

No. Apartment List's Mississippi recent-lease rent rose 0.6%, while Zillow rent growth had a 4.4% median across nine measured metros. The series use different definitions and coverage and should not be blended into one statewide rate.

Does tighter Apartment List vacancy overcome the weak demand indicators?

Not by itself. The Vacancy Index fell to 5.0%, but median metro employment was down 0.4% and measured county migration was -3,063. The packet cannot connect those state and local measures to a particular property's occupancy.

Are there measurable demand counter-signals?

Yes. Employment increased 2.9% in Oxford, MS, 1.0% in Starkville, MS and 0.8% in Laurel, MS, and inbound mover aggregate income exceeded outbound income by $97,027. These are local or income-based exceptions, not proof of statewide rental demand.

Can total county housing vacancy be used as a rental-vacancy assumption?

No. The ACS county measure covers the full housing stock and had a 16.8% median. It is separate from Apartment List's 5.0% rental Vacancy Index and does not show whether vacant homes are rentable, habitable or currently offered.

Can the FEMA leading-hazard counts set property-level insurance costs?

No. They identify each county's one leading hazard and do not measure parcel exposure, coverage availability, deductibles or premiums. Property-level quotes and location checks remain outside the packet.