Counties / Maryland / Montgomery County

Montgomery County, MD

FIPS 24031 · population 1,065,949 · part of Washington, DC

$627k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
Direct county rent answer

What does rent cost in Montgomery County, MD?

The latest county-level Zillow ZORI is $2,346 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

County Zillow ZORI$2,3462026-06 · down 0.3% year over year
County ACS gross rent$2,068ACS 2024 5-year · occupied-renter survey
HUD two-bedroom FMR$2,246FY2026 · administrative standard
HUD Fair Market Rent by bedroom count in Montgomery County
BedroomsHUD monthly FMRGeographyMeasurement boundary
Studio$1,953Montgomery County, MDHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
1 bedroom$2,015Montgomery County, MDHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
2 bedrooms$2,246Montgomery County, MDHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
3 bedrooms$2,835Montgomery County, MDHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
4 bedrooms$3,332Montgomery County, MDHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.

Zillow asking rent, ACS gross rent and HUD FMR describe different housing universes. They remain separate and no metro, city or neighboring-county value replaces missing county evidence.Zillow pulled 2026-07-26 · HUD pulled 2026-07-26

The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$627k
▼ 1.4% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
Median asking rent
$2,346
▼ 0.3% year over year
Zillow ZORI · direct
Gross yield
4.5%
annual rent ÷ price, before costs
derived: rent × 12 ÷ price ✓
HUD 2-bed standard
$2,246
market rent is 1.04x the standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

The annual signals disagree
FHFA five-year cumulative+35.1%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06−1.4%FHFA HPI2025+1.3%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-08-02.
Owner-reported value$640k
Surveyed gross rent$2,068
Rent burden 30%+51.6%
Median year built1980
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
4.3%vacant
406,531estimated housing units
Occupied tenure34.7% renter
owner 65.3%renter 34.7%
Structure mix64.4% single-family
Single-family 64.4%20+ units 20.2%Mobile home 0.2%Other 15.2%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs456,246▼ 1.3% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments36,634annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,853▲ 2.0% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorProfessional and business services26.5% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS−1.3%WEEKLY WAGE+2.0%Professional and business services26.5%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2021-2025; latest 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-08-02. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

Resident income

How local income has compounded

BEA per-capita personal income divides all personal income by the county population. It is broader than wages, but it is not household income or a measure of what renters can afford.

Per-capita personal income19692024
Per-capita personal income history for Montgomery CountyA line chart of annual BEA per-capita personal income from 1969 through 2024.$0k$55k$110k196919972024$6k$105k
Nominal annual dollars; not adjusted for inflation. A rising line can reflect wage, business-income, transfer-income and investment-income changes together.
Renter affordability

Who carries the heaviest rent burden

HUD CHAS separates renter households by income relative to local HAMFI. Moderate burden means housing costs above 30% through 50% of income; severe burden means more than 50%.

Share of renter households in each income band2018-2022
Renter cost burden by HAMFI income band in Montgomery CountyFive horizontal bars show moderate and severe housing cost burden shares among renter households in each HUD income band.0%25%50%75%100%At or below 30% HAMFI30,99079.8% burdened30–50% HAMFI21,42086.9% burdened50–80% HAMFI13,95061.6% burdened80–100% HAMFI14,27536.8% burdenedAbove 100% HAMFI52,1957.4% burdened
Moderate: >30% to 50%Severe: >50%
Each percentage uses HUD’s published subtotal for that income band. For disclosure, HUD keeps 0 as 0, publishes 1–7 households as 4 and rounds 8 or more to the nearest 5. Independently rounded categories can differ from their displayed sum and are not forced into a percentage.
Direct local rental evidence

Recent leases and rental-market liquidity in Montgomery County, MD

These Apartment List observations match the exact county Census code 24031. They are kept separate from Zillow asking rent, Census occupied-home rent and wider metro measures.

Direct recent-lease rent history

Monthly overall-rent index; missing observations are not filled from another geography.

$2,100$1,983$1,8662021-082026-07
Recent-lease rent$2,0382026-07 · -2.8% year over year
Rental vacancy6.2%2026-07 · +0.1 percentage points year over year
Time on market32 days2026-07 · +1.7 days year over year
County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Montgomery County presents an underwriting tension: a published market-rent yield and rising covered-worker wages sit beside softer price and MLS listing signals, net out-migration, and inland-flood exposure. Buyers who can verify a property-level lease and flood cost should investigate acquisition basis; those relying on near-term resale, FMR support, or broad county averages should be cautious. County-level evidence does not establish neighborhood tenant depth, insurance, or condition.

02Housing economics

At Zillow’s county 2026-06 observation, the $627,198 median home value was down 1.43% and the $2,346 monthly median asking rent was down 0.32%. The supplied gross yield is 4.49% before costs. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard, not asking rent; it cannot substitute for the measured market rent. The effective property-tax rate is 0.87%, a carrying cost to test against the yield. FHFA’s 2025 annual repeat-transaction HPI, not a home value, rose 1.32%. That reading cannot be averaged with Zillow’s decline because their methods and vintages differ.

03Demand & competition

Realtor.com’s 2026-06 MLS evidence describes the visible listing market: median listing price fell 8.26%, active listings rose 14.22%, median marketing time was 37 days, and 18.29% of listings had a price reduction. These are asking prices, visible supply, marketing time, and seller concessions—not closing prices or proof of buyer demand alone. Tax-return movers show more households left than arrived and a higher average AGI among leavers, weakening the interpretation of migration as a purely volume statistic. The 5.84% investor share of 8,709 purchase mortgages identifies a buyer cohort, not all-cash activity or competitive intensity.

04Risk & next checks

The modeled annual climate-loss ratio is 0.06% of building value, aligned with inland flood but not a property loss estimate; it warrants parcel flood-zone, elevation, drainage, insurance-quote, deductible, and coverage review. Supplied QCEW annual data cover jobs at county workplaces: employment fell while average weekly wage rose, and Professional and business services was the largest disclosed private supersector, not the whole economy. QCEW is neither resident employment, unemployment, a forecast, nor a metro CES/LAUS series. Missing property-level lease terms, occupancy, turnover, expenses, insurance, flood claims, financing, and closed-sale comps prevent underwriting net cash flow, buyer depth, and flood-adjusted value.

County ZIP rental landscape

How asking rent and renter pressure vary inside Montgomery County, MD

This view uses 12 direct Zillow ZIP markets matched to Census ZCTAs. Each ZIP is assigned by its largest HUD residential county share; this is not an exhaustive county inventory.

Selected ZIP range$1,611$2,793Zillow asking-rent index
Monthly spread$1,182highest minus lowest selected ZIP
Observed burden range40.3%62.9%ACS renter households paying 30%+
Renter households covered102,488across the selected ZCTAs
01 · ASKING RENT LADDERDirect ZIP ZORI
Horizontal bars compare Zillow asking-rent indexes across the selected direct-evidence ZIP set.20815$2,79320814$2,78620850$2,54720878$2,35120852$2,31320874$2,14220910$2,06220902$2,03820877$2,02220904$1,99320906$1,89520912$1,611
02 · PRESSURE MATRIXRent × observed burden
Each point is one selected ZIP and ZCTA match. Horizontal position is Zillow asking rent and vertical position is the ACS renter cost-burden share.65.4%58.5%51.6%44.7%37.8%209102085220904208502090620874208782081420877209022091220815Zillow asking-rent index →ACS burden share →
03 · BENCHMARK GAPZORI vs HUD 2BR
Bars show the percentage difference between the Zillow blended asking-rent index and the local HUD two-bedroom standard. Their housing universes differ.20815+104.2%20814+102.4%20878+97.6%20874+96.5%20850+93.0%20904+92.3%20877+91.9%20906+86.5%20902+85.3%20912+84.8%20852+81.4%20910+79.9%
WHAT THE LOCAL DISTRIBUTION SAYS

Within the selected direct-evidence set, June 2026 Zillow ZORI—the typical observed asking-rent index—runs from $1,611 in ZIP 20912 to $2,793 in ZIP 20815, a $1,182 spread around a $2,102 median. The county ZORI is $2,346, down 0.3% year over year; it should not be read as an average of the displayed ZIP values. The decision is therefore less about finding a single Montgomery County rent than about testing which part of this observed asking-rent range fits a household’s monthly budget, unit needs, and tolerance for limited choice. The selected readings show a broad rather than tightly clustered local price distribution.

Three rent measures answer different questions and should remain separate. ACS five-year ZCTA estimates put median gross rent from $1,465 to $2,488, describing reported gross rents for occupied units over a survey period rather than current marketed terms. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR spans $1,900 to $2,840. Direct ZORI equals 79.9% to 104.2% of those local two-bedroom standards, but that is a contextual comparison, not a price conversion or an affordability finding: FMR is an administrative, bedroom-specific benchmark and ZORI is not bedroom matched. Neither measure substitutes for the other, and neither establishes the rent of a particular unit.

ACS burden and vacancy estimates frame a separate trade-off, not a ZIP score. The share of renter households estimated to devote 30% or more of income to rent ranges from 40.3% in 20878 to 62.9% in 20904. Applying a 30-percent-of-income screen to the ZORI readings yields annual income figures from $64,440 to $111,720; it is only a budgeting screen, not evidence of a household’s actual payment, eligibility, or financial position. Estimated vacancy runs from 2.0% to 8.2%. A lower survey vacancy estimate may indicate fewer vacant units at the survey point, but does not measure live listings, leasing speed, or a prospective renter’s ability to secure a unit; a higher rate likewise does not demonstrate lower asking rents.

Coverage and geography limit any ZIP-level conclusion. The display contains 12 ZIP matches out of 25 eligible and accounts for 102,488 renter households, not a countywide inventory. In Montgomery County, a displayed ZIP is a USPS-based label, whereas the ACS measures are tabulated for an approximate ZCTA footprint, so the two do not align address by address. ZIP 20912, assigned here because 84.1% of its HUD residential addresses fall in the county, illustrates the cross-county issue. Before acting on any range, verify the address, bedroom count, current asking rent, included utilities, availability date, lease term, concessions, deposit, fees, and income or occupancy rules directly with the listing or property manager.

Selected ZIP evidence

Keep each source universe visible

25 ZIP profiles passed the county gate; the 12 with the most renter households are shown.

ZIP / ZCTAZillow asking rentACS gross rentHUD 2BRBurden 30%+VacancyIncome screenHUD county share
20910$2,062$2,022$2,58047.3%5.9%$82k100.0%
20852$2,313$2,224$2,84042.9%6.3%$93k100.0%
20904$1,993$1,918$2,16062.9%4.7%$80k99.6%
20850$2,547$2,309$2,74048.4%5.6%$102k100.0%
20906$1,895$1,963$2,19056.6%4.9%$76k100.0%
20874$2,142$1,995$2,22047.5%2.0%$86k100.0%
20878$2,351$2,226$2,41040.3%3.5%$94k100.0%
20814$2,786$2,333$2,72043.0%8.2%$111k100.0%
20877$2,022$1,887$2,20055.1%5.7%$81k100.0%
20902$2,038$2,116$2,39044.1%4.2%$82k100.0%
20912$1,611$1,465$1,90057.0%4.1%$64k84.1%
20815$2,793$2,488$2,68048.4%7.8%$112k100.0%
READ BEFORE USING

ZIP display assignment follows the largest HUD residential-address county share, not a guarantee that every address in the ZIP lies in Montgomery County. ACS housing and income values use ZCTA geographies whose boundaries only approximate USPS ZIP delivery areas.

The direct ZORI selection is not exhaustive: it shows eligible ZIP/ZCTA matches ordered by renter-household coverage rather than every county ZIP or housing option. Zillow, ACS, and HUD figures also reflect different concepts, collection methods, and reference periods.

SOURCE LEDGERCensus ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stockACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30Census ACS five-year — ZCTA housing and incomeACS 2024 5-year ZCTA · pulled 2026-08-08HUD Fair Market Rents — Section 8 standardFY2026 FMR · pulled 2026-07-26HUD-USPS ZIP-to-county residential-address crosswalkHUD-USPS 2026Q1 · pulled 2026-08-09Zillow ZHVI and ZORI — county values and rentscounty ZHVI/ZORI 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-26Zillow ZORI — ZIP market rentsZORI ZIP 2026-06 · pulled 2026-08-08
Cities & communities

Where people live within Montgomery County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Germantown CDP90.7KSilver Spring CDP81.5KGaithersburg city69.8KBethesda CDP69.4KRockville city67.7KAspen Hill CDP53.3KWheaton CDP52.9KNorth Bethesda CDP49.7K
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

59 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Germantown CDPCensus-designated place
    90,719
  2. 02
    Silver Spring CDPCensus-designated place
    81,462
  3. 03
    Gaithersburg cityIncorporated place
    69,825
  4. 04
    Bethesda CDPCensus-designated place
    69,397
  5. 05
    Rockville cityIncorporated place
    67,671
  6. 06
    Aspen Hill CDPCensus-designated place
    53,279
  7. 07
    Wheaton CDPCensus-designated place
    52,926
  8. 08
    North Bethesda CDPCensus-designated place
    49,677
  9. 09
    Potomac CDPCensus-designated place
    45,902
  10. 10
    Olney CDPCensus-designated place
    35,797
  11. 11
    Montgomery Village CDPCensus-designated place
    34,110
  12. 12
    Clarksburg CDPCensus-designated place
    30,487
Show 47 more places
  1. 13
    Fairland CDPCensus-designated place
    26,231
  2. 14
    North Potomac CDPCensus-designated place
    23,922
  3. 15
    Redland CDPCensus-designated place
    18,665
  4. 16
    Damascus CDPCensus-designated place
    17,640
  5. 17
    Takoma Park cityIncorporated place
    17,632
  6. 18
    Calverton CDPCensus-designated place · spans 2 counties
    17,624
  7. 19
    White Oak CDPCensus-designated place
    17,329
  8. 20
    Glenmont CDPCensus-designated place
    17,208
  9. 21
    Cloverly CDPCensus-designated place
    16,646
  10. 22
    Colesville CDPCensus-designated place
    14,519
  11. 23
    Flower Hill CDPCensus-designated place
    13,794
  12. 24
    Kemp Mill CDPCensus-designated place
    13,042
  13. 25
    Travilah CDPCensus-designated place
    11,721
  14. 26
    Burtonsville CDPCensus-designated place
    10,203
  15. 27
    Chevy Chase CDPCensus-designated place
    9,445
  16. 28
    North Kensington CDPCensus-designated place
    8,954
  17. 29
    Leisure World CDPCensus-designated place
    8,882
  18. 30
    Four Corners CDPCensus-designated place
    8,150
  19. 31
    South Kensington CDPCensus-designated place
    8,148
  20. 32
    Darnestown CDPCensus-designated place
    7,051
  21. 33
    Forest Glen CDPCensus-designated place
    6,840
  22. 34
    Poolesville townIncorporated place
    5,764
  23. 35
    Ashton-Sandy Spring CDPCensus-designated place
    5,630
  24. 36
    Layhill CDPCensus-designated place
    5,497
  25. 37
    Hillandale CDPCensus-designated place · spans 2 counties
    5,060
  26. 38
    Friendship Heights Village CDPCensus-designated place
    4,002
  27. 39
    Burnt Mills CDPCensus-designated place
    3,751
  28. 40
    Brookmont CDPCensus-designated place
    3,671
  29. 41
    Chevy Chase townIncorporated place
    2,906
  30. 42
    Kensington townIncorporated place
    2,369
  31. 43
    Cabin John CDPCensus-designated place
    2,179
  32. 44
    Derwood CDPCensus-designated place
    1,984
  33. 45
    Chevy Chase Village townIncorporated place
    1,903
  34. 46
    Ten Mile Creek CDPCensus-designated place
    1,184
  35. 47
    Somerset townIncorporated place
    1,088
  36. 48
    Chevy Chase View townIncorporated place
    1,063
  37. 49
    Spencerville CDPCensus-designated place
    1,028
  38. 50
    Martin's Additions villageIncorporated place
    1,012
  39. 51
    Garrett Park townIncorporated place
    932
  40. 52
    Chevy Chase Section Three villageIncorporated place
    887
  41. 53
    Chevy Chase Section Five villageIncorporated place
    803
  42. 54
    North Chevy Chase villageIncorporated place
    746
  43. 55
    Laytonsville townIncorporated place
    677
  44. 56
    Washington Grove townIncorporated place
    577
  45. 57
    Glen Echo townIncorporated place
    276
  46. 58
    Barnesville townIncorporated place
    208
  47. 59
    Brookeville townIncorporated place
    161

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.061% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.86%

$5,539 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-5,761

25,914 in · 31,675 out

Arriving vs leaving income−$4,184

$98,588 arriving · $102,772 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors5.8%

509 of 8,709 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings2,108▲ 14.2% year over year
Median days on market37▲ 19.7% year over year
Listings price-reduced18.3%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▼ 8.3% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

Same metro

The other counties in Washington, DC

A metro is an average of these. Which side of a county line a property sits on can change the tax bill, the hazard profile and the tenant pool.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Montgomery County1,065,949$627k$2,3464.5%inland flooding
Fairfax County1,147,837$779k$2,5423.9%inland flooding
Prince George's County959,754$434k$1,9515.4%inland flooding
District of Columbia681,294$579k$2,5325.2%inland flooding
Prince William County488,880$592k$2,2824.6%inland flooding
Loudoun County432,998$810k$2,9174.3%inland flooding
Frederick County287,048$509k$2,2175.2%inland flooding
Arlington County236,254$824k$2,7224.0%inland flooding
Charles County170,527$454k$2,3286.2%inland flooding
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Property-level rent, vacancy, operating costs, and financing could make the published gross yield unusable as net-cash-flow evidence.
  2. MLS listing softness may not match closed-sale pricing, limiting confidence in purchase basis and resale execution.
  3. Flood exposure, insurance terms, and prior loss history are unknown and could differ materially by parcel.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Is a gross yield available without using HUD FMR?

Yes. Market asking rent is published and the record supplies a gross yield; HUD FMR is separately identified as a payment standard.

What employment evidence is supplied?

Annual QCEW covered employment at workplaces in the county, along with covered-worker wages and the largest disclosed private supersector.

What is the dominant hazard to investigate?

Inland flood. The record also provides a modeled climate-loss ratio, but not a parcel-specific loss estimate or insurance quote.