Counties / Maryland / Prince George's County

Prince George's County, MD

FIPS 24033 · population 959,754 · part of Washington, DC

$434k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
Direct county rent answer

What does rent cost in Prince George's County, MD?

The latest county-level Zillow ZORI is $1,951 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

County Zillow ZORI$1,9512026-06 · up 1.8% year over year
County ACS gross rent$1,799ACS 2024 5-year · occupied-renter survey
HUD two-bedroom FMR$2,246FY2026 · administrative standard
HUD Fair Market Rent by bedroom count in Prince George's County
BedroomsHUD monthly FMRGeographyMeasurement boundary
Studio$1,953Prince George's County, MDHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
1 bedroom$2,015Prince George's County, MDHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
2 bedrooms$2,246Prince George's County, MDHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
3 bedrooms$2,835Prince George's County, MDHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
4 bedrooms$3,332Prince George's County, MDHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.

Zillow asking rent, ACS gross rent and HUD FMR describe different housing universes. They remain separate and no metro, city or neighboring-county value replaces missing county evidence.Zillow pulled 2026-07-26 · HUD pulled 2026-07-26

The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$434k
▼ 0.7% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
Median asking rent
$1,951
▲ 1.8% year over year
Zillow ZORI · direct
Gross yield
5.4%
annual rent ÷ price, before costs
derived: rent × 12 ÷ price ✓
HUD 2-bed standard
$2,246
market rent is 0.87x the standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

The annual signals disagree
FHFA five-year cumulative+37.6%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06−0.7%FHFA HPI2025+2.8%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-08-02.
Owner-reported value$426k
Surveyed gross rent$1,799
Rent burden 30%+52.9%
Median year built1977
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
4.9%vacant
365,506estimated housing units
Occupied tenure37.7% renter
owner 62.3%renter 37.7%
Structure mix65.9% single-family
Single-family 65.9%20+ units 11.6%Mobile home 0.6%Other 21.9%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs328,677▼ 0.2% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments18,935annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,463▲ 3.7% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities25.8% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS−0.2%WEEKLY WAGE+3.7%Trade, transportation, and utilities25.8%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2021-2025; latest 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-08-02. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

Resident income

How local income has compounded

BEA per-capita personal income divides all personal income by the county population. It is broader than wages, but it is not household income or a measure of what renters can afford.

Per-capita personal income19692024
Per-capita personal income history for Prince George's CountyA line chart of annual BEA per-capita personal income from 1969 through 2024.$0k$30k$60k196919972024$5k$60k
Nominal annual dollars; not adjusted for inflation. A rising line can reflect wage, business-income, transfer-income and investment-income changes together.
Renter affordability

Who carries the heaviest rent burden

HUD CHAS separates renter households by income relative to local HAMFI. Moderate burden means housing costs above 30% through 50% of income; severe burden means more than 50%.

Share of renter households in each income band2018-2022
Renter cost burden by HAMFI income band in Prince George's CountyFive horizontal bars show moderate and severe housing cost burden shares among renter households in each HUD income band.0%25%50%75%100%At or below 30% HAMFI32,08584.5% burdened30–50% HAMFI25,99582.0% burdened50–80% HAMFI18,59545.9% burdened80–100% HAMFI15,24520.4% burdenedAbove 100% HAMFI36,2454.1% burdened
Moderate: >30% to 50%Severe: >50%
Each percentage uses HUD’s published subtotal for that income band. For disclosure, HUD keeps 0 as 0, publishes 1–7 households as 4 and rounds 8 or more to the nearest 5. Independently rounded categories can differ from their displayed sum and are not forced into a percentage.
Direct local rental evidence

Recent leases and rental-market liquidity in Prince George's County, MD

These Apartment List observations match the exact county Census code 24033. They are kept separate from Zillow asking rent, Census occupied-home rent and wider metro measures.

Direct recent-lease rent history

Monthly overall-rent index; missing observations are not filled from another geography.

$1,892$1,816$1,7402021-082026-07
Recent-lease rent$1,8742026-07 · +0.2% year over year
Rental vacancy5.8%2026-07 · +0.1 percentage points year over year
Time on market24 days2026-07 · +5.3 days year over year
County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Prince George’s County’s decision tension is a gross-rent return against softer visible listing-market conditions and carrying-cost exposure. Investors considering rentals should investigate property-level cash flow, while buyers relying on resale should be cautious. In Zillow’s June 2026 county observation, median home value was $433,813 and median asking rent was $1,951 per month, producing a 5.4% gross yield before costs. Zillow value was down 0.65% year over year, whereas FHFA’s 2025 annual repeat-transaction HPI rose 2.82%; those are different vintages and methods, so they cannot be combined.

02Housing economics

Measured asking rent is distinct from HUD’s two-bedroom FMR of $2,246 per month, which is a payment standard rather than an asking-rent estimate or a replacement yield input. The 1.12% effective property-tax rate is a material carrying-cost screen alongside gross yield, but net yield cannot be underwritten: insurance costs, operating expenses, financing terms, vacancy, and property condition are not published.

03Demand & competition

June 2026 Realtor.com MLS evidence points to more visible choice, not closed-sale pricing or proved buyer demand: 1,986 active listings were 19.11% higher year over year, while marketing time and price-reduced share also rose. Migration adds caution: 4,517 more tax-return households moved out than in, and average income was $59,528 for movers in versus $63,490 for movers out. Non-occupants accounted for 663 of 9,291 purchase mortgages, or 7.14%, showing competition but not dominance. QCEW’s 2025 annual workplace series showed lower covered employment and higher wages; trade, transportation, and utilities was the largest disclosed private supersector, not the entire economy.

04Risk & next checks

Inland flood is the dominant hazard, and the modeled annual building-value loss ratio is 0.06%; it should be tested against parcel flood exposure and insurance quotes rather than converted into a dollar loss. County-level evidence cannot establish neighborhood rent durability, replacement cost, tenant quality, lease-up, or actual sales execution. Next checks are comparable asking rents and concessions by unit type, tax and insurance bills for the parcel, flood zone and claims history, and renovation scope. The thesis can fail if visible supply weakens pricing, out-migration concentrates among higher-income households, or flood costs outrun gross-rent capacity.

County ZIP rental landscape

How asking rent and renter pressure vary inside Prince George's County, MD

This view uses 12 direct Zillow ZIP markets matched to Census ZCTAs. Each ZIP is assigned by its largest HUD residential county share; this is not an exhaustive county inventory.

Selected ZIP range$1,563$2,127Zillow asking-rent index
Monthly spread$564highest minus lowest selected ZIP
Observed burden range43.6%56.7%ACS renter households paying 30%+
Renter households covered85,565across the selected ZCTAs
01 · ASKING RENT LADDERDirect ZIP ZORI
Horizontal bars compare Zillow asking-rent indexes across the selected direct-evidence ZIP set.20740$2,12720770$2,06820785$2,02920743$2,02620782$1,93420745$1,90620707$1,88620783$1,75620746$1,66920748$1,60120708$1,59420747$1,563
02 · PRESSURE MATRIXRent × observed burden
Each point is one selected ZIP and ZCTA match. Horizontal position is Zillow asking rent and vertical position is the ACS renter cost-burden share.59.2%54.7%50.1%45.6%41.1%207462074720783207852074020782207482070820745207072077020743Zillow asking-rent index →ACS burden share →
03 · BENCHMARK GAPZORI vs HUD 2BR
Bars show the percentage difference between the Zillow blended asking-rent index and the local HUD two-bedroom standard. Their housing universes differ.20743+110.1%20745+108.3%20785+100.9%20770+94.0%20782+90.4%20740+88.6%20748+85.6%20783+85.2%20707+83.5%20747+81.0%20746+80.6%20708+74.1%
WHAT THE LOCAL DISTRIBUTION SAYS

Within the selected direct-evidence set, Zillow's June 2026 ZORI, a typical observed asking-rent index, spans $1,563 to $2,127 per month: a $564 spread around a $1,896 median. The immediate decision question is whether a household's unit-specific budget and bedroom needs can be met near the lower, middle, or upper part of this range. That spread warrants comparing live unit quotes rather than assuming a single county figure describes every part of the search. ZIP 20747 anchors the low end, and ZIP 20740 the high end. Year-over-year ZORI change ranges from -0.7% to 6.7%, versus 1.8% countywide; those movements record asking-rent index change, not a forecast or a promise for an individual listing.

The rent series should remain separate. Zillow ZORI is a typical observed asking-rent index, whereas ACS five-year ZCTA median gross rent is a survey estimate: the selected ZCTA values run from $1,609 to $1,879, against a county ACS median of $1,799. HUD's FY 2026 two-bedroom FMR is instead an administrative standard and ranges from $1,760 to $2,400. It can frame administrative or screening context, but it does not describe the prevailing price of a currently listed unit. The direct ZORI-to-HUD ratio runs from 74.1% to 110.1%, useful as a screening reference but not as a merged rent measure: ZORI is not a two-bedroom unit quote, and FMR is not an asking rent.

Affordability and availability do not produce a simple hierarchy. ACS shares of renter households paying at least 30% of income for rent range from 43.6% to 56.7%, versus 53.0% countywide, while ACS vacancy estimates span 3.9% to 10.6%. Thus, a higher vacancy estimate should not be read as current advertised inventory or proof of lower rents. Using Zillow's direct index only for a 30% payment screen, annual income required runs from $62,520 to $85,080. That threshold is a budget test, not an ACS income or burden result; household-specific income, unit size, and non-rent charges still govern feasibility.

Coverage and geography constrain any conclusion. The display includes 12 selected eligible direct ZORI ZIP/ZCTA matches, representing 85,565 renter households, and it is not an exhaustive inventory of the county. ZIPs can cross county boundaries and are displayed here under the HUD residential-address crosswalk's largest-share county assignment; Census ZCTAs are statistical areas rather than USPS delivery ZIPs. Before choosing a property, verify its precise delivery geography, bedroom count, live asking rent, concessions and expiration dates, availability, utilities and recurring fees, lease term, and any income or occupancy requirements.

Selected ZIP evidence

Keep each source universe visible

26 ZIP profiles passed the county gate; the 12 with the most renter households are shown.

ZIP / ZCTAZillow asking rentACS gross rentHUD 2BRBurden 30%+VacancyIncome screenHUD county share
20746$1,669$1,745$2,07045.9%7.3%$67k100.0%
20747$1,563$1,693$1,93053.6%7.9%$63k100.0%
20783$1,756$1,725$2,06052.3%3.9%$70k100.0%
20785$2,029$1,830$2,01053.5%4.9%$81k100.0%
20740$2,127$1,839$2,40056.7%10.6%$85k100.0%
20782$1,934$1,814$2,14050.0%5.9%$77k100.0%
20748$1,601$1,650$1,87053.7%4.4%$64k100.0%
20708$1,594$1,812$2,15054.0%4.8%$64k100.0%
20745$1,906$1,634$1,76056.7%7.8%$76k100.0%
20707$1,886$1,879$2,26043.6%4.7%$75k99.5%
20770$2,068$1,845$2,20050.6%6.5%$83k100.0%
20743$2,026$1,609$1,84051.3%5.1%$81k100.0%
READ BEFORE USING

Zillow ZORI is a typical observed asking-rent index, while ACS county and ZCTA measures are five-year survey estimates. HUD FMR is a bedroom-specific administrative standard. Their differing definitions, periods, and geographies prevent direct substitution for the rent or availability of a particular unit.

Census ZCTAs are statistical approximations rather than USPS delivery ZIPs, and ZIPs may cross county lines. This display assigns ZIPs using the county with the largest HUD residential-address share. Only selected eligible direct-evidence matches are shown, so results neither map every county ZIP nor constitute an exhaustive local inventory.

SOURCE LEDGERCensus ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stockACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30Census ACS five-year — ZCTA housing and incomeACS 2024 5-year ZCTA · pulled 2026-08-08HUD Fair Market Rents — Section 8 standardFY2026 FMR · pulled 2026-07-26HUD-USPS ZIP-to-county residential-address crosswalkHUD-USPS 2026Q1 · pulled 2026-08-09Zillow ZHVI and ZORI — county values and rentscounty ZHVI/ZORI 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-26Zillow ZORI — ZIP market rentsZORI ZIP 2026-06 · pulled 2026-08-08
Cities & communities

Where people live within Prince George's County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Bowie city57.9KClinton CDP38.4KChillum CDP34.9KCollege Park city34.5KLaurel city29.8KSouth Laurel CDP29.3KFort Washington CDP25.1KGreenbelt city24.7K
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

85 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Bowie cityIncorporated place
    57,926
  2. 02
    Clinton CDPCensus-designated place
    38,376
  3. 03
    Chillum CDPCensus-designated place
    34,871
  4. 04
    College Park cityIncorporated place
    34,540
  5. 05
    Laurel cityIncorporated place
    29,798
  6. 06
    South Laurel CDPCensus-designated place
    29,272
  7. 07
    Fort Washington CDPCensus-designated place
    25,134
  8. 08
    Greenbelt cityIncorporated place
    24,678
  9. 09
    Landover CDPCensus-designated place
    24,514
  10. 10
    Suitland CDPCensus-designated place
    23,793
  11. 11
    Camp Springs CDPCensus-designated place
    22,544
  12. 12
    Langley Park CDPCensus-designated place
    21,508
Show 73 more places
  1. 13
    Hyattsville cityIncorporated place
    20,966
  2. 14
    Beltsville CDPCensus-designated place
    19,176
  3. 15
    East Riverdale CDPCensus-designated place
    18,336
  4. 16
    Seabrook CDPCensus-designated place
    18,317
  5. 17
    Oxon Hill CDPCensus-designated place
    17,893
  6. 18
    Calverton CDPCensus-designated place · spans 2 counties
    17,624
  7. 19
    Adelphi CDPCensus-designated place
    17,395
  8. 20
    Glassmanor CDPCensus-designated place
    16,981
  9. 21
    Hillcrest Heights CDPCensus-designated place
    16,063
  10. 22
    Summerfield CDPCensus-designated place
    15,065
  11. 23
    Accokeek CDPCensus-designated place
    14,362
  12. 24
    Lake Arbor CDPCensus-designated place
    14,335
  13. 25
    Kettering CDPCensus-designated place
    14,014
  14. 26
    Glenn Dale CDPCensus-designated place
    13,772
  15. 27
    Brock Hall CDPCensus-designated place
    13,615
  16. 28
    New Carrollton cityIncorporated place
    13,564
  17. 29
    Westphalia CDPCensus-designated place
    13,228
  18. 30
    Rosaryville CDPCensus-designated place
    12,883
  19. 31
    Largo CDPCensus-designated place
    12,229
  20. 32
    Brandywine CDPCensus-designated place
    12,160
  21. 33
    Lanham CDPCensus-designated place
    11,433
  22. 34
    Mitchellville CDPCensus-designated place
    11,359
  23. 35
    Friendly CDPCensus-designated place
    11,119
  24. 36
    Walker Mill CDPCensus-designated place
    10,931
  25. 37
    Forestville CDPCensus-designated place
    10,495
  26. 38
    Marlton CDPCensus-designated place
    10,222
  27. 39
    Coral Hills CDPCensus-designated place
    9,756
  28. 40
    Bladensburg townIncorporated place
    9,583
  29. 41
    Marlboro Village CDPCensus-designated place
    9,382
  30. 42
    Temple Hills CDPCensus-designated place
    8,969
  31. 43
    Mount Rainier cityIncorporated place
    8,245
  32. 44
    Woodlawn CDP (Prince George's County)Census place
    7,750
  33. 45
    Fairwood CDPCensus-designated place
    7,526
  34. 46
    Riverdale Park townIncorporated place
    7,270
  35. 47
    Glenarden cityIncorporated place
    6,344
  36. 48
    Cheverly townIncorporated place
    6,096
  37. 49
    District Heights cityIncorporated place
    5,891
  38. 50
    Marlow Heights CDPCensus-designated place
    5,456
  39. 51
    Peppermill Village CDPCensus-designated place
    5,238
  40. 52
    Springdale CDPCensus-designated place
    5,226
  41. 53
    Silver Hill CDPCensus-designated place
    5,193
  42. 54
    Hillandale CDPCensus-designated place · spans 2 counties
    5,060
  43. 55
    Woodmore CDPCensus-designated place
    4,613
  44. 56
    Seat Pleasant cityIncorporated place
    4,489
  45. 57
    National Harbor CDPCensus-designated place
    4,454
  46. 58
    West Laurel CDPCensus-designated place
    4,428
  47. 59
    Capitol Heights townIncorporated place
    4,020
  48. 60
    Marlboro Meadows CDPCensus-designated place
    3,929
  49. 61
    Brentwood townIncorporated place
    3,777
  50. 62
    Konterra CDPCensus-designated place
    3,641
  51. 63
    Brown Station CDPCensus-designated place
    3,451
  52. 64
    Melwood CDPCensus-designated place
    3,401
  53. 65
    Berwyn Heights townIncorporated place
    3,318
  54. 66
    Andrews AFB CDPCensus-designated place
    3,130
  55. 67
    University Park townIncorporated place
    2,698
  56. 68
    Forest Heights townIncorporated place
    2,642
  57. 69
    Croom CDPCensus-designated place
    2,418
  58. 70
    Baden CDPCensus-designated place
    2,325
  59. 71
    Cedar Heights CDPCensus-designated place
    2,213
  60. 72
    Queensland CDPCensus-designated place
    2,168
  61. 73
    Landover Hills townIncorporated place
    2,031
  62. 74
    Colmar Manor townIncorporated place
    1,566
  63. 75
    Queen Anne CDPCensus-designated place
    1,443
  64. 76
    Fairmount Heights townIncorporated place
    1,416
  65. 77
    Edmonston townIncorporated place
    1,307
  66. 78
    Cottage City townIncorporated place
    1,158
  67. 79
    Morningside townIncorporated place
    976
  68. 80
    Maryland Park CDPCensus-designated place
    839
  69. 81
    Cedarville CDPCensus-designated place
    730
  70. 82
    Aquasco CDPCensus-designated place
    719
  71. 83
    Upper Marlboro townIncorporated place
    683
  72. 84
    North Brentwood townIncorporated place
    624
  73. 85
    Eagle Harbor townIncorporated place
    72

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.063% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.12%

$4,771 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-4,517

24,041 in · 28,558 out

Arriving vs leaving income−$3,962

$59,528 arriving · $63,490 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors7.1%

663 of 9,291 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings1,986▲ 19.1% year over year
Median days on market40▲ 21.2% year over year
Listings price-reduced17.2%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▼ 3.3% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

Same metro

The other counties in Washington, DC

A metro is an average of these. Which side of a county line a property sits on can change the tax bill, the hazard profile and the tenant pool.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Prince George's County959,754$434k$1,9515.4%inland flooding
Fairfax County1,147,837$779k$2,5423.9%inland flooding
Montgomery County1,065,949$627k$2,3464.5%inland flooding
District of Columbia681,294$579k$2,5325.2%inland flooding
Prince William County488,880$592k$2,2824.6%inland flooding
Loudoun County432,998$810k$2,9174.3%inland flooding
Frederick County287,048$509k$2,2175.2%inland flooding
Arlington County236,254$824k$2,7224.0%inland flooding
Charles County170,527$454k$2,3286.2%inland flooding
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Additional MLS supply and seller concessions could pressure achievable entry or exit pricing.
  2. Net outbound migration with lower incoming mover income could constrain rental-demand quality.
  3. Inland-flood insurance costs or losses could make gross yield insufficient after costs.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can the reported gross yield be treated as net cash flow?

No. It is annual market rent before costs, and operating expenses, insurance, financing, vacancy, and property condition are not published.

Does HUD Fair Market Rent establish the county's market asking rent?

No. HUD FMR is a two-bedroom payment standard; the record separately provides measured median asking rent.

What does the available employment series measure?

QCEW measures annual average covered jobs at workplaces in the county, not resident employment, unemployment, or a forecast.