States / Oregon
State rental intelligence

Oregon rental market data

A source-traced view across 17 metro markets and 36 counties. State figures below are labelled medians and totals—not a made-up statewide investment score.

17/17 metros scored36/36 counties with FEMA risk14 sources used in this analysis
Median scored metro40.0out of 100 · 17 measured metros
Oregon identity diorama showing regional landscape, cities, housing, and infrastructure
Median metro home value$414kmedian across published metro values
Median metro rent$1,627monthly · published metro values
Median gross yield4.8%annual rent ÷ price · before costs
Median job trend▲ 0.1%trailing 12-month metro employment
Direct monthly rental evidence

Oregon rent market dynamics

Apartment List measures recent leases, rental vacancy and listing time separately. These figures do not replace Zillow, Census or Realtor measures elsewhere on this page.

Recent-lease rent$1,4592026-07 · ▼ 1.7% year over year
Rental Vacancy Index6.5%2026-07 · +0.5 pp in 12 months
Time on market32 days2026-07 · +2 days in 12 months
US recent-lease rent$1,3882026-07 · ▼ 1.1% year over year
Rent and rental vacancy through timesolid state series · dashed national series · no interpolation across missing observations
Recent-lease rent$1,617$1,313$1,009Rental Vacancy Index7.9%5.5%3.0%2017-012021-102026-07OregonUnited States
State research brief

Across measured metros, asking rents outran home values, yet Oregon's recent-lease rent fell as rental vacancy and marketing time rose.

Updated 2026-08-08 · evidence current to the releases listed below.

Oregon presents a sharp measurement split. Across 17 metros, Zillow asking rents rose a median 3.0% year over year while home values rose 0.4%, a 2.6-percentage-point gap. Apartment List's separate July 2026 state series moved the other way: recent-lease rent fell 1.7%, its Vacancy Index increased by 0.5 percentage points and time on market lengthened by 1.7 days.

For screening, the positive metro asking-rent spread is a lead rather than a statewide underwriting assumption. It should be reconciled with property-level achieved rents, concessions and lease-up evidence. The packet cannot establish a statewide forecast or neighborhood economics: county Zillow rent covers 24 of 36 counties, year-over-year county rent covers 22, and parcel-level operating costs and insurance exposure are absent.

01

Median Zillow asking-rent growth of 3.0% exceeded median home-value growth of 0.4% across 17 metros → investigate local rent-to-price improvement rather than applying the median statewide.

02

Apartment List recent-lease rent fell 1.7% as its Vacancy Index rose 0.5 percentage points and time on market added 1.7 days → require achieved-rent and lease-up support for near-term revenue assumptions.

03

Median metro job growth was 0.05% and statewide IRS net migration was -97 → do not rely on broad employment or population expansion to support rent growth.

04

Median for-sale supply was 3.8 months and 31.0% of listings had price drops → acquisition negotiation may be possible, but exit liquidity must be tested by locality.

05

Median metro gross yield was 4.8% while the median county rent-burden share was 50.5% → screen both operating-cost sensitivity and tenant affordability before ranking markets.

01
Price and rent momentum

Asking rents gained 2.6 points on home values

Across 17 measured metros, median Zillow asking-rent growth was 3.0%, versus 0.4% for home values. The supplied difference was 2.6 percentage points. Rent growth ranged from 0.2% at the 10th percentile to 5.5% at the 90th, while value growth ranged from -1.3% to 2.9%.

Coos Bay showed the strongest listed separation: rent rose 9.8% while value fell 2.0%, an 11.8-percentage-point difference by calculation. Its measured value was $354,901, rent was $1,580 and gross yield was 5.3%. La Grande was more balanced, with rent up 6.9% and value up 5.7%; Roseburg recorded 4.6% rent growth and 0.9% value growth. These differences make local rent verification more useful than the statewide median.

Evidence: Zillow ZHVI — metro home values · Zillow ZORI — metro market rents

02
Direct state rental dynamics

Recent leases weakened even with below-national vacancy

Apartment List's separate July 2026 state series supplies the principal counter-signal. Recent-lease rent was $1,459, down 1.7% from $1,484 a year earlier. Its Vacancy Index rose from 6.0% to 6.5%, a 0.5-percentage-point increase, while time on market increased from 30.3 to 32.0 days.

Oregon's Vacancy Index remained 0.6 percentage points below the national 7.2%, but state time on market was two days longer than the national 30.0 days. Oregon's rent decline was also 0.6 percentage points steeper than the national 1.1% decline. Rent, vacancy and time on market are separate Apartment List series; together they support conservative lease assumptions but do not explain the metro Zillow divergence or identify which localities drove it.

Evidence: Apartment List Rent Estimates — recent-lease rent index · Apartment List Time on Market — listing liquidity · Apartment List Vacancy Index — rental vacancy

03
Employment and household movement

Migration was flat while job growth split

Employment growth was nearly flat at the median of 17 metros: 0.05% year over year, with the 10th-to-90th-percentile range running from -1.3% to 1.1%. Salem, The Dalles and La Grande were stronger measured exceptions at 1.4%, 1.1% and 1.0%, respectively.

The older IRS 2022-2023 migration series recorded 127,721 arrivals and 127,818 departures across all 36 counties, for net migration of -97, or -0.023 per 1,000 residents. A positive $181,862 aggregate AGI gap is a counter-signal, but it does not measure the number of current tenants or current wage growth. The differing periods and near-zero statewide totals do not support a broad demand-growth assumption.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — population · BLS CES — payroll employment · BLS LAUS — resident employment · IRS SOI — county migration and mover income

04
Supply and resale conditions

Permitting did not remove resale friction

The median measured metro had 3.8 months of for-sale supply, 36 days on market, a 98.9% sale-to-list ratio and price drops on 31.0% of listings. Dispersion was material: months of supply ran from 2.9 to 5.6 and marketing time from 14.6 to 53.4 days between the 10th and 90th percentiles.

Bend recorded 2,540 permits, or 9.85 per 1,000 residents, alongside 4.3 months of supply, 29 days on market and price drops on 33.7% of listings. Ontario had 352 permits, 2.8 months of supply and 53 days on market; Corvallis had 558 permits, 3.6 months of supply and 51 days on market. Permit and resale measures differ in timing and concept, so permits should not be treated as current rental vacancy. The combination instead flags locality-specific acquisition and exit conditions.

Evidence: Census Building Permits Survey — permitted units · Redfin Data Center — inventory, days on market, and price cuts

05
Housing stock and tenant conditions

Tenant burden is high, but county vacancy is not rental availability

Across 36 counties, the median share of renters spending at least 30% of income on rent was 50.5%, with a 10th-to-90th-percentile range of 38.3% to 55.9%. Benton County reached 62.7% while its ACS housing vacancy rate was 5.9% and renter share was 43.1%. Crook County and Jackson County recorded rent-burden shares of 56.6% and 55.9%.

The median county ACS housing vacancy rate was 12.0%, but the range was wide at 5.1% to 22.8%. Tillamook County, Lincoln County and Clatsop County were higher at 37.9%, 29.2% and 23.1%. Because this is overall ACS housing vacancy rather than the Apartment List Vacancy Index or a count of units offered for long-term rent, it cannot establish lease-up availability.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock

06
Entry cost and affordability

Headline yields cluster near 5% amid uneven affordability

Across 17 metros, the median measured home value was $414,303, rent was $1,627 and gross yield was 4.8%. Gross yields ranged from 3.9% to 5.1% between the 10th and 90th percentiles. The median price-to-income ratio was 6.0, median rent-to-income was 27.9% and the median Zillow rent was 109.8% of the HUD two-bedroom Fair Market Rent.

Hermiston paired a $316,072 value with $1,448 rent, a 5.5% gross yield and 25.4% rent-to-income ratio. Coos Bay's yield was 5.3%, but rent-to-income was higher at 30.5%; Medford's yield was 5.0% with a $441,520 value and $1,841 rent. These are pre-expense market screens, not net returns, applicant qualification tests or evidence that the HUD standard is achievable for a particular unit.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — household income and gross rent · HUD Fair Market Rents — Section 8 standard · Zillow ZHVI — metro home values · Zillow ZORI — metro market rents

State ZIP rental intelligence

How direct rental evidence varies inside Oregon

The distribution uses 24 current published ZIP reports across 7 cities and 6 counties. Twelve measured counter-signals are shown below; this is not a statewide neighborhood ranking.

Published ZIP rent range$1,523$2,347full direct-ZORI report cohort
Median rent / income25.1%annual asking rent ÷ ACS household income
Median one-year growth▲ 0.5%exact direct Zillow endpoints
Renter households covered179,195across published ZCTA matches
01 · RENT DISPERSIONRepresentative direct ZIP ZORI
Horizontal bars compare direct Zillow asking-rent indexes for the twelve representative published ZIP reports.97702$2,34797229$2,17097206$1,88097124$1,85997006$1,84197203$1,81897402$1,80597209$1,75597330$1,72997401$1,69097205$1,65997230$1,523
02 · AFFORDABILITY PRESSURERent / income × observed burden
Horizontal position is annual Zillow asking rent divided by ACS median household income. Vertical position is the ACS share of renter households paying thirty percent or more.62.0%56.4%50.9%45.4%39.9%974019720997124974029700697330972299720697702972309720397205Annual asking rent / ACS household income →ACS renter burden share →
03 · PATH QUALITYOne-year growth × variability
Each point compares exact one-year Zillow asking-rent growth with annualized variability from the direct monthly series.4.9%3.9%2.9%1.8%0.8%974019720997124974029700697330972299720697702972309720397205Exact one-year Zillow rent growth →Annualized monthly variability →
WHAT THE STATE DISTRIBUTION SAYS

Across Oregon’s 24 current published direct-evidence ZIP reports, Zillow’s observed asking-rent index has a wide current range: $1,523 to $2,347 per month, with a $1,801 median. The lower endpoint is Portland’s 97230 and the upper endpoint is Bend’s 97702, a useful reminder that a state-level figure cannot answer a household’s location-specific budget question. The practical screen is sequential: identify the applicable asking-rent level, then test whether household income and historical rent movement fit the renter’s tolerance. This distribution is a reported-evidence set—not a census of every Oregon ZIP, neighborhood, or rental property—and the rent measure is Zillow ZORI, an observed asking-rent index rather than a signed-lease or property-specific quote.

Affordability and renter burden point to related but noninterchangeable pressures. At the report median, the current asking-rent-to-median-household-income ratio is 25.1%, while 49.5% of renter households are estimated by ACS to spend at least 30% of income on gross rent. The former pairs the current ZORI index with an area median household income; the latter describes the distribution of renter households facing a gross-rent threshold. For contrast, 97229 posts a 16.1% asking-rent-to-income ratio whereas 97401 reaches 39.0% on that measure. In the latter area, a $1,690 monthly asking-rent index implies $67,600 in annual income under the conventional threshold, above its $52,022 area median household income. ACS values are five-year ZCTA estimates, and ZCTAs are statistical areas rather than identical to USPS delivery ZIPs.

Momentum has not been uniform, and it should not be read as a volatility ranking. Recent annual Zillow growth spans a 4.2% decline in Hillsboro’s 97124 to a 7.3% increase in Portland’s 97203. Their annualized volatilities, 2.7% and 3.3%, respectively, show that direction and month-to-month variability convey different information. Across the reported set, annualized volatility ranges from 1.8% in 97206 to 3.9% in 97205, while the latter also recorded the deepest maximum drawdown, 11.4%. These are calculations from the direct monthly Zillow series: cooling, accelerating, or high-variability labels summarize observed paths, not predictions about the next rent change.

HUD serves a different decision purpose. The two-bedroom FMR/SAFMR benchmark is an administrative bedroom standard, not an asking-rent estimate; across these reports, direct asking rent is 79.2% to 169.5% of the benchmark. The upper end occurs in 97702, but that comparison should not be used to turn either figure into a price for a particular home. A ZORI index and a HUD bedroom standard do not identify any unit’s bedroom count, lease terms, or actual transaction rent. Use the benchmark for its programmatic two-bedroom context and the direct series for ZIP-level asking-rent movement, keeping neither as a substitute for property-level evidence.

Representative direct evidence

Twelve useful contrasts, every one traceable

The statewide summaries use all 24 qualifying reports. The table preserves measured extremes in rent, affordability, burden, momentum, volatility and the HUD benchmark gap.

ZIP reportPlaceZillow rent1Y growthRent / incomeBurden 30%+VariabilityHUD 2BR gap
97401Eugene$1,690▲ 4.8%39.0%59.2%3.0%▲ 100.1%
97209Portland$1,755▲ 0.4%26.2%43.2%2.2%▲ 91.3%
97124Hillsboro$1,859▼ 4.2%20.3%42.4%2.7%▲ 96.7%
97402Eugene$1,805▲ 1.0%37.6%55.4%2.3%▲ 106.9%
97006Beaverton$1,841▼ 2.1%21.1%44.3%2.3%▲ 95.8%
97330Corvallis$1,729▲ 4.0%29.3%59.5%2.4%▲ 94.8%
97229Portland$2,170▼ 1.9%16.1%46.5%2.4%▲ 112.9%
97206Portland$1,880▲ 3.0%22.9%47.4%1.8%▲ 97.8%
97702Bend$2,347▲ 5.9%29.3%43.2%2.8%▲ 169.5%
97230Portland$1,523▲ 0.3%24.2%54.9%2.7%▲ 79.2%
97203Portland$1,818▲ 7.3%27.7%50.8%3.3%▲ 94.6%
97205Portland$1,659▲ 0.3%34.8%50.5%3.9%▲ 86.3%
READ BEFORE USING

Zillow ZORI is an observed asking-rent index at ZIP geography. It is not a record of executed leases, and it cannot establish the rent, availability, bedroom count, or terms of an individual property.

ACS housing, income, and burden measures are five-year estimates for Census ZCTAs, which are statistical areas rather than USPS delivery ZIPs. HUD FMR/SAFMR values are administrative bedroom standards and should not be treated as asking-rent observations.

SOURCE LEDGERCensus ACS five-year — ZCTA housing and incomeACS 2024 5-year ZCTA · pulled 2026-08-08HUD USPS crosswalk and Small Area FMRs — ZIP rent fallbackZIP-CBSA 2025Q4 + SAFMR FY2026 · pulled 2026-07-26Zillow ZORI — ZIP market rentsZORI ZIP 2026-06 · pulled 2026-08-08
Evidence selected for Oregon

The ranges behind the analysis

Each row keeps its own unit and shows the measured 10th percentile, median and 90th percentile. A single-value row is labelled directly.

Price and rent momentumAre home values and asking rents moving together or separating?
10th pct.median90th pct.Home-value change-1.3%0.4%2.9%Asking-rent change0.2%3.0%5.5%Rent minus price2.6%
Employment and household movementDo jobs, household movement and mover income point in the same direction?
10th pct.median90th pct.Job change-1.3%0.1%1.1%Net migration / 1k-0.0Net household movement-97
Supply and resale conditionsWhat do permits, inventory, marketing time and price cuts say about pressure?
10th pct.median90th pct.Permits / 1k1.62.45.9Months of supply2.9×3.8×5.6×Days on market15 days36 days53 daysListings with cuts26.7%31.0%35.9%
Shape of the state

Distribution before conclusion

A statewide median can hide a wide spread. These SVG charts render at build time and carry no chart library or browser-side data request.

Metro score distribution17 scored metros · median 40.0
10–19720–39840–59160–79080–100
County evidence coverageEvery gap stays visible as missing—not estimated
67%24/36Rent100%36/36Climate100%36/36Migration
Highest measured metro gross yieldsscreening metric only · before expenses and financing
Hermiston5.5%Coos Bay5.3%Medford5.0%Ontario5.0%Newport5.0%Grants Pass4.9%Roseburg4.9%
Metro leaderboard

Markets touching Oregon

Multi-state CBSAs appear in every member state. Score is still a metro score; no value is reweighted into a statewide ranking.

#MetroScorePriceRentYieldJobs
1La Grande, OR69$339k$1,3414.7%▲ 1.0%
2Hermiston, OR54$316k$1,4485.5%▲ 0.9%
3Roseburg, OR52$346k$1,3984.9%▲ 0.3%
4Ontario, OR51$378k$1,5635.0%▲ 0.5%
5Astoria, OR49$523k$1,5603.6%▲ 0.8%
6Coos Bay, OR48$355k$1,5805.3%▼ 0.1%
7Salem, OR45$455k$1,6264.3%▲ 1.4%
8The Dalles, OR44$407k$1,6304.8%▲ 1.1%
9Medford, OR40$442k$1,8415.0%▲ 0.1%
10Klamath Falls, OR38$316k$1,2744.8%▲ 0.1%
11Bend, OR37$672k$2,2053.9%▼ 0.4%
12Eugene, OR32$464k$1,7894.6%▼ 1.3%

Showing the top 12 scored metros of 17. Unscored metros remain discoverable through the national rankings.

Below the metro line

Largest counties in Oregon

County figures join on the five-digit FIPS code. The table uses measured local values and prints “n/a” wherever a publisher has no record.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Multnomah County, OR801,477$511k$1,6884.0%earthquake
Washington County, OR603,947$569k$1,9114.0%earthquake
Clackamas County, OR423,975$623k$1,8963.6%inland flooding
Lane County, OR384,207$464k$1,7894.6%inland flooding
Marion County, OR349,244$447k$1,5974.3%earthquake
Jackson County, OR222,645$442k$1,8415.0%inland flooding
Deschutes County, OR206,334$672k$2,2053.9%inland flooding
Linn County, OR130,706$414k$1,6394.8%inland flooding
Douglas County, OR112,072$346k$1,3984.9%inland flooding
Yamhill County, OR108,734$512k$2,0034.7%earthquake
Benton County, OR96,303$564k$1,8073.9%earthquake
Polk County, OR89,662$486k$1,7864.4%inland flooding
County yield sample24/36counties have the rent needed to compute yield
Statewide net migration−97IRS tax-return households summed across counties
Median investor share4.9%among counties with HMDA purchase records
Bear case

What can break the thesis

  1. Zillow asking rents and Apartment List recent-lease rents measure different market segments; treating either series as a complete statewide rent measure could invalidate the thesis.
  2. County Zillow rent covers 24 of 36 counties, year-over-year county rent covers 22 and county listing measures cover 25, limiting conclusions about omitted areas.
  3. Gross yield excludes financing, maintenance, taxes, insurance, vacancy and concessions, so the apparent ordering of markets may not survive a net-income screen.
  4. ACS housing vacancy includes units not necessarily offered for long-term rent, so high county vacancy cannot be converted into a lease-up or competition estimate.
  5. Oregon's county-leading FEMA hazard labels are mutually exclusive summaries rather than parcel exposure, and the packet contains no property-specific insurance pricing.
Investor questions

Before underwriting a property

Should an Oregon acquisition be underwritten to 3.0% rent growth?

Not from this packet alone. The 3.0% figure is the median Zillow asking-rent change across 17 metros, while Apartment List's separate state recent-lease measure fell 1.7%. Property-level achieved rents and concessions are needed.

Which measured metro had the clearest rent-versus-price separation?

Coos Bay: asking rent rose 9.8% while home value fell 2.0%, an 11.8-percentage-point difference by calculation. Its 5.3% gross yield remains a pre-expense measure.

Does measured demand broadly support higher rents?

The evidence is mixed and not broad. Median metro job growth was 0.05%, IRS net migration was -97, and the positive aggregate AGI gap was $181,862. Salem, The Dalles and La Grande had stronger job growth, but they do not establish statewide demand.

Where does the packet flag slower resale conditions?

Albany, Klamath Falls and Newport recorded 56, 54 and 53 median days on market. Klamath Falls and Newport also had 5.0 and 6.5 months of supply and sale-to-list ratios of 96.7% and 96.3%, respectively.

Does the 12.0% median county vacancy rate indicate available rentals?

No. It is the median ACS housing vacancy rate across counties and includes housing not identified as available for long-term rent. It must not be blended with Apartment List's separate 6.5% state Vacancy Index.